So many sacks, just one defense.
The 49ers have struck a rich vein of form this year, improving in nearly every area of the game but there is a flaw in the golden seam that they have been mining, they do not seem to be able to pick up heavy blitzes. It's been a problem all season.
After the Saints game I was leafing through Rex Ryan's superb coaching manual on the 46 defense (a great read for real football fans, it'll show you why Revis Island is actually a peninsula) and I found that one of his schemes was leaping off the page at me. I knew this defense, I'd seen it,in fact the niners have been seeing it all year and the niners have more trouble blocking this scheme than anything else that's been thrown at them.
This scheme first made its mark in preseason when the Saints pummled the 49er quarterbacks with a series of big blitzes and the niners seemed to have no answer for it. It was then seen again as the Cowboys shut the niner offense down completely in the second half and I'm sure most 49er fans are tying to forget the nine sacks that were served up with their Thanksgiving turkey. The scheme was then used in Candlestick on Saturday when the Saints defense twice forced the 49ers out of field goal range with third down sacks.
The defense is actually the standard coverage of the 46 defense and the key adjustments are staggeringlysimple. The defense aligns with one safety playing the deep middle, corners in man coverage on the outside receivers and the other safety playing close to the line, usually lining up over the tight end. From there the defense will have five designated pass rushers along with three defenders lined up in man coverage against the slot receivers, tight ends and backs. So far this is a normal Cover-1 / Man-Free defense but it's the next step that results in sleepless nights for offensive line coaches. If the linebackers see the defender they had coverage responsibility for stays in to help in pass protection then the linebacker rushes the quarterback and attempts to 'hug' the back or tight end, preventing them from helping in pass protection, releasing for a screen pass or releasing on a delay.
This is single coverage 46-style and it provides two major problems for an offense, if the defense executes properly then it is impossible to double team a defensive lineman and even worse, the more players the offense adds to its pass protection the worse their predicament becomes as more blockers mean more rushers. The chances of an offensive line managing to communicate and hit all their assignments are significantly lower as you introduce more blockers into the protection. Things will get harder if the defense adds in a stunt or a twist, the defense has as many rushers as blockers so any mistakes in passing off a stunting defender will always release a free rusher. Unable to keep the quarterback upright the offense adds more pass protectors, unknowingly making the worst possible call.
It's no suprise that we've seen this from Dallas, New Orleans and Baltimore, these coaches learned from the best. This wrinkle to the well aged Man-Free defense was devised by Buddy Ryan with the Chicago Bears in the 1980s. Gregg Williams helped to coach this defense under Buddy Ryan himself in Houston in the 90s, Rob Ryan got the scheme from his dad and Chuck Pagano learned from Rob Ryan in Oakland and Rex Ryan when he was in Baltimore.
When the niners faced Buddy's acolytes they gave up nineteen sacks in three games, which is just horrible and the Ravens are still lurking as a potential opponent if the niners win on sunday. I can only hope that they can find an answer for it, I'd suggest having backs chip against the defensive ends rather than commit to a block, for a start.
This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wouldn't worry about the Ravens
yet.
If you can figure this out, so can the Giants. Obviously it can be beaten with quick slants (to crabtree). I would consider splitting out the TEs and have them run little stick or curl routes as well, since they will be uncovered. Motion the backs out as well.
I was wondering if this type of weakness in Max protect (blitz with LBs if their coverage responsibility stays in) is why Mike Martz won’t use it.
Oh, and of course the designed QB sweep.
[Poorly Wrought THING] is what Brian Sabean would have made if he were a [THING-maker] instead of a MLB GM
I agree
take what the defense will give you… don’t force it. Easier said than done. But if you can get 4 yards every play, take it.
Also, you can counter it by pulling guards and tackles assuming the blitz doesn’t come up the middle.
You can always roll out QB too and negate one half of the field.
I love the sweep
Some good ideas though the problem with the quick slants is that the corners can squat on the short routes knowing that their rush has a good chance to get to the quarterback and disrupt his timing. You also have to consider that this will be mixed in with zone blitzes with defenders dropping into short the path of any short routes that you are looking for. Motioning the backs and tight ends would make blocking this play easier but then you’d have more issued blocking the overload zone blitzes that they throw at you. I do think it’s a really nice little wrinkle.
I wouldn’t expect the Giants to move away from the four man rush approach that has been so successful for them.

by 




































