2010 NFL Draft transcripts: Anthony Davis, Mike Iupati, Trent Baalke and Singletary
As is the case for every team, the 49ers front office and new draft picks conducted various media conferences throughout the evening. The 49ers sent along transcripts for them and I thought they were worth posting. They consist of conference calls with Anthony Davis and Mike Iupati, Trent Baalke on KNBR, and the press conferences by Baalke and head coach Mike Singletary. Also, Davis and Iupati will both be at the team's Santa Clara facility for media conferences at 1:15. If they're streaming we'll link to it. If not, we'll get you transcripts later in the evening.
Obviously we get a lot of cliched comments out of these, but it's still nice to get a little more insight into each of the players. At the same time, we can get some pertinent information from these. For example, there is some concern over Anthony Davis' age and if he has the proper motivation to take care of business at the next level. Singletary had this to say:
"I talked to his mentor and he said, ‘Mike, the most important thing to do for him is to really, really surround him with the right people. He's a guy that doesn't really have a whole lot of people. He's not an entourage kind of guy. He's not a guy that likes to party. He's kind of a loaner. Make sure that you keep your hands on him. He's a kid that wants to learn. He loves football. He wants to work.' We just talked about a number of things. He may have one family member come out and live with him, we'll see. I know he has a younger brother that's playing and they're very close. We'll just see how it works out. Whatever it takes to get him where he needs to be, it will get done."
We've talked about Mike Singletary as a mentor/father-figure type of coach and while sometimes it becomes almost cliched, I do think I can see value in that role with a guy like Davis. It worked with our other Davis, so we'll see if Coach Singletary can make it 2-for-2.
T Anthony Davis
Conference Call - April 22, 2010
San Francisco 49ers
On when he knew he was going to be a 49er:
"About five minutes ago. They told me right before they made the pick. It's the best feeling in my life. It's the best feeling ever."
On the feeling that he got from the organization during his visit:
"It felt a lot different. That's why I was so big on the 49ers going through the process. Of course, I had to keep it to myself. It's great people in the building. The whole staff are great people. The team is a tight knit group. I like what Singletary is building over there. I can't wait to be a part of it and win some games."
On whether he had a dinner with Head Coach Mike Singletary:
"Yes."
On how the dinner went:
"He was straight forward with me. He told me what he expected out of me as a player and we just went back and forth a little bit. I can't wait to get a chance to play for him."
On what he expects out of him:
"To work, to want to be the best and that's what he got. He got somebody that wants to be the best."
On what it means for them to trade up for him:
"It's a great feeling. I can't even talk right now. It's an honor. He's a man of his word. We talked about some things and he made it happen."
On the knocks on him that he isn't committed to the game and what he has to say to them:
"We'll see. I love this game. We'll see. Everybody has negative things to say. I don't pay much attention to it, but I'm just ready to work, ready to learn and am ready to make myself the best tackle that I can be."
On where he is right now and how many people are with him:
"I'm in New Jersey at a restaurant, in a private room with a lot of people."
On who is with him:
"As far as family? I would say there's about 20 family members here and a bunch of guys I played with, coaches and high school coaches."
On where on the line he expects to play and how soon he expects to play:
"Wherever the team needs me to play. We didn't really talk about specifics. I'm ready to play wherever he needs me to play."
On where he played when he was at Rutgers:
"Right guard and left tackle."
On whether he played right tackle:
"Yes."
On the areas he needs to improve on to be the best:
"Little stuff like finishing my blocks, most importantly, playing with better knee bend, keeping my chest back, things like that."
On why he chose to attend Rutgers instead of Ohio State and other bigger schools
"I wanted to play in New Jersey, and I wanted to play in my home state. Also, I knew the coaches there would help me achieve my goals, as far as me wanting to be a good man in society and also a good football player. "
On where he thought he may be drafted and who the other teams were that showed interest in him:
"Oakland expressed a lot of interest, Buffalo, I talked to the Seahawks a couple of times. I was just going with the flow. It's a pleasure to be in this league, it's a privilege. I wasn't really concerned with which number. I was just honored to be a part of it."
On if he was nervous that those teams passed on drafting him that had expressed interest:
"No, not at all. Truthfully, I wanted to go to the 49ers. I really wanted to play for Coach (Mike) Singletary, and when I surpassed Buffalo, a smile came on my face. The people in the room were probably a little concerned , but I was excited to pass Buffalo."
On if there was more to meeting the great people with the 49ers that made him want to be here:
"It was my first time in California. I love the state, but most importantly it was the people that I met and the atmosphere in the building. It's a smaller place and more of a team atmosphere."
On where Coach Singletary took him on his visit.
"I don't remember. I don't remember the name of it, I'm sorry."
On if Coach Singletary was the one who called him:
"Yes."
On what Coach Singletary said when he made the phone call:
"I was talking to him. I can't even talk right now. I don't even remember what he said. He asked me if I remembered what we talked about and if I was ready to be a 49er. I said, ‘Yep, I can't wait to be a 49er.'"
Director of Player Personnel Trent Baalke
San Francisco 49ers
2010 NFL Draft, KNBR Radio Interview- April 22, 2010
On whether he knew what other teams were offering Denver for the No. 11 pick:
"You don't. You just set your limits. You get a feel for what you're willing to go, and we felt by giving up the pick that we gave up to move up the two spots, we felt very comfortable with that. There was no guarantee that we were going to get him if we sat at 13. So, we made the move. We guaranteed the opportunity to get the player we wanted."
On whether there's a big difference between left tackle and right tackle for a young guy coming in:
"I think there's always a little bit of an adjustment, but I don't think it's a big adjustment. Really, with the infrastructure that we have and the coaching staff that we have, I'm not concerned with that move. They'll get Anthony [Davis] right. We've got to remember one thing: These are young guys. They've got to come in and compete for the job. It isn't a situation here where we draft, we plug them and put them in. We've got some good football players on this team, and they're not going to roll over and give these guys the job. They're going to have to earn it."
On whether when T Anthony Davis said he wanted to play for Head Coach Mike Singletary, if it gave the team a different perspective on him than some of the things that had been said:
"I'll say this, we've done our homework on these guys, and if we didn't feel comfortable with them in terms of their physical talent or their intangibles or their character, we wouldn't have made the decision to draft them. So, we have no issues. We feel very comfortable with both of these guys. We think they're going to come in and represent the 49ers on the field and off the field very well."
On whether two offensive linemen say anything about him as a personnel person:
"I think we have an identity in this building, on this football team that we're trying to build. And, whether it be offensive linemen, linebackers, running backs, we're looking for certain characteristics in these players. These two players have the characteristics we're looking for. Physically, they're able to impose their will on other players. They've done it at the college level, and we expect them to do the same thing at the pro level. As far as how I view it and the things that I look for, this is an organizational decision. I think both of these guys are going to be very good football players."
On G Mike Iupati not playing at a high-profile school and becoming a big-time first round draft pick:
"Well, good football players come from all levels. Obviously the Division I level, the big schools, the big conference schools, they're going to put out more big time players. This is a young guy who fell through the cracks in the recruiting process. He ended up at the University of Idaho, and the one thing you look for in a smaller school player now, this is still Division I football, but in a lower level Division I, you look for players who dominate. I don't care what film you turn on, this is a dominant football player. We expect him to come here with some seasoning and some reps and learning of the pro game, we feel he's got the ability to do that at this level."
G Mike Iupati
Conference Call - April 22, 2010
San Francisco 49ers
On who called him to let him know:
"I got a text from - I was so excited I don't even know. I was so excited though. It was great, I talked to [head] coach [Mike] Singletary and stuff like that."
On the vibe that he got from the 49ers:
"It felt like home. It felt very old school style, but a hard working group."
On the 49ers drafting T Anthony Davis and whether he thought that ended his chances of coming here:
"Yes, kind of, but I still ended up at 17, so I was hoping for that."
On whether he sees himself playing right tackle:
"Yes. I can play anything. I just need repetition. I know I played guard in college and in high school, but I know that I can transition outside if they need me to. So, anywhere the coaches want me to play, I can play for them."
On whether left guard is where he feels most comfortable right now:
"Right now, if I come in and start at left guard I can go. I just need to get repetition at right tackle. I know I can get good enough to play those other positions."
On whether he was getting worried the further he slipped down the board after Oakland Raiders head coach Tom Cable passed on him:
"Yes, I knew I could be picked eighth and all the way to the Cowboys, so I wasn't nervous going into the draft, but once I sat down and after the eighth, I felt like..."
On his playing style where he attacks off the ball:
"Yes, I come off the ball fast and physical, so I try to attack my opponents."
On one of his greatest assets being that he is fast and physical with a mean streak:
"Yes, sir."
On how he ended up at Idaho:
"I was a Prop 48. I wasn't a qualifier for my school so either I choose the junior college route or take that Prop 48 which means I don't get my first year of school."
On the 49ers taking two offensive linemen in the first round and if he things they are making a physical statement:
"Yes, sir. Anthony Davis is my good friend that I met at the combine. I was very happy that I came here to the 49ers so that way we could work together and work as a team."
On if he has talked to Anthony Davis since the combine:
"No, but I think I have his number. I haven't talked to him lately. He's a great guy."
On what [head] coach [Mike] Singletary said he expects of him:
"He said, ‘You've got to learn the book, be on your game all the time and work hard.'"
On if he was worried that going to a small college would affect him being drafted in the first round:
"Yes, kind of. It's hard to tell because some people do competition level and stuff like that, but it's wherever you can play."
On what he thinks about blocking for [RB] Frank Gore:
"I would love to. I watched him a little bit. Coach Brown showed me one of his clips and I would really like to block for him."
On if he is from Anaheim
"Yes."
On if he is in Anaheim right now
"Yes, I am here right now."
On if it means anything to stay in his home state
"Yes, it does mean a lot. Especially since all of my relatives are big football fans. I'm very glad that I have them right here, right around the corner."
On what he learned from [offensive line] coach [Mike] Solari about the 49ers blocking schemes:
"I learned a lot from him. We spent at least a few hours in that room, just talking about plays, learning the defense and the plays that they run. If it were up to me, I would want to get coached by him. He's a great coach and he knows a lot."
On how many hours he spent with Solari:
"About three hours in there."
On how he pronounces his last name:
"YOU-pah-tee
On the worst way that he's heard it pronounced:
"Lu-pot-tee or eye-you-pot-tee."
Head Coach Mike Singletary
Press Conference - April 22, 2010
San Francisco 49ers
Opening comments:
"First of all, I'm just really excited about the first day. I think it's been a while, doing all of the work that we needed to do, to get to this point. [Director of player personnel] Trent [Baalke] and I talked a lot last night about hopefully having the opportunity to take both of these guys today. We didn't know if it was going to work. We didn't know how it was going to work. We certainly didn't think [T] Anthony] Davis would be there, but fortunately things worked out and he was there. We traded up a couple of picks to get him. We didn't feel at that time the teams that were in front of us, we didn't feel that they had a need for tackles. We also knew that there was going to be a lot of teams that wanted to trade up, maybe Dallas who likes [Mike] Iupati, who likes [Anthony] Davis. So, there were several teams. We had no idea of knowing who could move up in front of us. Trent and I just felt that rather than sit there and twiddle our thumbs and hope that we got the number one need that we had, we felt let's just take all of the excitement out of it and let's move up and if he's there we're going to take him. That's what we did. Iupati, we felt hopefully he would be there and thankfully he was. To me, this guy is a devastating, physical blocker, both of these guys are. Iupati is a little bit of a different style, extremely physical. He's going to be quite interesting. I know [offensive line coach] Mike Solari and [assistant offensive line coach] Ray Brown are very excited about getting their hands on both of those young men and being able to work with them and implement them into our offense. I know we have [G] David Baas and [T] Adam Snyder and they did a good job this year. We're going to just have to compete and work through it, and may the best man win. We're excited about what we have. Our number one priority was to upgrade our offensive line to allow us some flexibility in terms of what we wanted to do offensively."
On if he see's Anthony Davis and Mike Iupati being starters in week one:
"Possibly. No, I wouldn't expect them to be starters week one. I would say for both of these young men we don't just want to throw them in there. We're hoping that soon they can work their way in there. That's why we brought them in here. We see those guys as possible starters at some point in time. As far as when, that will be a work in progress."
On if it was the goal to get these two offensive linemen:
"It was these two offensive linemen. The only other, not the only other, but the other offensive linemen that we felt was a really physical guy was [T] Trent Williams. Those three guys really, we felt, fit the identity of what we're trying to do here."
On when he realized that Anthony Davis could fall to them:
"Well, when Oakland passed on him, we felt pretty positive about it at that time. We knew that Buffalo that it was a possibility for him, but we felt that they were pretty strong on [RB C.J.] Spiller. The opportunity was there and we felt let's move up, let's do it."
On Davis feeling his visit to San Francisco was different and he wanted to be a 49er:
"I can't tell you that I did anything else, anything special or anything like that. I just felt I was talking to a young man that I had done a lot of homework on. I talked to a number of people, coaches, mentors. When we finally had the opportunity to sit down and talk with him, I just sat him down and talked to him about what he wanted to do, what he wanted to be. He's an extremely young man. Just sitting there looking at him, I just felt we had a chance to touch on some things, maybe some misunderstandings, maybe some things that people don't understand about him, maybe some things that he wants put behind him and move forward. I told him about what we were doing here. There's no ambiguity about what the 49ers are about. We were able to walk him around and kind of look at who we are and the identity, that's what we're about. Did he like that? Was that something that interested him? Was that something that would excite him about being a part of something like that? He told me before he left. He may be the kind of kid that told that to everybody, but I didn't feel that. He said, ‘Coach, I've been in a number of places and I really like what's happening here.' I really think he liked talking to coach Solari and coach Brown. I really think he enjoyed that. Having the opportunity to be able to be coached by those guys, Ray Brown with the unbelievable experience he had in playing the game and of course Mike Solari. I'm sure when Mike Solari sits there and talks to him about some of the guys that he's coached and the resume that he has in terms of what he's done. I'm sure it was exciting to the kid to know that, ‘If I can come here and be a part of this. The way the coach teaches and the way he talks. If I can do that, I think that would be something special.'"
On Anthony Davis being only 20 years old:
"I talked to his mentor and he said, ‘Mike, the most important thing to do for him is to really, really surround him with the right people. He's a guy that doesn't really have a whole lot of people. He's not an entourage kind of guy. He's not a guy that likes to party. He's kind of a loaner. Make sure that you keep your hands on him. He's a kid that wants to learn. He loves football. He wants to work.' We just talked about a number of things. He may have one family member come out and live with him, we'll see. I know he has a younger brother that's playing and they're very close. We'll just see how it works out. Whatever it takes to get him where he needs to be, it will get done."
On why he was labeled being lazy:
"I don't know. I think sometimes whenever you hear of a young man with a weight problem, he comes in and he's overweight, sometimes you can get a label and it's hard to get rid of. So many people that I talked to that I have tremendous respect for just said, ‘Mike, this kid is special. He has a tremendous amount of upside. Every day he goes out to practice, he works hard. He gets after it. He's your kind of guy, I'm telling you, your kind of guy.' Guys that know me pretty well, I got that information from and I trust that.
On how many people he spoke with to gain background information on Davis:
"I would say three. Three, and three in-depth. Having some in-depth conversation, three."
On whether drafting two offensive linemen in the first round signals that the team might not go with as much spread next year:
"This is what we're going to do. I want to say this again. We want to have a balanced attack. When we want to run the ball, when we need to run the ball, run the ball. We're going to run the ball. But, we want to have a balanced attack. We're not just going to be run the ball, three clouds... We're not going to do that. We want to play good, solid football. We feel that we have good personnel to do that. We can pass the ball with [WR] Michael Crabtree, the addition of the new wide receiver. I just feel like [WR] Josh Morgan is continuing to grow and develop, and we made add another receiver before it's over. [RB] Frank Gore and [RB] Glen Coffee - we may add another running back. We'll just see how it goes, but I think first and foremost, we want to be a versatile offense that can do what we need to do in order to win the game."
On how much the two new linemen help QB Alex Smith:
"Well, they help our offense. Any time that you can help protect a quarterback, it gives him that much more confidence in what he's doing. It gives him a little more time to think about, ‘Where do I go with the ball,' rather than, ‘Where do I run?' I think it's going to help Alex Smith a lot. I think it gives him an opportunity. The more weapons we can give him, the more protection we can offer him, I think it's going to make a big difference."
On whether there is any trepidation that offensive line coach Solari and Ray Brown have to coach up two young rookies:
"No. There was a lot of conversation that went into these young men. Mike Solari and I have talked extensively about what it would take, the preparation. That's why we brought them in, so that Mike could put them on the board and really go over all of the finer parts of the game and talk about where there knowledge level was. Iupati, bringing him in and just putting him on the board and really going through almost a full day of coach Solari being on the board and talking about the different protections, talking about the different plays and talking about our style of offense and then going on to some other things and then coming back and putting him on the board and saying, ‘OK, we want to know how much information he can retain.' So, when that session was done, the question that I had for coach Solari, ‘Do you think he can do it? Do you think this young man can do it?' He said, ‘Yes. It's going to take a little work, just like it's going to take everywhere else. But, I do feel very confident that he can do it.'"
On whether he can compare the pluses and minuses between the two draft picks:
"I think Iupati, simply by some of the things that he's been through, coming over and trying to learn the language and adapting to a couple of new different coordinators, being a defensive tackle first, and then becoming an offensive tackle, but, at the same time, really understanding the concepts. He's a very proud young man. He wants to do things for his parents and his family. He's very appreciative. He knows exactly where he's come from. He's a guy that wants to give back to the community. He wants to give back to his family. He's all about giving. There's a tremendous amount of maturity there. On the other side, when you look at Anthony Davis, the other gentleman that we drafted, it's a different set of things that are there, but I just feel that we're going to get our hands on a young man that we're going to surround him with the right people. Both of them are going to be in great shape simply because of who they're going to be coached by. I am so thankful to have coach Solari and Ray Brown being the two guys who are going to coach and teach and train these young men how to be football players at this level, doing the things that they have to do in order to be successful. Not just teaching them how to be football players, but how to be men. I'm very excited about that combination."
On what level of temptation he had to use one of the first round picks on a quarterback:
"Very little. That's about the best answer I can give you."
On whether Davis was gone would CB Joe Haden be a possibility:
"Now you're starting to talk about a whole other can of worms. If Davis is gone, if this guy's gone, now we're back to the cheat sheet, and we've got to look at who's there. But, it didn't happen that way. And, if you know me, I don't want to talk about possibilities. I want to talk about what happened."
On whether CB Joe Haden being selected earlier helped Davis get to the 49ers:
"I think there were a number of things that helped him get to us. You could say when Haden was gone, when [S Eric] Berry was gone. Anytime an offensive linemen wasn't picked, that helped to bring him to us a little bit more. I'm just thankful of how it worked out. I'm not smart enough to figure out all the other stuff."
On whether he was prepared to take Iupati at No. 13:
"Possibly."
On his feeling of valuing guards in the first round or the middle of the first round:
"All I know is when I turn on film, what I see. There are a lot of teams that talk about the value of a tackle, the value of this and the value of that. Can the guy play? That's all I want to know. Can he play? Can he play physical? Is he going to come to practice every day and is he going to work hard? Is he going to get better? Is he going to make us better? Is he going to help our locker room? That's the only thing I want to know because at the end of the day, you've got 32 picks up there, but they are going to be a small percentage of these guys who are going to be great players. Hopefully we got two of them today."
On whether it's a priority to get the two linemen to start this year:
"Yes, hopefully. Anytime you draft someone in the first round, you draft them to play. But, at the same time, I believe that you want these guys to compete. I don't want to give anything to anybody. When you come in, you've got to earn it. But, do I expect them to start? Yes, I do."
On what he sees at the top priority in the next two days:
"There are a number of things that we want to look at, but I think on the defensive side, there are a couple of things that we need over there - and I really don't want to get into it. And, on the offensive side, we still have some work to do on the offensive side. Certainly, before it's all said and done, there are just a couple of key positions that we have pegged that we need to go after. I'll tell you after tomorrow what they are. Thank you very much."
Director of Player Personnel Trent Baalke
Press Conference - April 22, 2010
San Francisco 49ers
On the players they talked about and whether these were the two they had targeted:
"Well, we talked about a lot of people for a long time, but going back a week ago, these are two guys that we had targeted and we feel awfully good to have them on this team right now."
On why he traded up to get T Anthony Davis:
"I wasn't worried about the teams in front of us at all. The concern was in order to get tackles, obviously they are high-value players in this league. I was more concerned about who else may come up and jump ahead of us because they knew what our needs were at the time. It had nothing to do with the two guys ahead of us or the two teams ahead of us. It had more to do with the teams that were behind us."
On whether he went into the draft planning to take two offensive linemen with the first two picks:
"Honestly, we were prepared for that. Right now it's draft talk, but like I said, going back a week ago, we targeted these two players and we said, you know what, if we came out of the first round like this, it would be the perfect storm. We feel good. These are two good football players. More importantly, they're not only good football players, they are good people and they fit the identity of the type of players we want on this football team."
On what he means they fit their identity:
"Everyone here knows how coach wants this program to run and how this organization wants to be looked at. These are two guys that can play physical football and we are confident that they are going to come in here - they are guys that obviously have the size, the strength and the athleticism to play the position and play it well."
On whether there were any concerns about Davis with his work ethic or character:
"First of all, as far as the concerns, we've addressed the concerns, whether it be character or whatever you are referring to. We have no concerns. We did our homework. We felt good about it. Coach [Singletary] did a lot of background work. The scouting staff did a lot of background work. Our staff did a lot of background work. We don't have any issues with that whatsoever."
On whether the concerns he may have about a player are eased because Singletary is someone that can motivate a player like that:
"No question. You never want to deal with too many problems, but once again, we addressed the concerns and having a coach like coach Singletary that does a great job of working with all the players, that certainly helps when you make decisions."
On whether his first day managing an NFL draft went as well as it could have:
"I think we're thrilled. I'm more nervous now than I was during the draft. I think when you look back on it, like I said, I answered the question earlier, we targeted these two guys. These are two guys that we wanted on this football team. It just so happened that the draft board fell our way."
On whether he tried to go higher than No. 11:
"We had gone into the draft thinking that we would go as high as 10. We started making calls at 10 when the player was available. Jacksonville was at 10. They didn't want to make the trade. They had a guy targeted, which I felt good about because they drafted two offensive tackles a year ago. So, once they said they had a player they had targeted, I was pretty comfortable we could move up to 11 and still get the player. Once again, I was looking more at it from who was behind us trying to come up more than the teams in front of us."
On which teams concerned him:
"I guess I can't recall all the teams that had that need. Green Bay had the need. They addressed it with a nice player that fell to them. But, there were other teams that needed tackles, and I just wasn't willing to sit there, nor was coach [Mike Singletary], to sit there and let a good player go when all we needed to do was make a simple trade and get the guy we wanted."
On whether quarterback was an option at either selection:
"No."
On whether this is a signal to the fans of the confidence the organization has in QB Alex Smith:
"We've said all along that Alex Smith is our guy. I don't know how else to phrase it. Coach [Mike Singletary] has said it. I've said it. The organization stands behind him. These are two good players that are obviously going to be thrown into the mix and are going to add some strength in areas that we felt we needed to address."
On whether the team will take a quarterback tomorrow:
"I can't say that."
On whether he had seen T Anthony Davis or G Mike Iupati in a game:
"I didn't see either one of them play live. Obviously, one's a junior who came out early. The other one is a senior. In terms of seeing them in person, I saw both of them in person, but not live at a game."
On whether he would have taken G Mike Iupati at 13 if T Anthony Davis would have been gone:
"No question. Definitely."
On whether these picks were drafted out of need:
"No, I think this was, once again - I keep going back - a perfect storm, whatever you want to call it. These were two players that we had valued very high. We had placed first-round value on both of them, and high first-round value on both of them. It just so happened that they were players at need positions."
On the new format of the NFL Draft:
"I love the new format. It makes for a long three days, but it also give you time to sit back, reflect on what happened in the first round, sleep on what you want to do in the second and third round and then catch your breath for the finale on Saturday."
On trading for WR Ted Ginn, Jr.:
"We like Ted and obviously we liked him enough to trade for him. The one thing that you can never have enough of is speed and we feel that by adding him to the mix, he not only does he help in the return game, but also gives us a vertical threat to help take the top off of the defense. And when you do that, you hope to not see as many eight-guys in the box from a defensive standpoint. It opens up the field for the other playmakers."
On if there is enough ammunition to go get someone in the second round:
"There's always ammunition because there's always next year. Are we afraid as an organization, if there's a guy we see and we have targeted to use next year's picks to move up? No, we'll do whatever it takes to get the players on this team that we believe in."
On what is given up with the fourth round choice traded to Denver:
"Who knows what you give up. You can't worry about what you don't have. You've got to worry about what you got. I do it 100 times out of 100 I'd make that trade."
On possibly moving Offensive Tackle Adam Snyder inside:
"The one thing we've got to keep in mind is these are young guys. Obviously, when you take high picks, you want them to be starters. As far as their potential, we love their potential. These guys in the locker room are fighters too, they're good football players. It's not like they're just going to roll over. What this does create is good competition. On any good football team, that's what you've got, you have a lot of competition. We'll throw these young guys in the mix and we'll let them go play ball."
On if this closes the door of going after Chester Pitts:
"We don't discuss any trades that we're going to do or not going to do. Does it close the door? Anything's a possibility for us."
On what will be addressed in the next few rounds:
"I'm not going to address the needs that we'll be looking at. I will say this: we're going to go after good football players whether they're defensive or offensive. We're looking to get a starter out of this next pick and we're confident that on our board there's a couple players that we have targeted. If we need to move up to get them, we'll move up to get them."
On if the first round progressed like they had envisioned it:
"I think we had a fairly good read on the picks that took place as far as the players. I think that addresses the question."
On the biggest surprise in the first round:
"I think when you say, ‘what's the biggest surprise?' you're kind of taking a shot at another organization. So, I don't want to do that. We felt that all of the players that went had value, and high value. It's hard to look at it and say, ‘I was shocked that this guy went there.' Everybody's board is set up for themselves. I don't want to devalue anybody else's picks."
148 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I threw a huge fit
While watching the 49ers trade up 2 spots to get Anthony Freakin’ Davis. Totally ruined what buzz I had building. I was really angry, tossed stuff around and screamed. It was embarassing, but I was mad.
Now that the first round is over, I’m ok with the team taking A.Davis and Iupati, I’m just still scratching my head as to why the team had to trade up to get Davis. Were the Broncos going to take Davis? I doubt it. What team would’ve been trying to trade into that spot to get him? I’m baffled.
One thing that this crazy first round proves, is that no one is an expert (that I know anyway). What a crazy day. I’m glad that the team improved their LOLine, I just don’t get the trade. Ugh. But again, at least the team beefed up the OLine easily the biggest need by a mile. I have to put faith in these guys performing, and I think Iupati is a no-doubter. I’m huge on Davis, but I can learn to love him, he just needs to work hard, play hard and not bust.
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 22, 2010 10:32 PM PDT reply actions
trade
They were concerned the Dolphins would take Davis, or that somebody else would deal up to take him.
by David Fucillo on Apr 22, 2010 10:42 PM PDT up reply actions
I understand
the “we can’t just sit here and wait for him to fall theory”, but a 4th rounder to move up two spots in the draft? Worst cast scenario, the team could’ve traded that 13th pick to Philadelphia for the two third rounders and 24th pick (like the Broncos did) and still land Iupati at 17. I just don’t get why team had ants in their pants, it scares me a little bit. I’m over it though, because I’ll never understand it. I just have to buy a glass and fill it Koolaid. Oh yah.
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 22, 2010 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions
picks
They could have dealt a 2nd, 3rd and 4th for Tebow!
by David Fucillo on Apr 22, 2010 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
^5 Fooch
What I read in the transcripts was that both Baalke and Sing wanted Davis and Iupati.. and they got exactly who they wanted. They also felt totally comfortable with both players as did Solari and Brown. That is a lot of confidence going forward on these two kids.
Thank God we didn’t trade down and back up to get Tebow…. we filled our biggest needs.
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
Yes they overpaid for Tebow
But I believe they were playing with house money. All of their original picks are still there.
Pretty remarkable, I think. But not as remarkable as the patriots. Don’t they own half the 2nd round lol
I dont think the Dolphins were ever considering taking a tackle. I think teams knew the Dolphins wanted out of that spot, and the 49ers were worried a team would swoop in to take Davis. I was also angered at the time to see this, but they were only high on 2 tackles and Williams was gone. They didnt want Bulaga…the trainer already has a tough enough time getting Baas’ helmet on every game.
I thought for sure they were going to take Kyle Wilson with the 17th pick, but Iupati is a future Pro Bowler and hopefully our line is solidified for a long time.
The one thing that was very apparent in the difference between McCloughan and Baalke’s philosophies is that the latter was drafting for need as opposed to BPA. Singletarys closing commenst makes it very apparent we are going to finish the draft by drafting need – “Certainly, before it’s all said and done, there are just a couple of key positions that we have pegged that we need to go after”
Why don’t you get the trade? I think it was just front office initiative to ensure that no other teams would try to jump and draft Davis… Although in hindsight, when you consider how far Bulaga fell, it may have not been necessary.
by Rod Blogojevich on Apr 22, 2010 10:43 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
they reached a little bit...
got a little jumpy…its like playing poker… they still won but they could have gotten more had they sat tight…but of course who knows what might have happened
by thatguywiththebeardandthebanjo on Apr 22, 2010 11:54 PM PDT up reply actions
We got SIngletary man just watch we are going to have one of the best lines in a year or two
49ers Al Grito De Guerra!!! hahaha
by 49erSalvatrucha on Apr 22, 2010 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions
I can’t say I’m against that notion, or against the fact that the team upgraded the OL. I like that the 49ers went out there and got pieces for the unit that has needed upgrading since what, 2002?
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 22, 2010 11:02 PM PDT up reply actions
Kind of a rookie move
…but a harmless one. Its a 4th rounder. They probly could have sat still and kept the 4th round pick, but they felt they couldn’t risk losing Davis. The, “We could have just taken Bulaga” crowd, doesn’t get that obviously they wre not ranked similarly on our board, or they would have just done that.
As for trading down and all the people wishing we a “smart franchise” like the Patriots for trading down 100 times. Trading down every draft and not adding impact players is not a winning strategy. For all the times Bill Walsh traded down, he also traded up aggressively for the players he liked. Like freakin Jerry Rice. I know the Patriots have had a tremendous amount of success, but I think its because Belichick is a better coach than GM, got lucky with Brady, and all his super bowl winners were built around Parcells old picks and the high draft picks he started with. He’s been outsmarting himself for 4 or 5 years in the draft and they don’t have a whole lot to show for it.
Sorry, everyone falls over themselves to give credit to the Pats, but I think they’d be better off getting aggressive from time to time.
by hammystyle on Apr 22, 2010 11:20 PM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
again
my point is that the team likely would’ve had Davis at 13. I know, it would’ve been a bummer for the front office if someone did jump ahead of them to take him, but that’s when you start thinking about trading out of that pick (because you’ll still get a targeted player at 17).
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 22, 2010 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I think it’s clear the 49ers would prefer to have Davis over the 25 and trade package.
by hammystyle on Apr 23, 2010 12:49 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Whaa??
I think them getting Jerrod Mayo with OUR top 10 pick was damn genius!
by crumpedup15 on Apr 22, 2010 11:56 PM PDT up reply actions
And they have 3 second round picks this year
And the Raiders first round pick in 2011 too. Still, hammystyle has a point, they haven’t drafted all that spectacularly over the past few years.
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 23, 2010 12:00 AM PDT up reply actions
Has Mayo been all that great?
Just because you shoulda been good and got hurt doesn’t mean you will be good
If I gotta play, I'm gonna play 'till I win,
Since I gotta be here, I can´t wait to begin
by albertoleecho on Apr 23, 2010 1:12 AM PDT up reply actions
He was great as a rookie
I think he has a bright future.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions
Perfect example
They have two years of a very good ilb. We have three years of a pretty solid ot. Just
by hammystyle on Apr 23, 2010 12:32 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Perfect example of outsmarting youself
They have two years of a very good ilb who they’re paying top 10 money. We have three years of a pretty solid ot. They couldve stayed
put and drafted David Harris, had a better ilb for three years and paid him less.
Hindsight is 20-20, but
it’s almost like they don’t trust their own scoutin so go for quantity over quality to cover any flubs.
by hammystyle on Apr 23, 2010 12:35 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I was also not happy about the trade
But to be honest there are very few positions draft picks can find rosters spots on this years 49ers squad. It’s no longer 2005, this team has some talent and depth. Outside CB or ILB, there is serious competition to knock out in order to make the team.
Not against the position drafted, even though I’m a big fan of Davis, just against getting antsy and moving up because “someone might do it instead”.
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 22, 2010 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions
Giving up a 4th rounder to ensure the stability of our O-Line wasn’t a bad idea. Who would we have gotten in the 4th that could of been an immediate starter? I just don’t think it was as big a deal as people are making it out to be. It’s a 4th rounder for goodness sake.
I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
Credit to iaalexeeff
Also surviving member of the underwhelming Jed York Conference Thread 3/22/2010
Eat Shitake!
by Hoopers Judge on Apr 23, 2010 12:41 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Yeah... at first I wasn't thrilled
But it didn’t take long for me to think about the possibility of the ‘9ers having a really REALLY solid line. Plus, Iaputi and Davis are HUGE. They’re both like 6’6" and 330 give or a take a little. And they both grade out as excellent athletes for their size.
This draft could be as much a cornerstone for the offense as Willis was for the defense. We’ll see…
"Son, I'm going to break you like a wild horse." - Mike Singletary
here's what I think it was
You look at what happened immediately thereafter— the Chargers moved up into Miami’s spot and grabbed Matthews. And basically they only gave up the no. 40 overall to do it (there were some other picks flipped around in there, but 40 was the big enticement).
Now, you have Dallas lurking down in the 20s and an aggressive Jerry Jones looking ot make a splash on offense. He wound up doing that with Dez Bryant. But remember, that’s a team that needs a LT too. They got rid of Flozell Adams. Someone let slip that the Niners were concerned Dallas could swoop in and take the one guy they really wanted.
Of course we don’t know if that was a real possibility, but I’d bet my next paycheck that that was more or less what they were worried about. And I can’t really blame them for making the trade.
Put it this way— if Sing is really convinced that character-wise, Davis is gonna be fine, then we just got the best tackle in the draft at 11, hands down. That’s a RIDICULOUS value. The fact that we had to give up a mid fourth round pick to get it done is a minor annoyance in comparison to the bounty we stand to reap if Davis really is the guy Sing thinks he is. Time will tell, but at this point I trust Sing and I think this could look VERY good for the Niners in a few years.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Apr 23, 2010 12:40 AM PDT up reply actions 6 recs
Incredibly well put Smoke. You get a +1!
I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
Credit to iaalexeeff
Also surviving member of the underwhelming Jed York Conference Thread 3/22/2010
Eat Shitake!
by Hoopers Judge on Apr 23, 2010 12:43 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I like the possible analysis and the optimism...
this is our best case scenario
by thatguywiththebeardandthebanjo on Apr 23, 2010 1:17 AM PDT up reply actions
Niners trade up yesterday
Some said Dallas may have traded in there for the Bronco’s pick and snagged A David they have a huge hole at tackle too…
who know tho
I like to hear this
On if there is enough ammunition to go get someone in the second round:
“There’s always ammunition because there’s always next year. Are we afraid as an organization, if there’s a guy we see and we have targeted to use next year’s picks to move up? No, we’ll do whatever it takes to get the players on this team that we believe in.”
That’s what I’m talking about. Get two picks in the 2nd this year please.
Rays in '08.... Desmond Jennings - the breakout continues.....
by youALREADYknow on Apr 22, 2010 10:53 PM PDT reply actions
I’m 100% against a future first rounder getting dealt.
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 22, 2010 11:03 PM PDT up reply actions
Me too. Imagine being here one year from now with nothing to get pumped about!
by Rod Blogojevich on Apr 22, 2010 11:10 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Not just that, but what if the Niners stink again this season? There goes the ammunition to get that QBotF. I just don’t like the thought of getting a second rounder this season, over a first rounder next.
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 22, 2010 11:19 PM PDT up reply actions
I agree
But if they want to move up to get someone they will probably trade one of their 5th picks this year and their 2nd next year
by crumpedup15 on Apr 22, 2010 11:49 PM PDT up reply actions
McCloughan didn’t like them. He also didn’t like the idea of drafting a guard in the first round. It’s pretty clear things are at least a little different with Baalke.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Apr 23, 2010 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions
McC drafted Steve Hutchison in Seattle. I also remember McC’s words about 2nd rounds picks. He clearly indicated a long 49ers history of not liking 2nd round picks, it just wasn’t his philosophy.
McCloughan wasn’t in charge of those Seattle drafts. And my point is that you kind of have to throw the old philosophy out the window. I mean it may still be in operation, but just because McCloughan liked to trade away second rounders doesn’t mean that Baalke will. Heck, he’s listed Belicheck as one of his biggest influences, so theoretically he should love them.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Apr 23, 2010 12:54 AM PDT up reply actions
What does that mean exactly?
How do you not like a draft pick? It’s not even like 2nd round picks get paid very much, and seeing as how there is tons of evidence that the average 2nd rounder is better than the average 3rd or 4th rounder (etc.), it just doesn’t make any sense to me at all.
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 23, 2010 2:40 AM PDT up reply actions
wouldnt be a future first if we traded a future pick for an extra second round
it would be a future 3rd possibly with some trade bait
by thatguywiththebeardandthebanjo on Apr 22, 2010 11:57 PM PDT up reply actions
it depends on where in the second round...
if you want to get a pick near the top, that’ll definitely cost next year’s first. If it’s a pick near the bottom, you could probably get it for next year’s second and maybe some more trade bait this year.
I wouldn’t want to give up too many picks this year, because while I like Alex, I think we all know this is really his put up or shut up year. If he’s not our QB of the future, we need to be prepared to get that guy next year (in what could be a MUCH better QB class anyway— Mallett, Locker, possibly Luck)
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Apr 23, 2010 12:46 AM PDT up reply actions
remember our trade last year that got us a first?
it was a second and some bait… I dont think third round picks are worthas much next year because of the lock out but why not see whats out there
by thatguywiththebeardandthebanjo on Apr 23, 2010 1:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Me too, just on principle
Trading for a worse pick just to get a guy a year sooner is almost always a bad move to me, apart from a guy falling WAY further than he should.
If the Niners trade a 2011 first rounder to draft someone like Kindle people around here will be regretting that trade big time this time next year. It’s simply a short-sighted move.
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 23, 2010 12:03 AM PDT up reply actions
some people say that early 2cd round talent this year =’s mid-to late round talent next, thats how deep this draft class is… I could be wrong
It could be
Or it could not be. At the very least it’s not going to be a better talent then you could get next year. So really there’s no upside to it at all.
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 23, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Agreed.
You give up future picks for picks now because there’s a specific guy you really like, who fills a need, who you expect to contribute right away. The trade that netted us Staley is a good example of that.
The press and fans talk a lot about “moving back into the X round” when a team trades a pick away, but I don’t think teams think that way – especially for the middle rounds.
That being said, if the team was going to try to package, say, our second and next-year’s 4th to land Nate Allen, I’d be totally okay with that. I doubt it would be enough, though. A second plus a third seems a little much, but, again – if you really think Allen is an impact player you might be able to talk me into it. (I don’t know enough about him).
I do think people get too caught up in the value of mid-round picks. The odds of getting someone who significantly contributes starts to drop pretty significantly by the end of the third round.
I’m not sure if we get a safety in round 2. I think Singletary has given his daughters boyfriend his blessing… IF ONLY HE PLAYS FOR THE NINERS.
by Rod Blogojevich on Apr 22, 2010 11:13 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
this would be lovely at this point...
they can get married on the 50 yard line…
by thatguywiththebeardandthebanjo on Apr 22, 2010 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions
OJ Atogwe. Stanford guy playing for the Rams
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Apr 23, 2010 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions
Good day all around
Niners made two good to great picks
Sharks blew out the Avs
The Lakers lost.
The only thing ruining this day is Tebow mug on ESPN.com…
I'm annoyed by the interviews with Sing and Baalke
They’re basically saying:
We are targeting guys and we’re going to reach to get them!
WTF?
BPA anyone?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
Why is that reaching?
They obviously had Davis very high on their list and decided that it was important enough to grab the guy to give up a 4th rounder to get him before anyone else did.
My feeling is that the Dolphins was going to pick Davis and moved back after the Niners jumped to 11. I have no problems with the trade. They saw what they wanted and got him…no huge loss with a 4th rounder.
Reaching is San Diego…jumping 17 spots to get that RB…
I wasn't referring to Davis
They’re saying that that they have some guys targeted in the 2nd round and are planning to move up to select them using next year’s picks.
It’s worked wonders for Carolina hasn’t it? #sarcasm
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 22, 2010 11:38 PM PDT up reply actions
It depends on the guys they are targeting
If you can get first round talent in the 2nd round…it’s worth thinking about
BTW: Sorry for the misunderstanding
Don't worry about it
True on the first round talent thing.
But there are a lot of good players left for round 2.
I’m sure the 49ers can sit tight at pick 49 and just wait for one of those guys to fall to them.
If somehow all are off the board, they can trade down a bit and acquire more picks.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 22, 2010 11:59 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm still sore about Carolina
They had me all sweetened up when they started off so crappy I was like “Hellz yeah we are going to get a top 10 pick!” and then they started winning and gave us the 17 :(
by crumpedup15 on Apr 22, 2010 11:52 PM PDT up reply actions
Who would you have rather had than Iupati?
I guess Earl Thomas, or maybe Spiller, but that’s it. I’m happy with Iupati.
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 23, 2010 12:05 AM PDT up reply actions
Thank goodness we didn’t. He’s a little shrimp. But Jon Gruden asked… DO YOU LOVE FOOTBALL?! And Thomas said yes.
by Rod Blogojevich on Apr 23, 2010 4:44 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I didn't read it that way at all
I read it as if a guy who is first round talent slips we won’t be afraid to make a move to go up and get him.
I was right, you were wrong.
But they don't need to do that.
Lots of 1st round talent guys are going to be available in a little over a dozen hours
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Sure
But I think they’re just saying if someone slips that they really like they’ll move up, or even make a move to get additional picks.
I was right, you were wrong.
But they don't need to move up
Maybe I just don’t trust their judgment enough to have them trade up for players they “like”.
I was OK with trading up for Davis because he has HOF potential.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:21 AM PDT up reply actions
Little early calling HOF on Davis
His feet are still slow and he may be eaten alive by speed rushers at the NFL level.
I wanted them to send 2 and 3 to get Hughes when the Colts picked him… Mays is still available… I think he’s worth moving aggressively after as a 2nd rounder.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Apr 23, 2010 3:17 AM PDT up reply actions
Not early at all
The dude is massive.
Look at Flozel Adams for years he was an elite LT even though he doesn’t have elite lateral speed.
Speed rushers have a very hard time getting around these types of OTs (and Hughes won’t be allowed to line up so far off the OT in the NFL).
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 8:16 AM PDT up reply actions
Care to explain?
I could go back into the transcripts and quote them every time they say that they are not worried about trading up to get the players they “targeted”
I want them to sit tight and let the draft come to them.
It’s my opinion, and opinions can’t be wrong.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 8:18 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, but you’ve got to think about the other situation:
If Davis is your guy, and Bulaga isn’t, how do you feel if you sit at 13 and somebody swoops in and grabs Davis?
If you’re indifferent between the two, then that’s fine. And, of course, your evaluation could be wrong.
It’s great when the players you really want fall to you – but its a balancing act. Often they don’t fall to you. And then what do you do?
See, I'm OK with the 1st round
I understand the trade up for Davis.
But that is mainly because Davis really has HOF potential.
I don’t see the point in trading up for some 2nd or 3rd round guy (while sacrificing next year’s picks) to select guys like Taylor Mays or Everson Griffen when you can draft Reshad Jones, Morgan Burnett, or Eric Norwood if you sit tight or trade back.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions
Jones
It was the cowgirls who waned to trade with the dolphins and pick Davis, they need help at OT since they let go Fozell, J Jones and the Tuna are good friends and they where at the Phone around pick 9 or 10
F@ck the cowgirls we Fck them hard haha just like when we draft Rice before them
this...
who knows whether it actually would’ve gone down but I think this is what Baalke and Sing were afraid of when they traded up
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Apr 23, 2010 12:48 AM PDT up reply actions
I love these two picks
I think they will both start by the eighth game of the season.
I wonder if Baas could be a center in the future? Or could we trade him for someone like Marshawn Lynch?
It seems like we will target a DB with the second round pick, but who knows, I can’t explain why but I’ve got a feeling about Toby Gerhart.
They're called RUNS for a reason.
Baas
I think he played C at the U of M in his college days, at one point or another.
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 22, 2010 11:40 PM PDT up reply actions
I think Sing probably loves Gerhart… but we’d have to take him in the second round and I really think it’s going to be a DB. Fingers crossed Nate Allen is available.
Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...
by Smoke on the Water on Apr 23, 2010 12:50 AM PDT up reply actions
They don't have to take him in the second round
He could be there in the 3rd.
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 23, 2010 2:42 AM PDT up reply actions
He will be long gone
His combine numbers were better than Mathews at everything but 40 time. His 4.53 at 231 is nasty especially with his feet.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Apr 23, 2010 3:19 AM PDT up reply actions
Gotta love Sando - hating like always
I must have missed the announcement naming Mike Solari as the 49ers’ new general manager. Solari, the team’s new offensive line coach, came out of the first round with tackle Anthony Davis and guard Mike Iupati. Position coaches stress over whether their teams’ personnel people will find help for them in the draft. Solari will be the envy of the 49ers’ coaches’ meetings after this first round.
Adding Davis and Iupati is a good enough first round for me not to invest $10 into FireBaalke.com
I mean listen, we're sitting here talking about practice, not a game, not a game, but we're talking about practice.
He has a point though
Singletary sounds like Solari and Brown are his bosses.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 12:41 AM PDT up reply actions
Sando never has good points.
I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
Credit to iaalexeeff
Also surviving member of the underwhelming Jed York Conference Thread 3/22/2010
Eat Shitake!
by Hoopers Judge on Apr 23, 2010 12:48 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
It was a good joke
I lol’d
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions
No he's just being snarky
He puts down the 49ers for some made up reason, lack of authority, where it’s obvious the 49ers targeted a huge need.
I see it more as Sing getting his way
Smash-Mouth all the way… No excuses…. Baalke was his bitch on this. And on a side Note Sing better trust his coaches because he is not an X’s and O’s guy…. But i think he may be a great talent evaluator.. or at least good at getting his kind of guys…
by thatguywiththebeardandthebanjo on Apr 23, 2010 1:25 AM PDT up reply actions
He has to remember that he has scouts too
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:27 AM PDT up reply actions
I totally agree...
but if this pays off like the 1981 draft…. I will leave it at that… I am afraid to say anything more
by thatguywiththebeardandthebanjo on Apr 23, 2010 1:31 AM PDT up reply actions
We still have 4 more picks to go
Although I do hope that Sing chills out and lets the talent evaluators take care of the rest.
I’d like to think that Iupati and Davis are just Sing’s vengeance because he didn’t get Oher last year.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:36 AM PDT up reply actions
Sando
I think he’s just kidding around. I don’t see it as hating. Just making a joke because the team went with two offensive linemen.
by David Fucillo on Apr 23, 2010 8:24 AM PDT up reply actions
Ninjames apparently went
Was it fun?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 12:00 AM PDT up reply actions
Wow.
I am still in amazement that Jacksonville could have traded down with us and instead went after their guy. Wow.
I mean listen, we're sitting here talking about practice, not a game, not a game, but we're talking about practice.
Picky Correction
He’s kind of a loaner.
I’m sure he meant “loner.” A loaner is what you get when you take your car to the dealer for a warranted repair.
We'll see them again in the playoffs! What channel is it on?
Or gym shirts
In high school, the kids that forgot their gym clothes had to wear old shirts that had “LOANER” written on them.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 12:01 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah
My last name in HS PE class was “Loaner”
by mr. instigator on Apr 23, 2010 9:34 AM PDT up reply actions
What I like about this so much
is that it tells me the 49ers are finally figuring out what they want to be as a team. I’m a firm believer that franchises who have a long history of success don’t do it by drafting the most talented player available to them—they do it by drafting players that are talented and fit their identity.
I’m getting a real sense of purpose here and to be honest I never felt that with McC
I was right, you were wrong.
Love that ...........
they knew what they want’d and went out and got it …..now if they will juz go out and get what i want …want’s me some Toby G …. Ha!!!
Kewl
Weeks ago,
The Niners were telegraphing what they had in mind. By not signing any top notch linemen in FA, it was a hint of what they were going to do last night. I’m just so Happy that we got theses two young men.
smileyman, I agree that cutting McC loose was the best thing the Niners did this year. I now feel that a run at the SB is truly possible !
by LASVEGASNINER on Apr 23, 2010 6:29 AM PDT up reply actions
I also loved that Singletary is realistic about the first round
only a small percentage turn out to be great players and he knows that and he’s willing to let Davis and Iupati learn before throwing them into the lions den
I was right, you were wrong.
BTW
Some jackass on a website somewhere suggested that Anthony Davis will be about of the league in 6 years.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions
He also said...
…that he will be one of the biggest draft busts of all time.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:23 AM PDT up reply actions
I wonder why we Traded up???
- Rutgers offensive tackle Anthony Davis worked out for the Eagles on Monday, and, according to his Twitter account, he “killed it.” The Eagles have worked out and will work out dozens of draft prospects in preparation for the April 22-24 draft, but not many of them are expected to be top 20 picks, and not many hail from just up the New Jersey Turnpike. “Just got done workin out for the Eagles,” Davis wrote. “Killed it.” The 6-foot-5, 323-pound Davis is considered one of the top tackles in this year’s draft. There are number of highly rated tackles in this class, however, and Davis could slip. He could also be gone by the time the Eagles pick at No. 24. But if Andy Reid likes him and he’s available, the Eagles coach could use one or more of his 11 picks to move up. The Eagles have Jason Peters and Winston Justice as their starters at left and right tackle, but the Eagles don’t always draft for need, and they sometimes shift players. In 2004, for instance, the Eagles traded up to draft Shawn Andrews, then an overweight tackle out of Arkansas, and moved him to guard. Davis has battled weight issues. He entered Rutgers at 366 pounds but slimmed down to a playing weight of 315. He put on five pounds before his sophomore season and was dropped to the second team. “You just don’t do that at Rutgers,” Davis said at the NFL scouting combine in Indianapolis in February. “I just had to suffer the consequences…It hurt me to see someone else in my spot. It was just a lesson. It was a lesson to be learned.” – Jeff McLane, The Philadelphia Inquirer
I don’t think that at all… and of course this is all speculation on your behalf
by Drew K on Apr 14, 2010 2:05 PM PDT
I believe alot of teams in the 20s were big on Davis and they all knew the FO liked Davis. They were comfortable moving up to get their guy and made the move. I really could have seen Dallas or Philly trade with Miami and get Davis.
I mean listen, we're sitting here talking about practice, not a game, not a game, but we're talking about practice.
3PM (pacific)
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:23 AM PDT up reply actions
Funny Anti-Tebow/Broncos articles
They’re a little too radical for me but I do agree that the Broncos FAILED this evening.
I mean they moved up for Tebow because the Bills expressed interest, the BILLS.
You know the guys that just reached for a COP RB at No.9, the ones that drafted Aaron Maybin at 11 last year, and the Bills that have sucked for a LONG time.
Clearly the Bills knew what they were doing, so McDaniels had to jump ahead of them.
It’s like the 49ers trading up to No.6 overall in 2009 to draft DHB because the Raiders had targeted him.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
There is one thing that really annoyed me in this draft and I don't rememebr it happening in previous drafts
Before the commissioner announces the pick, NFL goes to one of the correspondents that pretty much says 100% correctly who the team on the clock will draft. Then seconds later, the commissioner goes to the podium and says the name of the player.
This next one isn’t as bad as the first one, but they kept showing players on the phone, which 100% means that the player just got drafted by the team, then they go to the commissioner for the announcement.
That kills all the buzz and suspense when the commissioner goes to the podium and is about to same the name, and listening to the fans reactions! I don’t care about some guy near the draft rooms saying without any excitement, “Oh yea, they drafted this guy”.
They can do that every once in a while and re-show the players on the phone crying and excited after their name is announced, but not for pretty much most of the picks that we saw. Anyway, excellent draft. We still have a 2nd and 3rd rounder, and plus…
That bothered me too
It got to the point where I would just switch to ESPN whenever NFLN went to Jason La Canfora, because I knew he was just going to give away the pick. It worked a couple of times. You think they’d realize it’s taking away from the fun….
by Brendan Scolari on Apr 23, 2010 2:45 AM PDT up reply actions
yeah, it's annoying
But every once in a while they don’t know who the pick is going to be and the commish drops a bomb.
2009: DHB
2010: Tyson Alualu
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 8:20 AM PDT up reply actions
Dan Patrick was talking about this topic this morning
He says that the picks are giving to the networks ahead of time to allow them to prepare graphics and video…it used to be that the analysts just talk about the position being drafted…now I guess the names are okay.
NFL network
I emailed a guy I know in one of the NFL’s media departments and let him know of people’s complaints about the names being given away before Goodell announces it. In the end I don’t think it’s the end of the world, but it can be a little annoying.
by David Fucillo on Apr 23, 2010 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for sending that e-mail Fooch
You think they’ll do anything about it?
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions
I doubt it. I mean I’m sure they consider all feedback, but I’d imagine it’s something more for them to consider for future drafts more than anything else.
Although it’d be pretty sweet if it was suddenly changed today.
by David Fucillo on Apr 23, 2010 1:20 PM PDT up reply actions
If they continue it next year
Maybe I’ll look into creating some sort of petition.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 2:32 PM PDT up reply actions
yes...
but in a way it is really no different than hearing it at the podium. Besides this way you get to see that first moment when they get the call which is a pretty cool moment…. I agreed with you at first but I got over it pretty quickly
by thatguywiththebeardandthebanjo on Apr 23, 2010 1:57 AM PDT reply actions
Next ?
I’m not an expert on college db’s but looks like there are a few possible in the 2nd round for us Chris Cook Va cb; jerome murphy cb S fla; Nate Allen Fs S Fla; and of course our friend Taylor Mays SS/FS USC – -
in the 3rd round B Ghee may be available or Arnas as cb’s or Rashad Jones safety from GA
that begs the question of going after Gerhart who I love… what do you folks think
Go Niners!!
don’t mortgage the future and get greedy trying to reach this year Sing/Trent!
Seriously
I’d actually like to see them trade back a bit in the 3rd to select Reshad Jones while picking up a 5th or 6th (assuming they don’t draft a safety in round 2)
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 8:22 AM PDT up reply actions
I'd rather the team grab Major Wright
but hey, extra picks aren’t going to upset me.
by Andrew Davidson on Apr 23, 2010 9:32 AM PDT up reply actions
Wright is great too
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
by SportsChicken on Apr 23, 2010 1:19 PM PDT up reply actions
Love Sing's press conference
He essentially gives a complete overview of what the roster is going to look like. Notice that when speaking about the two drafted players he singles out Baas and Snyder? Yeah, guess who just lost their jobs? While he says they’re going to come in and compete, he knows damn well that Davis and Iupati are starting day one unless something happens. He clearly points out that “they were ok” but he doesn’t really give them the vote of confidence.
He also goes on to mention the backs and receivers. When talking about the backs he mentions Frank and Glenn by name, but no mention of MRob. He also says point blank, “we may add another back.” You might as well come right out and say, “we’re getting another running back because we need someone else who can do the job.” As for the receivers, he makes mention of Ginn, but not by name. He refers to him as “the new guy,” so I doubt he has much impact in the receiving game. He’s just their to field kicks. He then names the obvious guys in Crabtree, Davis and Morgan but says that he might look to add another guy. About time for a real slot receiver to come in and make his mark.
Finally, when asked about the next two days, he says that there are specific positions that they want to target, primarily defensively. He says they need more on the offensive side, but he said defense was where the next holes would be filled. This draft is clearly being determined based on need and not BPA like they’ve been saying. You know what though? I’m perfectly fine with that. It shows that they believe they’re right there and want to get over that hump. Despite only having seven picks now, and none in the 4th and 5th, I think they’ll shore up the secondary today with a corner and safety, and then add some project guys in the 6th and 7th who can play special teams. Maybe they’ll even look at a QB since they seem to be sliding.

by 









































