Taking a quick look at 49ers Director of Player Personnel Trent Baalke
I'm down in Las Vegas for the first two rounds of the NCAA tournament and day 1 was incredibly brutal for me. My 8th seeded UNLV Runnin Rebels were knocked out by the #9 Northern Iowa Panthers on a deeeeeep three with 4 seconds left. It was quite the stomach punch after a great day of exciting basketball. I've moved past it, but it still stings. Now it's all just about winning money. We'll see what happens today after one of the most exciting first round Thursdays in a long time.
Of course, 49ers fans have had their own bit of excitement. I was sitting at a poker table Wednesday night drinking a beer when I caught the McCloughan news on the bottom line. We had plenty of discussion in a couple FanPosts and then in smileyman's post yesterday. As we try and figure all this out, we have to consider the man taking over in some aspect for McCloughan: Trent Baalke. Here's his bio from 49ers.com:
Trent Baalke enters his sixth season with the 49ers and his third as the team’s director of player personnel after being appointed to the position in February of 2008. In his 13th NFL season, Baalke oversees both the college and pro personnel departments.
Prior to being named director of player personnel, Baalke served as the Western region scout for the 49ers for three years. He joined San Francisco after spending four years on the Washington Redskins scouting staff, his last (2004) as the club’s college scouting coordinator. From 2001 to 2003, Baalke served as Washington’s national scout, traveling throughout the country in search of rising talent.
Before joining the Redskins, Baalke spent three seasons (1998-2000) as a scout with the New York Jets.
He previously held the position as the athletic director at Shanley (Fargo, ND) High School. Before his stint at Shanley, Baalke was the defensive line/strength and conditioning coach at South Dakota State (1990-95), where he helped promote former Pro Bowl guard Adam Timmerman and current NFL kicker Adam Vinatieri to NFL scouts.
Baalke cut his coaching teeth as a graduate assistant and defensive line coach in 1989 for North Dakota State.
I would imagine the team has to be fairly prepared at this point for the draft. Yes there are still Pro Days to be had, but a month before the draft, do you really think the team didn't already have a decent portion of their draft board figured out? Does anybody see any change in strategy with McCloughan now on some kind of "extended leave of absence" ?
On a somewhat unrelated note, we had a timing snafu (my fault) and Drew K had a great new feature post get passed at the top fairly quickly yesterday afternoon. If you missed it, check it out soon.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good to have you back Fooch
In these turbulent times it’s good to have a bit of stability and continuity at Niners Nation.
There were some crazy (though very entertaining) threads while you were away.
I think that
if Sing or anyone else had something they wanted to do and McCloughan was the only one standing in their way…obviously he’s not there to stand in their way now. I don’t know that we’ll ever really know who woulda made this decision or that…so it only further feeds those who need to find someone to blame, to start speculating if McC woulda made that choice or not, blah blah blah
"If I were to walk down a dark alley in a bad part of town, I'd want Ray Brown with me. And if I were to have a nice dinner at a fine restaurant, I'd want Ray Brown with me." The Late Great McKittrick
I don't know...
I still think it’s about either his drinking (as people have speculated) or his divorce, maybe a combo of the two. I know it’s probably just naivety but I’m hoping he comes back.
Why buy the cow, when you get the sex for free?
by return2greatness on Mar 19, 2010 8:37 AM PDT up reply actions
I hope the FO wants o move on Berry, but I highly doubt this is about draft choices.
If I were GM, Ninersnation would call me the draft hustler.
Step 1 - Offer contract to Bushrod and give up my 49th pick.(RT)
Step 2 - move up to #5 Take Berry for BOTH first rounds and acquire a 2nd and 4th
Step 3 - 2nd round - M gilyard, 3rd - J Jerry, 4th AJ Jefferson, 4th Rafael Priest CB TCU, 5th Deji Karim, 6th - Alex Daniels DE Cincy, 7th Al Woods LSU
From what I have read it looks like this took the FO by surprise
What I mean is that John York changed his travel plans to get back here quickly… Sing wasn’t here… it looks like McC may have asked for the meeting on the spur of the moment and that he needed the time to repair something in his life like Marriage or drinking problem or whatever.
This would also show up as the FO not wanting to give out a lot of details as these kinds of issues are usually kept inside.
It will be interesting to see what happens on Draft day. Will there be big trades from the 49ers? or will they choose to just take what they have available now and draft with those selections.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
Baalke...
is apparently quite respected in NFL circles, as well as Gamble. This means good things for the Niners, but I’m still skeptical of how and why things went this way. I just hope the draft isn’t blown or else we’re looking at regressing.
On a positive note, according to ESPN (which isn’t guaranteed, but it’s reliable), Jed will not be increasing his involvement in the draft process or the personnel matters of the team. This is a good thing, but I’m still wary of Sing’s involvement. They obviously should take his opinions, but not draft based on who he says is good or not.
Just curious as to why your feelings regarding Sings role in the draft?
Can you elaborate a bit..
but I’m still wary of Sing’s involvement. They obviously should take his opinions, but not draft based on who he says is good or not.
by WC-Ninerhead on Mar 19, 2010 9:30 AM PDT up reply actions
Because..
he admittedly has no experience in player evaluation. I won’t discredit his ability to evaluate a person’s character, but I don’t know if he’s the best on judging talent and how it will translate to the field. With more experience, this can surely improve if he’s committed to it, but I think he should be mostly focused on improving himself as a coach first. Taking timeouts before the first snap of the game is not good game management.
I do think his opinion should be valued if he believes a player is a great fit for the system and his team, but that’s as far as it should go right now.
by 9thevolution on Mar 19, 2010 9:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Agreed
I like Sing as a coach but honestly, he doesn’t even have that down yet. Putting too much on his plate and expecting him to evaluate personnel may be too much. Let him get comfortable with coaching first.
Why buy the cow, when you get the sex for free?
by return2greatness on Mar 19, 2010 10:06 AM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for the reply
I agree (at least in the short term) but just wanted to get your reasoning. I believe that as each season rolls by he will gain more experience at judging talent and at some point he may be “the guy” however for now it is enough for him to focus on his coaching skills.
by WC-Ninerhead on Mar 19, 2010 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Agreed
I’d like to see him become someone like Holmgren or Cowher who can completely control the roster and draft board, but for now, he needs to focus on coaching the team that the personnel department fields for him.
by 9thevolution on Mar 19, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions
i'd like
to actually bring in a cowher or the like instead of have sing do it. it’s previously been said that we shouldn’t put too much on sing’s plate since he hasn’t even got coaching down yet. if we give sing pseudo-gm type power i can see us making many mistakes, and regressing………again
"There is no pressure. Pressure only exists when you're not prepared."
-The Samurai
Alex Smith is garbage...
I too am wary about Singletatry’s involvement.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Mar 19, 2010 9:43 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I thought Tom Gamble was gonna be the guy and Baalke was going to handle contracts situations??
If I were GM, Ninersnation would call me the draft hustler.
Step 1 - Offer contract to Bushrod and give up my 49th pick.(RT)
Step 2 - move up to #5 Take Berry for BOTH first rounds and acquire a 2nd and 4th
Step 3 - 2nd round - M gilyard, 3rd - J Jerry, 4th AJ Jefferson, 4th Rafael Priest CB TCU, 5th Deji Karim, 6th - Alex Daniels DE Cincy, 7th Al Woods LSU
Paraag handles contracts
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Mar 19, 2010 9:42 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Coach was going to have input either way
Whether Sing was hired for personnel evaluation, he was going to have great impact in the decisions through his increasingly important role in the organization, if he remains as head coach. Evaluation of talent is part of his role. He will also grow into this position of providing expertise now sooner than later. Let’s hope the growing cycle is short to minimum competency! I don’t see that the team has lost a giant, after all. There have been mistakes even into the recent years. The biggest concern is offense. Who can guide the important decision of the size and type of offensive line, etc.?
I think that the biggest gain we had this offseason was in hiring Solari as OL Coach
Sing really wanted him and I can see why.. McKittrick raved about him and his OLs have been very good. I think that Sing will use Solari’s expertise to help advise the draft board on which OTs and OGs would be the top picks for the Niners. What I mean is how they would rank the OT/OGs.
It also appears that Sing has been spending a lot of time evaluating the KR/PR COP back prospects in this draft in the Combine and their pro days. He wants to know more about each player.
Coach Sing may not have the final say, but he will have a voice.. and that is a good thing.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
no way
He wasn’t even good with the Cowboys last season.
Why buy the cow, when you get the sex for free?
by return2greatness on Mar 19, 2010 10:56 AM PDT up reply actions
Two years ago actually
And yes I’m not interested. Although, he did apparently meet with team officials last week. That’s just due diligence though. I think he’ll never be as dynamic as he was back in ’06 when he looked like he would be at the top of the league
by 9thevolution on Mar 19, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions
My gut feeling is that it is less likely that the 49ers pull off any kind of big trade during the draft without Scot on board.
Just seems like you need one chief with some serious power and confidence in their job to pull off a risky move like that. I see them holding tight in their spot and going BPA (witch they were likely to do anyway).
schefter tweet
Eventually, (former) 49ers GM Scot McCloughan is going to have options. Many believe he’ll wind up with his friend Ted Thompson in GB.
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 19, 2010 5:20 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
barrows tweet
Scot McCloughan on SIRIUS radio: “Family needs to come first and I lost sight of that with my position at the 49ers … … I will be back in league at some point and be very successful.”
by Rod Blogojevich on Mar 19, 2010 5:22 PM PDT via mobile reply actions

by 

























