49ers Fall in Overtime: Pass Defense Still the Problem
The San Francisco 49ers suffered a heartbreaking 27-24 loss to the rival Dallas Cowboys on Sunday. And as much it would relieve me to rant about the number of mistakes they made, I still believe this is an improved unit from last year and have to take the good with the bad.
And while the Niners seemed to have taken a step forward overall, the pass defense continues to be a serious issue. For years we have been vulnerable to the big pass plays and have repeatedly been unable to stop teams with even decent aerial attacks. The display against the Cowboys in week two was a perfect example of the 49ers inability to control the oppositions passing attack.
As some of you may have read earlier in the week, I had a feeling Miles Austin would be relevant against San Francisco's susceptible pass defense. And what do you know? Austin finished the day with 143 receiving yards and a career best 3 touchdowns. Though, the dagger came from rookie Jesse Holley on the Cowboys' first offensive play in overtime on a 77 yarder from Tony Romo.
Whether it was man or zone coverage, the defensive backs couldn't consistently defend the receivers for 60 minutes. Early on, the Dallas offensive game-plan seemed focused on getting tight end Jason Witten the ball but once the safeties began honing in on him, that opened up holes in the secondary for Austin to make plays.
With the new regime led by Jim Harbaugh and his new but experienced staff, I was not expecting a mirrored performance of a Singletary/Nolan-secondary. This defense is supposed to know their roles and play smart, sound football -- that did not happen Sunday against the Cowboys. The wide receivers for Dallas had catches that went for 77, two for 53, 33, 25 and 18 yards.
The 49ers front seven played strong for the second week in a row, swarming and stopping the run, as well as getting hits on the quarterback. However, the defensive backs weren't holding up their end. We cannot consistently get beat by the pass; so much so, that everyone who plays us knows to attack our vulnerable secondary. They did a lot of things wrong, but there were some positive things to take note of with 2 interceptions and a few crucial third down stops.
In his post-game press conference, Harbaugh said, "I thought we played well enough to win, but we didn't." So clearly, having hard fought a competitive NFC East opponent, the overall team performance wasn't a complete waste. There are a lot of new players and changes, so naturally, the 49ers organization is expecting growing pains.
New addition Carlos Rogers has been under the microscope, and even more so against Dallas. He is no stranger to them, having played in the same division with the Washington Redskins. Rogers had the hit of the game when he blindsided Romo on a corner blitz but his coverage was questionable at best. He had a couple of pass breakups but after the rain shower that took place all over the 49ers secondary, not much good can be said about anyone on that side.
Rogers was not locked on to Austin the whole game, so I can't blame him for all 143 yards but Rogers was a non-factor nonetheless. There was even a play where the quarterback completely missed his receiver and the ball hit Rogers in the facemask; a ball almost anyone else would have caught if they were paying attention. Rogers, along with Madieu Williams, was responsible for Austin's second touchdown of the day. Williams also tanked the play that led to Austin's third and final touchdown.
2nd year cornerback Tramaine Brock came up with his second interception of the season in as many weeks. He reacted to a Jon Kitna tipped pass and came up with the turnover, displaying good ball skills and awareness. His progression is one to follow, as Harbaugh and the staff have shown confidence in his ability by putting him out there.
At the moment, there should be some level of concern by the defensive staff regarding the secondary. But it's early, so it makes sense that they are not where they need to be yet. The Niners defensive backs missed tackles, allowed receivers too much cushion and failed to seize any of the moments where they could have put the Cowboys away. This is just a reminder that even though we would love results now, we still have a long way to go. We are not looking at the finish product yet, and hopefully San Francisco rebounds strong at Cincinatti after this defeat.
Follow me on Twitter: @DeSimone80
63 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Kinda stuck with what we have.
Nobody with a starting caliber CB is going to want to trade them save for a really high pick, and even then I doubt it. There aren’t many (any?) starting caliber CB’s sitting on the couch as FA’s right now, either. Spencer is obviously in the dog-house to a degree…the same one Jason Hill was in: Special Teams-Only Hell. Getting Goldson back should be an upgrade over Williams, who doesn’t have good ball skills. Goldson (healthy) might’ve picked that TD pass to Austin near the goal-line.
Getting beat by making mistakes hurts the worst.
Follow @Tre9er
Darren Sharper
Instead of Madieu Williams while Goldson is out. An experienced vet that could teach our youngsters a thing or two is sitting home without a team
Follow me on Twitter: @DeSimone80
by Dylan DeSimone on Sep 19, 2011 1:43 PM PDT up reply actions
1 sack and patrick willis was..
mediocre at best yesterday. What happened to our all world linebacker? I haven’t seen him do anything for 2 weeks. What happened to the fangio “i’m going to use willis in different blitz schemes”? Did our attempt to blitz looked as pathetic to you guys as it did to me?
Fangio sucks and has zero imagination.
That’s what happened.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Sep 19, 2011 3:17 PM PDT up reply actions
fire him and promote Tomsula
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Sep 19, 2011 3:18 PM PDT up reply actions
Yes I agree.
It seemed like he barely even blitzed and on the other hand Rob Ryan had the ’Boys defense moving around and getting to Alex consistently, even without his starting two or three corners.
"Coach H seems like a great coach so far. He brings a lot of energy and always has a method for why he does the things he does. If he could, I think he'd want to be God." —Patrick Willis.
by SanFranciscoKnights on Sep 19, 2011 3:20 PM PDT up reply actions
For all the people who said that a good pass rush would fix the secondary
You have been proven wrong. I think Aldon Smith is going to be great but we should have tried to get Peterson or gotten Prince. We need better people in the secondary this team wont go anywhere without it.. for years we have had to put up with this it never gets changed though
The pass rush is much better then our pass defense.
Its not great but how many times have we seen this team get burned deep by almost every team in the league. Even Seattle had a 50+ yard pass play on us and they are considered the worst team in the league right now
49ers don't have a dominate pass rush
Its average and the secondary is below average. Just like the last two seasons.
last season's pass rush
Was below average too
by mcwagner on Sep 19, 2011 2:50 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
We actually got pressure on Romo
Just our secondary couldn’t hold coverage for more than 2 seconds so he had somebody to throw to even under duress.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Sep 19, 2011 3:11 PM PDT up reply actions
The word is “dominant”, not “dominate”
Sorry, hate to be a grammar nazi, but how do people not know this difference?
"And thank you to God for making me an Atheist." - Ricky Gervais
by MichaelClutchtree on Sep 19, 2011 4:12 PM PDT up reply actions
the difference
I don’t think it’s a matter of not knowing the difference. I think everybody has an instance where they type a word that sounds very similar to another word. It’s a simple oversight that happens to everybody.
by David Fucillo on Sep 19, 2011 4:20 PM PDT up reply actions
well Prince got hurt in preseason
so it worked out better NOT getting him
by sanfranfanmdk on Sep 19, 2011 2:08 PM PDT up reply actions
pass rush wasn't great this last game. We got there but not enough. 1 sack and a few hits isn't enough
I was screaming at them to “get him, get to hiM!” all game at the bar
Getting beat by making mistakes hurts the worst.
Follow @Tre9er
yeah but at least we beat the cardinals in week 17 last year!
Official Athletics Nation Rotating Tagline Editor - Pam liked my old sig better.
My thoughtful watermelon is easily mistook for an early American catapult.
DURRRR THEY’RE TOO OLD, BABIP IS TOO HIGH, TOO MANY Ks, DURRRRRR
We need to stay focused
and disciplined. The play after the bogus Brooks penalty that gave them their first td was due to a player falling down, but the rest of the big plays could’ve been thwarted if our guys stayed disciplined to the scheme.
Come on, Alex, please be good this year...
I think 60 minutes is the key
The defense seems especially venerable in the 4th quarter. And, the numerous 3 and outs by our offense doesn’t help.
Ummm...more like lack of a Pass Rush, still the problem
same problem the 9ers have had for the last decade or so.
Remember our Bill Walsh teams…. how our defense were good but not great until Walsh traded for SACK Master Fred Dean… boom onto the Super Bowl we went!
Walsh and Seifert both knew you cannot have a playoff caliber team without a Pass Rush.
And 9ers continuely stocked up on them, Fred Dean, Charles Haley, Chris Doleman, etc,…
But since the late 1990’s until present we have not had a Pass Rush demon.
Im hoping Aldon Smith, maybe Ahmad Brooks, but so far thru 2 games….ZERO.
And if Aldon Smith truely has Pass Rush skill, even in this his Rookie season he shold be able to prove it. All the great one’s were able to generate Sacks even in their Rookie seasons.
the guys up front got got leverage and were really close to hitting Romo
they were asked to do it all by themselves though. 5 to 6 blockers for dallas’ offense was not gonna allow our three and four man fronts to dominate the game. Fangio needed to call more blitzing so that we could draw a mismatch and allow one of our front seven to get in there for the sack. That front is way to good for Fangio not to call more blitz schemes, plus he should have known that the key to beating Dallas is to pressure the hell out of Romo. Yes the blitz can leave you exposed in the backfield, but Romo should have had at least 5-7 players gunning for him all day. If he beats the blitz, so be it. Congratulations. Not blitzing him though resulted in a 400 plus yard performance by Romo and Kitna. Learn your lesson Fangio
Some of their biggest plays came when we brought the blitz
Come on, Alex, please be good this year...
Eh.
Big sell-out blitzes don’t work well if your corners can’t cover. You put them in one-on-one coverage and they get beat.
People don’t notice that as a coaching failure, they yell things like “you stupid cornerback, stay with your guy” but the simple truth is that nearly ever corner in the league will get beat deep if asked to guard a good WR one-on-one repeatedly.
I’m not a fan of three-man rushes, but saying that we should have been rushing 7 often is crazy. That strategy is generally not effective in today’s NFL. But I do tend to think that you should rush less than four only rarely, as part of a misdirection.
the stats showed we were extremely effective sending 4 rushers, too
passer rating of 66.4 I think vs. 4-man pressures.
Getting beat by making mistakes hurts the worst.
Follow @Tre9er
We have excellent personal to field a 4-3 team
What do you think?
Come on, Alex, please be good this year...
Do we think personnel is the problem?
Or is it schematic? A mixture of the two?
by Gerald Tarrant on Sep 19, 2011 2:35 PM PDT via mobile reply actions
I think it's more team chemistry
than a personel problem. The secondary hasn’t played together long enough in a new system to get it right yet.
There is no stat for tipping the ball to a team-mate for the INT, but Aldon Smith made a nice play to get his hands on the ball and tip it to Brock.
Um Smith didn't tip that pass. The other corner did
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Sep 19, 2011 3:15 PM PDT up reply actions
Play Culliver on the other side of Rogers for the Cincy game.
Have him stay with A.J. Green. Let’s see what the kid is bringing (rookie vs rookie)
Check out my site!!
The Hometown Fan
by Drew Kerr on Sep 19, 2011 2:39 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
Can’t hurt to give it a shot. Culliver should be ready to see the field.
by mcwagner on Sep 19, 2011 2:47 PM PDT via mobile up reply actions
were the big plays
mostly on blitzes? I know at least one huge 4th down conversion the niners rushed 3… which is crafty I guess, but it didn’t work.
Brian Sabean: Sing His Praises To The Heavens!
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game that seems to have resurrected itself in my absence...
I could be wrong here
But it seemed to me that we were getting beat on a number of different looks. We’d bring 3, 4, 5, or 6 guys and Romo (once he came back in at least) would just get the ball out quickly enough it didn’t matter.
Regardless of how may you bring there has to be at least some semblance of coverage.
exactly
We were getting to Romo, (his ribs didn’t hurt themselves), but we couldn’t cover for even 2 seconds so he always was able to get the ball out to an open receiver.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Sep 19, 2011 3:16 PM PDT up reply actions
well, in the 2nd quarter
Romo was something like 0-7. Maybe he just needed the painkiller shot. Either that or the Cowboys adjusted to Fangio’s defense.
Brian Sabean: Sing His Praises To The Heavens!
-------
PARPG- Indy post-apocalyptic roleplaying game that seems to have resurrected itself in my absence...
Lets face it.
Romo came in after his injury and totally destroy the niners secondary even with busted ribs. He redeem himself this at the expense of the Niners. I believe that he was 12/16 for over 200 yds.
by LASVEGASNINER on Sep 19, 2011 4:55 PM PDT up reply actions
blitzes
from memory I think that we tried blitzing on the edges a lot but didn’t ever get real pressure up the middle. Gave Romo enough vision of the field to make plays. That might have been by design but it seemed like Romo was pretty comfortable in the pocket excepting his ribs.
on the pass rush (point taken)
but I did mention at least 5-7, not 7 all day, in other words, mixing it up a bit more. We had just 1 sack on Romo, why? Because they constantly had more blockers that we had rushers, and yes our corners limit when and how we can blitz. But then whats the solution, we played our shceme, and the guy came away with 300 plus yards anyway. They sent 5 and 6 man rushes on Alex Smith, who to his credit played well, but was sacked 6 times and had another game of less than 200 yards passing. I guess we will have to see what the coaches do, just my opinion though.
It's a good thing Vic Fangio got rid of Taylor Mays
It definitely shored up our pass defense. Fangio is gonna be fired within 2 years. When we’re still the 32nd ranked pass defense in the NFL.
Gimme 1 round!
Don't understand
I don’t understand all the negative comments… It’s as if everyone is giving up on the Season already.. It was only the second game, and the Cowboys beat us in OT by 3pts. Yeah we had some issues but I think we showed a lot of improvement overall. I bet we play the Bengals next week……. and DESTROY them! I am also pretty darn sure we take the division this year. Give the team some credit. There are a lot of new pieces to the team this year. It takes time. GO NINERS!
by TruckeeRider on Sep 19, 2011 3:54 PM PDT reply actions 1 recs
but... we lost!
You bring good perspective. I think there is a lot of frustration because regardless of what we thought last week or last year, we found the 49ers in solid position to win in the 4th Q and it evaporated in front of our eyes. Similar to the Minnesota game a couple years ago. I agree that overall I am pleasantly surprised with how well we competed, but I am concerned about how we coughed it up at the end. To me, being in position to win and finding a way to lose is worse than being outplayed and beaten. More from a mental standpoint i guess, especially the way the last few years have gone.
What improvement did you see?
The 49ers proved last year the offense could move the ball some of the time and defense could stonewall the opponents offense part of the time?
It was a home game against a team with half their starters in the training room. The entire Dallas secondary was on IR. Kitna played a quarter at QB. Dez missed the entire game while the their number #2 and #3 were hurt during the game. Flex Jones got hurt and didn’t play much. Dallas even lost their starting center beginning in the 4th quarter. Dallas might not field a competitive team this weekend but still good enough to throttle the 49ers on the road, trailing by 10 points in the 4th quarter.
by bignerd on Sep 19, 2011 6:00 PM PDT up reply actions 1 recs
To be fair, the 49ers didn't have their top 2 WR either.
And if you assume Goldson and Spencer would be starters if healthy (not a given), that’s half the secondary right there.
"Coach H seems like a great coach so far. He brings a lot of energy and always has a method for why he does the things he does. If he could, I think he'd want to be God." —Patrick Willis.
by SanFranciscoKnights on Sep 19, 2011 8:52 PM PDT up reply actions
I don't follow this at all
Brock is more directly responsible for Austin tds than Rogers who actually and for the most part had pretty decent coverage throughout. Brock’s fall on the first td to Austin masked the fact that he was already two steps in the whole at that point and was accelerating at the pace of molasses in january. He not good. At all.
The biggest fail though was the consistently awful coverage and blown assignments of Williams and Whitner. As you say, no one covered themselves in glory here, but if anyone played like an NFL db, it was Rogers.
He slipped
Of course the 49ers were bringing a heavy blitz and no one was home to tackle Austin after Brock fell. Lets not forget the 49ers already stopped the Cowboys on 3rd down but Ahmad Brooks elected to use his obligatory defensive offsides call per game at this instance.
The biggest problem
Is the playcalling offensively and the strategy. This team right now is worse than the 2010 version and yet the 49ers aren’t going to start off the year wondering when the first win will come.
Tired of the weak playcalling of Roman! It was terrible against Seattle and even if it was a little bit better than the Seattle game it wasn’t by much. Game plan using Davis as a blocker against Ware for a majority of the game is ridiculous.
The problem the defense faced in the second half is that it was pretty much on the field the entire time. Hard to have a fresh defense when every possession of that half except for one was a three and out.
And the only time to gain a first down is the pathetic mistake of Harbaugh to take the field goal instead of sustaining a drive to take time off the clock.
Cowboys fan
Just wanted to say what a good game that was, by both sides. Honestly I was sure y’all had won it in the 3rd quarter, before Romo came back (with his busted ribs and holed lung…).
Good luck with your division, honestly from what I saw yesterday I’d have to say you’re my bet to win it.
God Bless Texas
Hey at least we have the top rush defense in the league.
"Coach H seems like a great coach so far. He brings a lot of energy and always has a method for why he does the things he does. If he could, I think he'd want to be God." —Patrick Willis.
by SanFranciscoKnights on Sep 19, 2011 9:02 PM PDT reply actions
And yet Billick continuously said the Cowboys needed to run the ball against us.
"Coach H seems like a great coach so far. He brings a lot of energy and always has a method for why he does the things he does. If he could, I think he'd want to be God." —Patrick Willis.
by SanFranciscoKnights on Sep 19, 2011 9:05 PM PDT up reply actions

by 







































