Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

UPDATED: The Great Madden NFL 11 49ers Fanpost (Ratings Discussion)

UPDATES: All player ratings I have are added at this point - having some slight formatting issues, bear with me. I'm going to list these as "unconfirmed" for now but I trust my source implicitly. 

There will be another fanpost about a Madden NFL 11 Niners Naiton tournament posted by myself at a later date. Recently, Smileyman had a front page post about the top ten at each position. For that list, go ahead and click here. I won't be posting the top ten because it's already there and this will focus solely on discussion of 49ers players.

I'm the team captain for the 49ers over at the official Roster and Ratings Discussion board over at EA's forums - whether or not they use that route again this year remains to be seen, but either way Donny Moore, the self-proclaimed ratings czar, should be looking over the forums again this year.

As info comes out on each player I will update the top of this post with any news. All of these ratings have been confirmed by credible sources, including my own. We can talk about players whose ratings have not been released but I urge you to give me your thoughts on players who have already been rated! I will need to present a list of players to Donny of players that should be increased and also players that should be decreased! Try not to be too biased, let's be realistic, folks! I want input from all of you so we can get some very precise ratings.

Star-divide

OFFENSIVE RATINGS

Quarterback
Alex Smith - 77 OVR, 72 SPD
David Carr - 65 OVR
Nate Davis 65 OVR
Thoughts: I agree mostly, Alex Smith needs to show he can be better, though I'm scratching my head as to why the one point decrease from the final roster update for 2010.

Half Back 
Frank Gore - 93 OVR, 93 SPD, 77 STR, 92 AGI
Glen Coffee - 71 OVR
Michael Robinson - 68 OVR
Anthony Dixon - 67 OVR
Thoughts: I mostly agree, Coffee and Dixon need to show they can earn higher ratings - though I will still say Gore needs more strength and I just know Robinson is going to be way too slow

Fullback
Moran Norris - 77 OVR, 65 SPD
Thoughts: Miller doesn't appear to be in the game yet - fair rating for Norris.

Wide Receivers
Michael Crabtree - 84 OVR, 88 SPD
Josh Morgan - 74 OVR, 87 SPD
Brandon Jones - 71 OVR, 91 SPD
Ted Ginn Jr. - 70 OVR, 97 SPD, 92 AGI, 95 ACC 
Jason Hill - 69 OVR, 87 SPD
Thoughts: They are an unproven unit and it's hard to campaign for much better ratings, except for Crabtree. I do not agree with their speed ratings.

Tight Ends 
Vernon Davis - 96 OVR, 90 SPD, 84 STR, 87 AGI, 92 ACC
Delanie Walker - 66 OVR
Byham - 63 OVR
Thoughts: Things are mostly fair. Davis should be right on par with Witten and a bit faster than 90. Delanie Walker plays very well in the game - note that folks, despite his low rating Walker has always caught anything thrown his way. Still very low and I will be campaigning for an improved Walker in speed and catch-in-traffic rating.

Left Tackles
Joe Staley - 87 OVR, 86 STR, 76 AGI
Barry Sims - 76 OVR
Thoughts: I agree mostly, but I will likely suggest a slight initial decrease for Joe Staley - he just hasn't shown he's an 87 OVR lineman. Sims played great at LT last season.

Left Guards
Mike Iupati - 83 OVR
David Baas - 78 OVR
Thoughts: Agree here. Baas never truly played horrible football, but we still needed to improve on him. Holds value and if anything a one to two point decrease is in order for him.

Center
Eric Heitmann - 84 OVR
Cody Wallace - 70 OVR
Thoughts: I do not agree that Heitmann should be an 84 and Staley an 87. I propose a ratings switch between the two.

Right Guards
Adam Snyder - 81 OVR
Chilo Rachal - 79 OVR
Thoughts: Surprisingly very spot on! Rachal will be the starter but Snyder may surprise, he's a solid interior lineman.

Right Tackles
Anthony Davis - 75 OVR
Alex Boone - 58 OVR
Thoughts: Severe disagree but do not fret! This WILL be updated by the preseason when Boone shows his solid play. Davis is rated right where he should be!

DEFENSIVE RATINGS

Left Ends
Isaac Sopoaga - 71 OVR, 52 SPD
Kentwan Balmer - 68 OVR
Ricky Jean-Francois - 66 OVR
Thoughts: Take my word on it: Jean-Francois will be updated before preseason is over.

Right Ends
Justin Smith - 89 OVR, 73 SPD
Ray McDonald - 71 OVR, 66 SPD
Thoughts: I find it hard to agree with McDonald's ratings - he's always been a good player. Smith should get that 90, he's one of the better defensive ends in the game.

Defensive Tackle
Aubrayo Franklin - 90 OVR, 97 STR, 54 SPD
Khalif Mitchell - 60 OVR
Thoughts: Franklin dropped two points from where he finished OVR on the 2010 at the last update - why the two point drop?

Left Outside Linebackers
Manny Lawson - 79 OVR, 89 SPD, 77 STR, 89 AGI, 95 ACC
Travis LaBoy - 64 OVR
Thoughts: We all know that LaBoy is better than a 64 OVR but he'll have to prove it coming off a huge injury - so I'm OK with it for now. Lawson is very fair for now.

Middle Linebackers
Patrick Willis - 99 OVR, 90 SPD, 88 STR, 88 AGI, 96 ACC
Takeo Spikes - 84 OVR, 74 SPD
Navorro Bowman - 73 OVR
Scott McKillop - 67 OVR
Matt Wilhelm - 67 OVR
Thoughts: Pretty fair, McKillop is a special teams guy and Wilhelm is the only outlier here, he should be rated higher but he probably won't even make the roster.

Right Outside Linebackers
Parys Haralson - 78 OVR 79 SPD
Ahmad Brooks - 75 OVR, 74 SPD
Thoughts: I'm surprised Brooks is as high as he is. He should play better and earn an increase. I will campaign for a speed boost to both players.

Cornerback
Nate Clements - 84 OVR, 86 SPD
Shawntae Spencer - 81 OVR, 88 SPD
Tarell Brown - 73 OVR, 87 SPD
Will James - 72 OVR
Karl Paymah - 64 OVR
Thoughts: I'm a renowned Paymah hater and I can tell he is too low. Deserves around a 68 for now. Spencer is underrated, I wouldn't mind a five point increase for him and a one point decrease for Nate. Do not agree with speed.

Free Safeties
Dashon Goldson - 80 OVR, 85 SPD
Curtis Taylor - 60 OVR
Thoughts: Hard to argue here, Goldson needs to be faster though. That speed rating is criminally low.

Strong Safeties
Michael Lewis - 80 OVR, 75 SPD
Taylor Mays - 71 OVR, 95 SPD, 94 AGI, 93 ACC, 68 STR
Reggie Smith - 64 OVR
Thoughts: Again, hard to argue, but I think Lewis deserves a much higher rating than that. Basically decent here.

Specialists
Andy Lee - 94 OVR
Joe Nedney - 82 OVR

So do not make another Madden fanpost, this will serve for all discussion and help me organize our thoughts as a fanbase. Seriously, let's try and be as realistic as possible. So without further ado, give me your thoughts on the ratings that have already been revealed. Also, rec this.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.

Comment 401 comments  |  10 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ratings

Frank Gore: I think his speed should be around 90, not 93.
Vernon is faster than Gore: Speed should be 92-94
Crabtree should be an 87 overall

by mr. instigator on Jun 29, 2010 11:10 AM PDT reply actions  

Definitely but they do it a certain way...

…it’s stupid but they really won’t give a tight end much more than that. I will most definitely be lobbying for more speed though for Vernon, no worries.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

I've been wondering this

are the speed scales different for each position? I just have a hard time believing that some of the speed ratings because I see some players in Madden perform differently even though they are the same speed but a different position.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think it's different for each position

how fast you are relative to other people who play the same position. Ninjames can confirm that.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 29, 2010 3:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

So then VD should be 99

He’s the fastest TE in the NFL, and it’s not even close.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 29, 2010 11:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well no, not exactly.

There should be a bigger gap but 99 shouldn’t be the cap at the TE position.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 1:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't get it

If he’s the fastest relative to his position then he should be 99.

If not then it makes not sense to make it relative to position.
Just grade all the players on the same scale (only for speed).

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

They try and rate the tight ends on a scale for tight ends but it DOES have an affect outside of the position. He needs to be higher than the rest of the tight ends but based on the routes and the way tight ends operate on the game, their coding in the engine (which is unique, by the way), it needs to be a certain speed. You don’t compare a 92 TE with a 92 RB but a 99 TE will still be unstoppable on the game – and he is stoppable in real life. There’s a point where it breaks the game.

Once you start getting near 99 then you start comparing with the fastest of other positions. VD isn’t as fast as Chris Johnson. I think 93-95 is a great speed for him and will be lobbying accordingly.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nobody said he was as fast as Chris Johnson

I just said that if speed for a player is relative to his position then VD should be 99.

In which case VD’s 99 speed is slower than CJs 99 speed.

That sounds ridiculous, I know. So then speed should NOT be relative to a player’s position.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

I always felt they ripped off Delanie on speed on Madden. Back when Nolan was still the coach and they brought in Walker and VD they talked about how Walker was just as fast if not faster than Vernon. I haven’t heard those talks the past couples years as Walker is a clear second to Vernon but Walker has always been a dangerous weapon when utilized properly. Think he should be shown some more love. We definitely have two of the fastest tight-ends in all of football.

by jonesin25 on Jul 1, 2010 9:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, definitely.

A 99 RB doesn’t necessarily blow past the 95 speed of Taylor Mays, for example. It’s all relative.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 1:19 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't believe so

It’s all the same.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 30, 2010 12:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

a few to start off with:

Gore should be stronger, not as fast. 80’s strength and 90 speed.

Ginn, don’t I keep hearing how he has “long speed”? If that’s true his ACC shouldn’t be 95, it should be lower, like 88. I can’t wait to see what his CTH is.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:18 AM PDT reply actions  

93 isn’t really that fast on the game, make sure you don’t compare him to Vernon when you think about his speed, but I can see it dropping one or two points. Ginn’s ACC could go down, but the drop between 95 and 88 is really a staggering drop, I’d think more around 91. Thoughts?

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Gore isn't one of the fastest RB's

is all…what’s CJ’s speed for instance?

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:27 AM PDT up reply actions  

99.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:28 AM PDT up reply actions  

(which is hilarious that he's 4 points better than Mays)

That’s just how it is. The speed ratings have to be compared between players of that position, etc.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah, Gore shouldn't be even close to that

He can’t outrun most DB’s without a good head start

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Low ACC but good burst out of hole.

Basically the cut-off for a starting RB speed in Madden is like 91. It all has to be kept relative.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

see, I don't get that

I thought ACC was burst, like from a start or once you’ve changed directions you get up to top speed quickly

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

ACC is just how fast you pick up speed.

Burst is that initial burst from contact with the quarterback. Gore always has a considerable burst when he takes a hand-off.. it’s like.. BAM, he got the handoff, and now ACC kicks in to determine how fast he gets to his top speed in the second level.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

meh, that's misleading then

Acceleration is a change in present state of motion. Going from standing still to moving, changing directions, going faster…

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

There is no burst rating in Madden.

That was just my terminology. There is only one ACC rating.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

Accelerating in Madden is simply how fast you get to top-end speed.

Which makes perfect sense.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:38 AM PDT up reply actions  

yeah

Gore’s burst is incredible. It’s what lets him get so many long runs. Super-fast acceleration that lets him get out ahead of the pack.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 29, 2010 3:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

Really

Gore had no problem staying in front of the pack when he got clear. That is why he has so many plays over 65 yards or more. They can’t catch him once he’s gone. 93 speed would reflect this. It is not based on 40 yard dash times.

by ericalancanty on Jun 29, 2010 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

it was noted when he had the long runs against Seattle

that it was a good thing he ended up with the TD because he doesn’t have what is considered elite speed. He’s not slow, but more acceleration than straight up speed down the field.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Glad someone finally said it

I was going to say the same thing. I don’t think there is any debate that he is not the fastest in the league. But I can’t remember the last time anyone caught him from behind when he got passed the secondary. People are bringing up his burst as an argument but once he is through the line that becomes irrelevant. His burst plays no role is his break away speed once he’s through the line. I think his speed might not be generous enough because I get caught from behind quite often with Gore in the game.

by jonesin25 on Jul 1, 2010 9:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

he bursts through and get's ahead of guys who are trying to tackle him

then they are behind trying to make up ground. Even if they are faster than him they have to gain back all that space.

It’s fine, he’s plenty fast. His speed doesn’t hurt him.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 2, 2010 4:12 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ginn's ACC should be a 93 and his speed a 98 or 99

VDs ACC Should be a 92 and his speed a 92 also

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 29, 2010 2:00 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Heitmann

should be like an 87 as you said, Staley an 85

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:19 AM PDT reply actions  

No he is not.

Not at all. It’s not even close. Heitmann is far and away our best offensive lineman. You are severely overrating him or severely underrating Hietmann.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can always count on James to defend Heitmann

and I can’t blame you. But looking at the list of the top OCs, they are all OCs from a playoff team from either last year or the year before. I think it is easy to see that the Madden team has a biased for playoff teams (Jets), so it does not surprise me that a position that does not put up stats would be underrated. Heitmann will have to be one you push for.

However, when it comes to Staley, I would like to see where he ranks with other OTs. I believe Staley is as good as if not better than Sam Baker of the Falcons so if they are both the same rating, I feel that it would be fair.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I take nothing away from Staley.

I love the dude, funny off the field and fierce on the field. But he has a bit more to prove before he deserves an 87 overall, whereas Heitmann never shuts off, is rarely on his back – just a very good player.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 1:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree

I am just saying that instead of going to the rating, I want to see where he is ranked. Madden seems to overvalue LTs, so I think it is better to compare where Staley sits with the other LTs in the league and then decide where he should be rated.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

true

same with Heitmann. Heitmann has to be like top 10-15 Center though, right? Staley probably falls in the 15-20 range at LT?

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd put staley at 20--25 at left tackle

exceptional pass blocker, lousy run blocker. I agree with Heitmann as 10-15 ranking for center

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 29, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

You're F*ing crazy.

Staley has shut down some of the most elite pass rushers in the game. Something that other supposed “top rated” LT’s have not been able to do. Staley does his job just as good if not better than anyone in the league. The offensive line has to work as one, when there is a hole or two, which there is in ours, it plays a negative effect on the guy to your left and/or right. Staley has always stood his own with the best even with weak a** Baas next to him.

by jonesin25 on Jul 1, 2010 9:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

just cause he's been our most consistent Tackle

doesn’t make him great league-wide.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 2, 2010 4:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're crazy or just on powerful hallucinogenic drugs

if you think Staley is anywhere as good as the leagues elite LTs. He’s solid and our 2nd best lineman though.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 2, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

LT position requires a better athlete at that position.

If Staley is a 15-20 LT, and Heitmann is a 10-15 center and you have to be better to play the LT position, then it would stand to reason that Staley is the best O lineman….Period. Besides, I have never heard…not one single time…ever….that any media or comentator thinks that Heitmann is the best lineman we have….They always say it is Staley….

I like Staley, bet feel like Heitmann would be easier to replace if injured.

by ericalancanty on Jun 29, 2010 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

Heitmann is not a 10-15 center

He is a 4-8 (8 at worst) center

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 29, 2010 10:38 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I have never heard…not one single time…ever….that any media or comentator thinks that Heitmann is the best lineman we have

well there’s your problem

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 5:18 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dude you are 100% right

It’s not even worth wasting your breath over. NFL centers are not thought as highly of because as long as they get the ball to the QB and dont get pushed on their back, they are ok. On just about every play they are getting help from one of the guards as the T’s is taking a speed guy off the edge almost every play.

by jonesin25 on Jul 1, 2010 10:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's not the argument man.

Heitmann makes more blocks than Staley. He stops more players from hitting Smith, he opens more holes for Gore. Heitmann spends less time on his back and knocks more people down. Heitmann is a BETTER LINEMAN. I’m not taking anything from Staley, don’t think that – he’ll only get better over the next couple seasons, but Heitmann is better.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 1, 2010 10:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Staley

His ratings is based on the fact that he converted from the TE position. I do wish he was stronger. 88-99 for all Tackles in Madden. Because when I am are drafting for that postion that is one of the stats.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 29, 2010 2:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with ninjames

heitmann is far better than Staley. Staley is average to slightly above average at the left tackle spot. heitmann is one of the best centers in the league.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 29, 2010 3:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Note that Staley does have a lot of room to improve...

…and the tools to do so.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 3:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Agreed Heitmann 87-88 Staley 84-85

Staley was less than stellar before his injury. Heitmann was our only rock.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 29, 2010 2:01 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I think Sims outperformed Staley last year

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 29, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

he blocked for a more mobile quarterback who gets rid of the ball faster and has a tendency to check down or throw the ball away rather than take a sack. We also changed our scheme to more 2 TE sets and more shotgun, which helps the LT in addition to helping the QB.

by hellaninersfan on Jun 29, 2010 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

When Staley came back he wasn't all that sharp

and we had Alex Smith playing when Staley came back.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 30, 2010 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

He was pretty sharp vs. Trent Cole.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 12:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

If what we're hearing about Lawson is true (his off-season program)

then his strength could see a 3 point increase I’d think…

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:21 AM PDT reply actions  

wait, HOW is Mays rated 68 strength?

That’s just odd. I’d rather lower his agility some and give him 70’s strength. Have they seen the kid? How is he NOT strong?

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:22 AM PDT reply actions  

Note:

Strength more caters to locking up with a player, getting tangled and being able to out-power him. There is a separate HIT POWER rating that pertains more to Taylor Mays and his hard hitting style I do not know his hit power rating as of right now, however. I do believe it is very high, though.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think of strength as weight room type stuff...

and yes, as it pertains to one on one trench wars, locking up, etc.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mays hasn't ever...

…shown that he’s really the type to out-power someone, just someone to his his strength to his athleticism. His STR can go up, definitely, but hit power is his focus as far as that goes.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions  

look at him for Cheese sake

he’s freakin huge. He has to be stronger than 68. I guess he just hasn’t shown on-field strength

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

It's all about on the field and how it translates.

IIRC, Soapoaga’s strength has gone down and down as he gets destroyed, because it hasn’t been helping. Mays doesn’t show strength, also remember for blitzing there will be a different rating for how he interacts with power moves on offensive lineman so it doesn’t take just a basic strength check. I will definitely lobby for more. How much more are you thinking? Note that something like the 90s and what not are generally reserved for lineman.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 11:37 AM PDT up reply actions  

no, no like 70's

he’s 230 pounds at like 5% body fat…I think we’ll hear about him 1 on 1 locked up more in TC and then we can get a better sense.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just don't want him getting trucked by RB's in the game

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

Even Patrick Willis gets trucked in the game

The game is going to be broken no matter what.

While I believe he does deserve a little bit more strength, the top strength for a safety is 80 I believe, so if that is the top, then where do you think Mays belongs ratings-wise?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

73

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 1:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think that would be fair

now we just need Mays to be on the field so he can show that so he can get an increase.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

when I see 60's

in any category, it’s like saying “weak”

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 1:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

The problem is

the way the ratings are set up. They want positions to fit a certain zone. Safeties STR – 50-80. LBs – 60-90. So it’s broken down to Patrick Willis is the strongest LB in the game so he has 99 STR. I understand the idea because then you can say that this player is faster than this player or this player is stronger than this player, but it doesn’t always work out that way (look like RB strength compared to LB strength) because they are not consistent in their own system.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Considering he repped 225 24 times

His strength should be at least a 75. How many did Anthony Davis do? 21. 24 reps for a safety is pretty damn strong. Okung should have extremely high strength 93-94 as he did 38 reps and Mitch Petrus should get a 97 or 98 with his record tying 45 reps.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 29, 2010 2:30 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Also Mays ACC should be a 98 or 99

With his top end about right at 95

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 29, 2010 2:34 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ninjames

If they need proof just link them to the simulcast 40 where Mays comes out and runs with Jacoby Ford for the first 30 meters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oDhYKZHKh4Q

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 29, 2010 6:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

T Mays Hit Power

was 91 according to the “Rate the Rookies” website following the draft.

by crumpedup15 on Jun 30, 2010 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes, that's why I said somewhere up there.

It’s liable to change so I haven’t ‘confirmed’ it. The only rookie ratings I included were confirmed stuff to be final for the opening day roster.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 1:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ask that poor dude from Penn State if Mays should be a 91

Ask whatever poor corner was behind that Penn reciever if he’s a 91. It’s a special kind of hitter that knocks 2 people out of a game with 1 hit.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 5:29 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Didn't Vernon say Delanie was about as fast as he was?

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 11:23 AM PDT reply actions  

Yes.

He’s very fast.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 29, 2010 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Riiiight

Because one single play you saw reflects on his speed.

Did you ever see him play in College or even now on the 49ers offense?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 10:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

he's just saying

that TE’s usually don’t outrun a ton of people…although I agree that one play doesn’t necessarily prove DW’s speed

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 1, 2010 6:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well he's not going to outrun a CB or anything

But I’d say that he’s a lot faster than most LBs in the NFL.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 1, 2010 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think the rankings are fair

Maybe a tad bit too generous on Gore’s speed or Justin Smith in general (which he probably won’t rate top-10 at DE speed/acceleration given that he is a 3-4 DE and doesn’t get to show that off like a 4-3 DE does).

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 29, 2010 11:40 AM PDT reply actions  

Justin Smith is one of the better DEs in the league

he had as many hurries as DeMarcus Ware. He is solid as a pass rusher and solid against the run. The sad part is that he is not even seen as one of the best 3-4 DEs even though one could make an argument for him.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

this

he really is one of the best. Look at the sack-fumble of Warner to close out the game in week 1 last year…at the end of the game when you’re supposed to be gassed from fighting double teams and going all out every play…dude is a beast but doesn’t put up numbers in all the sexy categories

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Justin Smith may not have the speed of Jared Allen or Trent Cole, but he has that constant motor throughout the entire game like those guys do.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

He was the best 3-4 DE in 2009

but 89 still doesn’t feel right to me.

As for his speed, I was just addressing what Ninjames had said up top. Allen, Edwards, Peppers, Cole, Freeney, Mathis, Williams, Abraham, Tuck, Carter…..10 DEs I would say are faster. Primarily because they play in a system that portrays their speed.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 29, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

this

I could care about speed at his position, that’s what the LB’s are for. He’s got strength, agility and acceleration.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

He doesn't even need slick moves

just his motor which never, ever stops. His strength is enormous.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 29, 2010 3:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

89 is not the best 3-4 DE though

Darnell Docket – 94

Then right under Smith is Luis Castillo at 88. Smith is by far better than Castillo so he should be rated above him, which he is. So I am not sure how 89 is not fair when he is not even the highest rated 3-4 DE.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Smith may be better than Dockett

But just to be fair, I’ll say he’s barely below Dockett.

89 isn’t right before 94

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 29, 2010 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Justin Smith

I can honestly say that he should be overall 92-94

by mr. instigator on Jun 29, 2010 11:44 AM PDT reply actions  

True that

Especially when Dockett is 94

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 29, 2010 11:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

I find it odd they demoted Vernon.

He was a 97ovr in the last updated ratings at the end of the year, I see no reason to move him down.

Crabtree is a bit low, but I think because of how little he has played his rating will sway more if he does well.

Jeaaaggaahh

by Soulbrother16 on Jun 29, 2010 12:00 PM PDT reply actions  

Crabtree

I forgot to talk about him, thank you for the reminder. He should be a 90. I really think he’s there.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think all Niner fans think he’s there, but I’m not surprised Madden took the cautious approach and put him a bit low, however don’t be surprised if he has a jump in ratings higher than most once the season starts.

Jeaaaggaahh

by Soulbrother16 on Jun 29, 2010 12:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah

if you can step in and become the #1 WR mid-way through the season as a rookie…I think you’re pretty good (no matter how bad some of the other WR’s were on the team)

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 12:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

And let's not be homers

Crabtree did well. And the Madden team are not the diehards of fans when it comes to football. I think they do put too much into stats and highlight videos, so they probably only saw very little of Crabtree and see that he only scored two TDs last year and think that is a fair rating for him. I don’t mind his rating too much because Crabtree will easily go up during the season unlike other players who don’t always put up stats (D-line/O-line).

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Crabtree

Do you guys know Crabs speed? Accelration?

Niner Ball!!!!

by Batman559 on Jun 29, 2010 1:22 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Anthony Davis got punked on his ratings.

A 75 versus Iupati 85? Really? Based on what…Mayock and company saying that he was a risk? I think he should be at least an 80….

by ericalancanty on Jun 29, 2010 1:24 PM PDT reply actions  

Well

one thing that it looks like is that the Madden team rated the rookies before the draft. I think that is a good approach because then it is not about draft position, but more of how they would rate that player. Sure, they are not what I would consider great at grading/rating players, but what are you going to do when it is their game?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 29, 2010 1:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

You cannot just start saying rookies should be an 80.

Iupati is a very rare talent. Rookies very rarely get an 80 or above. Davis is right where he should be, especially considering he is raw and unready.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

this

Davis played up and down a bit though he had some really high highs. He has talent and upside but is far from polished. He’ll likely be the type of player that rapidly gains rating points in franchise mode though (James, thoughts?)

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 1:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I agree with you to a point

None of these guys are polished by NFL standards. None of them are guaranteed to be a success in the NFL….. But that goes for Iupati too. This is a game that is to reflect the players ability compared to other players drafted. Davis is the lowest rated OT in the 1st round. Bulaga dropped because NFL teams believed that Davis was the better OT. Bulaga is rated higher cause Mayock and Kiper all said that Bulaga would get drafted before Davis….Surprise….they were wrong.

Again….The only real concerns towards Davis was his age and work ethic…not ability. Okung is not 9 points better than Davis on ability. That’s all. Asking for an 80, or the same as Bulaga is not crazy. Just fair.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well there are 2 things

Bulaga has already cemented as the #1 backup at both LT and RT for the packers waiting for Clifton or the RT to get hurt like they always do. He will be the starting LT before long. We apparently didn’t want a true LT and got Davis cause he has the bigger RT frame and scouts felt Davis’ ceiling is higher there. Which, while it may be, I think there are plenty of questions on if he’ll ever come close to reaching it that made drafting him at 11 kinda foolish.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 10:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

So because Bulaga is already a backup

that means he is going to be good? Gee, that makes me feel better about Bulaga. So what does it mean when Davis becomes a starter before Bulaga? Nothing. So big deal if Bulaga is cemented as the #1 backup.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 3, 2010 11:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

Behind functional linemen.

Not behind Adam Snyder. Bulaga would have already cemented himself as the #1 here. His ceiling might not be as high but he is damn sure better than Davis right now.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 2:44 PM PDT up reply actions  

First off... Right now Okung ONLY being 8 points better is insulting

He should be a good 10-15 points higher. He was immeasurably better in college. Davis is overrated at 75 and while one day he might be a 95 or so. Right now I think he’s about a 65.

Bulaga should be a good 7-8 points higher right now also. Bulaga might not reach the same heights (which I also disagree with) but he’s a whole lot more NFL ready. Drafting Davis is the NFL equivalent of drafting a HS superstar in basketball. He might be the best… he might be a complete bust.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 10:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Just go look at the rookie ratings Nin.

Davis is one of the lowest rated in the 1st round and he was picked 11th overall. Mayock and company had Davis as the 4th OT in the draft……It was well published…….But I believe that NFL teams as a whole had Davis listed ahead of Bulaga. Bulaga is rated higher than Davis because of this perception. Truth is, Bulaga fell because teams had Davis rated higher.

The only real concern about Davis was his age and work ethic….not ability….it was said that he probably is the most physicaly gifted OT out of the group. So why is he rated the lowest? So again….he got punked.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 9:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

I know what the ratings are...

…and Davis is considered someone very raw and not ready. He is rated fairly where he is. He’ll make some mistakes. He’ll get handled a few times and allow some nasty sacks. But he’ll get better, and he’ll earn a higher rating.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 10:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Some NFL teams did

As evidenced by the Cowboys board alot did not. Cowboys had Bulaga at like 15 and Davis at like 75

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Also

Seriously? Where do you get these opinions? Do you watch tape or read any coverage? Do you just pull it out of the air from some unseen ether?

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 11:00 AM PDT up reply actions  

I like how you stick to the Cowboys board

do you know they rated Morgan Burnett ahead of Mays? Would you rather have Burnett instead of Mays?

They had Sean Lee rated as a first round pick. Do you think Sean Lee is a first round pick? Would you take Sean Lee over Navarro Bowman?

The Giants have a need at ILB but passed on Sean Lee for Linval Joseph who the Cowboys rated with a fourth round grade.

They had Saffold in the third, John Jerry in the fourth, Vlad Ducasse in the fourth, and Jared Valdheer in the sixth. All went ahead of what the Cowboys viewed. Makes you wonder how well they judge O-linemen.

Sergio Kindle was a third round grade while Koa Misi was a second round grade. Do you think Kindle is worse than Misi?

And of course, they have Bradford as the #1 overall prospect. Do you think Bradford was the best prospect?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 3, 2010 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also

they have Gerald McCoy rated higher than Suh. Do you agree with that?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 3, 2010 1:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

A lot of scouts did

I personally did not. But he’s not that far behind him. Suh is special McCoy very well might be too.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, a lot of scouts had McCoy better than Suh even though McCoy only did 23 reps at the bench while Suh did 32 reps. So would the teams that rated McCoy better know what they are doing even though Suh had the better college stats and better Combine?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 3, 2010 7:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Different style

McCoy is about speed more than Suh. Suh is more strength based. As I said I think Suh is the better of the two and it shows in how much stronger he is.

Other scouts thought his all around performance at the combine actually put him ahead of Suh based on all the numbers aside from the bench. I wish the guy we drafted 11th had put any good numbers up at the combine instead of doing his best Andre Smith impression. (Smith in all likelyhood actually did better at the combine than our future star).

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 9:56 AM PDT up reply actions  

Different style

Anthony Davis is a different kind of OT than Andre Smith. But I don’t see how Smith not performing workouts at the Combine means that he did better than Anthony Davis.

You put too much emphasis on the Combine. The Combine is a glorified physical. Anyone can go out there and run around in shorts. There have only been a few workout warriors who translate to football players and I would say those who do are more physical freaks than workout warriors. Vernon Gholston hasn’t lived up to hype. Bruce Campbell looked like the best OT at the Combine but was subpar in college, which is why he was picked in the fourth round. Heck, the only reason we got Crabtree is because of how good Heyward-Bey did at the Combine to fool good ol’ Al.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 4, 2010 12:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I factor the combine in for several aspects but I don't exclude players based solely on it

Okung and Trent Williams, (while at RT), both dominated the combine and were elite on the field. Bulaga was routine in the numbers drills but impressed at his positional drills at the combine but was dominating on the field. Andre Smith dominated on the field but the combine exposed him as lazy and a big time project… Anthony Davis didn’t do much to impress me at Rutgers and his combine just furthered that. I understand the upside but its like drafting Michael Olowokandi #1. Potential doesn’t always pan out and the less work ethic a player has the less likely it WILL pan out.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 1:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

Andre Smith did not do workouts at the Combine. I should also note that at his Pro Day, Andre Smith did 19 reps on the bench press. So again, how did Andre Smith do better?

And just because you don’t think Anthony Davis was good in college does not mean he was bad. Apparently, the 49ers scouts liked him in college otherwise we would have not taken him at 11.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 4, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um semantics - his pro day.

Anthony Davis’ combine:
Height: 6-5 Weight: 323 Arms: 34"
40-yard dash: 5.38 10-yard split: 1.82
20-yard shuttle: 4.97 225-lb. bench: 21
Broad jump: 8-3 Vertical jump: 33"
3-cone drill: 8.17

Andre Smiths Pro Day:
Height: 6’4 1/4" Weight: 325 Arms 35 3/8"
40-yard dash: 5.25-5.35 jiggling the whole way
20 yard shuttle 4.93 Bench Press: 19
vertical jump 25" broad jump 7’10"
3-cone drill: 7.86

Now - “As disappointing as Smith might have been in the timed drills, he did, according to multiple sources on hand for the workout, showcase the remarkable agility in blocking exercises that had generated so much attention from scouts in the first place.”

So yah for the most part he did do better than Davis

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 5:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

That's how slow Davis is laterally

A guy who was so out of shape that the tape of him running the 40 is seared into fans’ minds forever is beating him by 0.3 in a 3 cone.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 5:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Burnett might win the starting job

So that might not be that bad a call. Apparently he’s been dazzling so far.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 2:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah but who's really better?

Who’s Burnett competing with?
Fossils in the GB defense?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 4:46 PM PDT up reply actions  

Atari Bigby

Not great but serviceable.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 6:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

Be honest

Do you really think Burnett is better than Mays.

I mean really?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

No

But had Mays gone in the first round and sat on his laurels instead of studying his ass off… Maybe.

I think the slide will be the single biggest difference maker in Mays career. Had he come into the league in the top 15 I don’t think he’d be the same player.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 9:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe

But we’ll never really know.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 5, 2010 1:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

So you would rather have Burnett over Mays?

because the Cowboys would. Do you agree with the Cowboys?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 3, 2010 7:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think if they all went in the middle of the first round

with nothing to inspire Taylor to greatness that Burnett could very well have ended up better. The way it played out Taylor will be an all-pro.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

They weren't rated as first round safeties

the Cowboys rated Burnett better than Mays in the second. So even if Mays is trying harder because he fell out of the first round, the Cowboys would have still gone with Burnett over Mays.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 4, 2010 12:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

I understand that

But how do you account for a guy taking it so personally that he slid that it motivates him to such an extreme? I would say going into the draft Mays is better than Burnett but both are talented and the difference wasn’t that big. I think post draft and resulting fallout that Mays is now the much better choice. That’s just something you can’t factor in.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 1:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

Actually

I think the fact that Carroll chose Earl Thomas in the first over Mays did more to him than him sliding into the second. And I disagree that the difference is not that big. I would not take Burnett in the second, but I am thrilled to have Mays in the second. Mays is a physical freak of nature that Burnett could not match and so I would be willing to take the risk on Mays outside of the first round instead of over-drafting a player who is potentially safer.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 4, 2010 4:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

John Jerry I seem to remember hearing is coming along slowly so 4th sounds right there

Vlad Ducasse I thought deserved an early 3rd round grade, Saffold is a 3rd rounder, Valdheer is a 5th -6th rounder. He got abused at Texas vs The nation practices and that’s not even against elite college guys.

I’m pretty much exactly there on all of those.

Sean Lee vs Bowman – They needed a MLB – They also had Bowman rated as 1st round but their requirements made Sean Lee higher on their list. Lee won’t disappoint either.

I do disagree on Kindle vs Misi – But Misi is a 3rd and Kindle is a 2nd.

I think Suh is the #1 overall prospect and Bradford, Berry and McCoy are 2 – 3 – 4. I really don’t disagree with much of anything there.

Mays might only be the player he is set to become because he slipped.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 3:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

John Jerry is battling for a starting job

and for the Dolphins O-line, that’s pretty good. So you are saying that the Cowboys are wrong about Ducasse? Saffold and Ducasse went in the second and Veldheer and Jerry went in the third. So while the Cowboys did not put a lot of value in these guys, other teams did.

So would you rather have Sean Lee over Bowman? It doesn’t matter that they had Bowman in the first as well because the question is whether you would want Lee instead of Bowman.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 3, 2010 7:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not about them being wrong or right

it’s about different team needs.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jul 3, 2010 8:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

different teams rate different positions higher based on need, which is why one cannot say that the Cowboys board is right because it was their preferences.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 4, 2010 12:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

The Boys rated RT Ducasse in the 4th

which is below where I’d say he was for us, but we need a RT. I still think factoring that in that Ducasse should be a 3rd rounder but no higher than the end of the second.

They rated Davis slightly higher which I think is pretty accurate. They are basically saying he can’t play LT and I think they are right. His footwork needs major repair before you put him on a QBs blindside or you’ll have QBs getting put on the IR when he whiffs his blocks. A guy that whiffs several times a game at the college level isn’t a blindside protector and shouldn’t be moved up to 11th for.

I think third round may be a little low… But 11 was WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too high for how long we’re likely going to have to wait for him to develop. He should have gone no higher than mid 20s.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Also

Sing taking his mentors word as church was foolish. They pay that dude to make Davis look good he’s not gonna tell Sing anything he doesn’t wanna hear.

“Oh he’s got great work ethic, all he wants to do is learn, he’s just a little confused right now… but… one time I’ve seen him walk on water and if you lead him right he can do it again I’m sure! He’s definitely worth moving up for!”

psssshhhh

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

If you think Veldheer is a 3rd round talent to anybody but a team DESPERATE for a later round tackle who has upside

I dunno what to tell you. The guy is so raw he makes Anthony Davis look polished. He’s got upside but there is no way I spend a 3rd round pick on him if I don’t need a tackle. Which the Cowboys didn’t. But they were still willing to spend a high pick on Bulaga if he slipped. This is basically a matter of Bulaga being really good right now and the Cowboys willing to take BPA and those other guys you mentioned not being very good and not being ready and the Cowboys not wanting anything to do with them till the 6th or 7th.

And I’ve read nowhere that Jerry is competing for the starting job. When last I checked he’s the #2 guard and while not on the bubble is not amazing anybody.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 10:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Or

it could be that they put emphasis on ILBs and less emphasis on O-line on their draft board. There were only three OTs high (Okung, Williams, Bulaga) which could mean that they were looking at the possibility of a LT but did not want a RT (Anthony Davis). And I could care less about Veldheer, I was trying to show how different teams have different boards. So what if the Cowboys did not view Anthony Davis high. They are not that great at judging O-linemen anyway. I’m just trying to show you that you put too much emphasis on the Combine and the Cowboys leaked board even though you don’t agree with everything on the Cowboys board.

http://www.thephinsider.com/2010/6/1/1495023/five-things-we-may-have-learned

And I like how John Jerry being the #2 guard does not mean anything to you but Bryan Bulaga being the #1 backup means that he’s something special.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 4, 2010 12:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

I pretty much agree with all these

Ducasse late 2nd/early 3rd grade
Valdheer 6th rounder
I thought both Lee and Bowman were late 1st/early 2nd round guys
I like Misi more than Kindle but that’s personal preference really
I think Suh is better than McCoy, but lots of scouts had McCoy ranked higher

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jul 3, 2010 8:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

^5 dude

I agree with them all as well.
I like Kindle more than Misi but thats personal preference.
I think Lee is more of a traditional MLB which the Cowgirls needed vs Bowman who is more of the elite athlete OLB where the Girls already have DeMarcus Ware. I think the fact they had Bowman graded in the first round on their board says a tremendous amount about the guy when they have absolutely no use for him.
Veldheer is more raw than Alex Boone 2 bottles deep on Rye.
Suh is better than McCoy ;) Despite what many scouts say.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 10:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Bowman would play in ILB in the Cowboys’ 3-4 just like he is doing with the 49ers. Why would DeMarcus Ware sway them away from choosing Bowman?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 4, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

Um... No

Most teams didn’t have Bowman as an ILB. That’s why people are saying he’s too small to be an ILB for us.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow great reading comprehension

Where did I say most teams had Bowman as an ILB?

I said Cowboys would have Bowman as an ILB because they run a 3-4, have a need at ILB (why they drafted Sean Lee), and have both OLB spots filled. And in a 3-4, you usually want someone bigger than Bowman to play OLB who is also able to rush the passer. So I don’t know how you jumped from Bowman who played 4-3 OLB to the Cowboys would have him play 3-4 OLB. So Ware has nothing to do with why they chose one LB over another.

And OLBs transition to ILB all the time when coming out of college just like Jon Beason who has similar size and speed to Bowman.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 4, 2010 3:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

So its not that Navorro is still (I think incorrectly), perceived as too short to play ILB? (2" shorter than Lee)

Like the talk was initially when he got here?

Or that he was charged with felony assault and two misdemeanors (simple assault, disorderly conduct)?

Or that he (scouting report)

“gives ground to get off blocks and needs to learn to use his hands to disengage. Can be a tick late to diagnose and bites on play-action. Has a 29 1/2-inch vertical jump. Durability and character need to be evaluated. Immature. Rubbed coaches the wrong way at the Combine, coming off as selfish and arrogant in interviews.”

Or it couldn’t be that Sean Lee was generally considered the #2 MLB after McClain by scouts? Nahhhhhhh

I wanna know your source lol.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 6:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Or maybe... just maybe...

They wanted somebody who was a MLB in college.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 6:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I could ask you the same thing
I think Lee is more of a traditional MLB which the Cowgirls needed vs Bowman who is more of the elite athlete OLB where the Girls already have DeMarcus Ware.

And Sean Lee has his knocks too. I’m not going to list them because this is not a conversation about Sean Lee being better than Bowman, but I’ll hit on a main one in a second. I want to know what makes you believe that Ware has anything to do with why the chose one ILB over another or why Bowman would play OLB in the Cowboys 3-4?

For being a former first round prospect, teams were scared by the severity of Lee’s ACL tear. Sure, he bounced back to have a pretty good season, but he only played in 10 games because of injuries. It should be noted that while he moved around different LB spots in college playing primarily OLB (just like Bowman), Lee only settled into the MLB spot as a senior (10 games). The difference between Bowman and Lee are just like the other choices the 49ers made in this draft: they took a player with a higher possibility of busting but with a higher potential. I don’t think the league cares as much about height anymore with how many LBs are playing at 6’ or shorter (Jon Beason, Gary Brackett, London Fletcher, Curtis Lofton). If Sean Lee did not have injury concerns and Bowman did not have off the field issues, I wonder how high these guys would have gone.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 5, 2010 12:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because Bowman was an OLB in college and Sean Lee spent his senior season as the MLB

And cowboys don’t need OLB’s. That’s pretty simple huh. They could move him around and try and groom him like we’re doing. Or they could take a guy and play him at his true position right away.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 5, 2010 12:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

You do realize

that Bowman played 4-3 OLB in college so he would not play 3-4 OLB, right? You do know the difference? If the Cowboys drafted Bowman, he would play ILB for them, not OLB.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 5, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

That is the only reason they wanted Lee over Bowman? Now, that’s just insulting to Lee.

Again, if the Cowboys had drafted Bowman, what position do you see Bowman playing in the Cowboys defense?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 6, 2010 11:06 AM PDT up reply actions  

None of them

Because he’s too short for the Boy’s who don’t have any starting LB’s under 6’2".

 But if I had to pick… looking at their backups… Steve Octavian, Dominic Ware’s backup at ROLB, is almost exactly the same size so probably LOLB. But they don’t need that position so he probably wouldn’t be drafted by them and they would go for a taller guy to play ILB. I wonder if it will play out like that….

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 6, 2010 11:41 AM PDT up reply actions  

Dominic Ware?
"gives ground to get off blocks and needs to learn to use his hands to disengage. Can be a tick late to diagnose and bites on play-action. Has a 29 1/2-inch vertical jump. Durability and character need to be evaluated. Immature. Rubbed coaches the wrong way at the Combine, coming off as selfish and arrogant in interviews."

Does that sound like a guy you would play at 3-4 OLB?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 6, 2010 2:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

It sounds like a guy I wouldn't draft

if I was the Cowboys. I’d have probably drafted Sean Lee

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 6, 2010 4:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Which is why they drafted Lee

a whole round before Bowman was drafted.

They drafted Lee, not because of size, but because of skill. However, the off the field stuff did not help Bowman either. And Cowboys defense does not assign guys to a position because of size, otherwise, explain why Zach Thomas started alongside Bradie James two years ago.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 6, 2010 5:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because...

Zach Thomas was an absolute stud for 10 years? You put guys out there that produce like him regardless of other factors. I don’t care if there is a direct order from Jerry Jones that every Linebacker be 7 feet tall if Brian Urlacher in his prime comes knocking. Me and Jerry will talk it over after Urlacher goes to the pro bowl that year.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 6, 2010 7:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

Obviously you're not

Cause I’ve dominated you over and over again. It is completely about height in all but the most outlandish situations. If you this Bowman is Urlacher in his prime gimme what you’re smoking. They want their backers to be a certain size. You say that 3-4OLBs are big. Wrong. Their smallest guys are their OLBs. Their ILBs are 6’2" and taller. Navorro is too short. Sean Lee isn’t. Navorro and Sean Lee are about even talent wise. Dallas didn’t want the short guy to play ILB where they need players. Dallas made the right pick. And their grade on the players is correct for their team and philosophy.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 7, 2010 7:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

No, their starting OLBs are the biggest LBs on the team. Isn’t that the same as your argument? That Bowman could not be an ILB on their team because he’s shorter than the starting ILBs. But Bowman is the same height/weight as one of the backup OLBs means that he would be an OLB too, even though Bowman’s skill-set does not fit a 3-4 OLB. Jon Beason is also the same size as that backup OLB, would he play OLB because they are the same size? And no, their ILBs are not all 6’2" or taller. Jason Williams, third round pick from 2009, is 6’1". And when 4-3 OLB Keith Brooking came to the Cowboys, he moved to ILB. Did he move inside because he is 6’2"?

And this is not a discussion of where I am saying they should have drafted Bowman. I believe they drafted Lee because he fits the skill set they want in an ILB, not because he was a whole two inches taller than Bowman. So to say that the Cowboys disqualify players from their draft board because of size seems a bit off base.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 7, 2010 8:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Davis is a tackle and Iupati is a guard.....

I think that plays a role into their differences.

Iupati’s a bit high for a rookie. I don’t think any of them should be above 80 simply cause they haven’t performed.

"Lord, beer me strength."

by TexansDC on Jun 29, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

one-handed DL tosses

give you +5 OVR in this Madden.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 29, 2010 1:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

D-Lineman toss

Can’t remember what game, we had a link…here:

http://crazymotion.net/mike-iupati-77-utah-state-game/wfDVj8KgmePAjAy.html

go to about 1:30 I think…there are more examples of this out there too.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 5:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

ahh

I thought you meant something in the madden game. That really gives a +5 ovr?
Sounds suspect. A guy could do that twice in a game to someone he is dominating and be 10 points higher the next game? Well, the next roster update…??

by crumpedup15 on Jun 30, 2010 11:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

nah

it was a joke. Saying that since Iupati one-handed-DL-tossed a guy in real life, they had to just add +5 OVR to him because of his sheer awesomeness.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 1, 2010 6:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Davis has a lot to prove

the dude is inconsistent. He can be very, very good, but he also pretty bad on occaison.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 29, 2010 3:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I believe this is referring to college though

which is really the only competitive in-pads play we have to go on thus far.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 5:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

Davis wasn't particularly amazing at Rutgers either

Just has a lot of potential down the road

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

his good was pretty good though

so you saw what he could be if consistent.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 10:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Of course I can see the potential there

I just also see some huge demerits. His lateral movement and especially the first step of his kick-slide was farrrrr from polished and often left him off balance against outside inside moves from speed rushers. His motor isn’t the best and he’s not self-disciplined at all. Strong leadership can fix that… Something special will be needed to fix the placement of his feet and sub-par stride in his kick-slide.

Upside he’s got a big frame and the speed and agility of his feet are not in question. Just him placing them ineffciently. My knock is I think he won’t a very good tackle till at least 4-5 years down the road and will need 6-8 years before he’s elite. Also his biggest weakness is the type of thing that gets QBs not just hit but absolutely crushed. Cause when he gets caught with those out/in moves he’ll absolutely wiff entirely.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 3:14 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

have you watched the Mic'd up Solari thing?

I think that guy can coach, motivate, etc. I have high hopes.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 1, 2010 6:32 AM PDT up reply actions  

Alex Smith?

Any idea what his numbers will look like for this year?

by StereoPete on Jun 29, 2010 2:29 PM PDT reply actions  

If it's true that the raters only look at stats…

Then Alex should be in the range of 80-84 OVR in my mind.

I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
Credit to iaalexeeff
It's official: I'm a Buster Posey fan..... Who isn't?

by Hoopers Judge on Jun 29, 2010 4:34 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Finally my 2 cents

Gore… He has to be faster hands down. For some reason everytime I run with Gore he seems like a 85 speed guy. A guy that can get 1k for 4 years and he is not a burner 95 sp 92 agl 96 acc trk 95 els 90. If he is our go to guy Madden should reflect that more than a 93. He should be at least 96-97 with injury being his weakness. Last time I checked he has A potential and not at 30.

Crabtree…. Okay so if his potential is A why is his rating the same from the draft? Plus you give this guy an 88 spd? i know he is not a burner but 90 to 92 at best for speed, acc 95 agil 98 ( he can get into position for the catch). You have to advance the ratings from last season till now.

OL…. I believe that on average they should be between 88-99. Just the fact that an guy with 70 or lower would suck. I think around the second half of the season we will see our line ratings will be fine

VD… Let’s see he run a 4.3 and is considered the best run blocking TE in the game and he is still behind Witten. Witten injury prone and that should bring down his rating down a little.

Goldson… 80 I am cool with that but I need to see his Str 70 ish and his Acc/agl 90 ish plus we know he is a hard hitter so strength and hit should reflect that as well 70 / 90
Mays strength has to be higher 68 that is an insult his combine was top notch.

Okay the guys I am hoping for decent rating potential
A. Smith/N. Davis the qb ratings should advance high if 1 he gets MVP and Super Bowl MVP
also, the league is protecting qb so their careers are lasting longer. So the ratings should reflect that.

CBs can they pls do something about the awareness. I mean a guy been in the league for 4 yrs and still have the defensive awareness of a rookie? I wish they get that part right. I hate to see a guy with B potential and cannot get into the 80s.

Finally, ratings in general, if a person has A or B potential suppose have a rating increase during the offseason. I need to see that from my PS3. I need to see P Willis, V Davis, M Crabtree, J Morgan get those ratings boost. I really hate that they do it during the season.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 29, 2010 3:09 PM PDT reply actions  

no

His Overall Rating…

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 29, 2010 3:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Still too high

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 29, 2010 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

why?

why is the Niners best offensive weapon should not be in the high 90s?

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 30, 2010 12:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

Because that is quite homerish to think Gore is that good

And you don’t make a player better just because he’s the best weapon on the team.

Chris Johnson – 99
Adrian Peterson – 98

Maurice Jones-Drew – 96
Steven Jackson – 95

You would be saying that Gore is better than Jones-Drew and Jackson, but right under AP which would make Gore the third best RB in the league. Gore is not done enough to prove he’s the third best RB in the league.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

Gore is a 93. And I think Jones-Drew is overrated at 96. He should be a 93-94 also. AP and CJ should be head and shoulders above the rest right now.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

so

Body of work :( sigh the knock on gore is injuries, not speed. He can run. This is a video game all player ratings are exact, my complaint is if he is 1st option for our offense let his rating justify that. Jackson (rams) is there first option and wow he is at 95. Why can’t the 49ers have that on offense?

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 30, 2010 9:13 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Oops

I mean all players ratings are NOT exact.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 30, 2010 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions  

He plays just fine on this game.

You can’t say because he’s the best player on our offense that he deserves a higher rating, it just doesn’t make sense. At best he needs a couple more points in strength, and if that gives him a higher rating then fine. Gore has always been a beast in Madden.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Really? (south park)

NFL leading rusher… Four years straight 1k yards (with injuries). Great awareness for picking up blitz. He did start in Miami ahead of 2 RBs already in the league. I’m not saying he is the best RB, but he is a top 5 no hands down.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 30, 2010 9:21 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Frank Gore is already a top 5 RB at 93

You do understand that while Gore has put up good stats, Jackson, Jones-Drew, Johnson, Peterson have put up better stats, right? The only one that hasn’t put up stats comparable to Gore’s is MJD, but MJD would drop two points at most because of his unique skill set and still be better than Gore.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 1:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't agree with some of this...

…you’re asking too much for many of these guys. Gore isn’t that fast, that’s severely overrating the o-line. You’re saying at Chilo Rachal and Anthony Davis should be rated among the top five-ten of their position – it just doesn’t fit. Gore should be slow on the game because he trucks people, and Rachal should be a 79 at best. Davis is fine as a 75 (the tackle)

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

No

In General the OL avg strength should be 88-99 in regard to strength. I am okay with the ratings for OL. As for the Gore I wrote a comment below.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 29, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ok, apologies.

You didn’t say strength on the OL bit so I couldn’t tell. I’ll be sure to post their strength as soon as I have the numbers.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 4:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

My fault

I missed some words on that one. I just have this thing about guys being fast but they cannot have strength. Mays smh

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 29, 2010 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions  

For the ratings of OL

That’s true but in Madden I would like to see an average that does not go below that range. What if they give a guy 75 strength with A potential. Can you really start him knowing his strength will not increase? Players get stronger and faster but they decided that it’s not worth the adding to rating progression

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 29, 2010 6:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

Terrible

Iupati is soooo much stronger.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 29, 2010 11:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know

I think that Iupati’s rankings are ridiculous. Yeah I know he’s a rookie, but c’mon.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 30, 2010 12:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

dont worry

he’ll be a 92 by week 8

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 5:26 AM PDT up reply actions  

I don't know what's so ridiculous

He’s an 84 overall and a powerful run blocker. The only things that could possibly go up would be to raise his strength (which I agree with) and his awareness. However, it makes sense for his awareness to be low as a rookie. He’s not that great in pass blocking so it’s not surprising when you look at the breakdown of the stats. 84 is more than fair for a rookie.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 8:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

His overall ranking is fair

I’m just complaining about the strength.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I can see that argument

Here are the other rookies that look to have more strength than Iupati:

NT Dan Williams – 96
NT Terrance Cody – 97

I think that is stronger than Williams should be, but we should be able to see if Iupati is as strong as Williams is during the season. However, Iupati was tied with 3 other O-linemen as the strongest O-linemen (93 STR):

Mike Iupati
Anthony Davis
John Jerry
Vlad Ducasse

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 1:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

i'm too lazy to look

but is there some evidence I’ve forgotten about regarding Cody’s strength? Or is it “strength” as in “you can’t move his fat arse”?

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 1:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm going to go with

immovable object because it is probably easier just to give him a ton of strength than to make a new rating. But Cody is pretty strong too.

And I forgot to put Suh in that list above. He comes in at 95 STR.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 2:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Giving Davis a 75 is being kind right now.

He might one day be amazing. But right now… I’ll just say he’s got a long way to go.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 29, 2010 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

yeah but for video game purposes

His 40 time at the combine was one of those who play faster than his forty. He was a starter at Miami (ahead of Clinton Portis and MaGahee) Four straight years of 1k yards. He is our first option and at one time he was the NFL leading rusher. Gore is still in his prime and the last time I checked player ratings are suppose to increase. That’s my complaint. This is a game and I want my player ratings to reflect that. If I get Gore 2k and MVP for the season. how can they justify 1+ overall rating next season. I need to see rewards for my players that perform that season. This is why a lot of us play Madden as well as compete online. Nobody want to draft a player and the next season his rating does not increase or decrease! Then you see other simulated teams get ratings boost. That’s all I am saying.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 29, 2010 4:00 PM PDT reply actions  

I know

But speed doesn’t make a running back, it’s a combination of things. Chris Johnson gets by just on speed, Gore gets by and powering through people and making one good cut. His speed, in my opinion, is right in the realm, maybe one or two more points but not much more.

Note that just because I disagree with you guys personally doesn’t mean I’m not taking it into consideration!

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 29, 2010 4:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

It’s cool. I just hate to see these other RB’s that have one good season and they are considered the top 10 backs in the league. His body of work speaks for itself. Injury should be the only thing that keep Gore from a 99 rating. I am a ratings guys and I want to see somebody on the O side at 97 to 99 when I buy Madden. I mean right off the start menu =)

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 29, 2010 4:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hmmm never new ...

… that the player’s had rating’s … I pick the Pat’s and do the 5wr set and basically i’m unstoppable , read the D and i’m Montana all over again and i have yet to run ., been playing since Tecmo bowl …!!

Kewl

by Edggy on Jun 29, 2010 6:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Works great with the colts or saints too

by jobharve on Jun 30, 2010 8:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'll just say that Heitman's rating should be higher and Staley's lower

But my biggest beef with this game is the progression in franchise mode.

Have they fixed it?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 12:06 AM PDT reply actions  

Just an FYI, for offline franchise...

…you can change the potential of a player.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 1:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

Does that really matter?

With the current progression system the players will never reach that potential.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Uh...?

I’ve never had a problem with progression. When a player has an A potential they get up there. What are your exact issues so I can put them through to some of my people?

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 1:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

well,

daddy never hugged him and…

;-)

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

What about B or C

Do you see any progression with them in franchise? CBs and RBs are the worst for me with that type of potential.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 30, 2010 2:33 PM PDT up reply actions  

You can move their potential up to an A for frnachise.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 2:45 PM PDT up reply actions  

A 27 year old player at 88 overall will never reach 99

Even if his potential is “A”.

The progression is too reliant on age instead of actual production. Only rookies progress in their first few years, but they stop when they’re like 25 or so.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

You want all the players to reach 99?

I’m not wholly disagreeing with you. I absolutely hate the way progression is done now, and I hope they listen to the fans in that regard.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 4:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, no.....that's ridiculous

A guy like Moran Norris shouldn’t be allowed to reach 99.

But what about Alex Smith?
I used him in franchise mode in 09 and 10 Madden and had some very good seasons and he never progressed.
He actually regressed in Madden 09 after a 3800 yd, 28 TD, 5 INT season.

I mean, WTF?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 10:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I do know what you mean.

Unfortunately, my clout doesn’t extend that far.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just keep getting their attention

There is no harm in trying. Because in the fake franchise Draft, it seems every position gets a guy with speed regardless of potential.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jul 1, 2010 5:54 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is there anything I can do?

I’ll complain as much as I can.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 1, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

True

But they retire around 34 to 36 range. So they need to compensate that a player may lose certain abilities but retain another. RBs lose speed but awareness and pass blocking can still progress. I’m just giving examples.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jul 1, 2010 5:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

But they don't really progress based on production

I find it unfair that if a player keeps performing, the game goes out of it’s way to make sure he sucks by the time he’s 30.

There can never be a Brett Favre, Jerry Rice or Emmit Smith with the way the game is set up (unless I play it on rookie…which is really boring).

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 1, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

I really hate that part of the game

In one of my seasons, I had Justin Smith coming off a 10 sack season and he dropped a point. He had a good number of tackles so I have no idea what is the explanation for why he would drop. It makes sense if a player does bad as he gets older, but a player who is still productive should not drop just because of their age.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 1, 2010 4:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's the reason why I still play old versions of Madden rather than the new ones.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 2, 2010 2:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

I wish I could download the new roster to 2010 Madden...

guess I’ll have to hock my copy and pony up for the new one if I want to play with our new 49ers toys

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 5:27 AM PDT reply actions  

You can create the rookies and play offline

I don’t know if Madden 10 allows you to download user created rosters (MLB 10 The Show has it), but if it does you can bet that someone will create a roster for the 2010 season.

You just won’t be able to play online with it.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I could care less about online play for the time being

especially since I have it for the Wii, which no one has. But I still like to play Madden as the 49ers so even if it’s not PS3 or Xbox 360…I’m fine with it.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 1:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

So you're on Wii?

Then I’m not sure you have user created rosters….

Go online and check.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions  

I will, thanks

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 1, 2010 6:35 AM PDT up reply actions  

Staley is our best lineman

He is a monster in pass coverage, hes big, quick (for a lineman), and physical. If David Baas was worth anything and offered some help in inside coverage, Staley would be closer to a 90 overall. Heitman on the other hand struggles against quicker pass rushers, I think if he dropped around 10 pounds he’d be better.
And about that comment about Davis not doing as many reps as Mays, that doesnt mean anything, Brady Quinn did more reps than most runningbacks do, and more than JaMarcus Russel did, does that make him stronger? no, just better at bench press, which is the most over rated combine workout.

by 49ersfanConner on Jun 30, 2010 11:48 AM PDT reply actions  

Heitmann does not struggle against quicker pass rushers.

Staley isn’t near his level. I’ll stop replying to these because I’ve said it over and over.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 12:23 PM PDT up reply actions  

From what Ive seen

Staley is better in pass blocking, Heitmann gets more push on run blocking, but Staley can shut down blitz artist

by 49ersfanConner on Jun 30, 2010 12:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

Heitman is a great Center

He can handle all opposing defensive tackles.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 12:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

Please tell me,

Where did I say Heitmann is bad? Hes very good, and if you read my post I said he struggles against quicker rushers, most DT’s are not quick rushers, however linebackers and some defensive ends are. Hes a very solid blocker, I just feel that maybe if he slimmed down a bit he would be better in pass blocking.

by 49ersfanConner on Jun 30, 2010 12:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

It's not a matter of you calling him bad.

It’s a matter of you saying he’s not as good as he is, and saying that Staley is better. Heitmann is top 10ish in pass and run blocking for centers in the league, and Staley is around the 20s in such for LTs and just not as good as Heitmann.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 1:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hell name me 8

just 8 centers that are better than him. I have him no lower than 8th.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 1:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

Exactly

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

Heitmann

Probably based on how the whole OL protection in general. He is good center, but not sure if because of OC. I would like to see him progress this season.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 30, 2010 2:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

One more time

OT requires a more athletic and better athlete to play the position. If Staley played the C position, he may be better than Heitmann. Iupati is a beast cause he is a proto typical OT that is playing Guard. That is why Iupati is a rare player. How well do you think that Heitmann would play at LT? Out of the leauge inn a year? Back-up? OK starter? But not as good as Staley I would imagine. That is why Staley is the best O-lineman we have. Cause he is a better athlete and could succeed at C where Heitmann would not be very good at OT.

by ericalancanty on Jul 2, 2010 8:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow

You’ve got it all wrong.

Iupati is not in any way shape or form a prototypical OT. He’s built like a guard. OT does not require more athleticism—it requires a different skill set.

You claim Heitmann would be out of the league in a year playing LT. Same goes for Staley switching to center. It’s a completely different skill set, just like LT and RT are different skill sets.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jul 2, 2010 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

So when Mike Mayock says that Iupati is

A prototypical size OT, then I should just listen to you? No offense, but Mayock is a little more knowledgeable in this area than anyone on here. If he was retarded, then the NFL would not hire him for their Combine coverage. He has prototypical size, speed, and arm length to be an OT. But he likes to play G. It is also the reason that they tried him at OT during the combine. It is also the reason that they said a team COULD move him to the outside.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 12:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mayock didn’t say he was a prototypical OT. He said he could play OT if need be. He also went on to say that Iupati fit nicely at the guard position.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 12:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yes they COULD play him at OT

but after everyone saw Iupati get destroyed at the Senior Bowl and Senior Bowl practices in pass coverage, most teams dropped the idea of playing Iupati at OT. So even if Mayock said Iupati has the size, speed, and arm length to play OT, he hasn’t put it together to play the position. But he excelled in college at OG and that is why he was the first guard taken in the draft.

And just because a “draft expert” said something does not make it a fact or true. None of the draft experts predicted Jimmy Clausen falling into the second round or that Tim Tebow would go before Clausen.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 3, 2010 1:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

Seriously

put down the pipe. Iupati is a guard and a prototypical guard. He just happens to have good enough feet to fill in at OT if need be. Mayyyybe.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 2:17 AM PDT up reply actions  

You're underrating Smileyman

And misquoting Mayock.

Smiley probably knows more about Offensive linemen than anyone else here on the site.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 9:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

:[ That's my favorite thing though.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 9:43 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wow didn't read your before posting mine

Great post. Because we said the EXACT same thing lol

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 2:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

Eh.. you don't get it

So I’m not going to argue with you. You’re saying Staley is a better athlete so he can probably play center better, when the best offensive lineman aren’t necessary crazy athletes. You don’t judge a player on athleticism. Tony Mandarich ring a bell?

Heitmann makes less mistakes and handles more defensive players better than Joe Staley does. That makes him our best lineman.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 2, 2010 10:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hey, I like Heimann, he's a beast

He rarely gives up sacks and is very durable and dependable. The question was, who is the best o-lineman on the team. We can debate back and forth all night. It is just our opinions. Mine is based on what I hear from the leauge. I have never heard that Heitmann is the best lineman….just you guys….I hear than Staley is the best. I hear that from the commentators during the game, I hear it from ESPN and the NFL analysts. In fact, I have never heard from anyone on TV…you know, the ones that get paid and have total access to the players…..that Heitmann is the best. So as I respect your opinion, you can respect mine, even if you don’t agree.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 12:42 AM PDT up reply actions  

Heitmann makes more blocks. Allows less sacks. Better offensive lineman and one of the better centers in the league.

Look at it this way: Heitmann is rated as an 84 CENTER. I don’t care what Staley is rated at this point. Heitmann is an 84 CENTER and is rated lower than other CENTERS who are not as good as him. Heitmann deserves an increase.

Joe Staley is rated as an 87 LEFT TACKLE. He is rated higher than some LEFT TACKLES who are better than him at LEFT TACKLE. Joe Staley has never played like an 87-rated LEFT TACKLE. I think he CAN do so but he has not thus far. He deserves a decrease.

If I present Donny Moore (the ratings guy) with a list of everyone to increase and not a single negative criticism, he will simply ignore me. So I am saying decrease Staley and increase Heitmann. I wasn’t, at the time, trying to suggest that he deserves it because Staley is higher, it’s just the way I need to present things.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Fair enough....

I’m more concerned about Alex right now. Tired of easy passes going right into the stands. His short and medium accuracy sucks. (last year)

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 12:57 AM PDT up reply actions  

The point of focus in my mind...

…is Alex Smith and Shawntae Spencer. After that it’s probably Dashon Goldson, etc.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 1:02 AM PDT up reply actions  

Most "analysts"

Are morons.
Don’t we all remember Emmit Smith?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 9:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well there's your problem
Mine is based on what I hear from the leauge. I have never heard that Heitmann is the best lineman….just you guys….I hear than Staley is the best. I hear that from the commentators during the game, I hear it from ESPN and the NFL analysts.

I can bet you my house that Fooch knows more about the 49ers than any hack on ESPN.

Why do you think we’re all here at ninersnation rather than at the NFC West blog on ESPN? Or NFL.com?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 9:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Center is more cerebral than OT

Center controls the rest of the line if he’s good and makes everyone better. Staley would probably be out of the league in a year at Center. Completely different jobs and completely different skillsets. Heitmann is a better center than Staley is OT and by a good margin.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 2:14 AM PDT up reply actions  

Heitman almost never has to face a DE

Execpt on stunts.
And when they do stunt, they always go for Chilo Rachal (he gets all confused) because Heitman would still own them.

He’s just a much better player than Joe Staley.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jun 30, 2010 3:26 PM PDT up reply actions  

For a lineman bench does have significance

The punch used when engaging D-linemen is an explosive inclined bench press motion also utilizing the legs.

Davis’ 21 is lousy for most positions not even accounting for his size. For comparison Earl Thomas did 21.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 12:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Most blocking strength comes from the lower body

Im not saying that arm strength doesnt come into play though. And even if he did a low number that doesnt mean hes weak, maybe he just has bad bench bress form. All Im saying is that bench reps is very decieving, just because you did a high number doesnt mean your stronger than someone who did a low number.

by 49ersfanConner on Jun 30, 2010 12:43 PM PDT up reply actions  

Dexter McCluster did 20

and he weighs like 180

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 12:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

But thats my point

There is no way he would ever over power a 320 lineman. Just because you do a lot of reps doesnt necessarily mean your really strong. And besides, Davis is a very agile guy for his size. I read an article on 49ers.com and apparently the guy can dunk, and pretty well. While that doesnt mean hes a good player it does show his athletisism, I think this guy will do fine

by 49ersfanConner on Jun 30, 2010 12:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Shorter arms

makes it easier to bench press

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jun 30, 2010 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I was gonna say
Just physics. Longer distance moving same weight requires more work=more effort for each rep. Long armed lineman have to work harder to do the same reps as a short armed safety.

by crumpedup15 on Jul 1, 2010 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

Then explain to me why Okung did 38

His arms are 36" compared to A. Davis’ 34" Maybe its just that Anthony Davis has a very weak upper body for his size.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 1, 2010 2:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well yeah

we knew that when we drafted him. All I’m saying is that if you’re going to compare bench press results compare them with guys of the same size.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jul 1, 2010 10:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

Because

Okung is a MEAST. That’s half man half beast. There is no comparison between Okung and A Davis. I would much rather have Okung but that’s why he got drafted so high and Davis fell to us.

by crumpedup15 on Jul 1, 2010 10:15 PM PDT up reply actions  

Some guys prepare better for the bench press.

It’s about stamina with the bench press. It takes months to be able to build up to thoses kind of numbers. Some guys don’t lift as well as others, or as much.

by ericalancanty on Jul 2, 2010 8:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

But most any lineman can do more than 21 reps of 225

If you’re 320 lbs you should be throwing that shit up like nothing. Mathematically that’s like me putting 112.5 on the bar. I could be out of shape as hell and still put that up 25-30 times.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 2:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

I just recently started lifting again.

My friend and I like to create our own likeness on the game…I play next to Willis BTW : ). My friend is always saying that he is stronger and faster that me, so I said we will do our own combine. Now, I’m strong but not NFL strong so we used 135lbs. Bar and one 45 on each side. We had 2 weeks to prepare. When I first tried 135lbs I managed to get up 20. 2 weeks later after doing this everyother day, I was able to put up 40 reps at 135lbs.

Now 225 is only 90 lbs more, right……yeah!
40 reps at 135lbs
12 reps at 225lbs.

It is true that improper form can kill you when you lift 225lbs.
Some of these guys just don’t put that much time in the gym to be able to build it up. Some guys like Mays do…

BTW….my friend only put up 25 after 2 weeks, so we settled it.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 10:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

And Patrick Willis did 22

so does that mean that Earl Thomas is almost as strong as Patrick Willis? Justin Forsett did 26 reps so is Forsett stronger than Patrick Willis?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 2:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

besides

he’s not punching 28 times in a single play, like you would bench in a single set. Obviously he wasn’t in the best shape in college and/or the combine. That’s quickly turning around according to the insiders. I’m sure he’ll be plenty strong enough to do his job when he get’s his shot.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 1:28 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because the Combine shows so much about football skill...

And why would the number of reps be more important than say the max bench?

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 1:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Rankings

I think that rankings are really overated, I think everyone rates their players as if they were the best.

by DS469 on Jun 30, 2010 1:50 PM PDT reply actions  

It's my job to try and ensure that the ratings are fair.

For instance, I will be trying to get a Joe Staley decrease, and maybe more once I actually see the rest of the ratings.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 1:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

but aLex sMith is da bom bruh

hee shuld b btr then pAyton Maning!

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jun 30, 2010 1:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

How much are we talking here?

because I wouldn’t make him under an 85.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 2:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I’m going to suggest 85, but 84 is the minimum for me.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 2:21 PM PDT up reply actions  

going to be tough case

They like to keep players at certain rating close if they are unproven. Like last year Hill, Alex were so close in rating you could start either. And based on the team overall rating that 79 might be Alex Smith. I am backing you on this one, from reports, blogs and players; he is showing that first round talent.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jun 30, 2010 2:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

FINE!

But if he hits 83 or less, I’m going to flood the 49ers Madden discussion board with messages about how the team captain makes things up and doesn’t listen anyone else’s opinion and demand for a new team captain. You wouldn’t like me when I’m angry because I am the Hulk of Trolling

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 2:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

I browse Sherdog.

I’ve likely seen better trolls in the last thirty seconds than you.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jun 30, 2010 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

Easy, boy. He ain’t worth it.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 30, 2010 4:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I need to get on a proxy and go back there sometime.

Then u can see the true extent of my trolling prowess. When I channel the Emporer and let the hate flow through me there is little in the interwebs with the power to stop my trolls. I studied the Donny7 guide to trolling.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 5:20 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Listening to him on the radio

When whatever show that was had Trigg on it called him was awesome. “What do u think about the fight Donny?” “GSP by RNC… Trigg can’t defend the choke.” Que Trigg exploding.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jun 30, 2010 5:23 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

In stead of trying to lower Staleys ratings

Why don’t you just try to raise Heitmanns ratings…..There is no reason to try to lower any 49ers ratings. Just a thought.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 12:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Because it doesn't work like that!

Do you know how hard it is to get these people to listen?! Do you think I want all these players decreased? Hell no I don’t, man! Don’t talk to me like I hate hate hate on Staley alright? In case you forgot, I’m a 49ERS FAN.

“There is no reason to try to lower any 49ers ratings.” Yes there is.

I’ll post what I said earlier again:

If I present Donny Moore (the ratings guy) with a list of everyone to increase and not a single negative criticism, he will simply ignore me. So I am saying decrease Staley and increase Heitmann. I wasn’t, at the time, trying to suggest that he deserves it because Staley is higher, it’s just the way I need to present things.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I think I wrote that before you

said that you needed to show Moore increases and decreases in player ratings so he will look at what you say.
I never said that you hate Staley…as I know you like all 49er players….xcept Payman….I know that you like Heitmann more than Staley, and that’s ok. I like all the lineman the same, as I really don’t pay attention to them as much as skilled players.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions  

wallace a 70?

yet Boone a 58???

Crabtree closer to 90, heitmann and staley swap, Delanie better be 86 speed or higher and high catch, high BTK too

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 1, 2010 7:42 PM PDT reply actions  

Yeah there's a point where they just stop caring.

They’ll regret that.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 1, 2010 8:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

If it's your job, you better do it right.

I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
Credit to iaalexeeff
It's official: I'm a Buster Posey fan..... Who isn't?

by Hoopers Judge on Jul 4, 2010 6:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Eh but its hard to get reliable stats on them

If they never see a playing field how do you know what their game speed and agility is or their offensive/defensive awareness?

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 6:19 PM PDT up reply actions  

so our OL will average a 80

hmmm, i guess that’s….ok. Wondering how well we’ll perform in the game with that. I hope Rachal is rated higher than Snyder by week 1 if Rachal is starting. I hate having to change it when I’m not in franchise mode.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 1, 2010 7:47 PM PDT reply actions  

Considering we were one of the league’s worst o-lines last year I’m pretty happy with them.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 1, 2010 8:03 PM PDT up reply actions  

Goldson

Needs more speed like 88-89???

Niner Ball!!!!

by Batman559 on Jul 1, 2010 8:15 PM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Yeah, definitely.

He’s very fast out there, great closing speed.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 1, 2010 8:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yes and he’s pretty good in zone coverage. Maybe his Accel. Is high

Niner Ball!!!!

by Batman559 on Jul 1, 2010 9:00 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Probably, I’m sure he has decent agility too, but I’m not privvy to that information.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 1, 2010 9:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think Clements is pretty good at 84

mainly because of how some of the other CBs in the league are rated. I think it would be fair to see both Clements and Spencer at 84.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 1, 2010 9:20 PM PDT reply actions  

My problem is...

…the fact that there’s some other cornerbacks rated higher who aren’t better.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 1, 2010 9:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

I think

it’s because he was hurt last year. I seem to notice that when players are hurt for most of the previous year their rankings go down a little bit the next year in madden.

by crumpedup15 on Jul 1, 2010 10:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow

So do they even compare the last Madden and make player progression from that? Seem like they are dropping players on purpose. Not a good look EA Sports. Jason Hill (ran 4.2 or 4.3) can they please increase his speed back to normal. His injury should hurt his ratings more. The Niners are looking like it will be a fan favorite to play. For me as well.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jul 1, 2010 11:07 PM PDT reply actions  

Hill is fast in 2010

I put him out there on KR (because I can’t get him on the field much otherwise) and once he got through the hole he was hard to catch.

"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter

by Tre9er on Jul 2, 2010 4:15 AM PDT up reply actions  

I knew it, I just F**KING knew it.

How does Smith get a 77 rating and Sanchez get an 82?

Sanchez had a horrible year with the INT 20 of them.

Smith gets 0 respect. I thought that he deserved an 80-85 rating.

He had a slightly better year than Matt Ryan did, I wounder how Ryan is rated…90?

by ericalancanty on Jul 2, 2010 9:01 PM PDT reply actions  

I'll be advocating a raise.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 2, 2010 10:17 PM PDT up reply actions  

Thank you

I don’t need it to be unreasonable, just fair.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

I completely agree with you.

I didn’t even think of the Sanchez comparison, that will help a lot.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 12:47 AM PDT up reply actions  

http://espn.go.com/videogames/madden11?teamId=18

This is where i got his numbers…they have a few teams listed now.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 12:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah, there 49ers unveil isn't for another two weeks.

Showed them with my links, didn’t I?

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 12:53 AM PDT up reply actions  

2 weeks

What am i to do for 2 weeks, bang my head against my computer……I hate waiting.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 12:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

These are the ratings they'll be unveiling.

Leaked in a video and then I have a buddy at EA who sent me over some things.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 12:59 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sanchez is at 82?

What a [site decorum] joke.

That guy is just bad and has probably looked the worst out of all the rookie QBs last year (Josh Freeman was downright amazing at times last season).

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 9:55 AM PDT up reply actions  

Sanchez has the best line in football right now

and still looked bad. I don’t know how he was taken at 5. He stunk at SC too. Now the kid they have there now could be special. We’ll see how he develops. I’ve seen flashes where he looks amazing and other times when he looks average, (like the rest of the SC team he was playing on last year).

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 11:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

I'm not denying that he could be good

He has his moments.

But he’s grossly overrated in the game.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 4:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sanchez?

Or SC’s child prodigy at the helm now? Also – Carroll royally screwed that kid. He’s circling Seahawks games already.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 6:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

Eh, all of them I guess.

Sanchez and Carroll’s boyfriend are both overrated.

Yet they both have had some good moments (Sanchez is still much better than Barkley though).

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 10:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Than Barkley was last year

I expect the kid to blast off this year even without any talent around him. Barkley was a 19 year old starting Frosh QB. Give him a year or two. I think he could be something special.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 10:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe

I don’t forsee any good things for this USC team….

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 5, 2010 1:51 AM PDT up reply actions  

I expect Barkley

to basically be like Locker. Dominating on a team of nobodies. Nobody is going to SC for a couple years.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 5, 2010 12:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

Does Barkley have Locker's talent though?

We’ll see I guess…

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 5, 2010 11:29 PM PDT up reply actions  

What happened

between the draft and now to change players ratings? T Mays was a 75 immediately after the draft and now he’s a 71? Same with Iupati dropping from 84 to 83.
What is the link to the madden player ratings website? Is there such a website?

by crumpedup15 on Jul 3, 2010 12:21 AM PDT reply actions  

There's not really right now. There's a discussion board on EA's forums.

But these ratings aren’t officially out there yet. They were leaked… I guess by me.

As far as the rookies go, there was a vote thing after the draft where people voted on the ratings and I suppose both of them went down.

They are, of course, subject to change, but in the build of the game RIGHT NOW these are the ratings.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 12:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

Moore said they could go up or down by a couple pionts

But Mays dropping 4 points is rediculous. Did they do it cause he dropped to the 2nd round…If that is the case then Davis should go up from a 75, cause he got drafted higher than they thought.

by ericalancanty on Jul 3, 2010 12:49 AM PDT up reply actions  

ok 1st post here i LOVE madden and have been playing from the 1st madden on 1st Gen. HUGE niner fan also for many years and all i see Ninjames is the speed like you pointed out with a few guys. Vernon is the fastest TE in football he should be a 92 93 clearly which should put him on par with Witten. Look at VD last year nuff said. Taylor Mays ran a 4.3 40 or whatever he should be a 97 98 spd 95 is ridic along Goldson should be like a 91 92. Also Willis should be on par with VD with a 92 or so look at him chasing the Cards WR down from behind afta he got 5 yds head start on him, last is Crabtree with a 88 that is the most criminal spd on our team he should be like a 93. GIT R DONE ninjames talk to the EA fools haha

by TWISM on Jul 3, 2010 2:21 PM PDT reply actions  

Crabs speed really isn't that great

He’s a powerful guy with great hands that makes incredibly precise movements in his routes. If anything his Agility should be 97ish. 88-90 is just fine for his speed.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 3, 2010 3:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'd say that 90 would be fair

But I don’t really know which WRs they have rated as faster than him.

Ninjames can you give us a small list of the WRs that are rated faster than Crabs?
Or at least give us a link to where the WR rankings are?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'll see what I can do.

From what I can remember, 90 sounds very reasonable for Crabtree, with a 92-93 for Jason Hill, a 91 for Brandon Jones, an 89 for Morgan and a 97 for Ginn. Zeigler should be an 88-89.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 7:41 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well I don't know about Ziegler

I only saw him briefly in 08.
Is he even in the game?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Zeigler is fast enough to be an 88 at worst.

And yes, he’s in the game because I got him in the game. Just like I got Boone, Miller, Clayton, Briggs and Sheets in the game. Single-handedly.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

Clayton?

lol.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 5, 2010 1:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah.

What’s wrong with that? :[

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 5, 2010 4:08 AM PDT up reply actions  

Nothing

I’m just remembering the good old days of the Pre-Season of Clayton.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 5, 2010 11:23 AM PDT up reply actions  

What the heck

is this new rating SWAGGER?? What impact does it have on gameplay?
I don’t need any explanaiton as to what swagger is in real life as I have plenty of swagga… :)
But what does it mean for the game?

by crumpedup15 on Jul 3, 2010 9:45 PM PDT reply actions  

In all honesty it shouldn't affect the gameplay at all.

It will mostly have to do with celebrations and taunts.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

Shouldn't lead to penalties or stuff like that right?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 3, 2010 10:13 PM PDT up reply actions  

Nope.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 3, 2010 10:39 PM PDT up reply actions  

It can cause your best WR

to call his starting QB gay and feud with the head coach.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 4, 2010 10:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ah yes....

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 5, 2010 1:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

Course I've heard

TO caught Garcia checking the male in the shower. And pro athletes generally aren’t the most secure in that regard so I can see how that would go…

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 5, 2010 12:18 PM PDT up reply actions  

All TO needs to do

is check out Jeff’s wife.

Enough said.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 5, 2010 11:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe it is like the mysterious LUCK stat

so prevalent in RPG games and whatnot.

Or on a different note, maybe the Buccaneer teams will have plenty of SWAGger.

by brundylop on Jul 4, 2010 3:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

Speed Ratings

Madden in my experience is NOTORIOUS for underrating the 49ers team speed and just messing up speed ratings in general. The most recent example is the Broncos rookie WR Demaryius Thomas has a 96 speed rating!! He ran a 4.45 Jason Hill ran in the 4.3s but he’s an 87 speed & I agree about Vernon Davis in Madden 09 he was a 92 speed rating than in Madden 10 they cut his speed down to 88 for the “slow down” in game speed.

by 49ers_Lakers_Yankees on Jul 5, 2010 6:39 PM PDT reply actions  

Patrick Willis only at 99?

…should be 199.

"I'm blessed..... Thanks, God bless" ...hey, it worked for Tim Tebow.

by Drew Kerr on Jul 6, 2010 4:03 PM PDT reply actions  

They didn't have room fto show 1

But it’s still there

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 7, 2010 2:09 AM PDT up reply actions  

Well that's just lame cause he has been making pick after pick in OTA's

"I'm blessed..... Thanks, God bless" ...hey, it worked for Tim Tebow.

by Drew Kerr on Jul 6, 2010 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions  

Pick after pick?

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 6, 2010 5:05 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah

Taylor Mays has been doing great in OTAs with picks and deflections.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jul 6, 2010 5:22 PM PDT up reply actions  

I know but "pick after pick"

I only recall two picks?

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 6, 2010 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Ive been reading very good things about him

Not sure what the particulars are on stats

"I'm blessed..... Thanks, God bless" ...hey, it worked for Tim Tebow.

by Drew Kerr on Jul 6, 2010 5:51 PM PDT up reply actions  

I didn't even realize that they "kept track" of stats in OTA's

"I'm blessed..... Thanks, God bless" ...hey, it worked for Tim Tebow.

by Drew Kerr on Jul 6, 2010 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maiocco keeps track of most OTA "stats"

But he can’t watch everything.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 7, 2010 2:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

You know how I feel about that moron

"I'm blessed..... Thanks, God bless" ...hey, it worked for Tim Tebow.

by Drew Kerr on Jul 7, 2010 5:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Lol, yep

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 7, 2010 11:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

He had 2 in the same day

I’d say from memory he’s had 5 or 6 so far

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 6, 2010 7:25 PM PDT up reply actions  

He was a 75 OVR after the draft

I’m not sure why he dropped other than he did not go in the first round, but that should have nothing to do with his rating.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 6, 2010 5:12 PM PDT up reply actions  

Haters downed his rating.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 6, 2010 5:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I have like fifty of those.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 7, 2010 12:10 AM PDT up reply actions  

Cats?

"I'm blessed..... Thanks, God bless" ...hey, it worked for Tim Tebow.

by Drew Kerr on Jul 7, 2010 1:50 AM PDT up reply actions  

haters gonna hate pictures

Here is another:

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 7, 2010 2:13 AM PDT up reply actions  

seriously guys, don’t expect alex smith to get a higher rating. it’s just ridiculous

i feel alex’s rating is ok where it is. maybe it could be 78 or 79. the entire rest of the league outside of 49er fans thinks alex smith is a huge bust, and he will never get respect. you can;t expect someone as lowly respected as him will get near an 80 rating

all i can hope for is that he does like he did in my madden 08 franchise and , on complete CPU control, went from 75 to 99 overall in 3 seasons.

Dashon, Mays, and Bamm Bamm will get the record for most decapitations in one season

by MichaelClutchtree on Jul 6, 2010 7:56 PM PDT reply actions  

Like ninjames said why drop his rating from what he had after the last Madden 10 update?? He gotten worst since then??? I don’t think so

by 49ers_Lakers_Yankees on Jul 6, 2010 11:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Mostly I'm just wondering why they dropped him a point between...

…the end of Madden NFL 10 and Madden NFL 11. There is, from what I’ve been told, not a different scale.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 7, 2010 12:11 AM PDT up reply actions  

There's some good discussion going on here.

You guys who really care, give me three players you’d increase and three players you’d decrease. Don’t reply to anything, make them separate comment strings. This isn’t “Ninjames decides what all the ratings are” I want some concrete input. Gogogogogogo.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 7, 2010 2:35 PM PDT reply actions  

Do you mean besides you making them bring Taylor Mays back to a 75?

You’re a big guy, right? Use this thing called intimidation. They’re just a bunch a nerds over there
at EA.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 7, 2010 2:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Yeah I could definitely beat up Donny Moore.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 7, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions  

My 3 Increases

I want to see a spd increase for Jason Hill 87 is just insulting

I want to see a spd increase for Ahmad Brooks before Bowman’s arrival Brooks was speculated as the 9ers fastest LB there’s no way Parys Haralson is faster than Brooks

I want to see a spd increase for Dashon Goldson 88 or 89 sounds fair to me

by 49ers_Lakers_Yankees on Jul 7, 2010 3:00 PM PDT reply actions  

As far as Brooks, did you mean he’s the fastest LB after Willis and Lawson?

And I’m just not sure that Hill would be a top priority for me. But I don’t run many 4 WR sets when I play, so I guess my bias may be that.

Goldson – good choice.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 7, 2010 3:09 PM PDT up reply actions  

No I mean on the 49ers official website last year Brooks was estimated as the fastest LB on the team this was during training camp last year & I got you with Hill but his catch rating is gonna be higher than Ginn’s plus the speculation is competition between Ginn & Hill for the 3rd WR spot

by 49ers_Lakers_Yankees on Jul 7, 2010 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well

I will say that Brooks is slower than Lawson and Willis. But 74 speed does seem low for him. So I could see him getting a speed increase, but he’s not faster than those two.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 7, 2010 7:52 PM PDT up reply actions  

My 3 Decreases

This is hard no1 on the team is overrated IMO but since I have to pick I’d go with Michael Robinson bc he’s a ST player I would decrease McKillop considering he hasn’t come on as expected causing the team to draft Bowman and I would decrease Michael Lewis’ pass coverage rating but he’s have to get a speed increase if you ask me no CB should have speed lower than 88 and no S should have speed lower than 85

by 49ers_Lakers_Yankees on Jul 7, 2010 3:05 PM PDT reply actions  

My Increases

Justin Smith: increase overall – best 3-4 DE and yet, he’s underrated in Madden. I’m not asking for him to be on par with Ngata (freak of nature, understandable why he’s higher – he’s ridiculously strong and moves great for 340 lbs) or Dockett (tied top rated 3-4 DE with Ngata), but he should be the same rating as Richard Seymour who is rated a 92. Smith not only put up better numbers than Seymour, he was also named to the Pro Bowl, so I’m not sure how he was not on EA’s radar. I’m not sure on what the individual ratings that should be increased because I don’t know how those ratings are for him, but probably some kind of combo of accel, strength, power move, and block shedding. Oh, and he should definitely should be in the 90s for stamina.

Eric Heitmann – overall increase – It’s hard to argue for O-linemen because they don’t put up stats. However, I believe guys like Jeff Faine and Casey Weigmann were rated at 87 in Mdden 10, and Heitmann is better than both those guys. I also think 87 is a fair increase considering he could be higher.

Shawntae Spencer – overall increase – He had some good games that he did not get enough recognition for last season. He handled Andre Johnson pretty well last season and held him to 2 catches for 62 yards whereas he destroyed the Seattle secondary specifically Marcus Trufant. I would say Spencer is as good of a #2 CB as Josh Wilson, but what is Josh Wilson rated (what is Trufant rated as well?)? That is just one example, but while he did not put many INTs, Spencer held his own last season. I think Spencer should be an 84 like Clements, but that probably won’t happen, so I would settle for a 1-2 point increase.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 7, 2010 3:44 PM PDT reply actions  

My Decreases

Joe Staley (1-2 point decrease) – This is one we’ve already talked about with regards to Heitmann up above. Staley is a bit overrated and not the best O-linemen on the team. He should drop a point or two to be on par with Sam Baker of the Falcons because I think that is a fair comparison.

Isaac Sopoaga and Ray McDonald (2 point decrease each) – I’m putting these two together because I don’t think anyone did well at DE except for Justin Smith. Sopoaga got pushed around too much last season and a 71 OVR is overrating McDonald who was mainly just a pass rusher.

Adam Snyder (2-3 point OVR decrease) – I understand that he’s at guard now, but I had problems with Snyder’s rating going back to the last game when he was rated a 78. Rachal is going to start over him, so Snyder’s going to be decreased eventually anyway. Making them the same or Snyder slightly lower will allow the player to choose.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 7, 2010 4:03 PM PDT reply actions  

I understand Sopoaga but McDonald showed flashes I’m lookin for him or Balmer to take over this season opposite of Smith

by 49ers_Lakers_Yankees on Jul 7, 2010 7:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm fine with that

I just think it would be more realistic if they were both under 70 at this point. If McDonald or Balmer takes over and shines during the season, then he can earn a rating of 70+.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 7, 2010 7:53 PM PDT up reply actions  

Increase/Decrease

Increase:
1. Heitman: At least to an 87 overall. I don’t exactly know what specific skills they have to increase to get to 87 but he should be rated as our best OL.
2. Crabtree: Mainly his speed. I’d say about 90 would be fair (speed rating).
3. Justin Smith: 90 Ovr would be good (speed is too low)

Decrease:
1. Joe Staley: He’s not 87. No chance.
2. Frank Gore’s speed. Maybe just one point decrease.
3. David Baas: Maybe I’m being too harsh. But he’s too close to 80 for my taste.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 7, 2010 11:21 PM PDT reply actions  

taylor mays

im excited for madden cuz i wont have to draft or trade for him. I use ss and lewis will def be sitting the bench in my games.

by texasniner06 on Jul 8, 2010 9:46 PM PDT reply actions  

Increase-Decrease

Increases:
1. Alex Smith: Needs at least an 80 overall. He’s 77 with Sanchez being 82? child please.
2. Eric Heitman: Just terribly, terribly underrated. 86-87 overall
3. Shawntae Spencer: Great cover corner and should be at rated at least equal to Clements. 84

Decreases:
1. Michael Lewis: rating should go down a couple points due to sub-par man coverage skills. 78
2. Nate Clements: even though he was injured last season, should still be around an 82-83
3. Joe Staley: I love the guy, but he just hasn’t proven that much thus far. Around an 85 IMO

I miss Joe Montana/Steve Young/Jeff Garcia

by Mr HowsYourWife on Jul 9, 2010 1:46 AM PDT reply actions  

84 is already a decrease of Clements from last year

He was an 86 by the last update and I believe he started at 87 or 88. Decreasing him more would put him lower than players that he is clearly better than.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 9, 2010 2:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

That

may be true but it is honestly the rating he deserves. Its true that he is better than a lot of players rated higher than him, however that just means they should not be rated that high

I miss Joe Montana/Steve Young/Jeff Garcia

by Mr HowsYourWife on Jul 12, 2010 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

I find 84 to be a fair rating

but on top of that, to try to change the ratings order would be a lost battle from the start. One would have to come up with an order for what the CBs should be rated, then have every team discussion board on the madden ratings forum agree with it and submit it with the agreement with all the other boards. Instead, we could just accept Clements rating because it is a pretty fair rating. I just don’t see a reason why he should be lower.

by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 12, 2010 5:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

I'm as big a defender of Clements as you'll find around here

 but even I think 84 is fair for now. I expect him to outplay that and get a better ranking through the course of the season.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Jul 12, 2010 5:54 PM PDT up reply actions  

its all about spd here. Even at 95 spd for Mays is low he ran a 4.3 40 he should b a 99 for spd…Crabs should be a 90 or 91 and VD and Willis should go up a notch as well. I would say 93 or so for those two. Micheal Lewis could drop like others mentioned his cover skills and Dashon Gold should boost in spd as well. Ninjames whatcha think

by TWISM on Jul 9, 2010 3:02 PM PDT reply actions  

Mays shouldn't be a 99

99 should be reserved for Ginn, Jacoby Ford, Chris Johnson and their ilk.

HOWEVER, while Taylor’s top speed is not a 99, its about right between 95-97 and Taylor should have 99 ACC as he hung with Jacoby Ford for the first 25-30 yards.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 9, 2010 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions  

Tomorrow ESPN

the ratings for the 49ers will be released. So keep a look out and please post a new discussion for reaction to ratings.

Santa Clara, You are the Father!

by chriscream on Jul 13, 2010 10:40 AM PDT reply actions  

I already posted the ratings. They're right up there.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 13, 2010 10:52 AM PDT up reply actions  

We should try to mass release them to take traffic away from ESPN.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 13, 2010 8:35 PM PDT up reply actions  

Have you searched for madden ratings leak and things like that on Google?

Niners Nation has been the number one result for that for about a month now.

And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.

by James Brady on Jul 14, 2010 4:29 AM PDT up reply actions  

revenge of the birds

Is No.1 right now.

But there are a few other SBnation sites on the list.

awesome.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Jul 14, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Site Decorum: Remember, We Are ALL 49er Fans
Steve_young_small
Game Day Food

Recent FanPosts

Small
Concussions...
Small
Is Harbaugh lying or does he mean what he says?
872_small
Where have you seen 49er players?
Download2_small
Can the 49'ers Maintain their Turnover Differential in 2012?
Sfak_small
Why are you a 49er fan?
6a00e5500c77218833011168f234b4970c_small
FOX: "How To Save The Sport"
Small
Old Spice Patrick Willis Football ProCamp
Dave_small
Call For Moderators

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

Dylan_cannes_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

428030_10150598134996875_112852666874_9167376_1157036734_n_small mikeinsp