Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

2011 NFL Draft Grades, NFC West Edition: Cardinals Get Solid Value, Crush 49ers Fans' Dreams

It's my belief that the 49ers had themselves a very strong draft when it all came down to it, drafting at all of the need positions and getting value here and there. Now, we'll take a look at the rest of the NFC West to see how the teams around them grew. In 2010, it was a very close (and kind of pathetic) race to see who would grab the NFC West crown, with all teams being mostly around the same level of talent and mostly irrelevant in the scope of things. Now that you're good and depressed, let's take a look at the Arizona Cardinals.

Also known as "those douchebags who drafted Patrick Peterson," to a good number of folks here at Niners Nation. I recall, after the pick was made, there were a ton of people upset, and that was followed closely by a bunch of people claiming that he would be a bust and there was a lot to dislike about his game. Well, for one, there is a lot to dislike about his game, but folks saying that he'll be a bust are doing nothing more than to talking themselves down from the edge. I don't want to be the guy who talks you right back onto it, so I won't get into specifics, but Peterson should be really good really fast, and that's as far as I'll go regarding that. Then again, Aaron Curry was supposed to be the safest and best player in his draft class, and ... well ... you know how that goes.

So their first round pick is essentially the best player in the draft (and in a cruel twist of fate, he was the fifth player they wanted), but how did they do after him? Make the jump, and we'll talk about each pick in detail.

Star-divide

Round 1 (5th overall): Patrick Peterson, CB, LSU

Surprise! I lied to you, we're going to talk about Peterson anyway. He doesn't fill an immediate need for the Cardinals, so that takes away a little bit, but lucky for them (because I obviously matter in the grand scheme of things), I'm not a strong proponent of drafting for need in the first round anyway. Peterson graced the top of my personal cornerback rankings, and the rankings of just about every internet source out there. Possessing top tier man-to-man coverage skills and a physical style of play that will not only eliminate a receiver for the majority of the game, but will get in said player's head as well, Peterson is probably the safest pick in the draft. He'll start opposite Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie to create a truly dominant duo.

Round 2 (38th overall): Ryan Williams, RB, Virginia Tech

Well, the best thing I can say about this pick is the fact that Williams is a playmaker, and he'll play early and often in Arizona's rotation. The final word in the previous sentence is key though: rotation - the Cardinals already have a couple of running backs who are probably serviceable and it's far too early to give up on them. Beanie Wells was a high pick, and they're outright admitting that he's not enough. Right here is where the Cardinals really should have grabbed a pass-rusher who projects to be truly dominant.

Round 3 (69th overall): Robert Housler, TE, Florida Atlantic

This is another player who will contribute, probably not early, but once he gets going, he'll do well. He's a stark contrast to the perception of Arizona's normal tight end in recent years, that perception being a smaller offensive linemen who can occasionally catch a pass. Housler is athletic and a reliable target for whatever quarterback is starting for the Cardinals, and he's being drafted to eventually be a starter. The problems with this pick are pretty obvious ... the Cardinals aren't short of receiving targets, and the third round is too early to address the position, not to mention Housler was probably going to be around in the fourth.

Round 4 (103rd overall): Sam Acho, OLB, Texas

I suppose you could say that drafting for need paid off for Arizona, in that Acho is a legitimate talent with a lot of upside and possesses great value in the fourth round. That doesn't change the fact that there were unquestionably better pass-rushers in rounds two and three, nor does it change the fact that the Cardinals do not have a pass rusher worthy of being a full-time starter. Acho is exactly the type of player you want to get out of the fourth round though: he's skilled, he's got upside, and he wants to get better. The skills he already possesses will help him early on, but he's a way from being a starter, and that will hurt the Cardinals a lot.

The Rest of the Way

Round 5: Anthony Sherman, RB, Connecticut (136th overall)
Round 6: Quan Sturdivant, LB, North Carolina (171st overall)
Round 6: David Carter, DT, UCLA (184th overall)
Round 7: Demarco Sampson, WR, San Diego St. (249th overall)

Sherman was picked far too early, but he is a bruiser who can lead block for the backfield that Arizona envisions in the future (unless they see him as an actual runner, which will not bode well for them) so he's not a terrible pick. Sturdivant is very, very good value in the sixth round, but again, he's far from being ready and does not fill the immediate outside linebacker need for the Cardinals. It's smart to double up on the positions with guys who have great value though, so they get a lot of points for that. Carter has a lot of developmental potential.

All-in-all, this was a solid draft from the Cardinals, but that is graded on what is almost a curve because of Peterson being taken in the first round. The best picks beyond him are unquestionably Acho and Sturdivant, each going a round or two later than they probably should have, and each with the ability to he a starter with a little bit of time, and the former having pro-bowl potential with the right coaching. They're getting better, but probably not as fast as they'd like to. The lack of drafting a quarterback can be seen many ways, but I personally think it wasn't smart. It's very clear they're going for a veteran, but the one place this draft excels in is developmental potential, and taking a flyer in the later rounds probably should have been on the agenda.

Value: A-, Need: C, Overall: B

Poll
Grade the Arizona Cardinals 2011 NFL Draft (you don't get pluses and minuses like I do, neener neener).
A
135 votes
B
249 votes
C
89 votes
D
47 votes

520 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bad draft

Sherman is overrated here. If he played for Oklahoma State nobody here would have even considered drafting him.

Acho is way overrated everywhere. He looks slow and weak off the snap, and every tackle in this draft that he went up against in Senior Bowl practice dominated him. This was a weak tackle class.

Williams can make some plays, but as for consistent production he wasn’t even the best running back at Virginia Tech — don’t see how he’s rated good enough to be drafted this high.

And Peterson — I’ve been on record for a month since the draft — Peterson is not the secondary savior that all these draftniks are pumping him up to be. He has serious issues with fulfilling his assignment in zone coverage and recognizing the routes. In man coverage he dominates by committing assault and battery on the wide receiver and while NCAA rules allow it the NFL rules do not.

His ceiling is Antonio Cromartie, not Deion Sanders or Darrelle Revis.

I gave it a C instead of a D for Sturdivant and Housler, who were decent picks.

by Ougadas on May 3, 2011 10:09 AM PDT reply actions  

Peterson = Bailey

"I hate it! It looks like a stickup at 7-Eleven. Five guys standing there with their hands in the air."

Norm Sloan

"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors."

Weldon Drew

by EcERyda69 on May 3, 2011 10:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

I take it back.

I am thoroughly convinced by your detailed and accurate analysis.

by Ougadas on May 3, 2011 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions  

Thanks glad I could help

"I hate it! It looks like a stickup at 7-Eleven. Five guys standing there with their hands in the air."

Norm Sloan

"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors."

Weldon Drew

by EcERyda69 on May 3, 2011 11:22 AM PDT up reply actions  

This

Glad to see more people not completely on the PETERSUN ROX fanclub.

Trees rule. Don't deny it.
Check out the one and only Stanford SB Nation blog, Rule of Tree.

by FearTheTree on May 3, 2011 6:37 PM PDT up reply actions  

Grade F

Only because it wasn’t an option on the poll and because it’s the Cardinals. I don’t care how good they drafted. They get a big, fat “F”.

"When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story." - Barney Stinson

by Haggardninja on May 3, 2011 10:12 AM PDT reply actions  

I give it an F too.

Where is the F button?

Kellen Moore is awesome
Katie Mcgrath is our savior
Im not competitive I just addicted to winning.

by manraj7 on May 3, 2011 10:34 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

B-

but since we don’t get those, I averaged down just because I felt like it.

by McTee on May 3, 2011 10:29 AM PDT reply actions  

I gave it an F because their the Cards

But i’ll take Peterson over Aldon Smith any day

"I hate it! It looks like a stickup at 7-Eleven. Five guys standing there with their hands in the air."

Norm Sloan

"We have a great bunch of outside shooters. Unfortunately, all our games are played indoors."

Weldon Drew

by EcERyda69 on May 3, 2011 10:38 AM PDT reply actions  

Miller?

“drafting at all of the need positions and getting value here and there”….Which picks do consider to be a value? The pick that interests me is Miller. Here is a guy who has Kevin Fagan like strength (over 500lb bench) that weighs 15 less the former defensive end. Anytime you get a guy that does 42 reps @225 (more than 10 reps better than the strongest offensive linemen) you gotta give him a look. Most scouts project him as an outside lb, but I see him more as a guy that would seem to be a natural at ILB. Lets see if Rathman gets his way.

by JTay on May 3, 2011 10:42 AM PDT reply actions  

Kendall Hunter in the 4th is a pretty epic value pick.

imo.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on May 3, 2011 11:33 AM PDT up reply actions  

Kendall Hunter

Hunter is a poor mans Joe Morris.

by JTay on May 3, 2011 11:58 AM PDT up reply actions  

Hunter is a Darren Sproles without the same burst or top end speed.

Harbaugh can turn any QB into a great one. He's a QB guru, even if he's only been a head coach at the college ranks.

by BustaTheRippa on May 3, 2011 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

So, Sproles minus what makes him good

that doesn’t make me feel very confident.

Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.

by mikev on May 3, 2011 12:07 PM PDT up reply actions  

I don’t like him all that much. He’s a short strider with quick feet which makes it look like he is fast but he really isn’t. His power is non-existent and the only positives in his game are quick COD ability and good vision.

Harbaugh can turn any QB into a great one. He's a QB guru, even if he's only been a head coach at the college ranks.

by BustaTheRippa on May 3, 2011 12:10 PM PDT up reply actions  

top end speed isn't really the be-all, end-all for RBs though

It’s about vision and burst. And I think Hunter has those in spades.

Maybe Hunter is never an every-down back. But I think his ceiling is very high and his floor is at least that of a very useful change of pace back and potential return man. Good pick for the 4th round.

Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...

by Smoke on the Water on May 3, 2011 1:00 PM PDT up reply actions  

Hunter and Kilgore are value picks.

And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it.
SaberCats Examiner | SB Nation Bay Area | Niners Nation | Twitter

by James Brady on May 3, 2011 1:01 PM PDT up reply actions  

Re: Hunter and Kilgore are value picks

I’m not sure what you mean by “value” picks. What standard is applied to measure the term “value”. In most cases, I would think the “value” label would imply a prospect had slipped somewhat in the draft, hence the team drafting the prospect is getting a better value than having drafted the prospect earlier. I suppose we could use the grading system used at NFL.com which is weighted heavily toward to the combine workouts. That being said, it would appear to me that Hunter was selected about where he should have gone and Kilgore, based on his grades, was likely headed toward free agency. JMHO

by JTay on May 4, 2011 12:55 PM PDT up reply actions  

If the Cardinals don't solve their quarterback problem

They get a big fat “F”

They were smart to pick Peterson, but in a way they screwed themselves, and they know it. What they really needed was a quarterback. We did better because we got a good quarterback, and Peterson can only shut down one reciever.

It’s just as well though, they will likely have first shot at a quarterback next year.

It's about having the kind of faith that makes all the "what if's" irrelevant - Jim Harbaugh 2011

Frank Gore has earned his place among the great running backs of the NFL - Pat Willie on NN

by Pat Willie on May 3, 2011 10:48 AM PDT reply actions  

The sad part about that comment is that people have been saying that about the 49ers for years now. Hopefully Kaepernick will work out and be the QBOTF.

I think the Cardinals are relying on free agency a little bit too much. I doubt they will get Kolb and I don’t think Bulger is a very good option. I’m pretty confident that they will receive a grade F in free agency.

"When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story." - Barney Stinson

by Haggardninja on May 3, 2011 11:03 AM PDT up reply actions  

Is there an Acho in here?

by LondonNiner on May 3, 2011 11:06 AM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

Nope.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me six times…

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on May 3, 2011 11:34 AM PDT up reply actions  

niiiice

I would have loved to get acho being a UT fan and all but I’m still wondering how terrance tolliver went undrafted?? I know he ran around a 4.5 but you can’t teach being 6’5" and a gamer (had 180 yds and 3 tds during the cotton bowl)

by texasniner06 on May 3, 2011 2:49 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions  

I saw many pundits gave them good grade

but seems like they could trade their pick with Cleveland. They could still draft Ras Dowling and Cameron Jordan and Ryan William. I think they could have done much better.

by return222 on May 3, 2011 11:08 AM PDT reply actions  

I don't get it

Why would Cleveland trade up one spot when they ended up trading down?

"When I get sad, I stop being sad and be awesome instead. True story." - Barney Stinson

by Haggardninja on May 3, 2011 11:24 AM PDT up reply actions  

He probably meant take the trade deal from Atlanta.

The same deal that Cleveland ended up getting instead.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on May 3, 2011 11:36 AM PDT up reply actions  

Grade B

Peterson was the best player on the board. They needed a home run threat at tailback. Acho was decent value IMO.

But the biggest reason I liked their draft was the fact that their biggest need was QB and they didn’t panic and trade a bunch of picks away to grab one, nor did they waste their 1st on Gabbert or Locker. They realized that the odds of finding their “franchise guy” in this draft was slim and none and decided to take the BPA at every pick. Smart move, considering next years QB class is really, really good.

Harbaugh can turn any QB into a great one. He's a QB guru, even if he's only been a head coach at the college ranks.

by BustaTheRippa on May 3, 2011 11:46 AM PDT reply actions  

Wonder who the vet FA QB they have lined up is? I’m bettin’ Bulger.

by Jaxson876 on May 3, 2011 7:02 PM PDT up reply actions  

Maybe

AZ can resign hollywood leinart.

by Coach Harbaugh on May 3, 2011 11:49 AM PDT reply actions  

C - Average

Peterson- fell in their lap, not a tought decision if they don’t want Gabbert, best available- B
Williams- good player, but not a good value pick, they had bigger needs and just clouds their backfield even more, idiots- D
Housler- at least a need pick but still a reach- C
Acho- good pick, position of need, needs time to develop-
B
Rest- a couple decent player that can develop, depth, SP

by LPF on May 3, 2011 12:10 PM PDT reply actions  

I gave it a B

they get big ups for drafting Peterson in the first. He was the best player available, and contrary to popular opinion, CB isn’t as much of a strength for Arizona as it’s made out to be.

But I didn’t like the rest of their draft outside of Acho. A team that doesn’t really need a starting RB shouldn’t draft one in the first 2 rounds, ever. And I’m not a big fan of Housier, although I do think Arizona could use a TE.

The real glaring weakness for me, though, is where are the OL? No matter who Arizona gets to QB this team, they’re going to need to protect him, and they just haven’t invested hardly anything into their front 5. It’s reason no. 1 why I don’t think they’re really a credible threat to win the division— they just don’t match up well with the Rams or Niners— Niners because we’ve shown time and again that we can run the ball against their D, and Rams because of the pass rush Spagnuolo is building in St. Louis.

I really think the division is about to go old-school. It’s gonna be Rams vs. Niners for the next few years. I just hope we got the QB this year to help us keep up with Bradford.

Idolizing Robb Nen since 2002...

by Smoke on the Water on May 3, 2011 12:51 PM PDT reply actions  

Great

So after this season we’ll be facing Bradford and Luck for several years to come?

:’(

by ZivilynBane on May 3, 2011 5:24 PM PDT reply actions  

I gave it a C

Some solid picks, especially with Peterson, but there were problems.

The biggest problem with their draft is that they didn’t touch offensive line AT ALL. I just don’t understand how they come out of this draft with the same offensive line they entered it with. It isn’t like they have a good o-line or have a bunch of developing younger guys on the line; they have neither. They will supposedly attempt to address the QB position in FA with someone like Bulger, but if you have a mediocre or poor offensive line he is going to start racking up the hits like he did in St. Louis.

by TheRaven on May 3, 2011 6:27 PM PDT reply actions  

Solid, but conservative...

Except for TE, they didn’t hit primary needs early.

by Thrashard340 on May 3, 2011 10:38 PM PDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Site Decorum: Remember, We Are ALL 49er Fans

Recent FanPosts

Small
Concussions...
Small
Is Harbaugh lying or does he mean what he says?
872_small
Where have you seen 49er players?
Download2_small
Can the 49'ers Maintain their Turnover Differential in 2012?
Sfak_small
Why are you a 49er fan?
6a00e5500c77218833011168f234b4970c_small
FOX: "How To Save The Sport"
Small
Old Spice Patrick Willis Football ProCamp
Dave_small
Call For Moderators
Steve_young_small
Game Day Food

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

Dylan_cannes_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

428030_10150598134996875_112852666874_9167376_1157036734_n_small mikeinsp