Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing' Set For Sunday

Tom Brady vs. Joe Montana: It Is On Like Donkey Kong

This Sunday (in the Super Bowl that actually is not taking place because football ended already, right?), Tom Brady will take his second crack at winning his fourth Super Bowl ring when the Patriots meet the New York Giants. If he gets that elusive fourth ring, he will join Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw in the elite club of quarterbacks that will have four Super Bowl rings.

Naturally, that has opened debate on where Brady fits in the pantheon of all-time greats at the quarterback position. It is not a simple argument because people weigh everything a little bit differently. Whether it be counting stats, Super Bowl trophies or rule changes, there are numerous ways to break down the quarterback pantheon.

Monte Poole fired one of the first shots in the Bay Area, declaring Tom Brady "every bit the equal of Joe Montana." His primary arguments dealt with the fact that Tom Brady did more with less when he had guys like David Givens, Troy Brown and Deion Branch as his number one receivers in given years.

Joe Montana's teams in 1988 and 1989 had some dominant offensive players, but if you go back to 1981 and 1984, it reframes the debate a little bit. In 1981 Dwight Clark had a great year and Freddie Solomon was a strong #2, all while Montana had a fairly poor rushing attack (five rushers wtih 60+ carries, none averaged more than 3.6 ypc). In 1984, Dwight Clark led the team with 52 receptions and 880 yards. Of course, that team had Wendell Tyler averaging 5.1 yards per carry en route to 1,262 yards.

Star-divide

The comparison grows even murkier when we consider a lot of the rule changes over the last 15 years. We are in a sort of a statistical golden age for quarterbacks thanks to rules that do benefit the offense more than the defense. The rules have adjusted over the years, but it would be interesting to look at Brady over the last decade if he had played in the '70s and '80s. We can only speculate, but it's an interesting hypothetical.

I haven't really gone into the specific stat comparisons between the two quarterbacks primarily because there are legitimate arguments that quarterback stats are getting inflated by rule changes. When two players break Dan Marino's passing yardage record in a season (Brees, Brady) and four of the top six single season marks come from the same year (2011), it's safe to say inflation is at hand.

If I had to pick between those two I'd go with Joe Montana. However, I do think it is reasonable to think that Tom Brady has played his way at least into the discussion. A common refrain is that Joe was 4-0 in Super Bowls and Brady has that one loss. That is of some value in the overall context, but I'm not sure how much I value it at this point. It's really enough of a battle that every little detail can swing it this way or that. But it creates an interesting discussion as Brady is working towards the twilight of his career.

Comment 79 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Yawn.

Montana;)

by vixenflem on Feb 1, 2012 2:07 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Tom Brady has 572 less yatds,

But he has 27 more td’s and a lot less interceptions, and he also has a higher career qb rating. I know who I would want.

At least I can still hate the stinking Raiders!

by Chiefs1 on Feb 1, 2012 5:11 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

fantasy stats?

different eras. If Montana cried for a flag (as if he ever would) the defense would just target him more.

by mcwagner on Feb 1, 2012 5:29 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

if monatana cried for a flag

they would probably flag him for unsportsmanlike conduct

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 1, 2012 6:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Montana will be remembered

For getting hurt in the last two bog games that he played in, causing his teams to lose. Brady has only lost a couple of big games.

At least I can still hate the stinking Raiders!

by Chiefs1 on Feb 2, 2012 10:33 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

*big

At least I can still hate the stinking Raiders!

by Chiefs1 on Feb 2, 2012 11:54 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Brady's career QB rating is higher...

…but Montana’s career QB rating was much higher relative to other players of his era. It’s not even close.

by Bigmouth on Feb 1, 2012 6:08 PM PST up reply actions  

I'll remember Montana

For his shape-ups commercials

At least I can still hate the stinking Raiders!

by Chiefs1 on Feb 2, 2012 10:34 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Montana was

The best quarterback the Chiefs ever had.
He was great enough to make Shottenheimer look competent offensively.

"I'm gonna have to watch the film before I can answer that question"

by Celtic Sol on Feb 4, 2012 5:57 PM PST up reply actions  

Split decision

I say Montana. My wife says Brady. Then again, she doesn’t watch football.

"And the Warriors won, so I guess your household is pretty happy"--Donald Sutherland, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, 1978

by BlueInTheFace on Feb 1, 2012 2:27 PM PST reply actions  

Montana over Brady...

…and Steve Young over them both. You make a great point about the different eras in which each played. Over at Pro Football Reference, you can run a filter showing which QBs have the highest career Passer Rating Index, which is scaled to a league average of 100 for the player’s era. The top 3 are:

1) Otto Graham: 127
2) Steve Young: 126
3) Joe Montana: 123

Brady’s tied for 7th with a 118.

by Bigmouth on Feb 1, 2012 2:30 PM PST reply actions  

can't really compare the two because both played in different era's

The only guy I would compare Brady to would be Manning because they’ve both benefited from the new rules

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 1, 2012 2:32 PM PST reply actions  

My Metric is SB Wins

Therefore, Montana over Brad, over Young Tied with Manning(s) and Dilfer over Dan Marino and Jim Kelly.

by SH0ck-D on Feb 1, 2012 2:36 PM PST reply actions  

and by Brad I mean Brady

Would Michael Jordan be as good if he didn’t win any rings?

by SH0ck-D on Feb 1, 2012 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

yes he would have

The talent was always there. If he did get better it was because he worked hard and practiced a lot. Winning rings doesn’t increase the talent of a player.

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 1, 2012 2:43 PM PST up reply actions  

I beg to differ

Winning Championships proves you’re the best of the best and that your talent shows up when it counts. Montana was at his best during the post season. I think all his stats are better in the post season, than the regular season, which is crazy to think if you’re constantly going up aginst the best teams during the post season.

This is my reasoning for Montana over Brady, since Brady has had a string of poor to mediocre post season play over his last several post season games.

That being said, it’s still pretty close. The stats are close. Both have 16 post season wins, which is tied for the most All Time. If Brady wins the Super Bowl this year, or any other year, then they both will have 4 SB wins. If Brady wins the MVP, they will both have 3 SB MVP’s.

The one glaring problem for Brady’s case as best ever, is that 1 SB loss!!!!

by aBulldog on Feb 1, 2012 3:27 PM PST up reply actions  

I feel that Michael was so good that he could have won some rings with mediocre support

Maybe one or two. Definitely not six. It’s ridiculous how he shot 50% from the field as a shooting guard during a few of his seasons – the guy was unguardable.

If you're watching a blowout, you can pass the time by counting the double teapots.
Samurai Champloo > Macross
I gif stuff

by doubleteapot on Feb 1, 2012 3:32 PM PST up reply actions  

both

Cop out? No, accurate. Have seen both, extensively, and they are both on that elevated platform of The Best.
See nothing that clearly delineates one over the other. Both got it done. Both looked good doing it. Cool that one grew up watching the other.

by TheCatch81 on Feb 1, 2012 2:40 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

This is probably accurate

That said, since I’m a Niner fan, and watched Montana become a legend during my childhood, I’m gonna go with Joe.

Brady’s the closest thing I’ve seen since, but Montana was transcendant.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Feb 1, 2012 5:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Montana

Eddie George had a good comment regarding this very question and I agree with him. What sets Joe Montana above Brady are the signature moments, like The Catch and the pass to John Taylor in SB 23. Here’s the link:

Brady vs Montana

by doyoufeellucky on Feb 1, 2012 2:44 PM PST reply actions  

Both were non-physical specimens who played as close to perfection as anyone else in their era, but managed to win the big ones

The fact that Brady clearly gives props to Montana as his idol, makes me OK with him. Giving homage where it is due.

by jns8049ers on Feb 1, 2012 2:47 PM PST reply actions  

I hate the "did more with less" argument

It always neglects the counter point that teams can get further with less in this era. In the 80’s and mid 90’s a team needed around 8 Pro Bowl players with no weaknesses to win a title, the top end of the NFL was always stacked.

by bignerd on Feb 1, 2012 2:49 PM PST reply actions  

it was easier to have that many pro bowlers back then because there was no salary cap

If teams wanted to compete with the best, they had to spend a lot of money

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 1, 2012 2:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Ehhh

That’s true of the 1994 49ers, but the other 4 teams were built around excellent drafting and developing.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

Follow the Chicken on Twitter

by SportsChicken on Feb 1, 2012 3:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Gotta go Joe

because of the QB/Offense friendly rules of this era, and because Brady associates with known cheaters as coaches, kind of invalidates some of his accomplishments

by sanfranfanmdk on Feb 1, 2012 2:53 PM PST reply actions  

Sid Luckman

managed to put up 14,000+ yards in the 1940s, well before the NFL ruined the game.

by reedkrase on Feb 1, 2012 3:16 PM PST reply actions  

It's pretty close

I’d take Joe with one game to win or at his peak. Brady has a chance to do more with the last few years of his career.

Both benefited from great coaching and teammates. Joe lost twice in the playoffs to a Belichick coached defense. Brady never had to face Bill Walsh. Joe also had Jerry for 6 years.

by hammystyle on Feb 1, 2012 3:18 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Montana

Brady needs to win at least this superbowl, Brady’s career win % is better, if he matches superbowl rings with Montana, then the debate should begin.

by reedkrase on Feb 1, 2012 3:20 PM PST reply actions  

If a QB is going to surpass Joe Montana as the greatest ever...

…I’d rather it be Brady (rather than Brent or Peyton’s head).

Ideally, I’d rather Rodgers best Brady, but we’ll see how that goes.

What we've got here is a failure to communicate.

Follow the Chicken on Twitter

by SportsChicken on Feb 1, 2012 3:31 PM PST reply actions  

Why does one have to be better than the other....different times and rules, but both are top 5 all time.

Bradshaw may have 4 SB rings, but he isn’t as great as Brady or Montana. I have no problem putting Montana and Brady as equals

by ericalancanty on Feb 1, 2012 4:13 PM PST reply actions  

I do

Compare them to their era quarterbacks. Montana was head and shoulders above his competition which saw some of the greatest to ever play the game.
Brady has always been considered the equal to Manning and only later in his career was that even happening. 2004 was when it was finally agreed upon that Brady was the top guy.

by mcwagner on Feb 1, 2012 5:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Well , Brady's wife might be the kicker even though Joe's ain't to bad either ...!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 1, 2012 4:20 PM PST reply actions  

I will use your stat as well

by danknerd49 on Feb 1, 2012 4:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Ugh

Imagine if the 49ers had a chance to determine Tom Brady’s legacy. In my book he’s already one of the g.o.a.t’s, but if he wins this year he just might be considered THE G.O.A.T.

by supraman on Feb 1, 2012 4:38 PM PST reply actions  

Montana

He lead his team to and won all four Super Bowls WITHOUT his coach knowing exactly what the defense is going to do. Brady hasn’t won a single one since Belichick was told to stop cheating.

by madmatt on Feb 1, 2012 4:42 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

I'm sorry guys but

Montana is better all time. Brady would not have lasted in the 80s and 90s. He complains every time he gets breathed on now, imagine if he would have been playing under the rules of the past. With that said, now imagine Montana to Rice with today’s rules, then tell me with a straight face that Brady is better.

by Leoniner on Feb 1, 2012 4:43 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

I'm just glad

There is no ignorance like previous threads saying Brady is overrated and a “system QB”.

I’d still take Joe, but Brady is top 3-5 all time.

"Bears are crazy, Willie. They'll bite your head off if you're wearing steak on it."

by Blank x2 on Feb 1, 2012 4:44 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Yup

Joe’s #1 on that list, but Brady’s pretty close to the top himself.

It causes me physical pain to admit that, but it’s true.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Feb 1, 2012 5:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Are you serious?

I agree with ericalancanty, but even if that is the case place Montana in this era in which receivers can’t be touched or harassed as much as in Montana’s era he would put up even larger numbers. Really done more with less? Try doing more with smaller windows and more uncalled defensive pass interference. It is absurd to place Brady over Montana the only thing that Brady will be better than Montana is the possibility of rings. Other than that place Montana the player in this era and there would be no debate, so I say really Brady over Montana because he has less weapons try less passer friendly league and vicious hits that were legal no freaking TOM BRADY RULE hitting below the knee. Montana took punishment and was still had amazing numbers

by default007 on Feb 1, 2012 4:52 PM PST reply actions  

Montana

and no, it’s not close. Like not within nautical miles close.

This is not a stats thing. When did Brady throw four TD passes in an epic fourth quarter comeback victory while taking 6 sacks and generally being pulverized by the Reggie White powered dominating 1989 Eagles line? How many pics has Brady thrown in Super Bowls? Because Joe threw zero in four victories including dominating performances and thrilling comeback wins. When when did Brady ever beat the likes of a 5000 yards passing back when that actually meant something Marino in a Super Bowl?

And it wasn’t even his Super Bowls or even his victores that defined Joe. In the NFC championship in 83 against a heavily favored Redskins team, he threw 3 td passes to erase a 21 point 4th quarter deficit, only to see the team screwed on a bogus pass interference call on Wright. Even in the 86 washout when the 9ers were horribly overmatched against a utterly dominant Giants team with one of the best defenses in NFL history, Montana puts up what should’ve been a 50 yard TD pass on the opening drive before Rice inexplicably fumbles the ball out of the endzone. The team loses that game either way, but that shows the kind of moxie he had.

Then you take Brady who manages in his ‘record setting’ ‘most dominant’ year to guide his offense to 14 points against something less than the best defense a Superbowl has ever seen (for reference New England scored 10 against the 85 Bears).

Let’s just say I’ve never understood these comparisons. But that might have to do with me actually having seen Montana play.

by BKisforSF on Feb 1, 2012 5:07 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

wrong about the sacks he took against the eagles

it was 8 not 6, 2.5 of those by Reggie White, and they were playing in Phili.

Montana threw for 428 yards and 5TDs that game. Also, in the 86 washout against the Giants, he was of course knocked out by that infamous helmet to helmet Jim Burt hit, that gave him a concussion. Now of course that would be illegal. Just think what Joe would’ve been able to do if he was that protected throughout his career, given how many games he lost to injury. One marvels.

Without question, the man was the GOAT then, and still is now.

by BKisforSF on Feb 2, 2012 7:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Steve Young....had he not got that concussion

and he continued to play, well just think about that.

by BigMar on Feb 1, 2012 5:31 PM PST reply actions  

Young was 38 years old

on a team that was starting to wither. Better argument is if he played earlier in his career. Young was very good, but he is barely in the top ten quarterbacks and is a hard argument for the top five.

by mcwagner on Feb 1, 2012 5:40 PM PST up reply actions  

In retrospect, I feel a little bad for Young

A Hall of Famer who 27/28 other teams in the league would have been thrilled to have, and SF’s fans never really warmed to him because he only won one Super Bowl.

Having been through the proverbial desert from 2003-2010, I now appreciate Young more than I did when he was playing.

"Football combines the two worst things about America: It is violence punctuated by committee meetings" -George Will

by lottwasgangsta on Feb 1, 2012 5:55 PM PST up reply actions  

I never got it

I loved Montana, then I loved Young. I never compared the two. I just enjoyed him. Its the same problem all over again. No one appreciates Smith. He just had a resurrection season that got within spitting distance of the Super Bowl. Instead of cheering for him and enjoying what we just had, everyone wants to slam the guy (or love him up to something he is not which is also not appropriate.) Just look back and smile that he played good.

by mcwagner on Feb 1, 2012 6:06 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

this

"Cruelty, It’s not giving another person what they want. That’s our mindset on defense, to go out and play with everything we have and not give the other team anything." -Patrick Willis

by 49erLou on Feb 1, 2012 7:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I disagree

but there is no way of measuring that. They both were crazy good and Young hit a stride that was hard to top.

by mcwagner on Feb 1, 2012 6:12 PM PST up reply actions  

But you can measure it

See my post above about QB Rating Index. QB Rating isn’t a great metric, but it’s more reliable over a player’s career. And Young’s career QB Rating was better relative to his peers than Montana’s, though they’re close.

by Bigmouth on Feb 1, 2012 6:47 PM PST up reply actions  

No

These are CAREER numbers. Passer rating is more reliable over many seasons. Try again.

by Bigmouth on Feb 2, 2012 9:07 AM PST up reply actions  

Tebow career rating: 75.1
Bradford career rating: 74.2
Favre: 86.0
Romo: 96.9
P. Manning: 94.9
E. Manning: 82.1

by mcwagner on Feb 2, 2012 10:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Except Tebow and Bradford

Have only played a handful of seasons between them. As I keep saying, passer rating is more reliable over MANY seasons than one or two.

by Bigmouth on Feb 2, 2012 10:29 AM PST up reply actions  

Also, Sam Bradford is not a very good QB right now

Not sure that’s the best example for your argument.

by Bigmouth on Feb 2, 2012 9:16 AM PST up reply actions  

No...

…it means your sample size is too small to be meaningful where Bradford and Tebow’s passer ratings are concerned.

by Bigmouth on Feb 2, 2012 10:33 AM PST up reply actions  

no problem with the comparisons

it’s not a long list of QBs who have won 3 or more Super Bowls. While I, of course, give Montana the edge (greatest ever!), Brady does seem to have that same kind of magic winning aura that Joe had as well. Overall, I’d give the edge to Montana due to the era he played in was more difficult. While there may be more “parity” (parody?) today, there were seriously dominant dynasty/near dynasty type teams during his era that he had to beat over and over again (Redskins, Giants, Bears) to even get to the Super Bowls. During those days winning the NFC championship pretty much locked things up and the Super Bowl was a formality. To Brady’s credit, he’s 5-1 and AFC title games (ok, 4.5-1 – Bledsoe completed the first one for him.) Montana was 4-2.

The complaint that Brady didn’t have the weapons is…well, in 2007, he had Randy Moss and a totally dominant offense. They lost the Super Bowl. Joe never lost a Super Bowl.

"There was no torture in the end. Only rapture." - Mike Krukow
Flags Fly Forever

"Orlando before Zod" doesn't have the same nice ring to it.

by nostocksjustbonds on Feb 1, 2012 6:04 PM PST reply actions  

How can someone who believes in the random walk...

…take the idea of a winner-take-all championship seriously?

Or am I totally missing the reference in your alias?

by Bigmouth on Feb 1, 2012 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Here's a Question.

1st of all Montana hands down no question. What if the 9ers drafted Tom? Would we be so hard on this guy. I mean he is from Cal and his favorite team was 9ers and his favorite player was MONTANA. I mean we would be calling him the greates of all times b/c we would still have Steve M. as head coach and we would have like 5 more SB and be consider the greates franchise ever. We fucked up not him he was choosen 199 over all. We had our chance with him but over looked him, I just hope that he beats the fuckin Giants and ELI. Right now in todays NFL Tom Brady is the GREATES QB just like MONTANA was the GREATEST back in his NFL.

by Ninerfreak on Feb 1, 2012 6:05 PM PST reply actions  

watch the language please, no swearing please.

We would have ran Brady out of town long ago. The only way he would have become Tom is if Mooch kept his job. I think the Yorks wanted to do things their own way. Tom is a great story in the NFL and the fact he is even compared to Montana is the greatest compliment.

by mcwagner on Feb 1, 2012 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

The reason we are so hard on TOM is because he is being compared to the Greatest quarterback ever. They are taking away what Montana did and degrading it by saying Tom is better because he has less to work with. That is why we are hard on him because he is being compared to Montana who was better in his time than brady was and faced more adversity in the NFL and challenges

by default007 on Feb 1, 2012 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Brady would take Montana

"It's impossible to hide the fire inside" - Bob Seger

by Jaxson876 on Feb 1, 2012 7:07 PM PST reply actions  

to the movies

the whole time complaining that his tummy hurts from eating popcorn too fast and criticize the camera angles and directing of the Rams’ practice video

by mcwagner on Feb 1, 2012 7:12 PM PST up reply actions   2 recs

Greatness remains Great regardless

I believe Montana won Superbowls with two different head coaches and a number of different coordinators. Brady has been blessed with the same coach on a favored east coast team. Regardless, Brady remains a very good quarterback with great mechanics and plays in a terrific scheme that he could run in his sleep. He’s as good a quarterback as I’ve seen in a very long time — Possibly the best of his generation.

But he’s no Joe.

by Ninerpoints on Feb 1, 2012 8:52 PM PST reply actions  

It's the elephant in the room...

I’m sorry but as great as Brady has played I can never look at his achievements as equal because of “Spy-gate.” It’s the most under covered sports controversy in the of the last decade. In an era of football that is designed to prevent the old Niners/Cowboys dynasties the Pats dominated with “less than everyone else.”

Walsh was never accused by one of his former coaches of taping practices and no former Niner employee ever came forward to confirm that “spying,” had been around for a long time. The Patriots and Brady’s postseason dominance began declining the same year the spygate stuff broke and they’ve haven’t been able to get over the hump since.

I’m not saying by any stretch that Brady is the product of a corrupt coaching organization. He’s great at his job and has obviously gotten better at it the longer he’s been in the league. Those first three rings though… are tainted IMO. Every analyst marveled at how Belichick could cut whatever players he needed to and just substitute another cog into the wheel without repercussions. Goodell swept the cheating allegations under the rug and slapped the Pats with a ridiculously small one-time monetary penalty. It wasn’t good for the league to have it’s top franchise’s legitimacy called into question along with one of it’s poster boy QB’s. Which leads me back to discussing Brady…

Has there ever been a player in the History of the NFL that has received more preferential treatment than Tom Brady? They changed the rules of the game because he tore up his knee for one season. I’m paraphrasing a caller I heard on KNBR, “Leonard Marshall would’ve have been ejected from the game and possibly kicked out of the league for what he did to Montana.” And JIm Burt and half of the 1980’s Bear D-line wouldn’t be far off in today’s game. It’s a different era for a softer, pass happy league and Tom Brady has been on the biggest benefactors.

The most damning praise for Brady’s legacy has to do with the signature moment that created it: The Tuck rule. The Patriot Dynasty and Brady’s rise to greatness hinges on faulty interpretation of a ridiculous rule that is designed to once again protect quarterbacks and hinder the defense that is trying to get to them. Montana has signature plays in the biggest moments of the biggest games that involve him doing something positive for his team. Montana’s legacy was created because he was scrambling away from pressure and Dwight made a great catch. Brady’s legacy was born out of a group of referees looking at replays for 20 minutes. And if Vinateri doesn’t actually come through with the clutch kicks there’s no legacy to speak of.

by throwthedamnball on Feb 1, 2012 10:39 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Hmmm.

If I had to credit Tom Brady for one thing he has done in a Super which Joe Montana has not… It would be throwing an interception.

by Frederick Sparks III on Feb 1, 2012 10:48 PM PST reply actions  

Close but no cigar

You can argue Montana had better teams. But the year the Patriots had debatably their best team, Randy Moss, Welker etc they choked in the playoffs.

Statistically Brady is a good match to Montana. However, here are my key points.

1) Montana never lost a Superbowl, nor has he thrown an interception in a superbowl, Brady has done so for both, this factors in the argument that football now favors the offense.

2) Brady has never been required to score a TD to win Superbowl in clutch situations. All his Superbowls have been won on field goals or lack of the opposing team’s offense to win the game. You can even extend that to playoff wins in general. Most of the playoff games he has won have never required him to make a last second comeback.

3) Brady has never blown out teams in the Superbowl in terms of offensive scoring. Montana has.

I know this doesn’t count and is purely hypothetical and with no disrespect to Steve Young, but had Montana played his whole career in SF, arguably he would have been there in 94 for that 5th superbowl win. Montana has been perfect in the postseason and its unlikely that that will be challenged anytime soon.

Now that does not take anything away from Brady. I would say Brady statistically has had the better numbers in regular season in terms of %s and interceptions. But the 2008 year is a perfect example that none of that matters when it comes to the playoffs and keeping cool under pressure. Now if Brady wins a 5th we can open the conversation up again. But in terms of playoff and Superbowl performance and overall career, Montana wins.

by fireroad01 on Feb 2, 2012 12:19 AM PST reply actions   1 recs

I cannot Rec this enough man..Exactly my thoughts Was going down to see if anyone mentioned the Brady loss in superbowl..This is why i was only half excited to get to the superbowl this year. I did not want to make it there , and then sully our great record of 5-0 at superbowl apperances

Founder of team Omté Caspeen

by Widowwolf on Feb 2, 2012 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

Brady is today's Montana, but that doesn't mean he's better.

Personally, I think it is splitting hairs to argue about this. After Brady;s career, I think he will be on the shortest of short lists for greatest QB of all-time, alongside his childhood idol Joe Montana.

Who would I take? For a season or one game, Montana. I simply think he is the better, more well rounded player (Tom can’t answer to Joe’s mobility). However, you’d be likely to get more mileage out of Brady due to a much larger, less fragile stature. But that is really only a difference of a few years at best.

I’ve never seen anyone command an offense with the grace under pressure of Montana, not to mention he was a jack of all trades, not just a master of passing. He could (and would) beat you whichever way was necessary, greatly evidenced by his performance in the Superbowl against the Dolphins where he shredded them both with his arm and his feet.

Alex Smith went from "We Want Carr!" to "The Run" and "The Catch 3."
SAN FRANCISCO GIANTS: WORLD CHAMPIONS!
Jim Harbaugh and Alex Smith are our future!
Giants Baseball: Torture. It hurts so good.

by Effage on Feb 2, 2012 11:48 AM PST reply actions  

Montana is better

Until Brady has a coked up Lawrence Taylor barreling towards him in an NFC title game, Montana is better.
Also, less teams, no free agency during the Montana era, which means Montana was consistently facing better defenses.

"I'm gonna have to watch the film before I can answer that question"

by Celtic Sol on Feb 4, 2012 6:07 PM PST reply actions  

What about the fact Belichick was cheating. Brady definitely was helped with Belichick during the whole cheating scandal.

Who has it better than us?

by B1GB3N on Feb 5, 2012 4:35 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Site Decorum: Remember, We Are ALL 49er Fans

Recent FanPosts

Sfak_small
2012 Regular Season Standings Mock 1.0
Small
Concussions...
Small
Is Harbaugh lying or does he mean what he says?
872_small
Where have you seen 49er players?
Download2_small
Can the 49'ers Maintain their Turnover Differential in 2012?
Sfak_small
Why are you a 49er fan?
6a00e5500c77218833011168f234b4970c_small
FOX: "How To Save The Sport"
Small
Old Spice Patrick Willis Football ProCamp
Dave_small
Call For Moderators

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

Dylan_cannes_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

428030_10150598134996875_112852666874_9167376_1157036734_n_small mikeinsp