Outside Looking In: Pressure in the Bay Area
To introduce myself, I am Dylan DeSimone -- a California native now residing on the east coast. As a Connecticut Husky, I was a sports journalist for the Daily Campus at UConn. Now, I am an up and coming filmmaker and aspiring NFL beat writer. Now a part of Niners Nation, I intend on bringing a whole new style to covering our beloved 49ers.
For the 2011-12 season, the Niners have a fresh new look offense which has the fans anticipation at an all time high. Jim Harbaugh's reputation validates the anxious fans that await game 1 of the regular season. What everyone should be equally excited for is the new 3-4 pressure defense Vic Fangio is busy installing. It is a system Fangio inherited under Dom Capers in Green Bay and one that has worked so well for Dick Lebeau in Pittsburgh. Make no mistake, Fangio plans on bringing the heat with new packages and a lot of movement. A crucial element in Fangio's system will be the pressure coming from the outside linebacker positions. However, in this rebuilding year, it is still to be determined who will be playing right and left outside linebacker.
Fangio said in a press conference this year, "We have got a lot of jobs open." It is clear he is still evaluating the talent of the majority of the defense. Only right defensive end Justin Smith and inside linebacker Patrick Willis could be promised starting roles because of their undeniable talent and leadership. Between the 2011 NFL Draft, free agency, and last years crop of men in the front seven, there's is a great mix of players competing for the two available outside linebacker spots.
The names to consider are first round pick Aldon Smith, Antwan Applewhite, Parys Haralson, Ahmad Brooks and Thaddeus Gibson. "I think we got a little bit more there than less unsettlement there than we do in other positions," said Fangio about how open the competition really is. Clay Matthews and James Harrison are the unquestioned rushers in the 3-4 systems mentioned earlier, yet San Francisco faces so much uncertainty at that position. A position that is vital to the success of the system Fangio plans on utilizing to win the west. So the question is, should 49ers fans be worried?
I say no. Reports for training camp indicate Smith has lived up to the hype of his first round status. Many thought San Francisco was going to select another available Missouri Tiger, Blaine Gabbert (Jacksonville Jaguars). Smith is transitioning smoothly from a down lineman to the upright position of an outside linebacker. There have been praises for Smith's rushing ability in camp thus far, even beating veteran tackle Joe Staley in dramatic fashion. The rookie has earned the respect of the veterans already as they are in awe of his physical abilities. As a first rounder who seems to have panned out, Smith is likely to secure a starting spot by the beginning of the regular season.
Assuming Smith is a lock for a starting role, that leaves one spot to be filled. Out of those competing for the position, I believe it needs to be won fair and square -- everyone should have an equal opportunity and I think Fangio would agree; "We need to find out what this team is all about." Parys Haralson has been one of the unquestioned starters the past few seasons, but given the 49ers new direction, Haralson's job may not be as secure as it once was. There is room for players to simply win it in camp, and that's what many of the coaches are hoping for. Haralson has been taking the first team snaps but nothing is certain as of yet; someone with a chip on their shoulder could easily come out ahead.
Furthermore, my favorite candidates to contest for the position are returning 49er Ahmad Brooks and Antwan Applewhite who was recently acquired from San Diego. The two are large physical presences with the blue collar attitude Harbaugh's new regime is all about.
Looking at the tape from last year, Ahmad Brooks played ball like a capable NFL starter in both pass rushing and coverage. He looks like Justin Smith as an outside linebacker. As a rotational player, Brooks recorded 31 total tackles, including 5 sacks. In addition to that, he had an interception returned for 32 yards -- so the guy can move. Applewhite showcased flashes of talent in San Diego but is not ready for a starting role in any defense. If Brooks stays healthy, look for him to push Haralson for the spot opposite Aldon Smith by the beginning of the regular season. Brooks and Smith could make for the right combination that Fangio is searching for in his pressure-based defense.
88 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
everyone loves a good pass rush
but how do these guys work in run support? Will it be three guys behind the line of scrimmage while Willis takes on every blocker?
Don't forget about Bowman. If the OLBs do their job, they should be able to set the edge and funnel RBs to Willis and/or Bowman. One distinct advantage we have is that our MLBs are probably the fastest duo in the NFL.
The DL, Soap, Smith, and McDonald need to do a good job of keeping people off of our LB corp.
From what I’ve read, Aldon still has some work to do in run support but that may be due to his learning curve as an OLB. I think Brooks/Haralson will be solid in run support.
by Sactown_Loyalty19 on Aug 9, 2011 8:33 AM PDT up reply actions
YOU CAN DO IT!!!
(2 thumbs up)
Niners,Nets,Reds & USC!!!
The Most Interesting Man In The World---->Mikhail Prokhorov!!!
by Kidd2Petrovic on Aug 9, 2011 9:38 AM PDT up reply actions
lol.....smh
Niners,Nets,Reds & USC!!!
The Most Interesting Man In The World---->Mikhail Prokhorov!!!
by Kidd2Petrovic on Aug 9, 2011 12:06 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes...
I gave others a good 30 seconds to respond before I responded to myself.
Check out my site!!
The Hometown Fan
Nice to see you!
How was campus when the Huskies won the NCAA tournament?
Ougadas was suspecting that Fangio will run a different 3-4 than before, with the D-Line more focus on attacking the QB instead of “holding the run.” (maybe why Aubrayo was let go) If that’s true, he says, 2 pass-rushing OLB’s leaves the D very vulnerable to the run.
he's not a person. He's a computer program that can predict the season
Digital Defense Simulation one
by mcwagner on Aug 9, 2011 8:42 AM PDT up reply actions 7 recs
So we shouldn't listen to anything he says about offense?
We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.
clever
"(I)f you think you've got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated." Saul Alinsky
I was thinking he got his named changed
how Fooch is now David Fucillo, Ninjames is James Brady, etc.
Smileyman still smileyman tho
howtheyscored has gone rogue.
He’s using his Head Ball Coach status to activate new accounts and promote them to Author.
We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.
contributor
I came across him via Twitter. All of our writers were generally site regulars before posting on the front page but I decided to roll the dice on an outside voice.
by David Fucillo on Aug 9, 2011 11:05 AM PDT up reply actions
is he a regular now, or only when you call on him?
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
regular
As in regular poster? Yea, he’s going to become a regular poster…probably three times a week give or take.
by David Fucillo on Aug 9, 2011 10:57 PM PDT up reply actions
Welcome, Mr. DeSimone
Fangio will probably continue to be in the evaluation mode right into the first part of the regular season. I’d expect occasional breakdowns in run coverage as the front 7 get used to playing with each other.
It was obvious they were making compromises in run support the second they let Lawson go.
And only affirmed when they let Franklin walk too.
Not that a change wasn’t necessary, but the defense is going to take a slip from a perennial Top-5 run-stopping unit to something more ordinary, all in the interest of getting to the QB in base formations. It will be interesting to see how this trade-off affects the secondary.
I wouldn't quite come to that conclusion
There are several ways to attack the run.
One is to clog up running lanes by holding up blockers at the line and then allowing your LBs to chase down the outlets.
The other is to attack the gaps and have guys in the backfield destroying the blocking scheme and causing delays in play development that will allow your pursuit to swarm to the ball.
The first is reactive, the second pro-active. The second is a higher variance approach, yielding more drops for a loss and more 5-6 yard runs, but what you get in return is that you also get far more pressure on the passer even when run blitzing.
The biggest difference is going to be having a Ray McDonald playing 5-tech...
…instead of an Isaac Sopoaga. I’m not as concerned about the loss of Franklin as I am about losing the “two-NT” base formations on 1st down — there will be bigger gains up the middle where we haven’t seen them in recent years. If this comes with more pressure on the QB on first downs, then I think it’s a trade-off we can live with.
We’re also going to see more runs at the OLB’s without the dependable Lawson/Haralson combo sealing the edges. The puts more pressure on Willis, and presumably Bowman, to get to the sidelines, but that’s the unit on defense I want to rely on too.
idk, Soap, P-52 and Whitner make quite a trio as the teeth of the midfield.
There might be some 3 yard gains instead of stuffed runs, but I don’t think we’ll be soft in the middle.
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
Not soft, but softer.
Your shiny 3.7 yards per carry probably isn’t going to exist anymore — more of those runs are going to get to the linebacker level.
Again, not saying that’s detrimental. Perhaps it’s the necessary measure the team takes in order to be an overall better defense — the step back in order to take two steps forward.
He won't be if what I suspect is right
A 1 gap front doesn’t use a 5 tech alignment on both sides. It only uses a 5 tech alignment in front of the rush backer to force the offense to block your best rusher with a running back or with an interior lineman that must swing out.
And with Justin Smith being that 5 tech opposing O-Coords are going to lose some sleep before they play us.
McDonald would then be in the 3 tech strongside where he can attack the inside shoulder of the tackle leaving primary contain to the OLB behind him.
That’s why I think we start Aldon and Haralson.
see that seems strange to me
if your strongside DT is playing 3-T, that exposes the contain OLB on that side to a potential blocker(s) in the Tackle, TE, AND RB…makes it hard to contain. Rather play 3T on the weakside and let Aldon/Whomever have either 1-on-1 with a Tackle, or with a RB/nobody.
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
I think Smith will play inside leverage on the weakside for this reason
Aldon likes the inside move anyways. If he’s manned on the Tackle, he should win that battle most of the time.
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
(Justin) being the SMith in subject
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
I know it seems strange
You are relying on your 3 tech getting penetration to kick the play wide, and remember your TED is shaded outside of your 3 tech so he can read the blocks in front of him and come up in support since he doesn’t have a gap assignment.
ok, as long as you're playing the SAM over the TE's outside shoulder.
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
Could be
They might have Pays in there on 1st downs and short second downs, and Aldon Smith in there for pass rushing downs, at least until he gets a feel for run support.
probably this
like Manny last year. Then LaBoy/Brooks came in as pass rushers.
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
the thing is parly is not good against the run.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
by HUNGRY HUNTER on Aug 9, 2011 11:30 AM PDT up reply actions
he's good on runs up the middle
just not in pursuit
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
Off topic here...but what's up with Kelvin Hayden?
The Bears are not going to sign him and I’ve heard a few people here mention he’d be an upgrade for our #2 CB spot. One-year deal maybe? Can he hold up in man coverage or is he more of a cover-2 CB?
by Sactown_Loyalty19 on Aug 9, 2011 8:45 AM PDT reply actions
crafty, zone corner mostly
heard yesterday that “passing physical will be key”
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
if it bears mentioning, it might be that it could be failed
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
Speaking of
I wonder how hard it would be to get an angry bear into a 49ers uniform and train him to line up at NT?
Corners in your average Cover-2 system aren't turn-and-run guys.
They need the play in front of them in order to be effective, and that scares me in translation. Plus, people need to hold their horses about replacing Shawntae Spencer. He’s been an above average corner in this system for years and has been able to stay healthy.
Spencer is the kind of veteran this team needs in transition.
Cover 2
Expect him to play man and ya end up learning the same lesson the Saints did with Jason David.
Ian Williams
appears to flash talent for clogging up the lanes. Franklin relied on quickness and veteran savvy, not size
Response
Hey everyone, thanks for the welcome to Niners Nation. Im proud to be here. This is a site by the fans, for the fans and I aim to continue that in my time here. To field a couple questions, I am confident Brooks and Smith would be solid in the run support for their own unique reasons. Aldon has the speed and wingspan to register many tackles for a loss. Brooks’ concern was that he wouldn’t hold up in pass coverage and that he was strictly a man with a nose for the backfield. With that that said, I believe he will do just fine in supporting willis and the 800 lbs of defensive line in front of them. And Bowman is intended to fill in for Spikes…we hope.
actually I think it's closer to 900 lbs.
Especially if Soap is back around 330
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
Still a little exasperated
ESPN came out with their preseason ranking and the 49ers are at #26, one spot below where they finished last season.
I do love that we are not getting any respect nationally, fly under the radar and prove that east coast bias to be complete BS
Yes, I just did Twitter. Follow me for ultra intelligent insight.
"I am our future, forget Kory"
by nocal81(Vincent) on Aug 9, 2011 9:50 AM PDT reply actions
As Harbaugh said: "we're just laying low in the weeds, sharpening our blades"
by Sactown_Loyalty19 on Aug 9, 2011 9:54 AM PDT up reply actions
New HC, New Coaching staff with few holdovers, new Offense, new defense... and very young team
- 26 right now is not bad. Of course I expect that to be around # 10 by mid year :-D (positive attitude)
"Whether you think you can, or you think you can't, either way, YOU'RE RIGHT !"
true, true, semi-true, semi-false, irrelevant due to experience level of "young players"
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
"New" just means "unproven" but I hate how they make it "doomed"
The sky isn't falling. It was just an acorn.
I tweet, therefore I am
Lack of respect is all
The Cowboys were #4 heading into the 2010 season and the Steelers were #18. So, it doesn’t mean a whole lot.
Yes, I just did Twitter. Follow me for ultra intelligent insight.
"I am our future, forget Kory"
by nocal81(Vincent) on Aug 9, 2011 9:59 AM PDT up reply actions
This is the best thing that could happen!
Let the media find another darling this year because it didn’t work out for us when we were it.
by Jaxson876 on Aug 9, 2011 11:20 AM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
Remember what they said last year...
…they can be (and often are) wrong. Let’s just hope they over-corrected the other direction this year!
The defense would have been better with Lawson. We shall see, I’m excited.
Wait for it, wait for it, yeah 49ers sign, an undrafted free agent, AGAIN!!
Better for us...
The last couple of years we came in as “the team to beat” in the west, and look how far that got us. I much prefer to fly under the radar and be underestimated.
by motomatt716 on Aug 9, 2011 10:05 AM PDT via mobile reply actions
My prediction
that should last about two games. Once we kick the Cowgirl’s azes the media azes are going to open an eye or two our way.
No excuses A okay?
Nope...
The first few we win, the media will comment on whether our opponent is that much worse than they expected rather then give us cred. We will have to build a winning record to gain respect, which is fine by me.
by ColoradoNiner on Aug 9, 2011 12:01 PM PDT up reply actions
Watch out for Thaddeus Gibson
4th rounder for the Steelers last year has serious talent.
Aldon Smith wearing 48?
Anyone know why or how, aren’t those numbers reserved for backs?
Wasn’t there a safety that played with Lott mid to late 80s? I remember a guy getting horribly hurt after a few good seasons, but it’s so long ago.
Mays would have been the perfect canidate last year
Too bad, he could have been great.
JEFF FULLER
injured at stanford stadium in 89 after the earthquake while playing the dolphins… sad.
partial paralysis.
Earl Cooper
Going into the end zone in our first super bowl and spiking the ball left handed. Also Ralph McGill. A fearless safety that got knocked out about 3 times a year.
i hope he's a beast
just based on the number he wears of course
Ahmad Brooks
should be the starter opposite aldon smith, but can Ahmad Brooks stay healthy?
Brooks has been more consistent than parly, besides the injuries.
"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin
Can he stay on sides?
He did a lot of anticipating last year which is fine if you’re guessing right most of the time.

by 













































