A Football Analyst's Wet Dream: Stuffing the Ballot Box at NFL.com
Hey everyone. For the newbies who don't know me, I'm the guy who turned David's front-page generosity into a three-year writing gig on Niners Nation (2008-2011), and then turned that into an Assistant Editor job with Football Outsiders. I post today asking -- begging -- you to vote on THIS SURVEY on NFL.com, which asks fans to vote on (a) whether or not they'd be interested in having access to the coach's film for every play, and (b) how much they're willing to pay for it.
Now, full disclosure, you'd only have access to the coach's film if you subscribed to NFL.com's Game Rewind service. However, Game Rewind is only $39.99 per season, so, if you care about watching the 49ers with any kind of depth, it's well worth the fee.To boot, that's about $40 for access to all 256 regular season games from the current season, plus all games since 2009. In other words, Game Rewind is currently 40 bucks for 768 NFL games! Your average NFL game has about 125 plays, so that's less than one-thousandth of one cent per play!
After the jump, I continue the shameless pleading, explain how a "yes" vote would enhance Niners Nation game coverage, and give some examples of the kinds of 49ers play-by-play analysis that would benefit...
Right now, Game Rewind subscribers get the coach's film for about 20 of those 125 plays per game. By filling out the survey, and telling the NFL that you want full access to that coach's film, you'd make it all the more possible to view every play of every NFL season going forward. That means being able to get a previously unseen look at offensive/defensive formations, player assignments, wide receiver routes, or anything else comprising the chess match that is NFL football. True, if they allow access to the coach's film, the NFL will most likely bump up prices for Game Rewind. But, hell, even if they increase the subscription fee to $100, that's still only something like three-tenths of one cent per play per season.
For instance, say you wanted to see if Alex Smith checked down to Frank Gore for no reason or if his downfield receivers were actually blanketed by the secondary. Or what about if one of Smith's interceptions was because the secondary disguised its coverage or because his receiver read a different option route than the one Smith read. What if you simply want a better look at the offensive line's goal line blocking scheme from an end zone angle? With the coach's film for every play, you can find all of this out for the first time in NFL history on a play-by-play basis.
So, please, please, please go take this survey, and tell the NFL that, as informed, avid football fans, you want access to the coach's film, which shows what all 22 players are doing on every single play. To be completely honest with you, this is the holy grail of NFL video analysis. Whether you're a "scouting guy" or a "stats nerd," access to the coach's film can enhance your experience of NFL football. Furthermore, if this happens, David and all of his Niners Nation minions -- of which, I used to be one -- will be able to provide even better 49ers game coverage than they already do.
In a situation like this, it's totally OK to lie, and tell the NFL that (a) you're optimally interested in access to the coach's film, and (b) you're willing to pay the proverbial right nut/ovary for it. We're not talking about a UN vote on Middle East peace or a congressional vote preventing a government shutdown here. This is sports, not geopolitics, after all.
To be perfectly clear in closing, I'm not some NFL shill, and I couldn't give a crap about what money they make off of you (or I) paying for all-22 game videos. I, nor any of my Football Outsiders brethren, will see a dime from any of this. What all of us gain is an increased understanding of what happens on the football field every weekend, and an enhanced ability to talk about it intelligently. That's something you can't put a price tag on, so it's a win-win for everyone.
Rock the jock vote!
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
PLEASE VOTE FOR THIS!
I for one would love spending more time watching film if we had angles that showed us what “All-22” players were doing at the same time. It’s crucial to accurately evaluate any given play.
There's no column for "Ugly Win", just "Win"
Follow @Tre9er
Do I get one of those "I Voted" stickers?
I would love it if our writers here had access to that info.
Thank you.
Now I’m going to go downtown for lunch and confuse the hell out of everyone when I tell them to make sure to vote for the special election. lol.
not something i would ever buy
but i voted for it anyway, just for you guys :D
(IF) the 9ers can beat Buc's and make it 3 win's in a row....
We all start to…BELIEVE!
Done
Question – if one person buys it, can they post the pics and/or post game media interview links on here?
yes, a few pics used for editorial is fine, per Fooch
There's no column for "Ugly Win", just "Win"
Follow @Tre9er
that's a darn good deal.
NHL Game Center, conversely, is $160.00 for a similar service. I assume it is because there are 82 games in the season- per team
If this kind of power
is available, why aren’t we getting more contingent stats?
For example, how does Gore do on 3rd & 1 on runs to the 1-3 side? If his median is 1.5 and his success rate 90 percent, that’s fantastic, even tho summary stats says he stinks.
Or maybe, Danny, you’re already giving us this & I’m out to lunch, like most ancient foggies.
because those with current access to those stats decide in what manner to use them
and “those” aren’t “us”
There's no column for "Ugly Win", just "Win"
Follow @Tre9er
This would be invaluable to folks like me who want to analyze in detail.
Come on, Alex, please be good this year..
Follow @JesseReed78
wow,
that took all of 20 seconds to do…and I didn’t even have to give them my name or address.
by Doni S on Oct 5, 2011 10:46 AM PDT via iPhone app reply actions
Took me longer to find your link to the survey than the survey itself.. : )
"You have to reinvent yourself each year, ... What helped us was that there was some turnover each year." Bill Walsh...
I can see the bumper sticker ...
I do it for Danny!
Today's Justin Smith :: Yesterday's Bryant Young
by OffensiveInterference on Oct 5, 2011 4:13 PM PDT reply actions
Done.
"Blackmail is such an ugly word. I prefer "extortion." The "X" makes it sound cool." - Bender Bending Rodriguez
Eleanor Rigby - "Greatest Song" or "The Greatest Song"?
Dobbs is some kind of Young/Smith/Roosevelt hybrid, and will absolutely ruin the NFL experience for the other 31 teams and their few fans.

by 






































