49ers Dominate Buccaneers: In His Free Time, Jim Harbaugh Walks On Water
It's Monday morning and while things are not perfect in 49ers-land, it's pretty close. The 49ers emerged somewhat scathed in their 48-3 rumbling over the Tampa Bay Buccaneers as Joshua Morgan suffered what is being reported as a fractured ankle. While that is a downer (more to come), the game itself was otherwise pretty awesome.
As I said yesterday, this was the most complete effort by a 49ers team since the 2002 playoff team. We've had some strong performances in recent years, but never four quarters of domination. No team can dominant for four quarters for 16 games. But good teams will dominate whistle to whistle several times a year. The 49ers still have plenty to build towards, but they are establishing a fantastic base from which to build.
The team is executing with greater and greater precision and that has been one key to victory. But the San Francisco 49ers are returning to relevancy in 2011 because of Jim Harbaugh. We're only five weeks into the season, and yet, I feel like I can say that if you are not sold on Jim Harbaugh, I don't know what else there is that can be done.
Yes, the 49ers have to take what they did against the Bucs and establish some game-to-game consistency. There are still some areas to improve and continue to get better each day. The team has to deal with some injuries and remaining difficult games on the schedule. And yet in spite of all this, I move forward with more confidence in the 49ers than I have felt since Steve Mariucci was coaching the team.
The biggest question mark in regards to Coach Harbaugh came on a late play. As @49ersCBSSports pointed out and I had overlooked, the pass play where Morgan was hurt actually came on 4th and 3 at the Bucs 20. Instead of kicking a field goal the 49ers went for it, converted the fourth down and lost Morgan for an undetermined amount of time.
The game was all but over with four minutes left. The 49ers had already proven they were a dominant team on the day. It got Colin Kaepernick a chance to make a fourth down play, but even still, was it worth it? I know hindsight is 20/20, but isn't the concern about losing players to injury one of the reasons teams bench players when they're up big late in a game? I think this goes beyond hindsight and considers common sense and logic.
Moving forward it will be interesting to see how Harbaugh responds if a similar situation presents itself.
Head Coach Jim Harbaugh
Press Conference - October 9, 2011
San Francisco 49ers vs. Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Was that about as well as you guys could execute?
"It was good, it was definitely very good. Felt like everybody contributed: offense, defense, special teams. I think you're going to see a lot of good play by a lot of folks. Secondary stood out, probably the most, shined the brightest. Getting their hands on balls all over the field, getting takeaways, making huge plays, scoring, just thought it was a phenomenal effort by them. [LB] Patrick Willis, [LB NaVorro] Bowman all over the field, again. Next thing to highlight, just the play of our receivers and the way they blocked, and the way the tight ends blocked. There was second level blocking; there was hustle, just outstanding. Then, yards after contact by our skilled players, thought was really good. It all got going with the passing game. Thought [QB] Alex [Smith] did a terrific job. Offensive line, I thought, was at their best today, in all regards. No sacks and coming off the ball; really felt they played well. Stopped the run, our guys were set up to do that, they wanted to do that. They made that a point of emphasis and they got that done. Across the board, I thought it was an outstanding day by our team."
You mentioned the yards after contact by the receivers. How much of that is Alex Smith putting it in a nice place for them to keep going down field?
"I think Alex was really on point today, right from the opening snap of the game. Came out, read the play properly, got it to [RB] Frank [Gore], because it was covered down field. Then, just made really cool headed decisions all day long. That was big. His location, though, his accuracy, I thought was the best of the season. One high ball to [WR] Michael Crabtree on a third down, and Crab again goes up and makes the high catch. He makes it look so easy the way he does it. I've never seen a guy with that strong of hands, to just pluck a ball at the outer ring of his catch radius is really outstanding."
When Alex is on like that, what is sort of different? What is important for him fundamentally, mechanically that is different from him being just okay to being really, really good?
"I think it's all the guys. It's always the unit. It's always how they play together, how they function together. I think he had time to see things today because the offensive line did a great job protecting, not just straining but locking guys up at the line of scrimmage. All together, receivers that make plays for you like that, running game that gets cranked up, I think it all feeds on each of those phases."
What was it about the matchup with putting TE Delanie Walker on the field that you guys used that more than maybe two back sets?
"Right now, I don't know. I would have to look at the numbers to self-scout ourselves to know that we did that more than normal. But that's always a big part of our plan, Delanie, [TE] Vernon [Davis] and the two wide outs."
How big of a play was CB Carlos Rogers' interception return to kind of get everything going in your favor?
"I thought that was huge because we had just turned the ball over on the fumble when we had knocked it down in there on a long drive and came away with no points. But then, Carlos gets that interception, that puts us right back in business. That was huge. I think he's had three in a row now, right? Three games in a row with an interception. Just outstanding."
Did you think both the offense and the defense would be this intact in week five?
"Intact?"
Like today, both the offense and defense were pretty superb.
"I thought we played well. I thought our guys really prepared well, I thought they were ready to play this game. From an emotional standpoint I thought they were prepared; physically and mentally for the ball game. Thought our coaches did an outstanding job preparing our guys for that. We'll just move on with humble hearts and get ready for Detroit.
Does this surprise you at all? Here you are 3-1 and you played so well today...
"4-1."
This early in the season, I mean that things have come together so quickly?
"I think a lot of you think it's a cliché that we're really just focused on getting better. Being better tomorrow than we were today. Being better today than we were yesterday. That's how we're judging success, so we didn't put any limitations on ourselves or any things like that. We'll just keep moving on with that plan, improving. Not changing but improving."
What kind of setup was this, though, to get you to the next level?
"Thought it was a great win for our team, great thrill of winning. We take the next step. It was a step. I feel like our team performed well, competed hard."
Buccaneers QB Josh Freeman didn't get into a rhythm during that game at all. It seemed like he had a lot of trouble with your coverages early. Did you guys do anything different for a plan in the secondary?
"We were doing some things, we were changing some things up. We don't really talk about the scheme. I thought that our players, especially in the secondary, were just breaking on balls and fast. Fastest I've ever seen our guys break and cover and read. I thought they were getting the jump, and I think that's just good. It's good playing, it's good coaching, it's good scheme. I think it was tied in very well together. The line, the linebackers, the secondary, everybody was on point today."
Can you talk about the play of DT Ricky Jean Francois from what you saw?
"It's Ricky Jean, it's Ricky Jean. Get the pronunciation right. I think he was outstanding, Ricky
Jean was outstanding. There was never any doubt that it wouldn't be. Ricky Jean's prepared hard, he's a heck of a football player, we had great confidence in him."
Does the way you won in Philly last week help you take these next steps, make you better?
"The game in Philly? I think that was a good character builder for a young team last week. To be able to do that on the road and then bounce back and put an exclamation point on and stamp that, that's another step, that's another block, another building block for our team. Certainly not where we want to be yet, but we'll leave out of here and enjoy this one and then get back to work."
Can you enjoy it after WR Joshua Morgan goes down late in the game? Does that sort of cast a pall over the day a little bit?
"We'll see. When we were out there on the field, Josh said it was starting to cool down. We'll get an evaluation on it."
How special was this win for you given that, I think you made some comments yesterday regarding the passing of Coach Al Davis and how much he made an influence to your coaching career?
"Yes. First of all, like you said, any time you win a game it's a great thrill of winning. I think Mr. Davis would have been proud of the way our team played today. He would have been proud of those guys."
The play that Joshua Morgan got hurt on, it was 41-3 and it was a pass. It's easy to second guess that, why were you still in kind of a passing mode?
"You've got to play. You can't take a knee with four minutes left in the game. It could have been a run. Josh was competing; I think he's going to be okay. [QB Colin] Kaepernick is competing; he's got to get to work. We're not taking a knee with four minutes left in the game."
You talked about the running game being cranked up; Frank Gore had another strong game, second game in a row. Can you talk a little bit about him?
"Another strong game by Frank. I thought he was seeing things really well today, I thought he was seeing holes. Thought he was planting very well, he was making the shallow cuts today. He had his burst back. He looked like Frank. He's having fun out there. That's the thing I see in Frank most of all right now, is that he's enjoying football."
64 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Outstanding!
It’s Ricky Jean, it’s Ricky Jean. Get the pronunciation right.
Come on, Alex, please be good this year..
Follow @JesseReed78
And yet an article in the Nuggets this morning has RJF pointing out to Harbaugh that he had it wrong. So Harbs gets it wrong, then is corrected, then Harbs corrects the reporters! Hey, Harbs can do anything he likes I guess. He’s 3-1 – whoops, as he also corrected a reporter on, he’s actually 4-1!
I think that was Harbaugh humor
He must’ve read the article, thus he was emphasising that he had gotten the name wrong before, but now he had it down.
He’s definitely a complex man, with a sense of humor to match.
I hope the 5% of the fan base that was nervous about Harbaugh are now completely won over
Nitpicking aside, is anyone completely psyched that so many of the defensive players that the team needs to look good going forward, is looking very good?
McDonald – Awesome
Bowman – Awesome
Rogers – Awesome
Brooks – Pretty Good
Aldon Smith – Very Promising
Culliver – Very Promising
Goldson & Whitner – Pretty Good
I hope they can stay healthy and the team can re-sign the free agents ( Rogers/Goldson ). Starting to get worried that Rogers might play his way into a really big contract.
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 6:59 AM PDT reply actions
Rogers was signed to a 3 year deal.
by motomatt716 on Oct 10, 2011 7:10 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions
Rogers is not going to leave the Super Bowl champions though is he?
by LondonNiner on Oct 10, 2011 7:16 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Yea Rogers a FA along with
Alex, Edwards, Morgan, Ginn, Brooks, and Goldson
All of whom, save Edwards because he’s injured, are playing pretty sizable roles on the team. And all of whom are playing them well.
I’d imagine Brooks, Ginn, Morgan, and Smith wil be affordable no matter what. Rogers and Edwards have the potential to get really big contracts, Goldson probably a medium sized contract.
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 7:18 AM PDT up reply actions
I don't give a flying $#W% about Goldson
In the 2011 NFL you need safeties that are more ball-hawk than big-hitter ie Earl Thomas up in seattle…I’m STILL mad at dingleberry about that one
...and then Singletary opened His Book and it said "thou shalt NOT pass"
by jimisoursavior on Oct 10, 2011 8:54 AM PDT up reply actions
don't need to beat that drum with me
I’ve long been preaching that the modern NFL requires 2 tackles that can pass block, 2 safeties that can cover, and 2 pass rushers.
Goldson is a decent ball hawk and he is a great hitter
If they can get him for 2.5-3.5 a year for 3-4 years. That would be a good deal for the 49ers. I don’t know of any marquee play making safeties coming out in the draft.
They could still take a middle round guy who has potential if they desire. We’ve all seen the depth issues in the secondary and god knows I don’t want to see Maddieu Williams back.
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 10:35 AM PDT up reply actions
smh
Clayton Kershaw, Giant Killer
KEMVP
Kempin' ain't easy
"By now if u don't believe the Niners are for real ur probably not that good at what u do..." - Donte Whitner
and I forgot that Snyder/Rachal are too
I assume Rachal is done, but they’ll have to decide what exactly they’re doing with RG by the end of the season.
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 12:57 PM PDT up reply actions
This
Starting to get worried that Rogers might play his way into a really big contract.
That would not be very good as he’s likely going to be the best FA corner on the market. The only other guy who might be close, would be Samuel; if the Eagles release him after the year.
by 9thevolution on Oct 10, 2011 8:06 AM PDT up reply actions
We really need to extend rogers
...and then Singletary opened His Book and it said "thou shalt NOT pass"
by jimisoursavior on Oct 10, 2011 8:55 AM PDT up reply actions
I wouldn't worry about the FA signings at this point.
We still have quite a bit of cap room left, and I think the 49ers did that on purpose to extend any promising one-year FAs.
My guess is that Edwards leaves, especially if Crabtree gets to 100% and keeps performing well. Ginn, Brooks, Goldson and Rogers can all be signed within the cap. We’ll be fine.
reaaally hope they keep Edwards
the receiving corps are very vanilla. I want Edwards and Williams out there. They are dynamic guys with big play potential, which is the missing ingredient with the offense ( other than consistent pass blocking ).
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don't think the receiving corps is that vanilla.
We have a guy with great hands and athleticism, but has injury and focus issues (Crabtree)
We have a big, physical receiver who’s an athletic freak (Davis)
We have two speedsters in Ginn and Williams, both of whom are much improved, and Morgan is an excellent possession receiver and has been doing quite well this season. Throw in decent targets like Walker, Gore and Hunter into the mix, and this is a good passing attack even without Edwards. If Edwards commands too much money, I don’t see a problem in cutting him.
I don't consider VD part of the receiving corps.
The problem is that both Crabtree and Morgan are possession receivers.
Edwards is a deep threat who can catch jump balls and Williams is a guy with the speed that can get a ball in space and break something.
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 4:57 PM PDT up reply actions
He's always been good...
No need to include him in that list.
by 9thevolution on Oct 10, 2011 12:46 PM PDT up reply actions
Maybe
If they kicked a field goal Akers leg might have been broken.
I have no problem with the call.
by gee man on Oct 10, 2011 7:12 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
That is only half a joke.
Other half is truth. Was not he out during pre-season.
4 active wideouts..
They only had four wide outs, on the day, morgan considered number 2. I have no problem going for it with your rookie QB to see how he responds under that pressure. With starters pulled a second stringer got hurt, lets remember morgan is actually 3rd on the depth chart with a healthy Braylon Edwards.
You can't take a knee with four minutes left in the game
This is one of the bigger things that’s been missing in recent years. Yeah, it sucks that Morgan got injured. But Nolan/Singletary would have basically played not to lose, rather than to win.
It's a bit different with that kind of lead.....
If we were up by 10, then you might say we’re taking a shot to completely finish the game, but with a near 40 point lead, it was just about seeing how Keapernick would respond and if he could convert that play.
I don’t disagree with the call completely, but it was a bit unnecessary at that point in the game.
by 9thevolution on Oct 10, 2011 8:04 AM PDT up reply actions
True
But still overall I liked how Harbaugh didn’t get too conservative in the closing minutes. Or for that matter after the Niners were up by about three TDs.
Me, too
Maybe later in the season, we just run out the clock to keep guys healthy. But this sent an important message not just to the fans but to the team itself: be aggressive, don’t let up. That kind of killer instinct has been lacking for the past few years.
by Bigmouth on Oct 10, 2011 9:48 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
eh, I mean
if they call a running play and Morgan gets rolled up on from behind, or one of the linemen gets hurt..
it’s the NFL and injuries happen. Until you can actually kneel out the game, you don’t kneel.
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 8:26 AM PDT up reply actions
Yeah, it's a freak accident...
They could have ran the same exact play and someone else could have broken a bone away from the ball. It’s not something that can be helped, and you just deal with it. Prob should have just kicked the FG there though.
by 9thevolution on Oct 10, 2011 12:50 PM PDT up reply actions
Well what if we run the ball and Hunter blows out his knee?
Or we kick the field goal and on the ensuing possession Dobbs breaks his leg. It sucks but I’ll tell you Morgan certainly supported Harbaugh having them actually playing to finish the game strong.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Oct 10, 2011 8:44 AM PDT up reply actions
Don't disagree....
Anyone can be injured on any play. It happened, and now we move on, but there wasn’t a need to go for it there at all.
by 9thevolution on Oct 10, 2011 12:51 PM PDT up reply actions
It's about sending a message
There was no need to keep racking up the points either. A 21 point margin of victory would’ve been just fine.
foot on the gas
Seems to me the team is learning that you always have your foot on the gas even with a lead. We need to burn down the whole nurse a lead play not to lose mentality that’s been instilled for years here. Anytime you play full-on theres a chance you’ll get burned for it, but playing safe will lose you more games in the long term. Morgans ankle sucks for us but less than playing scared.
by marinfrs on Oct 10, 2011 10:04 AM PDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Still disagree
I’m glad that Harbaugh went for it in such a big manner. It’s a ruthless mentality that I love. It told the Bucs “Don’t you disrespect us when you come to our house” and it put the rest of the league on notice that there would be no let up.
I thought it was a brilliant move. Yeah the injury sucks but it was a freak injury that could’ve happened during any play in the game.
we have outscored 69-3 in last 6 quarters
we are explosive and can score in all 3 phases of football. the o-line is looking good and we get push on runs, alex is getting the ball out quick and line is also providing some time. our front 3 on d (with or without rjf/soap) get pressure on passes. when we send 4 it is almost a guarenteed pressure or sack. secondary gets the game ball from yesterday. we completely shut them down. I don’t know the numbers but our turnover ratio is looking great. who is going to be watching the lions game? This is crazy because I didn’t even talk about the best 2 tandems in football. p-52 n b-53; vd n dw. watch out! Lions are going down
I think I read last night
Our turnover ratio is +10, good enough for first place in the entire NFL. We have something like 13 take aways and 3 give aways, or maybe 14 and 4. Pretty sure we’re +10 and leading the league.
I think we are pretty high up on margin of victory (difference in points scored vs points allowed on the year), and teams leading that stat usually go pretty far in the playoffs I read. No means a guarantee, but we are excelling in areas that dominating football teams excel at.
"Bears are crazy, Willie. They'll bite your head off if you're wearing steak on it."
I read somewhere that Gore said that this is the first time in his career that the offense can do whatever they want to do....
In the last 6 Quarters I would say that is true.
Defense, too
Especially the last four quarters. They did what they wanted with Tampa’s offense.
"Bears are crazy, Willie. They'll bite your head off if you're wearing steak on it."
It was interesting to see the big coaching difference between the Seahawks game and this one
In the Seahawks game, we had an overly conservative offense as we clung to a small lead.
In this game, Harbaugh never stopped trying to put points on the board. And, I think this is the real Harbaugh. He’s kind of an A-hole who sees no reason to beat a team by 30 points when you can beat them by 40. After that, why not go for 50.
by ecost on Oct 10, 2011 10:00 AM PDT reply actions 3 recs
The Niners have lacked swagger for years now, so that is how you get it back. Winning close games is one thing, absolutely crushing what was supposed to be a tough opponent is something else entirely. NFL teams don’t win by being nice guys, they win by playing smashmouth football and not worrying about who’s toes they step on.
by modsuperstar on Oct 10, 2011 10:33 AM PDT up reply actions
I think it's less about being an a-hole
more about just playing. You train to accomplish something, keep playing to accomplish that. For the offense it’s scoring points, for the defense it’s stopping it. You only have 46 active players in the NFL, can’t bring in 40 back-ups. Some starters will play the whole time. shrug
The difference in the games was the thin line. You could see it in Smith as well, with the game in hand he let some loose balls fly. Probably had 3 interceptions dropped, no way he attempts those balls in a close game.
Playing up let’s them be loose, try some things out. Probably accelerates the learning curve, but don’t mistake it for actual fundamental change. If they’re tied with the Lions 10-10 in the 4th quarter next week, it’ll be a conservative offense focused on getting the ball out quickly and winning the game with defense and special teams.
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 10:40 AM PDT up reply actions 2 recs
I agree 100%
don’t mistake it for actual fundamental change
I don’t think it is change at all. As you mentioned, his coaching decisions were dictated by the game situation. He has shown excellent acumen on what’s going on on the field, as well as the teams capabilities.
I agree with the “accelerating the learning curve” comment as well. Although, I thought he might go conservative in order to limit the game film available for future opponents. But, the learning curve comment also explains why the niners were passing on the play that injured Morgan. Going for it on 4th down made the play a little more meaningful to the opposing defense in what was otherwise a meaningless play. Harbaugh wanted to see how well Kapernick performed.
They should have went for 2 on the last touchdown.
As is, they only matched the worst defeat in Bucs history.
And 49 points is cool.
I have this take on that fourth-down play based on my reading of Harbaugh's mindset.
Harbaugh would have run that play even if the Niners were up 100-3. His mindset is to play 60 minutes of competitive football. Even if he had third-string players in the field, each play would be teaching moment and he would demand perfect execution. He tries to cultivate a competitive mindset in the players that demands perfection for 60 minutes of football from themselves and their team mates.
I recall attending a Stanford night game against Wake Forest two seasons ago. Stanford was up 50-10 or something in that vicinity when we left at 10 pm in the middle of the third quarter because the kids were falling asleep. Second string players were in the field but playing with typical Harbaugh intensity. When we got home, the game was still going on late in the fourth quarter with third string offense scoring a TD (final score: 68-17). Nobody accused him of running up the score since the backups were beating the first team of Wake Forest. The “What’s your deal” play for the 2-point conversion against USC was probably another play that Harbaugh wanted to execute going into the game, irrespective off the score.
For Sing, it seemed that domination was a tactic. It seems to me for Harbaugh, domination is the end result of perfect execution of a game plan. He sticks to the game plan whether he’s down by 3 scores (against Eagles) or up by three. Conversely, sometimes his sequence of play calling doesn’t make sense (end of the first half against Eagles) perhaps because the execution didn’t go according to plan and he will not to get super-aggressive and have Smith throw Hail Marys.
Harbaugh may have seen a mismatch on that fourth down play he wanted to exploit. It was also a learning experience for Kaep. (He pointed out in his presser that he had a limited number of WRs active. Should he have used Kyle Williams? Maybe. But maybe he figured Morgan could execute it better). He has a process in mind that the offense is following within a game and from game-to-game. Harbaugh is not going to open up or close down the offense based on the scoreboard.
by Mood_Indigo on Oct 10, 2011 10:40 AM PDT reply actions 4 recs
Well said and totally agree
This game reminded me of a Harbaugh led Stanford game. You can see the other team saying “uncle” and Harbaugh just keeps pressing harder on the accelerator.
I did think going for it on 4 and 2 was a bit much (especially a pass?) but the move is the epitome of what Harbaugh is. Next man up!
by AptosNinerFan on Oct 10, 2011 10:59 AM PDT up reply actions
great game guys
i thought this would be an easy win for us as it was last year and i was mistaken, you guys have a great team that demands more respect and im sure you shall have it from now on. great coaching and alex smith is coming together as something we all thought he would in 05. again great dominating game and good luck the rest of the year.
- a very hurt bucs fan
by Carlitin1988 on Oct 10, 2011 11:07 AM PDT reply actions 2 recs
thanks Mr. Carlitin
your team plays very well too, but it didnt show this week. i think the 9ERS remember the beat down you guys gave us last year, and they just wanted to return the favor. good luck to your team as well.
An ice cold beer, pizza and a 49ERS game is my idea of heaven. =)
Alex Smith outperformed Aaron Rodgers...
…by just about every advanced statistical measure this week. In particular, his 8.9 Adjusted Yards/Attempt* were 2nd in the league just ahead of Rodgers at 8.6. At this point, I’m buying into Harbaugh. Hell, Kaep looked great, too.
*A quarterback’s Yards per Attempt (YPA) minus sack yards, adjusted by a 45-yard penalty for each interception thrown. 45 yards is chosen because it is approximately equivalent to the Expected Point (EP) value of an interception
That Green Bay passing offense is still so damned impressive
Watching Rogers roll out and throw crisp 30 yard accurate passes is a thing of beauty.
by whistlingmountain on Oct 10, 2011 12:44 PM PDT up reply actions
For sure...
…and Rodgers is obviously a much, much better QB overall. I just think it’s an indicator of how much Harbaugh has helped Smith. Another thing I’ve noticed is more touch on Smith’s passes. That was something Harbaugh taught Luck to do at Stanford.
It's also what I'm hoping he can teach Kaepernick.
I love when Kap unloads his 100 mph fastballs as much as the next person, but in preseason his touch was terrible. If CK7 can master the art of the touch pass, he’ll be practically unstoppable. Hoping the passing of the torch from Smith to Kap, whether it be next year or years from now, is a smooth transition of awesomeness.
Also, Pro Football Reference...
…has various permutations of Yards/Attempt, including numbers scaled to a league average of 100 so you can more meaningfully compare numbers.

by 












































