Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

So many sacks, just one defense.

The 49ers have struck a rich vein of form this year, improving in nearly every area of the game but there is a flaw in the golden seam that they have been mining, they do not seem to be able to pick up heavy blitzes. It's been a problem all season.

After the Saints game I was leafing through Rex Ryan's superb coaching manual on the 46 defense (a great read for real football fans, it'll show you why Revis Island is actually a peninsula) and I found that one of his schemes was leaping off the page at me. I knew this defense, I'd seen it,in fact the niners have been seeing it all year and the niners have more trouble blocking this scheme than anything else that's been thrown at them.

Star-divide

This scheme first made its mark in preseason when the Saints pummled the 49er quarterbacks with a series of big blitzes and the niners seemed to have no answer for it. It was then seen again as the Cowboys shut the niner offense down completely in the second half and I'm sure most 49er fans are tying to forget the nine sacks that were served up with their Thanksgiving turkey. The scheme was then used in Candlestick on Saturday when the Saints defense twice forced the 49ers out of field goal range with third down sacks.

The defense is actually the standard coverage of the 46 defense and the key adjustments are staggeringlysimple. The defense aligns with one safety playing the deep middle, corners in man coverage on the outside receivers and the other safety playing close to the line, usually lining up over the tight end. From there the defense will have five designated pass rushers along with three defenders lined up in man coverage against the slot receivers, tight ends and backs. So far this is a normal Cover-1 / Man-Free defense but it's the next step that results in sleepless nights for offensive line coaches. If the linebackers see the defender they had coverage responsibility for stays in to help in pass protection then the linebacker rushes the quarterback and attempts to 'hug' the back or tight end, preventing them from helping in pass protection, releasing for a screen pass or releasing on a delay.

This is single coverage 46-style and it provides two major problems for an offense, if the defense executes properly then it is impossible to double team a defensive lineman and even worse, the more players the offense adds to its pass protection the worse their predicament becomes as more blockers mean more rushers. The chances of an offensive line managing to communicate and hit all their assignments are significantly lower as you introduce more blockers into the protection. Things will get harder if the defense adds in a stunt or a twist, the defense has as many rushers as blockers so any mistakes in passing off a stunting defender will always release a free rusher. Unable to keep the quarterback upright the offense adds more pass protectors, unknowingly making the worst possible call.

It's no suprise that we've seen this from Dallas, New Orleans and Baltimore, these coaches learned from the best. This wrinkle to the well aged Man-Free defense was devised by Buddy Ryan with the Chicago Bears in the 1980s. Gregg Williams helped to coach this defense under Buddy Ryan himself in Houston in the 90s, Rob Ryan got the scheme from his dad and Chuck Pagano learned from Rob Ryan in Oakland and Rex Ryan when he was in Baltimore.

When the niners faced Buddy's acolytes they gave up nineteen sacks in three games, which is just horrible and the Ravens are still lurking as a potential opponent if the niners win on sunday. I can only hope that they can find an answer for it, I'd suggest having backs chip against the defensive ends rather than commit to a block, for a start.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Go Patriots?

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Jan 17, 2012 1:52 AM PST reply actions  

this

no question (as Alex Smith would say)

by reedkrase on Jan 17, 2012 8:44 AM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't worry about the Ravens

yet.

If you can figure this out, so can the Giants. Obviously it can be beaten with quick slants (to crabtree). I would consider splitting out the TEs and have them run little stick or curl routes as well, since they will be uncovered. Motion the backs out as well.

I was wondering if this type of weakness in Max protect (blitz with LBs if their coverage responsibility stays in) is why Mike Martz won’t use it.

Oh, and of course the designed QB sweep.

[Poorly Wrought THING] is what Brian Sabean would have made if he were a [THING-maker] instead of a MLB GM

by zenbitz on Jan 17, 2012 12:04 PM PST reply actions  

I agree

take what the defense will give you… don’t force it. Easier said than done. But if you can get 4 yards every play, take it.

Also, you can counter it by pulling guards and tackles assuming the blitz doesn’t come up the middle.

You can always roll out QB too and negate one half of the field.

by SH0ck-D on Jan 17, 2012 3:38 PM PST up reply actions  

I love the sweep

Some good ideas though the problem with the quick slants is that the corners can squat on the short routes knowing that their rush has a good chance to get to the quarterback and disrupt his timing. You also have to consider that this will be mixed in with zone blitzes with defenders dropping into short the path of any short routes that you are looking for. Motioning the backs and tight ends would make blocking this play easier but then you’d have more issued blocking the overload zone blitzes that they throw at you. I do think it’s a really nice little wrinkle.

I wouldn’t expect the Giants to move away from the four man rush approach that has been so successful for them.

by Karl Cuba on Jan 17, 2012 1:49 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Site Decorum: Remember, We Are ALL 49er Fans

Recent FanPosts

Small
Concussions...
Small
Is Harbaugh lying or does he mean what he says?
872_small
Where have you seen 49er players?
Download2_small
Can the 49'ers Maintain their Turnover Differential in 2012?
Sfak_small
Why are you a 49er fan?
6a00e5500c77218833011168f234b4970c_small
FOX: "How To Save The Sport"
Small
Old Spice Patrick Willis Football ProCamp
Dave_small
Call For Moderators
Steve_young_small
Game Day Food

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

Dylan_cannes_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

428030_10150598134996875_112852666874_9167376_1157036734_n_small mikeinsp