Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

NFC West: Seattle Seahawks

If there's been one story to come out of Seattle this off-season it's that nobody's job is safe. The Seahawks have had more turnover this year than any other team. The biggest issue for this team has been the turmoil. New head coach who brings in several new position coaches including a line coach who implements a new blocking system and then quits. 

Draft:
Round 1: Russel Okung, OT
Round 1: Earl Thomas, Safety
Round 2: Golden Tate, WR
Round 4: E.J. Wilson, DE (Cut)
Round 5: Kam Chancellor, Safety
Round 6: Anthony McCoy, TE
Round 7: Dexter Davis, DE
Round 7: Jameson Konz, RB (Cut)

Of their draft picks--Earl Thomas is exciting to watch. He's inconsistent and can give up the big play but he also has the ability to make the big play (against the Vikings he had an 86 yard interception returned for a touchdown). If he can settle down he'll be a big addition to the team. 

Free Agent Signings/Re-signings:

Leon Washington, RB
Chester Pitts, G
Michael Robinson, RB
Stacey Andrews, OT (presumably will start on the right side)
Evan Dietrich Smith, G
Kentwan Balmer, DE
Raheem Brock, DE

Star-divide

Offense Review:

Matt Hasselbeck can still throw the ball. The problem is knowing who he's going to throw it too.  Nate Burleson and T.J. Houshmandzadeh accounted for over 50% of the Seahawks receiving yards last year and they're both gone. Theyve got some young rookies who could be good, and Mike Williams looked good in the pre-season but he's not done much thus far in his pro career so it seems a stretch to me to rely on him to replace Housh or Burleson. Losing those two is going to hurt them badly. On top of that their offensive line has been decimated.

The worst loss is the sudden retirement of Alex Gibbs, the man who was brought in to replace Mike Solari and fix their issues. His replacement is Pat Ruel (who was an Alex Gibbs protege). They got rid of Rob Sims who was a starter last year, and rumors are that Locklear is going to be on the chopping block soon. They did bring in Chester Pitts (who presumably will start at RG) as well as Stacey Andrews (who will presumably be starting at RT), but that means two new starters on the right side and a rookie on the left side. In other words, bad news for protection.

They do have good depth at RB in Leon Washington and Justin Forsett, and Julio Jones took a pay cut to stay with the team, so there's potential there. It's going to be rough for them though, especially with Okung missing one or two weeks at the start of the season. 

The offensive line struggled with pass protection and struggled with 3rd down conversions. However Hasselbeck still can deliver the ball on the money and you don't ever want to write off Forsett (whom I really like) or Leon Washington (whom I also like). They have some potential but it's going to be very hit or miss. If Hasselbeck misses any time this year I don't think Whitehurst can win games for the Hawks (he did look good in the pre-season but winning in the regular season is a different story). 

Defense Review

Earl Thomas is going to be exciting when he figures things out. Right now he's making some big mistakes (trying to jump balls and giving up big plays), but he's also making some big plays (he had a nice 86 yard pick 6 against the Vikings). They got rid of Josh Wilson which was a bad mistake as he was one of their best CBs. Thomas' INT was made possible because Wilson tipped the ball and Wilson had his own INT during the pre-season. Marcus Trufant can be good, but struggles against bigger WRs and TEs (Jermichael Finley ate him alive).

There's a weak spot in the center of their deep pass protection that was easily exploited by Aaron Rodgers and Brett Favre. They'll need to fix that or they'll be destroyed during the regular season. Their underneath stuff was defended pretty well for the most part and their linebackers made some good plays on the ball. 

On the defensive line they struggled to get any kind of pass rush at all. I lost track of how many times I counted 4 seconds for protection for the offense. On one drive in Minnesota the Vikings converted 4 out 5 3rd downs (and three of those were 3rd and long). 

However, all that being said I think that the defense is probably going to be the bright spot for the Seahawks (or at least the less dark spot) this year. I think watching Earl Thomas develop could be fun, but their CBs are going to get tested over and over again. 

Special Teams

If Andy Lee is God then I think we can nominate Jon Ryan as a saint. The dude can boot it which is a big help for the Seahawks coverage units. They're not as bad as the Rams units, but they're not great either--I'd put them at middle-of-the-road, but that should improve. On returns they do an ok job as well--this is another area where they're going to miss Josh Wilson who was a pretty good return man. 

Schedule

Week 1 SF @ Sea: First week of the season, Okung out and Chester Pitts probably filling in at LT? Seahawks are going to be destroyed

Week 2 Sea @ Den: I really don't like what McDaniels is doing in Denver but I think that team is better than the Seahawks. Loss for the Hawks

Week 3 SD @ Sea: Seattle might be able to win this one. It's early in the year and San Diego won't have found it's groove yet. Close game but I think Seattle pulls out a win

Week 4 Sea @ St. Louis: I think Seattle loses this for the reasons I indicated in the Rams thread. Sam Bradford's accuracy will pick them apart.

Week 5: Bye

Week 6: Sea @ Chicago. Cutler will lose this one for Chicago. Thomas will have a big night picking him off. Win

Week 7: Arizona @ Seattle. I predict a close Seattle win here. Seattle gets the edge due to it being a home game.

Week 8: Seattle @ Oakland. Seattle wins this one. I think the Raiders defense will be ok this year, but their offense will struggle

Week 9: NYG @ Sea: Easy win for the Giants who have too many weapons for Seattle to contend against.

Week 10: Sea @ AZ. I think the Cardinals will be hunting for revenge. It's at AZ so they'll get the win.

Week 11: Sea @ NO This is going to be a bloodbath. New Orleans will slaughter the Seahawks

Week 12: KC @ Seattle Seattle could win this one--it all depends on the ground game of the Chiefs, since I think their passing game is suspect.

Week 13: Carolina @ Seattle: Another home game for the Hawks and that gives them the edge. The Panthers QB situation is worrisome.

Week 14: Sea @ SF: SF decimates the Hawks. We're playing at home, by Week 14 we'll be playing for homefield advantage in the playoffs . . .

Week 15: ATL @ Sea: Schaub picks apart the Hawks. This will be a beat-down like we got last year.

Week 16: Seat @ TB. Win for Seattle. Two teams with about as much talent facing each other, only the Hawks have a better QB

Week 17: STL @ Sea: Win for the Rams

I can't see the Hawks with more than 6 wins. If they have a surprise upset or two they might stretch it to 8, but I'll be shocked. I wouldn't be surprised to see them finish with 4 (which should put them in fine position to draft Jack Locker). 

Poll
How many wins will the Seahawks have this year?
More than eight
90 votes
Six to Eight
357 votes
Less than Six
333 votes

780 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I’ve got the Hawks penciled in for a 5-11 record.

by Andrew Davidson on Sep 8, 2010 10:17 AM PDT reply actions  

Ditto

Touchdown Forty Niners!

by Effage on Sep 8, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Love the fact nobody picked above 8.

"Bears are crazy, Willie. They'll bite your head off if you're wearing steak on it."

by Blank x2 on Sep 8, 2010 10:22 AM PDT reply actions  

Its just such a long shot. Hasselbeck would be better than he ever has been and Carroll would be coach of the year unanimously. Any given Sunday.

by mcwagner on Sep 8, 2010 10:27 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

shaub

For week 15 I just don’t see Shaub going back to Atlanta just to beat the Seahawks. If he doesn’t I think Matt Ryan could win this one too

by mcwagner on Sep 8, 2010 10:25 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

Jake's Brother?

Not sure where Jack Locker plays, but if he’s not available, they might go after Jake Locker… And there’s no way that the Rams sweep ANYONE this year.

by Lott'sMissingPinky on Sep 8, 2010 10:36 AM PDT reply actions  

Possibly the Cardinals

But the Seahawks is easier.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Crabtree Vs. Tate -49ers Lets Get Ready To Rumble!!!

I’m just feeling the Heat when our boy CRABTREE does some major damage on Seahawks!!!

l can already paint the perfect picture of him attacking the ball in the air from Alex

49ERS – LETS GET READY TO RRUUUMMBBBLLLEEEEEEEEE !!!!!

by London_9er on Sep 8, 2010 11:17 AM PDT reply actions  

Ya tu sabes

49ers los mejores!!!

by 49erSalvatrucha on Sep 8, 2010 11:21 AM PDT up reply actions  

Crabtree is glad he gets to burn Earl Thomas twice a year.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 11:44 AM PDT up reply actions  

Wait.

You made a mistake. He’ll burn him dozens of times, over two games a year!

by mr. instigator on Sep 8, 2010 1:16 PM PDT up reply actions  

I stand corrected

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 1:48 PM PDT up reply actions  

Just Too Many Holes

You cannot contend, even in the weakest division, with as many holes as Seattle has.

I cannot for the life of me understand why they recently let both Josh Wilson and TJ Housh go. Makes absolutely no sense considering they were two of the most talented players at their positions on the team. Also, I cannot see Leon Washington being much of a difference maker, he really hasn’t been thus far in the NFL.

All this said, I really do like their draft. You couldn’t ask for a better first 3 picks in Okung, Thomas and Tate. I am really high on all three, but you will see a lot of rookie mistakes, especially with Thomas and Tate. I think Seattle is looking at 6 wins at the most, but 4 more realistically

 Can anyone tell me why Seattle has Tate so far down on the depth chart? Did he have a bad camp?

"He who lives on hope will die fasting" Benjamin Franklin was a fool

"If we are thinking playoffs, why not look towards the mountaintop"

I like my quote better

by nocal81(Vincent) on Sep 8, 2010 11:25 AM PDT via mobile reply actions  

I cannot for the life of me understand why they recently let both Josh Wilson and TJ Housh go. Makes absolutely no sense considering they were two of the most talented players at their positions on the team.

Not only that.
They’re paying TJ to play for the Ravens.

I mean, WTF?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 11:45 AM PDT up reply actions  

Ozzie Newsom strikes again.

I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
Credit to iaalexeeff

The New and Improved Bay Area Connections:
Alex Smith to Michael Crabtree
Stephen Curry to David Lee
Madison Bumgarner to Gerald Buster "Jesus" Posey

by Hoopers Judge on Sep 8, 2010 12:20 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Indeed

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 12:31 PM PDT up reply actions  

lol, it reminds me of...

… Terry Donahue & John York, post-Mariucci.

Ahh, it’s fun seeing the Seahawks go to the cellar.

Touchdown Forty Niners!

by Effage on Sep 8, 2010 2:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't really agree with the Wilson/Housh moves, but I do understand them.

Wilson – 5’8" tall at CB. Carroll prefers taller CB’s, and only had 1 starter in his years at USC who was under 6’. Wilson is an awesome nickelback and return man, but Wilson is also in a contract year and will likely command starter money after the season. If we’re not going to contend this year and we’re not going to resign him in the offseason, why not get value out of him?

Housh – Works best in the Slot, but we have a glut of slot guys, and the coaching staff has been praising Branch all camp. And while Housh is surely the best of the group, he’s older and could be done by the time we’re ready to contend again. So we might as well let some of the young guys get playing time. Also I would be surprised if attitude had something to do with it as well.

by Mind of no mind on Sep 8, 2010 12:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

But why if you are paying him to play for another team.

Just demote him and keep him in case of an emergency.

You’re going to pay him regardless.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 1:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Because they want to suck and are aiming at a certain college QB.

by bignerd on Sep 8, 2010 2:11 PM PDT up reply actions  

I would laugh so hard

If they have Locker on the board when they pick next year. And then they draft some random guy like Robert Quinn or something.

Everyone in the state of Washington will commit suicide

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 3:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Well, if you do that you have to either cut Deon Butler, who is young and has good potential (3rd round pick last year),

or you have to cut Ben Obomanu who is a little older and with a little less potential, but is a solid special teams contributor. Also while it’s not a lot by comparison, the ravens will pick up $855,000 of Housh’s salary this year. Plus, Housh can be a distraction when he’s starting, if he was benched he’d probably be 10x worse.

Again, I’m not saying I agree with the move, but I do understand it.

by Mind of no mind on Sep 8, 2010 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions  

Sounds cheap

Who are your other 3 WRs?
Branch, Williams, ???

I’d cut Obamanu.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 9:04 PM PDT up reply actions  

Branch, Williams, Tate.

I’d cut Obamanu too, but only if I was going to start Housh (which I would). But if I were going to keep Housh on the bench, I don’t think it’s worth the distraction. I think Housh would be badass in the slot, but the previous regime brought him in to be the #1, and I think if you move him in to the slot he would pout (although I’d take a pouty Housh), but if you put him on the bench, I could see him destroying the locker room.

by Mind of no mind on Sep 8, 2010 10:34 PM PDT up reply actions  

I see

Wasn’t he always in the slot in CIN?

Is that why he left?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 9, 2010 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Why don't they just use the rebuild word up there?

They have avoided saying it all off season. It’s actually a good thing otherwise they would be following the Rams’ path … 3, 2, 1.

by bignerd on Sep 8, 2010 11:46 AM PDT reply actions  

Boom!

?

I was assuming you were counting down…

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 8, 2010 12:32 PM PDT up reply actions  

I predict they will choose between the two top overall picks in the 2011 draft.

I think right now, Seattle is a hair better than the niners were after Dennis Erickson and Terry Donahue ripped SF’s winning tradition apart. This team is a mess, with no continuity. I honestly see them beating the Bucs, but I think every game on the schedule is quite possibly a loss.

They need two-three years(at least) to get it together. I suppose we can anticipate continued success in their future draft classes. But they’re very geared towards starting from scratch. Not necassarily a bad long term plan, but it will be a delicate coaxing of the talent in the short-term.

I would also not be surprised if Carrol produces Nolan-like results.

jacobtaylor2002

by jacobtaylor2002 on Sep 8, 2010 12:08 PM PDT reply actions  

This could be true if we had a normal schedule,

but we play both the AFC and NFC West, as well as a 3rd place schedule. Our win total will likely be inflated due to this.

by Mind of no mind on Sep 8, 2010 12:30 PM PDT up reply actions  

everyone on your schedule is saying:

“Our win total will likely be inflated because we get to play the Seahawks this year.”

When life gives you fruit, add a bunch of sugar to it.

by these3words on Sep 8, 2010 3:40 PM PDT up reply actions  

True,

but again, I’m only talking about going 6-10. Compare that to a team like the Bills who play in the AFC East, and against the AFC North and NFC North. The seahawks play enough mediocre to average teams that while you can still expect a losing record, it seems a stretch to say bottom two records.

by Mind of no mind on Sep 8, 2010 4:59 PM PDT up reply actions  

Good write up, but I think you really missed the mark on the predictions.

You have them winning 6-7 games depending on the KC game, but going only 1-5 in the division. I have the Seahawks pegged as a 6 win team as well, but there is no way we go 5-5 or 6-4 outside of the division (depending on how you’re swinging the KC game). Most likely we take 2-3 division games and 3 or 4 non division games.

The Rams have lost 10 straight to the Seahawks, with the last 3 losses at Qwest being by more than 20 points. Throw in the fact that as good as Bradford has looked in the preseason, he’s still a rookie QB with very few weapons at receiver. I can see the Rams splitting with the Hawks, but a sweep is unlikely.

And while I favor the 49ers in both games, the Seahawks are 2-1 vs Singletary, and last year in the second game our line was a mess (gave up 5 sacks) and Smith threw for over 300 yards, and you guys still lost. That’s why while I say 2 division games is more likely, we still have a decent shot at getting 3. Also, keep in mind, Chester Pitt started 32 consecutive at LT in his first two seasons at Houston before moving to LG. It’s not like your getting a guy who’s never done it before.

by Mind of no mind on Sep 8, 2010 12:28 PM PDT reply actions  

Do You Remember What Happened When Pitts Started those first two seasons?

Houston led the world in sacks allowed and nearly got David Carr killed, it may have eveb ruined his career!! I am not saying Pitts isn’t a good player, I even advocated the 49ers signing him, but to play G not T. There is always a reason a player moves from T to G, and usually because he doesn’t cut it at T.

In regards to predictions and the moves to get rid of Housh and Wilson. Well, if you are in rebuilding mode it makes sense to let the young players play, but not to pay for a top tier WR to play for another team, well a good WR, not top tier. Also, the Whitehurst thing was an absolute joke to be honest. Didn’t you trade down 20 spots in the 2nd and give up a 2011 3rd for him? A player that has played 5 years in the NFL without throwing a regular season pass. WTF?

The core of this team is really missing, and that is why it could be compared to the Nolan years here in SF. However, the additions of Okung and Thomas helps that a bit. But, you don’t have a QB of the future, top flight RB, anchor on the D-line or stud in the defensive backfield (Thomas could be that).

 A lot of positioons need to be filled in order for you to even talk .500! In all honesty a 3-4 win season is possible and may be the best for this franchise. Detroit has done nice bulding through the draft, and now they have a talented young corp. N.O was able to get Bush and Brees in the same year via draft and free agency. Spend wisely and draft good and it won’t be a long drawn out process, but avoiding the “rebuilding” tag will cause years of futility.

"He who lives on hope will die fasting" Benjamin Franklin was a fool

"If we are thinking playoffs, why not look towards the mountaintop"

I like my quote better

by nocal81(Vincent) on Sep 8, 2010 1:17 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

ok seattle sucks

however sad it is to say for me, but your thoughts i think are a little cynical for the seahawks. colin cole is the line anchor. he isn’t good he isn’t bad he just does his job while brandon mebane makes up for it with his talent. about the stud in the defensive backfield, uhm have you heard of marcus trufant? sure he was injured and sucked last year but he is back to pro bowl form. earl thomas could be good and lawyer millor is a BEAST against the run but of course not a long term solution. qb of the future…well lets just say thats tbd. we do not have a top flight rb, but we have multiple running backs that combine to get the job down. washington has the burst to rip through holes and forsett can fight for yards. both are serious receiving threats. not trying to troll, but gore is waaaayyy overrated. his good games are against my seahawks and he gets his stats inflated from long runs. he had two long ones last year but the rest of the game (and season) he was held in check.thats all from me good luck in the game sunday.

by 12thseattlefan on Sep 9, 2010 6:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

As tough as it is to play in Seattle

We beat ourselves there last year. Frank Gore’s fumble inside the 20, the fumble on the kick return that led directly to a TD and then Delanie Walker getting mugged in the end zone on a 4th and goal. At a minimum that’s a 10 pt swing that we should’ve had.

Our team has gotten better while yours has gotten worse.

Rams have also improved significantly—a sweep may be unlikely, but it really depends on how fast your secondary can get it’s act together.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Sep 8, 2010 4:06 PM PDT up reply actions  

You mean the ball thrown behind his head?

Crabtree wouldn’t have caught that ball in passing drills.

To add on smileyman’s list, not to mention our 9th string DB getting beat deep on the last offensive play of the game.

by bignerd on Sep 8, 2010 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

It was only behind his head because he was ducking. It was a catchable ball that he didn't even attempt to reach.

And you can’t use the 9th string DB excuse, otherwise we could use the 9th string LT excuse. I agree that you guys did as much to lose the game as we did to win the game, but you’re still essentially the same team, so until you guys learn to put away a weaker team that has had recent success against you, it seem presumptuous to just assume that this time you will “destroy” them. Remember, you’re still the same team that was in a tight 7-6 game against the rams the last game of the season before they self destructed part way through the 4th quarter, with Kyle Boller and Keith Null at QB no less.

I think the 49ers will win the division, and probably win 10 or more games, but you still account for 2 of Seattle’s 9 wins over the last two seasons. You’ve been blown out by Seneca Wallace and got 1 victory in OT. I think you’ll probably win both games, but 1-1 is not at all unrealistic.

by Mind of no mind on Sep 8, 2010 11:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

No team is ever exactly the same year to year. But it's pretty close as far as I can see.

Sure you got two promising rookie starters coming in on the OL, but they’re still rookies playing their first game on the road in one of the loudest stadiums in the NFL, plus a backup center. Besides, just about every team in the league has a promising rookie or two making their debute this weeked. I believe Bruce has been replaced by Morgan, but we’ve seen him before. I’m assuming you have a new CB starting opposite from Clements. Beyond that, who else new do you have starting? Are you counting on Brian Westbrook to not be a 31 year old running back? Plus you still have JRII running your offense, other than the benefit of continuity for Alex Smith, I don’t think there is much else to be happy about with that.

by Mind of no mind on Sep 9, 2010 2:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Mark Roman is off the team

You know, the guy that cost us the MIN game?

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"

by SportsChicken on Sep 9, 2010 12:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Gah

It’s not as if it was blown coverage or anything like that. He was right there—had he just pushed Payne out of bounds we would’ve won the game. That’s all he had to do, but instead he goes for the ball. Idiot.

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Sep 9, 2010 4:42 PM PDT up reply actions  

I see 5-6 wins… I went with the 6-8 range. I think they have good personnel people in charge, but I’m not in love with Pete Carroll as a coach and really, they don’t have any playmakers on that offense that scare you. Even in his heyday, to me, Hasselbeck was always good in a “ya he’s MAYBE in the top ten of QBs” kind of way, and now his age is beginning to show. They don’t have much protection for him up front and their wide receiving corps is typically uninspiring. Oh and this Alex Gibbs thing hurts them. REALLY hurts them.

On the bright side, I do like the Forsett/Washington combo, and I think Golden Tate could develop into a really nice slot receiver as the year goes on. Defensively, they’ve got a couple of potential playmakers in Tatupu and Curry and the interior of their DL is better than advertised, IMO. But I just can’t see them winning more than 6 games.

That said, I fully expect this Sunday to be the toughest NFC West game the Niners will play all season. I still expect them to win, but it could be close given the noise level, the first game with a new coach factor, and the fact that Hasselbeck enters the game healthy (which I doubt he will for more than half the season).

Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...

by Smoke on the Water on Sep 8, 2010 1:44 PM PDT reply actions  

Concerns for me with this game

are the noise level particularly with A. Davis’ propensity for false starts and if Mebane has any double moves he wants to try out on Davis.

I could see Anthony Davis getting called for 2 or 3 false starts this game and giving up a couple of sacks

Logic merely enables one to be wrong with authority

by smileyman on Sep 8, 2010 4:08 PM PDT up reply actions  

Those false starts mean....

that instead of Gore getting 75-80 yard TD runs, he will have to make them 80-85 yarders lol

by sanfranfanmdk on Sep 8, 2010 5:56 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don't have him on my fantasy team

and I hate losing so when I play against Gore I’ll ask him nicely to not run as hard.

by manraj7 on Sep 8, 2010 8:14 PM PDT up reply actions  

Wow if you go by the SeaHag's website, they may never win a regular season game again !!

They are in FULL BLOWN panic mode in SeaHag-Ville! I have never seen such utter panic and confusion as I saw on their blog, our sister blog on the SB Nation. Now I can’t even find what the name of their dumb and slow blog is this morning. I think it was the dirty feathers or something like that. Anyway, they were posting PICS of the TWEETS of players who were being shuttled out of town or players who have been with the team for a while. Tweets like “WTF is Management doing, these moves make no SENSE!” and “What a Farking Disaster” Tweets are posted so that you can see visually WHO made the post and at what time! The rest of the players think that the new coach is just clearing house and is cutting vet players with talent left and right just because they belonged to the old regime.

I think that is a VERY POOR way to do things, but Pete Carol doesn’t have the best PRO record of all time. I guess after his last PRO gig, Carol wrote in his Notebook, “Get RID of Every Single Player who you dont think will fit your system Immediately or you will suffer and be fired in 3 years!”, because he is just going through and systematically cutting players with no replacement, replacing players with inferior talent and cutting old players. Keeping rookies and cutting expensive vets that are signing on elsewhere because they still have TALENT. In fact, it appears that TALENT has no bearing on whether you are getting the AX or not in Seattle and I think that is REALLY PISSING who is LEFT OFF! Not to mention the players that are getting canned because Pete waited to cut loose several talented players with TALENT so VERY late in the process that they may not get jobs until mid season in some cases. Those players HATE Pete Carol right about now, and will forever come back to haunt the SeaHags! I think Carol is totally screwing up like Danielson in Denver. TOO MUCH power and just cleaning house not to improve the talent level, but to get RID of players you dont agree with or dont think will listen, or may not fit your system. In the NFL, they have names for coaches like Carrol, they are called “Canned in 2 years”.

I TRULY think that Carrol is making a career suicide move by purging his roster like the pogroms by the Commies in RUSSIA just eliminating players not because they lack TALENT, but they dont agree with your coaching abilities. TALENT is the HARDEST thing to obtain and retain in the NFL. You can NOT win without talent, not consistently anyway (See Oakland Faiders). If you do NOT have talent in the NFL, you are a doormat team who will get walked over at home and on the road without mercy. AND, when the players on your team see the Coach in PANIC mode just PURGE the roster because he wants to bring in his OWN GUYS despite the talent that is lost is a HUGE thing that the players left on the team will NEVER forget. AND, much like that DIPWAD Daniels in Denver, Carrol will forever be linked to this Mass Purging of talent. Every time they lose a game because of a lack of talent, the story of the 2010 Sweet Pete TALENT PURGE will be brought up again and again till the ownership must rid themselves of the Cancer. Carrol is a pretty good X’s and O’s coach, and his defenses are always prepared and innovative. BUT from all reports, he has totally left the Defensive side of the ball alone other to PURGE talent that they are unable to replace. Now they have huge holes in their defensive line that gets no pressure on the other team and their defensive secondary where they cut vets who were able to perform and a decent level and replaced them with either inferior talent or rookies!

To me seems like they WANT to lose this year and get a good QB next year in the draft. BUT, how does it make the players who are getting older and are now just at the beginning of a "REBUILD’ situation in Seattle? The “R” word is now being used by the Main Newspaper Beat reporter in the Sports section to describe the situation. Players are TWEETING the “R” word to each other and to fans. You know, the “R” word is HATED by football fans because the average shelf life of a player is 5-7 years TOPS. If you are rebuilding, you star players wont be around to see any positive results.

The vets on the team all want OFF THE ISLAND. The last few vets traded right before cut down day seemed RELIEVED in their Tweets that they have escaped the BLACK HOLE that Carrol has created. Vet free agents wont go to Seattle because the Crappy treatment ownership showed the vets they purged as they were thrown out the door late in the pre season. The Vets on the team are going to be playing “Not to get Hurt”, which almost always ends in an injury. And dont even start about the Press and the Blogs associated with the Dirty Birdz… They are FLAMING P1ssed! You would think Carrol was the DEVIL the way the fans are posting over at the SeaHags blog. And the Beat Reporters in the Seattle Papers are totally going after this PURGE as a major concern. Hey, if it works and Carrol is able to recreate the team as a winner in 2 years then he is a genius. However NOTHING in his past pro record would indicate he has that sort of ability to change the mindset and the roster so fast and so many vets leaving. If Carrol was smart, he should have quietly rid himself of 1/4th the players who you thought were not any good. Replace them with players who will buy into the system. Continue to do that for a 2-3 year period and the team will have complete turnover anyway. BUT, the way he has chosen to Wipe the Slate is disturbing to the fans, has the PLAYERS totally lost because their Vet buddies got the AX and the players that are now on the team haven’t even PRACTICED together! WOW! Can you imagine? We have 2 rookies, a relatively new Center, a young player (Chilo) who needs some snaps to get better, and we as fans think our Offensive line is suspect and need time to GEL! WHAT would you then say about the SEA-Buzzards circling the Seattle Training Camp, where the turnover is such that the 5 guys LEFT on their Offensive Line have not had even ONE practice together, and the Fans wont recognize 2 of the 5 players starting! I think an interesting side bet is to bet which Offensive Line gets MORE false starts and Illegal Motions! I’d have to say that the Seattle O-Line is gonna win that dubious prize. Seattle fans are pissed, the Local Papers are ROASTING Carrol for his moves, what is left of the team is in disarray and are angry about the sudden Rebuild they find themselves in, and the Fans MUST buy a Roster at the game to find out who is playing where, who is left from last season (Approx 50% turnover from 2009). If the Seattle team wins 4 games this year, it will be a Miracle IMHO. They MAY come together a little at the end of the season and win a few meaningless games down the stretch against teams that have nothing to play for, but they wont win many competitive games. The O-Line will give up sacks and Hassleback is one hit away from taking the year off. He is as brittle as Chris “Chandelier” who used to play for the Rams when they were in LA. Great QB when healthy, but rarely played because he was made of Chrystal like a Chandelier! (his actual name was Chandler I believe). GOOD LUCK SEATTLE FANS! MAYBE NEXT YEAR…or 3 !!

Another year, another chance to hope for the team !!

by FaStRmAn on Sep 9, 2010 6:02 AM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ohmygoshilovemiguelxd-1_small
What the 49ers Should Do This Offseason
Frog_small
Official Draft NN Draft Thread

Recent FanPosts

Small
On Dashon Goldson
Images_small
Official Community Thread [2/9/2012] I hate pet peeves
Small
We didn't suck, so we don't need Luck.
Small
Have not heard this QB scenario
Small
49ers Season in a nutshell
Riceprofile_small
Where is the faith in Chilo Rachal?
Small
If Peyton Manning is a free agent, do the 49ers go after him?
Small
Potential QB Draft Targets

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

P_willy_america_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

San-francisco-49ers-helmet-logo-©photofile_small LondonNiner

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

Images_small mcwagner

Thecatch3_small mikeinsp