2010 NFL Roster Cuts: The fallout from 49ers-Raiders
The completion of the third preseason game is big news for the 49ers for a couple of reasons. The third game is when we generally see the starters play more time than at any other point. However, the completion of the third full week of preseason action also means it's almost time for the first round of roster cuts.
The NFL requires teams cut down to 75 men on the roster as of Tuesday August 31. Teams will cut down against to a 53-man roster next Saturday, but this first roster cut is an intriguing one. After all, we're talking about players that likely won't be making the practice squad anytime soon. Considering the team will be cutting down another 22 guys, I'm fairly confident we won't see one Tuesday's roster cuts on the practice squad initially.
In counting up the 49ers roster, the team currently has 78 players on the roster, including the recently signed Aubrayo Franklin. It's possible that number is inaccurate, but I'm not totally sure. Assuming it is a correct tally, the team will have to cut three players. At this point, I'd guess some guys who could be on the chopping block would include LB Mike Balogun, OT Matt Kopa, one of either Tony Curtis or Joe Jone Finley, and after Phillip Adams performance yesterday I'd imagine Bobby Guillory can't be feeling too comfortable with his roster spot.
In relatively unrelated news, you can check out the audio of Aubrayo Franklin's press conference from yesterday afternoon.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
don't think they'll cut Long
They probably want him on the PS
by whistlingmountain on Aug 29, 2010 9:10 AM PDT up reply actions
to put him on the PS they have to cut him
then hope he clears waivers
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
yea I meant in the cut down to 75
Generally if they’re cut before 75 they don’t keep them for PS.
Long and Stoudemire were both cut today, surprising to me
by whistlingmountain on Aug 29, 2010 3:31 PM PDT up reply actions
Guillory has my vote....
showed a little promise, but has Arnaz Battle syndrome…Adams showed he can fill in until Williams heals (and they also have Ginn as an emergency returner too)
I don't think promise sits well
With Sing, Schottenheimer or anyone on the coaching staff. I want to like the guy by default (he’s from my hometown Vallejo, CA) but I can’t be a homer if Guillory isn’t bringing anything. Unfortunately I agree, he’s one of the three. Kopa is almost obviously the 2nd. Has he even played in the last two games? The third I would vote for Joe Jon Finley. Anyone who looked that lost on a PAT has no business being on the field.
27 da. . .Shut up mango :P
I'm on twitter now. Please follow me! www.twitter.com/@yougomango
How about Jurovich?
If anything, he has shown less than Guillory thus far. Anyway, these are the easy ones. Getting down to 53 is a lot tougher anytime, and with what we saw of Adams and LaBoy last night, I think both have left the bubble category and made the final roster.
Definitely agree
Not sure how it will translate to the regular season, but Adams and LaBoy are just about locks on my roster. I love how LaBoy is showing he’s still got quite a bit after being out for a whole year. On top of the TD, Adams still was looking like he could contribute really well for the D. He’s a really physical guy & I’m very impressed with his play.
27 da. . .Shut up mango :P
I'm on twitter now. Please follow me! www.twitter.com/@yougomango
Uh, did you watch the game last night?
Jurovich had one opportunity, a kickoff return; he ran it back for 48 yards — much more than Guillory has done during the entire pre-season.
by 49erFanSince1950 on Aug 29, 2010 10:31 AM PDT up reply actions
Huh , he got one shot and made the most of it ...!!
I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's juz my game ...!!
what are you talking about?
of the receivers who have no shot at the 53-man roster, kevin jurovich has shown more than any of them.
When life gives you fruit, add a bunch of sugar to it.
Cuts could happen quickly
It would give these players a chance to stand out for pick up by other teams. Also, the 49ers could go beyond the 75 mark and make room for a pick up from the scouting list. I don’t see picking up a (semi) experienced qb as out of the question, in case Smith gets hurt and Carr can’t do the job. Qb, in a certain sense, is ironically one of the less deep positions in terms of quality replacements. (Not interested in a qb controversy!) I say this even though I sincerely respect the grit and the tenacity of Carr to get the job done in the 4th quarter last night. I’m thinking of upgrade at #3, which can also be left often for a few weeks to not lose the talent of LaBoy, Adams—the Bubble Boys.
Think'n Laboy and Adam's , aren't on the bubble ...!!
I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's juz my game ...!!
I found this interesting from Maiocco
One thing is clear …Caulcrick is ahead of Brit Miller on the 49ers’ FB depth chart. But will the 49ers keep two FBs? Byham can play there.
Would Miller be moved to the practice squad if this is true or would he be placed on waivers?
"Dodger fans aren’t happy when foul balls get into their section, because it interferes with their playing with the beachball"- Mike Krukow
You can't be put on the PS until you have cleared waivers
If you are not on the final 53 or IR, you are up for grabs by the rest of the league. But remember, they have the same problems you do getting down to 53.
by seafood lover on Aug 29, 2010 10:22 AM PDT up reply actions
I want to say Brit Miller if waived would clear and make the PS
But he did make a good case last night to make the roster for ST’s. I say find a way to keep him and put Caulcrick on the PS.
27 da. . .Shut up mango :P
I'm on twitter now. Please follow me! www.twitter.com/@yougomango
MM has no idea what he's talking about when it comes to roster predictions
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
roster
That comment was a tweet, but if you check out MM’s stock report post from this morning, it looks like the tweet was based on the fact that Caulcrick is getting all the second team snaps behind Moran Norris. So not just a judgment call.
by David Fucillo on Aug 29, 2010 12:02 PM PDT up reply actions
And in my view the reason Caulcrick has been getting the snaps
is because he’s an unknown quantity and we’re trying to see what he’s got.
It’s like saying Dixon has passed Westbrook on the depth chart as the backup RB since he got all the #2 snaps last week and Westbrook didn’t get any.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
And we know what we have in Miller? No. At this point, I don’t think Miller even makes the practice squad.
Actually yes
A great ST player and a guy who can fill in at FB.
I really have to wonder how much attention you pay to special teams.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
I pay attention to special teams.
And i know he is a good special teamer. But we don’t know he can fill in at fullback… Yet. Until they play him at FB.
IMO they already know what they have ...
… in Miller and trying not to show their hand to other team’s …!!
I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's juz my game ...!!
Miller was still very good on ST
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on Aug 29, 2010 11:48 AM PDT up reply actions
why not Michael Robinson?
All the players you are mentioning can play more than special teams. MR gets you a foot when you need a yard EVERYTIME!
by wtlichens on Aug 29, 2010 11:24 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
You say this
but then totally discount Miller’s contribution to ST. Miller has replaced McKillop has the point man on coverage units and done a fantastic job. I will be shocked if he gets cut.
Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority
stoudamire didn't impress in coverage
he made some plays in the running game, but he stunk in coverage.
good to get those waivers out of the way.
Post up
With the roster cuts official, we’ve got a thread up.
http://www.ninersnation.com/2010/8/29/1657470/2010-nfl-roster-cuts-49ers-waive

by 

























