2010 49ers Roster Projections: Inside Linebackers
I thought we'd jump back across the line to the defense for today's 53-man roster projection. In the past I've done the linebackers as a single unit. However, given the complexities and different duties inside and outside linebackers have, I figured I'd break them down accordingly. To date, we've discussed the offensive line, the defensive line, the quarterbacks, the running backs, the fullbacks, the safeties, and the cornerbacks.
The inside linebackers are led by all-world linebacker Patrick Willis, alongside his tag-team partner Takeo Spikes. At this point in time there is little doubt that Willis and Spikes will be starting week 1.
Locks
Patrick Willis, Takeo Spikes, Navorro Bowman
Bubble
Matt Wilhelm, Scott McKillop
To be perfectly honest, I'm fairly convinced Matt Wilhelm makes the roster. And I'd like to think the 49ers will give Scott McKillop a second season. The problem I have is this: Last season the 49ers kept only four inside linebackers on their 53-man roster to start the season. The players were Willis, Spikes, McKillop and Jeff Ulbrich.
At this point, aside from Willis and Spikes, Navorro Bowman would seem to be a lock. After all, he was a high third round pick and you rarely cut those players. More importantly, while Matt Wilhelm is a very solid backup, Navorro Bowman brings more athleticism to the table, and has been getting time at the Ted linebacker position behind Spikes. There were a lot of folks who thought he'd be best suited outside, but Coach Manusky appears to like what he brings to the table on the inside.
The question that leaves is what to do with Matt Wilhelm and Scott McKillop. I guess the first question is whether the team sticks to just four inside linebackers, which would leave one of these two on the outside looking in. At the same time, whereas Wilhelm brings a solid veteran presence, McKillop could potentially develop into a Jeff Ulbrich role. Of course, if the team runs out of roster space, McKillop may not be around long enough to completely take over that role.
McKillop could very well find himself in the situation where he's battling guys like Brit Miller and LeRoy Vann. He needs to prove the team should keep that fifth linebacker...unless of course Matt Wilhelm ends up on the chopping block. So many questions, and so much time to get answers.
34 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think Willis get's cut
he’s old, unproven, and can’t tackle
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
what?
Willis is our best player and you just told us to cut him. You are playing right
welcome
now you know me
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
Fooch...
However, given the complexities and different duties inside and outside linebackers have, I figured I’d break them down accordingly
Translation: The off-season is at it’s worst lull right now…so really, I’m reaching for a post here.
;-)
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
exactly
The dog days of summer are here.
by David Fucillo on Jun 24, 2010 9:08 AM PDT up reply actions
McKillop
he IS competing with Brit Miller, LeRoy Vann, a 5th Safety, a 9th OL, Zeigler/Hill (5th or 6th WR’s)
He’s known for being possessed on special teams, so this will have to continue to be his mantra in order for him to make it. Wilhelm has pretty much no upside, but you are right in that he’s the only guy with any experience in this defense, which is why he was brought in.
Still, I have to wonder if Bowman were here last year instead of McKillop, would the team have turned to Bowman or Wilhelm when Spikes went down? I think Bowman is a better option (or would have been) than McKillop last year…but was it just that they wanted a vet or was it more about McKillop himself not being ready?
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
When you do inside linebackers ...
… the vote will look like the dead sea scroll. Which of the 15,000 inside linebackers Coach Singletary has collected at camp do you think will make the 52-man roster? Will he keep 52 middle LB’s on the roster or will he think, you know what, hang it, let’s just go 53?
LondonNiner - member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010.
Outside linebackers ...
… sorry, meant OLBs. Ruined my own joke. Punches stupid self in stupid self’s stupid face
LondonNiner - member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010.
the bit in bold here
semi-redeems you though mate
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
I get it
mate, dude…we’re talking like each other! awwwww!!!
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
Depends on how well Bowman picks up the defense
If the coaches think Bowman has a good grasp on his assignments and knows where to be then i think Wilhelm will get cut and Bowman will be Spikes back-up. McKillop didn’t seem to work out too well last year backing up Spikes in the Ted position and probably is going to be the backup for Willis in the Mike position. That said, if the coaches aren’t confident in Bowman for whatever reason, i think the team will probably keep both guys.
eventually
I think Bowman is backup to both Ted and Mike…even when he becomes the starting Ted.
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
Spikes or Bowman
Do you think there is a chance that during the season Bowman will pass Spikes on the depth chart??
yes
if Spikes get’s hurt and is out significant time (like 5+ games) and Bowman shines…at that point if Spikes was able to return to form, they’d so some sharing…if Spikes can’t match his former level of play…Bowman takes over permanently.
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
I do know this ...
… happen’s , but Tre plz refrain from talk’n about injuries it’s juz bad karma .. it’s like look’n at a cop when your driving . if you don’ t see them they don’t see you …!! = )
Kewl
I know
I do talk about them a lot. Think I’m psyching myself out in case one happens, I wont be shocked. That’s the worst part though is we know there will be some…
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
Patrick Willis has tiny biceps.
Seriously, look at the picture. It’s called a gym, dude. Go to one.
I can't wait for Mango's sig to say "0 days to go".
the part of satirical false observer has already been cast
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
What appearance has to do with anything...
is unclear. There is not necessarily a 1:1 relationship between muscle size and strength. Based on the results, there’s nothing wrong with Willis’ upper body strength, and lifting for any reason other than to increase strength or explosiveness strikes me as dumb. You just add dead weight and unnecessary risk of injury by trying to get bigger than you need to be to do your job.
I know, man.
I was kidding. He’s not even flexing in that pic and his biceps are about to explode.
I can't wait for Mango's sig to say "0 days to go".
And here I just thought you were making an unreasonable comparison...
with somebody like LaMarr Woodley or something… That guy’s upper arms appear to be larger than his head. When you see stuff like that, you can be reasonably sure the league’s PED testing program isn’t working.
Wilhelm out
Since he’s only on a one year deal and McKillop is young and could be around for a while, Wilhelm is more likely to be cut imo. I don’t think the team will want to keep that 5th ILB just for a ST role and possibly fill in for an injury. They’d be better served keeping one of the 5 safeties they have in the event Goldson can’t be re-signed.
In my mind, you can't separate the ILBs from the OLBs
I’m keeping a total of 9. I have:
ILB locks: Willis, Spikes, Bowman
OLB locks: Brooks, Lawson, Haralson
Then, ILBs McKillop and Wilhelm and OLBs Briggs and LaBoy are competing for the remaining 3 slots, so we must cut 1 of them. Depending upon who the odd man out is, we’ll have either 5 ILBs and 4 OLBs, OR 4 ILBs and 5 OLBs. That will be determined by how these 4 guys perform in camp at their respective positions and on special teams.
If one or more of Keaton Kristick, Martail Burnett, and Mike Balogun have a great camp, perhaps he/they can be PS’d. That’d be a nice problem to have…
After all was said and done, a lot more got said than done.
thats easy
Cut wilhelm. And if burnett can be ps’d, do it.
by random_guy on Jun 24, 2010 7:37 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Wilhelm is currently my 1st choice as to which of the 4 to cut
but I’m going to wait to see how they all perform in camp before I decide (as if MY opinion really matters on all this).
I know little about Burnett. What do you know about him that makes you say this…?
After all was said and done, a lot more got said than done.
McKillop makes it over Wilhelm
Wilhelm is older and was a pickup we had to make due to injury. McKillop is younger and has more potential
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
I sincerely hope though
that McKillop and Bowman know their responsibilities inside and out
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by 


























