2011 49ers Grades: Daniel Kilgore & Mike Person
I thought we would combine Daniel Kilgore and Mike Person into a single post in part because they are in somewhat similar situations. While Kilgore is believed to have a bit more upside, both spent virtually all of their time on the sidelines in 2011. Kilgore got one snap as an extra blocker against the Pittsburgh Steelers while Person was inactive for all 16 games.
Both Kilgore and Person played tackle in college, but it is anticipated that both will make their way towards the interior of the line. That has been the plan for Kilgore all along, while Person is a little more of an unknown. Both guys would have benefited from a full offseason last year for assessment, but the odds were not particularly high that either would have snatched a starting job.
Now they get a full offseason and Kilgore is the one I'm most intrigued about given some of the 49ers needs. The 49ers are likely going to let Chilo Rachal walk while Adam Snyder remains up in the air. We don't really know how the team views Snyder as a long term option and is probably looking for ways to address the right guard position in some measure. Jonathan Goodwin is also signed for a couple more years but eventually the team will look to transition in a long term solution at center.
Could Kilgore move into the right guard position sooner rather than later? You can go back to our selection post after the 49ers traded up into the fifth round to draft Kilgore. Also, we had another breakdown of some scouting reports on Kilgore a month after the draft. If the team is high on Kilgore, that could very well lower the likelihood of a particularly high pick on the guard position.
One very specific option is for the 49ers to retain Adam Snyder as a short term answer and hope that Kilgore can push him enough to take his job this year or in training camp next year. Or do they bring in a day two guard prospect to compete with Kilgore and others (potentially Snyder if they bring him back)? It all comes down to their thoughts on Kilgore's long-term potential, because if they think highly of him, do they really spend a day one or day two pick on a guard?
Mike Person on the other hand is a tougher one to figure out. He was a seventh round draft pick so the team does not have much invested in him. This will be a big offseason for him as he looks to establish some kind of role with the team. They should have a good idea by the end of training camp what he brings to the table now and what his potential might hold moving forward. Whether that guarantees him a roster spot in 2012 remains to be seen.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The thing that surprised the hell out of me
Was how bad we were at right guard last year and neither of these guys made it off the inactive list. Not even late in the season when the difference between them and Rachal with respect to the offensive scheme should have been minimal.
Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.
Maybe Harbaugh is superstitious
Doesn’t want to start Kilgore till Gore retires?
"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us"
by FearTheTree on Feb 22, 2012 12:54 PM PST up reply actions
I don't see that way , thought they wanted to exhaust the prospect of Chilo to it's fullest effect ...!!
I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!
Uhmmm....9ers clearly have to spend at least 1 of their draft picks on O-Line.
I dont think either Kilgore or Person will amount to anything special.
won't amount to anything special....
why do you think this?
by David Fucillo on Feb 22, 2012 9:23 PM PST up reply actions
won't amount to anything special
It’s already been said- if they couldn’t make it off the inactive list to play in front of Rachal, it’s likely because they’re not perceived by the staff to be any better than Rachal. Great names, good guys, low investment, but probably not good enough to be a starter based on the fact they never got the chance.
I hear what you're saying...
but I don’t think anyone came off inactive or practice last year to replace anyone else without injury. I think Harbaugh decided to stay with the devil he knew rather than push too far. You could say that about many aspects of the team last year.
not sure that's enough reasoning...
these are first year players that had an extremely truncated offseason. Maybe they don’t pan out, but I don’t think the fact that they were rarely active their rookie season is sufficient reason.
by David Fucillo on Feb 22, 2012 10:26 PM PST up reply actions
drafted as "projects"
Wasn’t that 2011 draft the draft Baalke received a lot of criticism for drafting players for positions they hadn’t played in college? Who/what was Aldon Smith? Bruce Miller was a pass-rushing defensive end, a conference player-of-the-year, and he’s being moved to play fullback? Chris Culliver was a safety-played 7 games as a cornerback in his college career-and he’s being drafted as a cornerback? Colin Kaepernick was a quarterback from a “gimmick” offensive system. Kendall Hunter had a twice-surgically-repaired ankle. Ronald Johnson was a solid pick at wide receiver. Colin Jones, David Kilgore, Mike Person, Curtis Holcomb—a collective WTF? these guys play football? who knew?
Seems to me the post-2011 draft Conventional Wisdom had smaller-college tackles Kilgore, and Person, being targeted for interior offensive line positions, with center being the position mentioned as the one of greatest need. At the time Kilgore, and Person, were drafted, Baas hadn’t bolted, and the need to sign Goodwin didn’t exist.
The team may look to Person as the center-in-training, which would work to relieve Snyder of the responsibility of covering Goodwin, and allow the consideration of Kilgore as an alternative to retaining Chilo Rachal, all-the-while Boone appears to be the swing tackle. Looking forward to what develops as a result of having a full slate of organized team activities through the off-season.
Bring me home, Dusty Rhodes
by jestasmaltownboy on Feb 23, 2012 1:14 AM PST up reply actions
They are deffinately looking at the O-line
They have 5 O-linemen signed to future contracts.

by 








































