San Francisco 49ers 2010 Draft, One Year Later: Nate Byham
Many of us were surprised that the 49ers went with a Tight End in the 2010 draft because they already had Vernon Davis and Delanie Walker on the roster. That said, Byham was brought in to be a completely different player at that position.
Byham only caught a total of 47 passes in four seasons with the Pitt Panthers, not exactly eye-popping numbers. He was brought in to be the short yardage hybrid FB/TE because of his blocking ability. Surprisingly, he showed some great hands in the pre-season.
This morning I am going to take an in-depth look at the pick and what options were available to the 49ers at that position in the 6th round.
6th Round, 182nd Pick: TE- Nate Byham Pittsburgh
2010 Stats: 5 Receptions, 27 Yards, 0 TD
Analysis: Great blocking ability, extremely strong in between the hashes, ability to control pass rushers on the end and surprisingly soft hands. Nate Byham may in fact be considered a steal moving forward. He will not surprise anyone with his speed or athleticism. What he will do is bruise and humiliate defenders physically. There is nothing finesse about Byham except maybe for his hands. That said, he is restricted at what he can do, which is usually the case for 6th round picks.
6th Round, 184th Pick: LB- Adrian Tracy William and Mary
2010 Stats: Did Not Play
Analysis: Was placed in injured reserve in August and never played a game for the Giants in 2010. Coming out of college he was seen as a player with tremendous upside that really never put it completely together. Obviously, we have to reserve judgment until/if he plays for the Giants.
6th Round, 185th Pick: TE- Anthony McCoy Southern California
2010 Stats: 2 Games, 0 Receptions
Analysis: McCoy was considered a 2nd round pick in the weeks leading up to the draft, but academic and off the field issues caused his draft stock to plummet. He was playing at USC during the height of their corruption and character seemed to be an issue. Former coach Pete Carroll took a flier on him in the 6th round, but it didn't pan out.
It is hard to imagine that McCoy will be anything more than a roster filler in the NFL, but if anyone can bring his talent back out it is Pete Carroll
6th Round, 186th Pick: DE- Clifton Geathers South Carolina
2010 Stats: 1 Game
Analysis: Released by the Cleveland Browns and picked up by Dallas with a stop in Miami in between. Geathers didn't see the field that much in 2010. When a player makes three different stops before his rookie season is over, it cannot be seen as a good thing. I was high on him as a sleeper pick in the late rounds, but apparently that was false hope.
6th Round, 191st Pick: WR- Dezmon Briscoe Kansas
2010 Stats: Another player that didn't finish his rookie season where it started. I am still trying to understand why the Cincinnati Bengals cut this talented receiver loose; but their loss is Tampa Bay's gain. Although not making an appearance until week 16, Briscoe made an immediate impact. He caught six passes and scored a TD in the Buccaneers final two games.
Moving forward I expect Briscoe to continue improving as a receiver and the Buccaneers to utilize him on the field more. This could be a real steal
6th Round, 195th Pick: WR- Antonio Brown Central Michigan
2010 Stats: 9 Games, 16 Receptions, 167 Yards, 0 TD, 1 Kick off return for TD
Analysis: This is a pick I am sure the 49ers would have made if he fell to their spot when they selected Kyle Williams. At 5 foot-10 inches, Brown is a smaller receiver but was able to produce a great deal for the Steelers in his limited action in 2010. He had nearly 680 all purpose yards.
I don't expect Brown to be anything more than a #3 or #4 receiver in the NFL, but his return ability makes him an attractive young player moving forward. Additionally, coming from a small school Brown's learning curve was bigger which means that he should mature as a player and build off a strong 2010 season.
6th Round, 196th Pick: CB- Jamar Wall Texas Tech
2010 Stats: 1 Games, 1 Tackle
Analysis: The Cowboys selected hometown favorite, Jamar Wall, in the 6th round, but it didn't work out too great. He never played a snap for Dallas and was later picked up by the Houston Texans; currently with the Eagles. I really did expect the 49ers to take a long look at Wall who was extremely productive with the Red Raiders in college, but they decided to go another route; good thing they did.
Synopsis: We all know that Jim Harbaugh loves to utilize his Tight Ends in the WCO hybrid that he plans to run. This will benefit Byham a great deal. His blocking ability has never been questioned, but what surprised many skeptics was the soft hands that he showed during the pre-season. Even when Nate Byham was going against opposing 1st team defenders he was able to get separation and make plays.
I expect Harbaugh and Co. to utilize him more than Singletary last year in 2011. You are going to see him in on red zone plays as both a FB and a TE. Byham possesses the ability to be sneaky in the passing game. This means that he can fool defenders with what looks like a blocking projectorary and then sneak into the defensive back field; ala Tom Rathman, who I expect will work with Byham a lot in the weeks leading up to the 2011 season.
It really is impossible to project 6th round picks a year later, but I will attempt to do so. The players drafted immediately following Byham at need positions for the 49ers did not fare all to well in 2010. On the other hand, Nate Byham contributed somewhat, but looks to have a nice career ahead of him.
You are not going to see him spread out wide like Vernon Davis or Delanie Walker. Instead, you are going to see Byham play within the confines of the hashes and get dirty. He is a physical delight that can pound with the best of them. Once Byham is in the game it is like you have 6 offensive linemen playing, with one of them receiver eligible. This may fly under the radar a little bit, but you cannot understate how that can help a team in the redzone and on short yardage downs.
Additionally, there are some of us who believe that Byham would fit perfectly as the 49ers FB in the future. While, I am not for or against this, it dues seem like a decent idea. What I would rather see is Byham play a versatile role in the 49ers offense switching between three different positions: extra offensive linemen, fullback, and tight end. He has a future as a multi-dimensional player for the 49ers.
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Fullback position
I’m really intrigued to see what exactly the 49ers will be doing at the fullback position in 2011. Anthony Dixon mentioned playing some there in an interview (which has somehow turned into him becoming the #1 fullback based on some comments). Bruce Miller was drafted to be a FB but obviously will need to convert over. And Byham will somehow get some chances there it seems like. Lots to consider.
We need a new FB!! Moran Norris was just short of horrible last season, most probably the
worst offensive player on the team (the most offensive offensive player?). Furthermore, I like Byham. Those having been said, I am not yet ready to anoint Byham as the starting FB. I want to see what, if anything, Bruce Miller brings to the table, understanding full well that he’s a rookie 7th round draft choice who’ll be playing a position he didn’t play in college. I still find him to be an intriguing prospect…
After all was said and done, a lot more got said than done.
Miller = default starting FB
Byham taking on FB responsibilities for different sets. I’m not sold on Dixon’s blocking ability, even though I feel he has the size to become a good FB.
Not the starter I don't think....
but it’s tough to judge. I can see him as a swing player who contributes all over the field. He should easily be taking snaps at FB, TE and playing ST. I think Harbaugh will definitely have a place for him on the team, and likely use him in some interesting ways depending on the situation.
Bear Pascoe
We took pretty much the same player in the 2009 draft. A blocking TE with some (but limited) pass catching ability. But the coaches didn’t take to him or he didn’t take to the coaches because in a surprise to us all, he was cut in training camp.
The Giants picked him up and he became what he was advertised, a blue collar blocker that occasionally catches a short pass. So it seems like the Niner’s coaches inability to coach Pascoe created a waste of a pick and resulted into having to pick for the same position the following year in the draft and we end up with Bynham. Not that Bynham is bad….it just seems like inefficient coaching/personnel management….a waste.
by allforfunnplay on May 19, 2011 11:22 AM PDT reply actions
Hard to call 6th round picks wastes
They have so little value in the first place.
I still don’t know if Byham is worth anything beyond special teams and injury relief at TE. I’d prefer the full back have a little more mobility than him.
by whistlingmountain on May 19, 2011 11:35 AM PDT up reply actions
yeah but I see him also as a FB/H-Back
Kind of Cooley like. A big guy that’s kinda slow but has good hands and a great blocker. Sounds perfect for playing some FB position. 6-4 268 lbs. I like the idea of having him at FB.
by ChesapeakeBay9er on May 19, 2011 6:51 PM PDT up reply actions
I was gonna say
that he seems to tall for a fullback
by Sigelvictory on May 19, 2011 1:17 PM PDT up reply actions
seems to block well enough for me
wouldn’t his center of gravity be more of a knock on his blocking ability than his FB ability?
Inline blocking vs. Iso blocking
First, Fullbacks are Iso blockers. They need to be agile enough to hit moving targets such as the middle linebackers…one of the problems Norris has had lately as his skills have deteriorated. But along with running towards a moving target, the Fullback must get into position, square up and bend (at their knees) to get under the pads of the defender.
Inline blocking is usually against a taller type of opponent (like a defensive end or a pass rushing linebacker vs. generally shorter middle linebackers). getting low to block on the line isn’t as difficult because you’ don’t have to run to the target as it’s moving.
by allforfunnplay on May 19, 2011 2:38 PM PDT up reply actions
I have been laughing out loud for a minute or two here
He is a physical delight that can pound with the best of them.
does anyone really care who the full back is as long as it is not moran norris?
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
Good, interesting post!
I don’t know if he’d be a good FB, but agree with the too tall comments. It would be nice if he could be the FB and we could thus not carry another FB on the 53-man roster.
Excitement
Easily Dixon and Byham could be awesome receiving fullbacks. Just think of the sets! Or Dixon could even help with trick running plays to Gore. Now we have Hunter two RB set would be just great. Miller could be a plow when we need to keep the push!
It will be nice to put in fresh young legs every couple of downs to ensure we keep the push for our star RB.
by 49erfannm on May 20, 2011 12:11 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
Nate
has had a strong off season,cut his weight to 260,down 10 lbs from the end of the season,He is playing BB in a mens league 3 nights a week,something he has not done since HS….BEEN CATCHING 50-75 FBs 3 days a week…still lifting 4 mornings a week..may see a little different player when FB starts,btw,will be working with Alex, and the offense next week…just a little info for all of you..

by 












































