Could we lose the 2011 NFL season?
As the lockout situation continues to move at the speed of molasses, we're left to wonder if we may end up facing our worst nightmare, the cancellation of the 2011 season. "We sit here at a time of uncertainty and say, 'When will football be played?'" said NFLPA president Kevin Mawae. "My answer to you as fans is I don't know. My hope to you as the players association president is that I believe that we will play in 2011 but under what system I do not know."
It's not like it couldn't happen. The '94 World Series was cancelled because of a players strike. The entire 2004-05 NHL season was cancelled because of a lockout. Even the NFL lost games during both the 1982 and 1987 seasons. Will the 2011 NFL season join that inauspicious group?
They say those who don't learn from the past are doomed to repeat it. So let's look at the history of the NFL's labor disputes and see how we got to this point to begin with.
In the really old days of the NFL, when players still wore leather helmets, played both ways, and three receiver sets were considered a radical idea, the NFL practiced what was called the "reserve list". Basically it meant that when a player's contract was up, they were free to renegotiate a new contract with the same team, which is another way of saying they were free to accept whatever they were offered and be grateful. If the player had the audacity to ask for more money they were put on a "reserve list" and had to sit around hoping their contract got sold or traded to another team. In other words, they were a lot like Carson Palmer but with less money.
In 1947 the league adopted the "1-year option" rule. So instead of being put on the reserve list, players who couldn't come to an agreement with their current team would resign for 1 year and then would be free to sign with another team if they were able to find one that was willing to sign such an ungrateful player.
The rest of how we got to this point after the jump.
In 1962 R.C. Owens became the first player to take advantage of this new rule, even though it had been around for 16 years, and left the 49ers (ingrate) to sign with the Colts. Afraid about what this would do to the competitive balance, commissioner Pete Rozelle instituted the "Rozelle Rule" in 1963 which allowed the commissioner to compensate teams losing players by taking something of equal value, usually draft picks, from the players new team and giving it to his old one. The problem was that few teams wanted to sign a player only to find out it was going to cost them two future first round draft picks.
Imagine if we had that rule today. The 49ers need help in their secondary so they decide to sign Nnamdi Asomugha. Realizing he might be the best CB in football, Rodger Goodell tells the 49ers that they have to give the Raiders their next two first round picks as well as Shawntae Spencer, Terell Brown, and pay for Al Davis to have a face lift to compensate the Raiders for their loss.
Predictably, only 34 players changed teams over the next 12 years until a court ruled in 1976 that the "Rozelle Rule" unfairly restricted trade, much the same having your car booted restricts your ability to drive it. Teams losing Free agents were still compensated based on the Collective Bargaining Agreement they had in place, only the commissioner didn't decide what that compensation was.
Then came the 1982 strike. For 57 dark days there was no football. The players demanded 55% of the revenue and a minimum salary. The owners told them where they could shove it. In all, seven weeks of football were lost before a compromise was finally reached and nine games of the season were salvaged, with the Redskins eventually winning the Super Bowl. Strangely, the most important concession won by the players didn't seem like that big of a deal at the time. For the first time in the history of the NFL, every player knew exactly what everyone else was making.
Tom "I am the super agent" Condon, then a Guard with the Chiefs, found out his backup was making $65,000 a year, or $15,000 more than he was getting. The Vikings starting QB, Tommy Kramer who threw for 3,912 yards in 1981, was earning $100,000 a year while 49ers backup QB Guy Benjamin, who only threw for 171 yards, was earning $130,000. All across the league there were players finding out they weren't being paid their fair market value. After that, salary negotiations would never be the same.
Of course there still was no true free agency, so five years later brought the 1987 strike. But this time the owners were prepared. After losing the first week of the season to the strike, rosters were quickly refilled with players cut during training camp and augmented with 89 players who crossed the picket line such as Jets DE Mark "I have ants in my pants" Gastineau, Cowboys DT Randy White, Seahawks WR Steve Largent, and 49ers QB Joe Montana.
In the history of working unions, there has never been a stranger strike. Players earning as little as $1,000 a game pretended to be elite NFL players while NFL players worth over $1 million pretended to be blue collar workers marching the picket line. Scabs are never looked upon favorably. They're often grouped with tax collectors, meter maids, and DMV employees, yet the fans still turned out for the games and weren't very sympathetic towards the players plight. Reluctantly, after three games played by scabs, the union gave in and once again the Redskins went on to win the Super Bowl.
Realizing the strike didn't work, the union took their case to the courts. When the courts ruled the players had no case since they were represented by a union, they decertified. Fearing another strike, the owners instituted "Plan B" which allowed teams to protect 37 players on their team while allowing the rest to be free agents. And to think players today are upset about the "Franchise tag".
In 1989 eight players, led by Jets RB Freeman McNeil, sued the NFL's "Plan B" saying it violated US antitrust laws. This time the federal jury ruled in favor of the players, awarding damages to four of them. With several other lawsuits in the works, in 1993 the owners finally gave into the players demands for free agency in return for a salary cap.
So that brings us to 2011, only instead of a strike we're looking at a lockout. Right now the players get around 55-58% of the revenue after the owners take $1 billions off the top. The owners want to increase that amount to $2 billion but also want to increase the overall size of the revenue pie by increasing the regular season to 18 games. They also want to put in a rookie salary cap while the players are using this opportunity to argue for better retirement benefits. They don't appear to be very close and neither side seems very willing to budge. If the past is any indicator, we will lose games. Maybe even all of them. But there is one thing I've learned from looking at the past. I'm going to run over to Vegas and put everything I can on the Redskins to win it all.
45 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great post!
"When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story." - Barney Stinson
by Haggardninja on May 23, 2011 2:23 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Goodell Is Terrible In Every Way
If the commish has anything to do with it, there will be no season. The players hate him, he is nothing but a devisive
player in this game. Nothing good will ever happen for football as long as Goodell is the commish.
He could screw up a wet dream. He has zero respect for the players, tries to screw them every chance he gets. The owners and coaches can get away with destroying the integrity of the game(Belicheat), breaking employees jaws(Raider coach), and god knows what other junk they do.
The double standard is appalling. His idea of justice is to screw the players and let management run amuck.
Goodell is the single worst thing ever to happen to the NFL
by The Sear on May 23, 2011 2:34 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
I think regarding the lockout, Goodell is doing his best to get a resolution. However, as you said, his tough guy approach has alienated the players so badly. They may have to fire Roger to get a resolution. Might as well, his job is on thin ice.
by mcwagner on May 23, 2011 3:52 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
had to rec'ed this.
you cited some very good examples. really goodell is representative of the owners who only care about money.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on May 23, 2011 4:49 PM PDT up reply actions
he also has to represent their viewpoints
whether he agrees with them or not. Where he has failed is his relationship with the players. They do not trust him. He has no one to blame for that but himself
to me he is a liar and tells half truths, he represents the owners perfectly and I am sure jerry richardson is probably the one who trained him. roger goodell=$10,000,000.00 a year mouth piece. what kind of health benefits and retirement package does he have?
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on May 23, 2011 5:06 PM PDT up reply actions
very good
I’m not defending his job at all. He will be fired. He has failed his job responsiblilities. But as far as the lockout goes, I don’t think he is the problem as much as others *looks in DeMaurice Smith’s direction
Agree About Smith
I have to agree with you about Smith. His snide comments and overall bad attitude haven’t helped the negotiations at all. When they named a freaking lawyer to replace Gene Upshaw, I knew that was serious trouble.
Re: Smith
Seldom see a long interview with D. Smith regarding issues, only quick sound bites, so all we ever hear from Smith is snark.
His job is to stand tough to the owners. That’s what a union leader is supposed to do. If he rolled over and let Goodell scratch his belly he wouldn’t be leader for long.
This LOCKOUT was brought about by the owners, none of whom apparently are losing money, because they want MORE money. So this LOCKOUT is about rich men being GREEDY.
There are a lot of people who’ve been ingrained with anti-union rhetoric. The best way to get the public to understand what’s going on would be better reporting on the issues in dispute, not attacking Goodell or Smith. That Goodell had any interest in the players’ welfare was always a crock. He’s the owners’ rep, just as Smith is the players’ rep.
but then I have a reading problem...
by Bob In Beaverton on May 24, 2011 8:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Thanks for the gambling tip - skins are 60 to 1 right now!
And to settle the dispute
1. Owners get 1.5 billion off the top
2. Rookie salary cap is a good idea
3. 16 games forever.
done and done
the owners should have an income cap also.
anything over that gets donated charity.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on May 23, 2011 4:50 PM PDT up reply actions
a dollar amount cap
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on May 23, 2011 7:58 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm at the point..
where I don’t care if there is football or not. The NBA is almost year round anyway. Baseball will take me into the Holidays, NCAA football will still be played, etc.
The NFL is fast becoming over rated. Unless they do away with the Salary Cap.
Bite my shiny metal sig
by drummer on May 23, 2011 2:48 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
sports
I figure I’ve got baseball, a little bit of college football, and then college basketball back to baseball. I watch the NBA on occasion but just can’t get super excited about it. The quality is obviously much higher than college basketball, but I just find myself enjoying college basketball more.
by David Fucillo on May 23, 2011 2:54 PM PDT up reply actions
Must be nice
Unfortunately I just can’t get excited enough for any other sport. If this thing doesn’t get sorted out I may lose my mind.
by BangingHebrew on May 23, 2011 3:12 PM PDT up reply actions
Seen a LOT of football in my time...
I don’t play Fantasy either, so it really isn’t that big of deal to me. Besides, I’ll take a season of Sunday’s off this year. I should have taken this past year off of yet another craptastic 49er season.
Bite my shiny metal sig
Growing up playing it
and of course watching the 49ers all my life, I just don’t know what else to do. Although if there is no season I won’t have to suffer through the depressing loss at Qwest field this year while getting heckled by Seahawk fans. That’s never fun.
by BangingHebrew on May 23, 2011 3:27 PM PDT up reply actions
I'm on the same page
Grew up playing football and loving the niners since I knew what football was…No other sport really does it for me, not even college football.. If we miss games I’m going to be pissed….
I'm in the same boat as you dude
The only sports I watch are NFL and MMA, and there’s no way MMA is going to carry me through what would be an NFL season by itself this year. It’s so depressing =/
Don't agree with what you're saying
But yeah, I can survive without football.
Baseball, College Football and Basketball will keep me entertained.
What we've got here is a failure to communicate.
"I'm just like you, but 10 times better"
by SportsChicken on May 23, 2011 3:59 PM PDT up reply actions
Spectator sports ain't life or death..
I refuse to get hijacked over something I can’t control. It’s just a game. It’s entertainment. I will go on the side of having options to fill that void.
Bite my shiny metal sig
More time for a lot of things...
Besides, I can still enjoy the game on a smaller, local scale by supporting High School Football. I’d rather spend my $$ supporting local football programs than fret over a National game that is fast becoming a bloated, over rated spectacle that will wind up costing consumers more $$ in the longer term.
BTW, I don’t have an opinion on Goodell yet. I hate Bud Selig and David Stern more for being complete and utter lying dirtballs.
Bite my shiny metal sig
nba is going to be locked out next year also.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on May 23, 2011 4:51 PM PDT up reply actions
I looked across the room
and there was my girlfriend.
but then I have a reading problem...
by Bob In Beaverton on May 24, 2011 8:08 AM PDT up reply actions
Terrific read
and good perspective. The courts are composed, mainly, of insiders and political operatives. Not a fan of our supposed judical system, which has largely screwed workers over when they wanted shorter weeks, basic freedoms, right to organize. The current court was shopped as a lead pipe certainty to rule for the owners.
That said, I’d like to see the players clearly put each issue out there in non-propaganda manner. We as fans could then negotiate amongst ourselves as above.
Just get it done
Money is money we al want it but some of us just want more and more and loose themselves in being money hungry. It is sad to see.
by San_Hezzy_Playa on May 23, 2011 3:41 PM PDT reply actions
Yes , he who dies with wealth , dies in shame ...!!
I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ...Jimmy Raye your no daisy ...!!
I personally hope the players break the balls of all the owners.
I want to see roger goodell, jerry richardson and jerry jones crying.
at this point I might enjoy that more than a year of football. I hate greedy and stuck up people, they all seem to fit that.
I have a feeling that if the courts do not lift the lockout that nothing will move until the season and peoples money is at risk, even then they might be so hardened that nothing may happen.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
The fine line between Hatred and Envy is but one step from Envy to Hatred ...
.. the real solace of either is in which there is no positive outcome , there’s no winner’s here , only loser’s by default …!!
I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ...Jimmy Raye your no daisy ...!!
great, we all can be losers together. lol
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on May 23, 2011 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
still a long way off
the biggest reason I don’t think they’ll miss games is because there hasn’t been real negotiation yet ( players have never offered a counter proposal ), and at some point it will occur..
by whistlingmountain on May 23, 2011 6:18 PM PDT reply actions
if i offered you one dollar to buy your $500,000.00 house
would you counter offer for 5 dollars?
i think that is why the players have not countered
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on May 23, 2011 7:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Plus
there’s no point in countering while the courts are in play. Unless there is some reasonableness on the owners’ part.
but then I have a reading problem...
by Bob In Beaverton on May 24, 2011 8:10 AM PDT up reply actions
are you 12?
they didn’t offer 1 dollar to 500,000
they offered 350,000, which is basically what’s happened in the housing market,
by whistlingmountain on May 24, 2011 5:48 PM PDT up reply actions
am I 12?
lol
awesome response.
the point is someone does not respond to such a low ball offer, they throw it in the thrash. the lack of response is the response.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on May 24, 2011 11:46 PM PDT up reply actions
well, are you?
It’s the only way you can put out such hyperbole and refer to it in a serious manner.
Calling it “such a low ball offer” just tells me you’ve never followed any big labor negotiation. This is how they work. Low ball over’s go both ways until they find some middle ground where they’re both unhappy.
Walk into the US House and Senate these days and you’ll see another one going on. If one side simply doesn’t help they get naive public support and nothing gets accomplished.
by whistlingmountain on May 25, 2011 5:24 PM PDT up reply actions
Hope they get this settled
I want some football – 49ers style.
Jay Cruise
Zeolite Radiation Survival Guide Chuck Norris Gym
Can't remember the last time i read an entire post of anyone other then Ninjame's & Fooch well done it was a nice read ...!!
I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ...Jimmy Raye your no daisy ...!!
Difference between a lockout and a strike.
In a strike individual players can cross the picket line. In a lockout they can’t. So solidarity doesn’t come into play until 51% of the players agree with the owners’ offer and demand that their leadership accepts it. That doesn’t happen instantly. In a sense, the owners are forcing the players into solidarity.
If the owners were to accept some players in without a contract they would open themselves to all the lawsuits, to include individual breach-of-contract lawsuits. The circuit court couldn’t give them cover then.
To me it appears that the ownership decided on a strategy of brute force to get more money and already many owners realize that even if it succeeds in the appellate courts that it won’t succeed in the real world. Someone should be mailing out copies of the nursery rhymes to the owners highlighting the story of the Golden Goose.
In short, unless the owners make an offer satisfactory to the players there won’t be a season. And then they will open themselves up to all sorts of individual lawsuits. So it goes.
but then I have a reading problem...
by Bob In Beaverton on May 24, 2011 8:19 AM PDT reply actions
what's a satisfactory offer? the naivite is running rampant in the fandom.
there’s no negotiation going on.
how do one go about buying a house or a car? should they just offer sticker and if the salesman doesn’’t respond just offer more?
by whistlingmountain on May 25, 2011 5:27 PM PDT up reply actions

by 





































