They Were Our Future! Nolan Carroll and Aaron Hernandez updates
Why am I writing about these guys you ask? Simple--they were the players selected with the draft picks we gave up. For those who weren't around last year, the name is in reference to a certain poster who showed up after Kory Sheets was nabbed from the practice squad. His username was KORY SHEETS WAS OUR FUTURE (all caps his), and every post he made bemoaned the fate that was sure to fall the 49ers because of us letting Sheets go. (He also had a thing for Shaun Hill.)
There was a significant amount of debate over giving up a 5th for Ted Ginn, and even more for giving up a 4th to move up to grab Davis.
Join me after the jump as I examine our draft trades and the players selected with those picks.
3rd round:49ers trade their 3rd round pick (#79 overall) to the Chargers for their 3rd round pick (#91 overall), their sixth round pick (#173 overall), and a 2011 4th round pick. With the 3rd round pick the Chargers picked Donald Butler. With the Charger's pick we grabed Navarro Bowman. With the 6th round pick we grabbed Anthony Dixon.
4th round:
49ers trade their 4th round pick and 1st round pick to the Broncos to move to #11 overall for Anthony Davis. The Patriots traded their first round pick (#22 overall) to the Broncos for the 24th overall pick. The deal included the 4th round pick that the Broncos picked up from the 49ers.
With that 4th round pick the Patriots picked TE Aaron Hernandez
5th round:
The 49ers acquired Ted Ginn Jr from the Dolphins for a 5th round pick. With that pick the Dolphins selected Nolan Carroll.
Last week I hopped on over to the Pats Pulpit and the Phinsider to see what news they had on these players.
Patriot fans seem pretty high on Aaron Hernandez (pun intended). There's not much doubt he makes the team. He's already signed a deal that's heavily laden with incentives. It's a four year deal worth a total of $2.378 million. His signing bonus money was $200k, but he has roster bonus money of $76k, $90k, $104k, and $114k. The Patriots are concerned about his alleged multiple positive tests for marijuana so this is how they've chosen to deal with his concerns. It's a smart contract in my opinion.
User brady12mvp3 had this to say about Hernandez:
depending on the the set the pats open the game in he might start a few games but most likely coming off the bench he is going to be what they call a move te in the clark/cooley style we hope as good as those 2 . he is a oversized wr more then a blocking TE. he is going to play some h-back some te play in the slot a little split the seams open the middle of the field.
User Comedic.Sans followed up with this:
There are three things to bear in mind.
1) Gronkowski and Crumpler are both bigger, taller and more capable of blocking, so they're likely the #1 and #2 ‘true' TEs in one and two TE sets. Any 3 TE sets, and Hernandez is likely the guy who lines up in the ‘move' TE position just back of the line.
2) The Pats aren't carrying a true FB on the roster this year, so it's likely the Pats will try Hernandez in a Chris Cooley-like H-back role at times.
3) The Pats have a great slot WR in Welker, but he's coming back from surgery, so they could well employ Hernandez as a Dallas Clark-type slot TE/WR while Welker recovers, or when the opposition isn't suited to cover a guy like Hernandez in the slot.Hernanez is a versatile guy, so he could be a FB/TE/H-back/Big WR at different times of the season. I suspect that if he plays well, they'll find ways to get him onto the field, much like how they did with Julian Edelman last year. He'll also be used wherever he'll create matchup issues, so he could be bouncing between H-back, TE, and slot receiver pretty freely.
Q. How's his progress been during mini-camps and OTAs? Any news good or bad about him?
A.Impressive, by all accounts - he's catching almost everything thrown at him, and he's getting a fair percentage of the reps alongside Gronkowksi and Crumpler. It seems that he's mostly being used as a receiving-type TE in the slot, but he's also been used on the line as a Y TE, at fullback/H-back, and even at halfback, apparently.
Hernandez's contract is interesting. It's very incentivised - he has to make certain performance targets and be available for a certain amount of games to hit the late-contract escalators. Most commentators have suggested that's because he's considered a little bit of a risk due to his testing positive for marijuana on one (and maybe more) occasions. If he's clean and he plays, he gets paid a fair amount. If he's cut or suspended, he loses a hefty chunk of the cash. There are definitely more strings attached to his contract than some of the other rookies in the Pats, so it seems they're taking the risk seriously.
Finally, Pats beat writer Sean Crowe says this about Hernandez (the article is short and worth reading):
Hernandez will be the 3rd tight end behind Alge Crumpler and fellow rookie Rob Gronkowski, but he won't be a traditional 3rd tight end. If OTAs are any indication, Hernandez is going to be used extensively in the passing game.
The Patriots are hopeful that he can be their Dallas Clark, a small-ish tight end who basically serves as an additional wide receiver. The Patriots know all-too-well how those types of guys can be nearly impossible to cover.
Over at the Phinsider the fans were equally high on Nolan Carroll. The Dolphins have also reached a deal with Carroll. It's a four year deal worth $1.981 million and includes $191,000 in signing money. There are some escalators that could push the deal signicantly higher.
Beat writer Barry Jackson had this to say about the rookies:
Although offseason practices shouldn't be overstated, several rookies have made a strong early impression on veterans. We polled more than 15 incumbent Dolphins about which teammates -- rookies or veterans -- have impressed them, and cornerback Nolan Carroll and linebacker Koa Misi were mentioned the most.
``Nolan is real athletic and quick -- he will play a lot of years in the league,'' Yeremiah Bell said.
Jake Long said Misi ``is quick off the line, very strong for his size.'' Channing Crowder added, ``He's still getting a rush even when he goes against Jake and Vernon Carey.'' Quentin Moses said ``college to the NFL was night and day for me, but Misi has made the transition easily. He looks so smooth; his motor stands out.''
Apparently he's being used mostly on special teams and has been working out as backup nickel corner.
Funnily enough the conversation got derailed with Kory Sheets talk (some fans loving him, others not so much), and Ted Ginn Jr talk (same deal). It's an entertaining read, so head on over there and enjoy it.
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Shawn
KSWOF actually had a thing for “Shawn Hill” as I recall. He was undaunted by the fact Hill doesn’t spell his name that way. I loved KSWOF and still miss him. It was obviously a joke which most people didn’t get. I am convinced it was Ninjames. It was beautifully done.
LondonNiner - member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010.
:]
:]
And then God created Saturn... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
Twitter me and what not.
by James Brady on Jul 21, 2010 11:43 PM PDT up reply actions
So
After all everything said and done, we actually ended up trading a 5th round pick for Ted Ginn Jr. (bargain) and gaining a sixth round pick while getting a fourth round pick next year instead of this year…All while insuring the big fish didn’t get away. I’d say there was some pretty crafty trading going on.
+1
I feel like too many people in NN want Ginn to be the next John Taylor, but he’s really not needed in that role. he’s going to give our KR some spice, and wreck defensive coverage schemes. there are ZERO fifth rounders that will have that type of impact in 2010.
the best thing about this offseason has been the demise of McC and the rise of the new FO. Very solid work in drafting, hiring, and signing key players.
Trust me I know JT and Ted Ginn is no JT...
sorry but I have a bit of a personal “love” for JT he was and is a great and quiet man and a great 49er. Ted Ginn I also have respect for but I don’t think anyone could be more exemplar of what being a 49er and to a degree a football player is about. He performed his role with no complaints and provided an at times unnoticed huge benefit to the 9ers. gets down off my soapbox
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Jul 21, 2010 7:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Just a wee bit off there
According to what smiley has up there it was our trade of the 3rd that got us the 4th next year. The move up to 11 was a swap of our firsts with our 4th rounder added in as “the vig” essentially but yes I’d take Bowmann and Dixon over Donald Butler any day of the week in fact probably take Bowmann straight up over Butler but that’s just me. I did and still to a tiny bit go “grrr!” a bit at the giving of the 4th two move up two spots. We could have gotten Ansah and had him as a CB/S for us at that price point. But hey we got Davis and we got Bowmann and we got Dixon and more importantly we “got” a good team going here.
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Jul 21, 2010 7:27 PM PDT up reply actions
We could have played around a little bit with that 4th
and gotten Everson Griffen to replace Sopoaga… GRRRRRRRRR… :/
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 22, 2010 2:29 AM PDT up reply actions
Or a good CB
or CB/S like Ansah yeah I have a bit of a man crush on him. But there were some pretty nice young CB’s taken in the 4th but oh well. We got a good crew and they’re gonna do good this year and better the next.
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Jul 22, 2010 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions
Signatures
Is it just me, or does everyone over at the Phinsider have 3-4 line signatures? Gets busy/annoying fast…
-Brett Gleason
-Daily Evergreen Staff Sports Writer
by Brett the 49er on Jul 21, 2010 12:29 PM PDT reply actions
Aaron Hernandez
Heck, he should turn out to be a pretty decent TE in New England, but really, neither of these guys have me pining over the picks traded.
by Andrew Davidson on Jul 21, 2010 12:38 PM PDT reply actions
I think other than Joe Haden
That Hernandez might be the best player on that Florida team.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 21, 2010 4:07 PM PDT up reply actions
Don't get me going on Haden
he benefited from a couple of great safeties behind him and a great d-line in front of him
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
Yes he did.
But he’s still a better version of Nate Clements/Eric Davis
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 21, 2010 7:24 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
I think his girlfriend will have a big bust.
by Andrew Davidson on Jul 21, 2010 7:47 PM PDT up reply actions
If she doesn't have one to begin with she'll end up with one
what with the rather large signing bonus he’ll be getting.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
So I'm guessing you were not exciting about the pre-draft possibilities
that Haden could have fallen to the 49ers? I would enjoy Haden busting because of a rather annoying Browns’ fan I know.
I have to say that I was not that impressed with any of the early CBs taken in this class. The only one I did like was Devin McCourty but it would have been too high to take him at the spots the 49ers were at. Plus, McCourty is more of a zone corner than man or press, so not the best fit. So I am glad that they did not take a corner early because next year’s class looks much better.
by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 21, 2010 10:23 PM PDT up reply actions
Nope. I was not wanting Joe Haden at all
I really liked Kyle Wilson but not at #17. If Wilson had fallen to #49 it would’ve been a steal, similar to Mays falling there
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
Agreed
I don’t think I would have taken Wilson unless we were late in the first round like the Jets. I remember there being a rumor right before the draft that the Browns liked Wilson more than Haden to the point they would take Wilson at 7. Man, that would have really shook things up (and really pissed off Browns fans).
by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 22, 2010 11:12 AM PDT up reply actions
Wilson will be better than Hayden I feel but I wouldn't have taken him at 7.
He is good I’ll admit that, darn good but I would have traded that pick down to the 20s and gotten an extra pick or two. 7 was not the place to pick a CB in this past draft.
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Jul 22, 2010 2:22 PM PDT up reply actions
Yup
I think the Browns screwed up big time on that. 7th is not too high to negotiate with. They probably could’ve picked up a later 1st round and an extra 3rd for that 7th overall pick and still gotten an excellent CB.
Look what Denver did—they really played the trade game well on draft day. Much as I hate McDaniels I’ve got to give him and their front office props for mad negotiating skills wiht their draft picks.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
Any team taking Tebow in rd 1 is getting a failing grade from me no matter how many trades they made.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 22, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions
I disagree
I think Tebow certainly has first round potential. Question is do you draft based on potential or current ability?
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
Let me amplify that
they ended up with two first round picks. They met a need with one of them and used the other as a “luxury” pick.
Now I think Tebow certainly has first round talent. Question with him remains his mechanics—does he have the ability to translate that first round talent into first round playing?
The big advantage with Tebow is his incredible work ethic. It’s not like the Raiders drafting a QB with questionable mechanics and a lazy work ethic #1 overall.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
Zing!
Anyway, I think that would make a good post looking into whether it is more beneficial to draft on potential or current ability. I cannot say one way or another because it is a rather hard question. I don’t like to see first round picks wasted on a player with some huge potential when the possibility of bust is so high, but at the same time, playing it safe can make you regret the player you skipped, especially if that player reaches that potential and have a HoF career.
I like the way you look at Tebow. He has great work ethic to where if I was a Broncos fan, I could believe that he can fix his mechanics. However, the question comes for when a play breaks down or Tebow gets pressured, does the bad throwing motion come back?
As much as I do not like McDaniels, if he is as good of a QB coach as people say he is, then Tebow is in a great situation to succeed. He also does not have to be a starter as a rookie.
I really just hope that if Tebows succeeds, I do not hear McDaniels say that he made Tebow into what he is.
by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 22, 2010 6:53 PM PDT up reply actions
Even more so in the Broncos case they could take this chance
because it was a late first rounder. I don’t think there was a snowball’s chance that they would’ve taken him at 9 overall (or wherever it was that they were first slotted to pick)
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
He'll be better in zone coverage for sure
most likely better in man-to-man when giving a guy a cushion and possibly better at bump and run.
Haden will almost certainly be better blitzing off the corner and in run support. Just depends on what you’re looking for. We have our physical corner in Nate Clements. Haden is a young version of him. We didn’t need Haden but other teams might.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 22, 2010 4:05 PM PDT up reply actions
Haden was horrible in run support
missed angles, couldn’t shed blockers.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
But
Wilson was not much better. He makes tackles but he tends to launch himself at the ball carrier instead of wrapping up. But Wilson is aggressive and willing to make a tackle so that is at least something to build upon.
by ZeroOneInfinity on Jul 22, 2010 6:38 PM PDT up reply actions
I wonder how many college CBs are truly great tackers?
you don’t make the highlight reels on ESPN by making a beautiful wrap-up in the style of Deion Sanders. You make the highlights by launching yourself at a guy and taking his head off
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
I liked Wilson and McCourty and...
there were some good CBs all thru the draft. I wouldn’t have given up a chance at Davis or Iupati or Bulaga for them but I would not have tossed out my 4th for moving up two spots but then that’s me and I’m not gonna Baalk about it too much (pun intended). Otherwise it’s a superb draft, only knock I can think of with getting two guys to help take care of the major defiicieny (OL) in the first and then getting a good DB in the second and a filler for the ILB spot in the 3rd and a KR and WR in the sixth that probably was more a late 5th round choice and RB that was probably a 3rd to 4th rounder in he 6th and a good blocking TE also in the 6th (probably the right place to take him really). Overall we did fabulously feel.
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Jul 22, 2010 2:20 PM PDT up reply actions
We could have used that 4th to move up a few spots and get
Everson Griffen who any other year is 1st round material, (and many scouts had going in 1 or 2 this year), to replace Sopoaga or pick up any number of corners. That was a big blunder but can’t change the past… All I can do is follow Packers training camp and hope Bulaga doesn’t look like Joe Thomas.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Jul 22, 2010 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions
KSWOF redux
An interesting, if speculative, line of thought. Assume we kept Kory Sheets—-PS or roster—-last year. Assume he inherited PR/KR duties with the loss of our first or second stud (the collection prior to Battle, Spurlock and I forget his name). In that scenario we win 1-3 more games last year, probably not enough for the playoffs. This year we draft later, so we don’t get Davis but probably still get Iupati. Boone moves up on the depth chart or we are probably drafting Bulaga and Iupati. No Ginn, no Williams. We have our COP back, who may actually be coachable and learn to block.
Are we better off or worse off than now?
[It is a slow day in a slow 49ers news week, so maybe this is a bit better than who wins a fist fight between Ditka and Singletary].
Slow day in the off-season ...
… Just on that point, when Coach Singletary was interviewed by BBC London while here on Monday, he was asked about playing the position of middle linebacker, and in an attempt to explain the defensive positions to a British audience, he said that the defensive linemen were elephants, the linebackers were lions, and the DBs were cheetahs. Discuss …
LondonNiner - member of the legendary David Carr thread, 6 March 2010.
Well if..
he’d just stayed on the PS and been learning to be a better blocker (amongst improving his others skills as well) then that would in no way mean we one or lost any more games last year so we’d be in the same situation. We might not have grabbed Dixon or maybe we would have after making the other maneuvers we did in the draft (essentially gaining an extra 6 for trading Butler for Bowmann). I feel that Dixon was brought in as much as a pick of value at that price point that could also make Coffee’s back orifice pucker a bit and remind him that he’s not the defacto next back up after Gore. And to a degree it seems to have worked as he has bulked up some. I don’t think that even if he had been put on the 53 he would have had as much of an impact to sway our team more than at best one game if that so we would be in about the same position and quite possibly would have made the same moves.
by ChesapeakeBay9er on Jul 21, 2010 7:43 PM PDT up reply actions

by 




































