2010 NFL Preseason Fun
The NFL's preseason is off and running and that means fans get to pay full price to watch the starters play less than half the game. It's also the time when the winners get to chant, "Our 80 man roster being played for observational purposes is better than your 80 man roster being played for observational purposes." But that is why they play the preseason after all. It gives the 45 or so players who know they're going to make the team a chance to get into game shape and the remaining players a chance to prove the deserve one of the remaining available roster spots, or at the very least that they deserve a spot on the practice squad.
But we can also learn other things in the preseason. So far I've learned that Speedway is the official convenience store of the Indianapolis Colts and that Wicks sugar cream pies are their official pie, although I still haven't found out who their official hemroid medicine provider is. And in case you were wondering, the Colts have 240 official sponsors. Just as an aside, I understand why a Pop Warner team would need some sponsors, but why does a football team worth $609 million according to Forbes need a sponsor? They should just be honest and say they have 240 companies willing to pay them money so the Colts will shamelessly plug them. The announcer could say something like, "When you're running low on gas or just want to snack on food that will clog your arteries, make sure to stop at Citizen gas. With hundreds of Citizen gas locations throughout the Indianapolis area to choose from, there's always one close by. Citizen gas, we like taking their money."
I also got in depth analysis for the offensive/defensive mathup between David Carr and Kavell Conner and learned that Diyral Briggs is a second year player out of Bowling Green, since the Colts announcing crew made sure to remind me every time Briggs made a play. It's like they found it amazing someone from Bowling Green actually made it into the NFL and had to keep reminding us of that incredible accomplishment.
There's also no better instrument for building a cult following around a fringe NFL player than the preseason. Kory Sheets gets turned into the next Rodger Craig. Nate Davis is the second coming of Joe Montana. And who can forget about the time Thomas Clayton led the league in rushing during the preseason? Quick quiz! Who led the league in passing the same preseason Thomas Clayton led the league in rushing? It was everyones favorite ex-49er J.T. O'Sullivan.
More after the jump.
Now there's talk of changing the preseason. NFL commissioner Rodger Goodell has talked about reducing the number of games played from 4 to 2 and increasing the number of regular season games from 16 to 18. He was quoted as saying, "It's clear fans don't want four preseason games. It's clear the players don't want four preseason games. They tell me that all the time. You ask them that question and they'll tell you. And we really don't need to make the game better. So we have to evolve just as we did a couple of decades ago when we went from six preseason games to four." And by a couple of decades ago he means over 3, back in 1978.
Personally I couldn't imagine a preseason that was 6 games long. Do coaches really need 6 games to know LeRoy Vann won't be on the final roster? In his case they didn't even need 1. That was a cult following that got cut down long before it ever got going. And while I think everyone can agree that 6 games was too many, there are some who feel playing only 2 preseason games won't be enough.
Is 2 games enough for some of the bubble players to show they belong and is it long enough for the regulars to get into game shape? What compounds the problem even more is that with only 2 preseason games the regulars are going to have to play more to get into shape since they have less time. That has the double effect of cutting back even more on the bubble players chance to shine and possibly increasing the risk of an injury to a starter.
So what, if anything, should be done? After consulting the very scientific formula that is my gut feeling, I think 3 games is the ideal number for the preseason. The starters hardly play at all in the 4th preseason game and I'm pretty sure the coaches already know who's going to make the team by that point. The NFL would be able to increase their revenue by including a 17th regular season game and the fans would get to watch real football 1 week earlier. Cigars for everyone!
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
voted 3
i feel like i need a little preseason…for myself. i mean, i gotta know which beer to pair with pancakes for these 10 AM games. hey, and sometimes i just wanna yell at the failed third down attempts- but i get a little rusty… “stupid face QB” doesn’t sound as menacing as “Alex balltarded Smith!”- it takes a little seasoning to get into midseason armchair QB form.
even better
which kind of pizza/steak/ribs taste best for breakfast.
dont waste your time with pancakes. bacon – i endorse that
Two should be plenty...
One game to give the starters a half game and the backups a half game. A week to make adjustments, a second game to give the starters 3 quarters, make cuts, play real football. Done.
Z!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Tweet Tweet.
Only 2 games are really nessessary.
You can see enough of the players in 2 games. In college they get 0 preseason games. The bubble players can make an impression in 2 games. Many of these guys have no shot and the coaches have their vavorites before the game. How many times does a guy kick butt in the preseason and get cut when the guy who got drafted higher and makes more money sticks around. Some guys only make the team because a starter got hurt in that 3rd or 4th game, so do they really count as the ones who made it? Still not convinced that 18 regular games is the way to go either…how many 2000 yard rushers and recievers will we have. CJ would have broke the record if he had 2 extra games last year, and same with Brees and Marino passing records a few years back. The NFL wants those games to make tons of money. 2 is fine, but keep the 16 regular games.
3
I’ve wondered why the league doesn’t mandate three games. One to open and get the backups plenty of reps (like yesterday), one to game-plan and play starters into the 3rd Q, and one to finalize the roster and play the guys on the bubble. It could switch off year to year whether a team gets one or two home games. One year the owner wins (two games of revenue), the other year the fans win.
The league could even make the middle game always be the regional rivalries (SF-Oak / NYG-NYJ / PHI-PIT). At least that would be the game where starters play more which would make the result feel more legit which always matters in a rivalry game. The league could sell it as reducing player injuries and the burden of cost on fans.
You gotta bring ass to get ass.
I say keep it at 4
I feel this allows for the back-ups to get more playing time in game situation. What happens if Gore tears his ACL in the first regular season game. I bet all of us would have wanted Dixon to have gotten as much game time as possible.
Yeah exhibition games aren’t all that exciting to watch, but they serve an important purpose in my mind.
Proud member of the "Bring Back Semenov" Club
on another note
all the beat writers are a-twitter about sing postponing his postgame conference calls, a new rb signing announcement to be made when it does happen?
question
Since we do need another running back, why not consider Brian Westbrook? I am a big believer in Dixon but we need depth at that position.
by Iupati_like_its_1999 on Aug 16, 2010 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
BREAKING NEWS WE SIGNED WESTBROOK!
http://blogs.sacbee.com/49ers/archives/2010/08/niners-close-to.html
GeT Ya Popcorn ReadY
The Last Names Ever, First Names Greatest.
3 games, you need starters to get in the groove but enough time for no-name players to show their worth
what happens with Season-long records?
Aside from per/game records, Is a new history book opened since you can’t really compare the 16-game to 17-season stats
Yes
The problem of compairing stats happened when the NFL expanded from 14 to 16 games back in 1978. Miami is still the only team to go undefeated for an entire season and post season but they did it over a 14 game season not a 16 game season. You just have to compair the stats for players based on the era they played in.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
If players are gonna get injured, and they are going full speed
then the games should count for something. cut 2 preseason games that mean nothing and add 2 meaningful regular season games. one more home game and one more away game. It will make the owners richer and the players richer, only the fans will be poorer. Well, unless you pay full price for pre season, which I dont. I figure if I am gonna shell out 300 for my son and I to go to a game, it is gonna be a game that all the starters play the whole game. I dont understand why the owners cut the pre season games to 75% of the price of a regular season game. You only get about 50% of the talent on the field, so they ought to give the fans a break on the price. It is sad that the owners are so greedy that they charge full ticket price for an over glorified scrimmage. I think the regular season is overpriced!
Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!
I like 4 preseason games
Or I should say, I prefer a 16-game regular season. I think the four preseason games are helpful for teams to evaluate talent and give players opportunities to prove themselves. What I think needs to be addressed is the price of preseason tickets. It shouldn’t cost regular season prices, for preseason football.
I will gladly eat crow if Brandon Jones does well for the 49ers in 2010.
by Andrew Davidson on Aug 16, 2010 8:37 PM PDT reply actions
I agree with all of this
Players don’t even get paid for preseason games so I’m not even sure what Roger Goodell and the owners are aiming at here.
If they remvoe 2 preseason games the player's salary would get a corresponding salary increase
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
with you on the 3 preseason games.
but i recently realized that they can’t have a 17-game regular season, because some teams would have more home games/less road games than others.
unless they had a week where teams switched stadiums and every game was on a neutral field. i think that would be cool, but i’m not sure it would be good for revenue.
When life gives you fruit, add a bunch of sugar to it.
I thought about that as well
It seems like the NFL is playing more and more games out of the country to promote the game. I’ve heard in the future they may have as many as 4 games every year in England. Maybe the 17th game could be the ones played in Europe, Mexico, or Canada to promote the game. That way a team won’t lose a home game when it’s really a neutral site.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
yeah, but then they would have to play 16 international games a year
so each team could have one. they might do it anyway, but it would take a major leap of faith to redesign the schedule around 16 international games every year.
When life gives you fruit, add a bunch of sugar to it.
Some of those games could be played in the U.S.
Say you have 4 games in England, 2 in Germany, 1 in Mexico, 1 in Canada, and 8 games in cities in the U.S. that don’t have a team. I live in Utah and I can say with a lot of confidence that if the NFL played a regular season game here it would sell out. It’s just a thought.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
Where are they gonna play it at though..College stadiums? for regular season..That would cost NFL way too much money
Founder of team Omté Caspeen
Some of those college stadiums are bigger than NFL stadiums
Penn St sits 107,000, Alabama sits 92,000, and Nebraska, Wisconsin, and Oklahoma all sit over 80,000. Even BYU sits over 64,000. Plus it’s a 17th game which means everything earned is extra over a 16 game season.
Don't trust this guy. He lies.
not entirely extra.
it would have to replace the revenue from the 4th preseason game.
When life gives you fruit, add a bunch of sugar to it.
by these3words on Aug 17, 2010 11:00 PM PDT up reply actions
i'm sure they could sell out a non-sunday game in utah,
but where would they play it? rice-eccles seats less than 50,000 doesn’t it? i don’t know if they could get permission to use lavell edwards stadium, or if they would even want to.
When life gives you fruit, add a bunch of sugar to it.
by these3words on Aug 17, 2010 10:53 PM PDT up reply actions
3 games
One home, one away, one neutral field.
There’s a lot that goes into this: Roster selections, players working off offseason rust, team revenues (extends to concessions, parking, etc.), TV advertising, Directv packages…
I imagine a lot more haggling back and forth between the various powers that be before Goodell or anyone is able to make a change. But I do see 3 as a good number, especially when you add the neutral field game- that way you can have your London game (or ten), all in the preseason, and season ticket-holders don’t lose a regular season game. European soccer, particularly the big ticket teams (Man U, Chelsea, Barca, Real Madrid) have played their games here all as preseason games- I don’t see why the NFL forfeits games that matter.
Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!
preseason games on a neutral field wouldn't sell any tickets.
people in st. louis wouldnt pay to see the dolphins and vikings play a meningless game.
When life gives you fruit, add a bunch of sugar to it.
But
People in LA would pay to see the Raiders v. Rams, Raiders v. (insert team); or in Vegas to see (insert two teams); or in (insert foreign city) to see (insert two teams)… I bet the Cowboys could draw just about anywhere in the Red/Flyover states, as could a number of other teams.
Just as the HOF game is on a neutral field, other games could be as well. And rather than removing one teams regular season game to play it on a neutral field, play those games as exhibitions.
Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!
Additionally
A wise NFL franchise could use the opportunity to foster a fan base in a particular location by playing in the same city year after year, while still making sense geographically. For egs- the 49ers in Hawaii; Seachickens in Portland; Chargers in LA/ Vegas; Broncos in Salt Lake; Bills in Toronto… As you move east, the teams play closer together so the obvious destinations are fewer, but still easy opportunities for, say the NYJ and NYG to play eachother somewhere in NY State (where the Meadowlands are inaccessible) or for one of those teams to play the Bills somewhere in NY State.
Chris Cohan- YOU'RE FIRED!

by 































