2010 Offseason NFC Power Rankings: Where do the 49ers stack up?
As announced previously in this space, XFINITY from Comcast has generously agreed to support the best NFL community around -- us! As part of that effort, between now and the end of the 2010 NFL season XFINITY will be sponsoring a variety of special editorial and interactive features on our site. Welcome!
Over the weekend remembertheCATCH posted a FanPost asking, "Are the Niners Super Bowl contenders this year?" In the accompanying poll with 119 votes, 43% voted yes, 20% voted no, and 36% voted only if the 49ers get extremely lucky. I bring it up now because there was plenty of discussion as to whether the 49ers are really good enough to win a Super Bowl at this point.
Given all the discussion, I thought now was as good a time as any to put together some power rankings for the NFC. Where exactly do you see the 49ers fitting in the power structure of the conference? Here is one man's opinion. I've posted more detailed thoughts after the jump.
1. New Orleans Saints
2. Dallas Cowboys
3. Green Bay Packers
4. Minnesota Vikings
5. Atlanta Falcons
6. San Francisco 49ers
7. Philadelphia Eagles
8. New York Giants
9. Washington Redskins
10. Seattle Seahawks
11. Chicago Bears
12. Arizona Cardinals
13. Carolina Panthers
14. Detroit Lions
15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
16. St. Louis Rams
First off, the Vikings ranking is based on a returning Brett Favre. I think he'll be back so I'll keep the Vikings up near the top. At the same time, I like where the Cowboys and Packers are at this point a little better than the Vikings.
After those top 4, things get a bit more jumbled up. While I think Atlanta is closer to the top 4 than the other teams, I definitely think the rankings of 5 through 12 are incredibly close. You could bump many of those teams, including the 49ers, in a variety of spots throughout that portion.
I'm sure my rankings are considered a bit homer-ish, but given the way the offseason has advanced, I'd like to think the 49ers are better than those teams at this point. I had trouble with several of the teams, and it mostly came down to pairs of them: Giants/Bears, Seahawks/Cardinals, and Eagles/Redskins.
The Giants and the Bears are tough because I honestly don't know what to think of them. They could make the playoffs, or they could end up counting down to the draft, and neither would surprise me.
The Seahawks are a conundrum for me given all their injury issues last year. With Kurt Warner retiring and Matt Leinart taking the charge, combined with some big losses via free agency and trades, the Cardinals could take a bit of a dive this year. They're still talented, so I'm certainly not writing them off, but if the Seahawks can stay healthy, could they end up being the 49ers chief opponent for the division title?
The Redskins and Eagles are a tough one because of the Donovan McNabb deal. Kevin Kolb has shown some skills, but he is the Eagles biggest question mark. On the other hand, the Redskins were fairly abysmal last season, but now they've got Donovan McNabb in town. Is he enough to turn them around? As tough as 5-12 is for me, the homer in me has 7-12 as even more difficult.
So given all that, how would you line up the NFC from top to bottom?
XFINITY from Comcast is a proud supporter of Niners Nation. You'll get your 49ers games as a part of over 120 NFL games XFINITY provides in HD, as well as On Demand game recaps from every NFL game every week, faster Internet speeds, and stunning HD. With XFINITY and NFL RedZone, you get every touchdown from every game every Sunday afternoon! Call 1-800-XFINITY or visit http://www.xfinity.com.
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think you're overrating a Bears team...
…that has to overcome an awful lot of mediocrity and old age.
I would go…
1. New Orleans Saints
2. Dallas Cowboys
3. Minnesota Vikings
4. Green Bay Packers
5. Atlanta Falcons
6. San Francisco 49ers
7. Philadelphia Eagles
8. Washington Redskins
9. New York Giants
10. Arizona Cardinals
11. Carolina Panthers
12. Seattle Seahawks
13. Chicago Bears
14. Detroit Lions
15. St. Louis Rams
16. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I think the Lions and the Rams are interchangeable. I think Bradford can be as good as Stafford, and I think Bradford will get hit a whole lot less than him, and have a much better running game, and a better defense. The Panthers should do OK. There’s some decent teams here, but not enough wins to go around.
Frustrated fireworks inside my head..
Bears
I agree that they are over-rated. First of all they have Martz coming in, so they have to learn his system from which I remember was like learning Calculus. Cutler through 5 ints against the 49ers last year and I see him being just as bad this year.
I believe that the Lions are going to do better then the Bears are.
Gonna have to...
… put Dallas @ 16 , juz can’t help it … and for their stadium to fall into a sinkhole …!!
Kewl
I think people are way undervaluing the panthers. Steve Smith, DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart are all still in place, now they just have someone functional at QB. NFC south this year will be the best division in the NFC.
So where do you think they should be ranked?
Ahead of Phily? NY? AZ? SF?
I can't wait for Mango's sig to say "0 days to go".
I dont question their offense
I question their defense. Other than Beason and Gamble, I am not that impressed with any of their players especially that D-line. I do think Thomas Davis is good but he’s coming back from tearing his ACL (I may be wrong on the exact injury) so he may not be as effective as he has been. They rotated a ton of DTs because of injuries and poor play and then lost Peppers and Harris. While they drafted Everette Brown last season, I don’t think they have any other pass rusher. Then they did not do anything significant in this year’s draft to upgrade any of those positions. I think I would rather have the Chiefs defense over the Panthers defense at this point.
by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 7, 2010 10:19 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
They are a good team
But their OL is overrated, LaFell isn’t ready to step in as a starter, and they just lost Julius Peppers.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 1:05 PM PDT up reply actions
to be honest
I think the 49ers should rank somewhere in the 10 range. I think we CAN beat just about anyone, if not anyone, in the NFL but I don’t think we’re consistently better than 9 other teams…Talk to me again about week 6 thru 8.
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
We are talking about just the NFC.
Do you think we are that low?
I can't wait for Mango's sig to say "0 days to go".
I'd stick with 6th or 7th in that case
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
yea...somewhere in the 6-8th place
but if those teams ahead of us have the same sesason as last year, then we’re definately top 5…..
side note:
i just really hope eli manning fails BIG TIME from here on. i dont like the little whiney cry baby B***h..
A man's life is described either by his actions, words, or even the people who he loves and loves him.
he's always got that "Awww maaaannnn!!!" look on his face
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
he looks like a
kid with down sydrome
not to mention little B***H syndrome…i cant stand him as a player or person
A man's life is described either by his actions, words, or even the people who he loves and loves him.
I've never really seen him complain
He’s always quiet.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions
His face does look dumb though.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions
to be more honest
1. New Orleans Saints
2. Dallas Cowboys
3. Green Bay Packers
4. Minnesota Vikings
5. Arizona Cardinals
6. New York Giants
7. Philadelphia Eagles
8. Atlanta Falcons
9. San Francisco 49ers
10. Chicago Bears
11. Carolina Panthers
12. Washington Redskins
13. Seattle Seahawks
14. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
15. Detroit Lions
16. St. Louis Rams
Really???
I just can’t see the Cards, Giants and Eagles ranked above the Niners, let alone the Falcons.
by 9thevolution on Jun 7, 2010 10:32 AM PDT up reply actions
I can't see the Cards or Falcons
for sure. I don’t care what anyone says, that was a fluke that ATL beat us last year. Someone put valium in the gatorade or something. We’re a better team, I’m sure of it.
The Eagles are too hard to call. Kolb played well when called upon but chemistry takes time and 16 games is longer than a few here and there.
I look for the Giants to bounce back with something to prove. Not sure it’ll work but they were a pretty good team when they were playing defense.
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
I disagree
No way the Cardinals remain in the top 6.
And you’re overrating the Giants and Eagles.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 1:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Ranks
1. New Orleans Saints
2. Green Bay Packers
3. Minnesota Vikings
4. Dallas Cowboys
5. Atlanta Falcons
6. San Francisco 49ers
7. Philadelphia Eagles
8. New York Giants
9. Carolina Panthers
10. Arizona Cardinals
11. Washington Redskins
12. Seattle Seahawks
13. Detroit Lions
14. Chicago Bears
15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
16. St. Louis Rams
Based on my infinite knowledge of all NFC teams
Here’s my rankings:
1. New Orleans Saints
2. Green Bay Packers
3. Dallas Cowgirls
4. Minnesota Vikings
5. Atlanta Falcons
6. San Francisco 49ers
7. Philadelphia Eagles
8. New York Giants
9. Arizona Cardinals
10. Carolina Panthers
11. Washington Redskins
12. Detroit Lions
13. Chicago Bears
14. Seattle Seahawks
15. St. Louis Rams
16. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I could have switched a few teams around and been perfectly happy with it: AZ and NY, Carolina and Washington.
I can't wait for Mango's sig to say "0 days to go".
Contained one major error!
1. San Francisco 49ers
2. Green Bay Packers
3. Dallas Cowgirls
4. Minnesota Vikings
5. Atlanta Falcons
6 New Orleans Saints.
7. Philadelphia Eagles
8. New York Giants
9. Arizona Cardinals
10. Carolina Panthers
11. Washington Redskins
12. Detroit Lions
13. Chicago Bears
14. Seattle Seahawks
15. St. Louis Rams
16. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Fixed!!! Someone has to be the ultimate Homer.
Nice, thanks.
I have no doubt this will be accurate for the 2011 season though.
I can't wait for Mango's sig to say "0 days to go".
Just announced:
The 49ers have already won the Superbowl. All other teams decided unanimously it was useless to even compete in 2010 against the vast talents that the 49ers possess. The Lombardi will be presented shortly.
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
by Tre9er on Jun 7, 2010 11:09 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
+1
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAHAHHAH very naice!
A man's life is described either by his actions, words, or even the people who he loves and loves him.
Nice.
rec’d
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 1:07 PM PDT up reply actions
My anti-SEA rankings.
1. Saints
2. Packers
3. Vikings
4. Cowboys
5. 49ers
6. Falcons
7. Giants
8. Panthers
9. Redskins
10. Eagles
11. Cardinals
12. Lions
13. Bears
14. Seahawks
15. Rams
16. Bucs
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
1. Green Bay Packers – The NFC team to beat (dang it). Improved OL, a top 5 QB, a Def more comfortable in the 3-4. And they can comfortably play in the cold Giants Stadium weather in the Super Bowl.
2. New Orleans Saints – Contender, but whether its the SB hangover or lack of the magic they had last year, no way they repeat as the top NFC team.
3. Atlanta Falcons – Turner missed 5 games last year, Ryan missed 3. And they still went 9-7. If those two stay healthy, this team could go far.
4. Minnesota Vikings – Contender, but over-ranked. No Farve = no magic. Farve = age will show this year. Good Def & Off weapons, but QB takes them out.
5. Dallas Cowboys – Contender, but Romo still can’t win out. Wade Phllips is a joke. Mediocre team despite JJ’s money.
6. San Francisco 49ers – Put them at #1, or #10 or #16. It all hinges on Smith.
7. Carolina Panthers – Strong running game, strong Def unit. If QB comes thru, might contend.
8. Washington Redskins – Hard one. But Shanahan is worth a mid-NFC slot here. Might bust out, but just might bee a team to watch.
9. Philadelphia Eagles – As a Niner fan spoiled at the QB position for years with Montana and Young, I know first hand how disappointed Eagle fans are about to be.
10. Arizona Cardinals – Leinart. Enough said.
11. Seattle Seahawks – Not this year. But soon, I’m afraid.
12. New York Giants – An 8-8 team in 2009 did nothing to get better this year. They are on the decline. Owership figures to sell seats by offering a new stadium, not a better team in 2010.
13. Chicago Bears – Julius Pepers? So. They should have done something about a sucky OL.
14. Detroit Lions – Interchangable
15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers – Interchangable
16. St. Louis Rams – Interchangable
*oops
Meant to finish #1 with, “…comfortably play in the cold Giants Stadium weather in the Super Bowl in the years to come.”
I honestly believe the Lions are going to be better than a lot of people think.
I would say they’re going to finish above the Bears easily in their division. The Bears are a few injuries and mid-season coaching change from contending with the Bills and Rams for worst in the league
I agree Lions will be much better than people think
I wouldn’t crap my pants if they went 7-9 this year, honestly.
"I will speak at times, when it's necessary, but I don't believe in talking just because you can." - P-52
Let's talk on Twitter
I'ts true though
I could see 7-9 and even 8-8 if they get lucky on a few games
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
I don't think the Panthers are that strong on defense
They were good against the pass last year and Beason is good, but losing Peppers is going to have an big effect on their pass rush. Peppers had 10.5 sacks out of the 31 sacks last season, who is going to step up to take his spot. They did nothing in the off-season to upgrade that D-line especially the revolving door at DT.
by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 7, 2010 2:29 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe so
I don’t follow them that much, but they were a good D last year and I don’t see a whole defense based on Pepers…he wasn’t THAT good, was he?
Yes he was THAT good
He was their best defensive player.
Beason is pretty good but I don’t think he can carry that defense on his back.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 3:23 PM PDT up reply actions
He is good
but no, the whole defense was not based on him. I was looking at it more from the perspective that they were only decent against the run last season allowing an average of 4.4 yards per carry. The strength of their defense was pass defense and turnovers. There is a bit of luck when it comes to turnovers, but you are more likely to force more turnovers by putting pressure on the QB. Peppers is a pretty good pass rusher and if they cannot match the pressure that he brought, their passing defense may become only decent. Less pressure also means that the QB has more time to throw which can set up deep routes as well as giving WRs more time to beat the DBs.
So if the Panthers defense does take a step backwards, the offense has to be able to step up. I do think the offense will be better, but I do not think they will be able to overcome the shortcomings of the defense. I also think there is a good chance their run defense will be exploited next season which could take them out of games which would take them out of their strength of running the ball.
by ZeroOneInfinity on Jun 7, 2010 3:36 PM PDT up reply actions
This year's superbowl isn't going to be in NY
The NYG SB is in 2014.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 3:22 PM PDT up reply actions
My bad
You think they’ll still be competitive by then?
Look at the Giants, they went from winning the SB to .500 in two seasons.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
I do
It seems a team stays on top for 5 or so years on average, no? Sometimes longer, but rarely less.
Well they've been good for a while
Rodgers took over in 2008. By 2014 they might have a completely different team.
That secondary is OLD.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 8, 2010 10:34 AM PDT up reply actions
the bears and eagles
are rated too high. the bears suck. n the eagles will fold. i wouldn’t be surprised if kolb gets benched for vick. i think the eagles will be at the bottom of their division for the first time in a long time.
"There is no pressure. Pressure only exists when you're not prepared."
-The Samurai
Alex Smith is garbage...
This
I think Vick will be starting at some point next season.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Jun 7, 2010 3:24 PM PDT up reply actions
I dunno guys...
Power rakings should be based off hard facts, not gut feelings. So without any bias…
1. New Orleans
2. Minnesota Vikings
3. Green Bay Packers
4. Dallas Cowboys
5. Atlanta Falcons
6. Philidelpha Eagles
7. New York Giants
8. Arizona Cardinals
9. San Francisco 49ers
10. Carolina Panthers
11. Chicago Bears
12. Seattle Seahawks
13. Washington Redskins
14. Detroit Lions
15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
16. Saint Louis Rams
by ZivilynBane on Jun 7, 2010 2:07 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
true
but did you factor in that the Cardinals lost their franchise QB, and a lot of weapons on DEF. and Boldin on Offense
eagles also lost their Star and Franchise QB, among other possible factors that i dont know about (i dont care to look into)
giants are falling apart with a QB that is Over rated (his recievers made him “Great”)
falcons are a little sketchy as a team, the loss to them last year was a fluke. but none the less a loss.
then NO, Vikes, Packs, Boys, are good where they are.
A man's life is described either by his actions, words, or even the people who he loves and loves him.
I dunno guys...
Power rakings should be based off hard facts, not gut feelings. So without any bias…
1. New Orleans
2. Minnesota Vikings
3. Green Bay Packers
4. Dallas Cowboys
5. Atlanta Falcons
6. Philidelpha Eagles
7. New York Giants
8. Arizona Cardinals
9. San Francisco 49ers
10. Carolina Panthers
11. Chicago Bears
12. Seattle Seahawks
13. Washington Redskins
14. Detroit Lions
15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
16. Saint Louis Rams
by ZivilynBane on Jun 7, 2010 2:29 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
Don't hate...
Cause I’m being serious. I’m aware I have Vikings at 1, and I honestly think they are. Panthers are going to have a good year. Think Cowboys are being way overhyped (Packers slightly overhyped)
1. Minnesota Vikings
2. New Orleans Saints
3. Green Bay Packers
4. Dallas Cowboys
5. Carolina Panthers
6. Philadelphia Eagles
7. San Francisco 49ers
8. Atlanta Falcons
9. New York Giants
10. Seattle Seahawks
11. Chicago Bears
12. Arizona Cardinals
13. Washington Redskins
14. Detroit Lions
15. St. Louis Rams
16. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
I'm predicting a finish not basing much of this off of last year but some of it.
1. Dallas Cowboys – WHY? As much as I hate to say it, they are here because the Vikes can’t be, they blew the ncf championship due to fumbles and Favre’s magic will run dry this year.
2. Green Bay Packers – I did make the comment about the Vikes owning these guys, but with a gapig hole in the front 4 after the suspensions come down and plenty help needed in the back 7 the Vikes slip under the Pack.
3. Atlanta Falcons – NFC South is so up and down every year, Brees on the front cover of Madden has him droping along with the team in fantasy and overall. league play
4. San Francisco 49ers – Homerism? Naw, it is but it isn’t, we thumped the best int he division for the past few games, nw is time ot lay down the law. 49ers were right there with the best in the league and will be right there when it’s all said and done this year.
5. Washington Redskins – The Shocker, McNabb has a running game for the first time ever. he has a TE and some mediocre WR’s, sounds like Philly to me.
6. Minnesota Vikings- They had an unfortunate miss at the big one and the chance will not come back, can you say 20 INT’s Brett, I CAN!!
7New Orleans Saints – Superbowl hangover, they are still partying right now in NOLA. Madden curse to boot, sorry NO, SF spanks that ass in week 2.
8. Carolina Panthers – Maybe should be ranked higher, they have two unproven options at QB, but no Delhomme is HUGE for them. They could easily be 5 or higher this season.
9. Arizona Cardinals, I know they lost a lot, but they have a good coach who brough in key players in the offseason, I see them splitting with SF this season. Linehart will not be asked to be Kurt Warner, but Beanie Wells has to be healty for this to work.
10 New York Giants not much to say, over-rated QB and it’s obvious Spags should have been kept as HC.
11. Seatlle Seahawks
12. Philadelphia Eagles – Too young on both sides of the ball.
13. Detroit Lions – Better than 15th
14. Da Bears – Do I need to comment?
15. Tampa Bay Buccaneers, may not be the cellar dwellar this year, but WILL NOT mak th eplayoffs.
16. The Rams and this will be the last year they are here, but hey, they are here.
Black Sand Ninja!!!
14-2 or 7-9, based on the schedule and within the realm of possibilities
I don’t see why the 49ers could not at best, go 14-2…and here is why:
They could (and probably should) sweep the division. That would be 6 wins right there. Keep in mind 5 of their last 8 are division games, with 3 of them at home.
They play OAK, NO, PHI, DEN, TB at home, and could win all 5 games, which brings us to 11 wins.
They play at CAR, KC and ATL, which will all be tough, but again are possible wins, and since we are exploring reasonable possibilities, we are at 14 wins…
It might be too much to ask to go to GB and SD and expect wins, and so the easy thing to do is saddle them with these two as losses….14-2
At worst? Well, lets explore pessimistic possibilities:
I think they are just too good to split the divisional games, so we’ll say 4-2 in the division, losses perhaps away at SEA and maybe even a surprise loss at ARI.
NO might come into town and dispell all these SB hangover curses. They are a good team, lets not forget.
Away games at KC, ATL and CAR, as mentioned previously, will all be tough, they should get at least one of them…putting them at 5-5.
OAK and TB at home should not be losses at all, so we’ll give the Niners 2 more wins, but PHI and DEN could be tough, and worse case scenerio we give 2 more losses, putting them at 7-7…
At GB and SD? Well, also mentioned previously, these will be tough, perhaps the toughest games all season with playoff implications around each game, so once again we’ll go with 2 more losses, putting us back at the old familiar 7-9…yuck.
So let’s be reasonable and find a middle ground, with this roster and this schedule; I am willing to realistically say 10-6, maybe even 11-5, good enough for maybe a 3 or 4 seed, with the division and playoff spot wrapped up by a week 14 home win vs SEA.
Of course, Alex Smith might have something to do with all this…
quantification
I really believe this is the year for Alex and the Niners…they play arguably the weakest division in the AFC and arguably in the weakest division in the NFC. Stars are aligned, now or never …or with someone else under center next year.

by 




































