Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

49ers 2012 Free Agency Review: Tight Ends

Photo

Today we move to a position of strength for the 49ers as we take a look at the tight ends that spent time on the 49ers roster in 2011. This was kind of a bizarre year for the 49ers tight end position. In hiring Jim Harbaugh, the 49ers were bringing in a coach that loved his tight ends at Stanford. The Cardinal used two and three tight ends fairly consistently, and to great success.

In 2011, the 49ers went to two and three tight end sets quite frequently. Vernon Davis and Delanie Walker are known for their receiving skills, but both have developed into incredibly solid blockers for the team. Two of my favorite plays this season were when Delanie Walker placed strong blocks on Ndamukong Suh to spring Frank Gore for a pair of big gains.

The 49ers went with two tight ends in their base offense, which allowed them to get Walker and Davis on the field fairly consistently. They went with Justin Peelle as the third tight end after second year tight end Nate Byham went down with a torn ACL in training camp. The 49ers have Vernon Davis locked up through 2015, Delanie Walker through 2012, and Nate Byham through 2013. Justin Peelle is a free agent this year.

After the jump, we'll take a look at the individual players and how their seasons played out, and then ask you how you feel about the position going forward.

Star-divide

Vernon Davis

The 49ers charismatic leading tight end had what can best be described as an up and down season. It seemed at times like the 49ers coaching staff was struggling with how best to utilize the versatile tight end. Davis brings a combination of speed and power that can matchup with most any tight end in the NFL. Alex Smith has often looked to him as the team has moved down towards the end zone, with the seam route being one of their most prominent plays in recent seasons.

And yet, 2011 saw Vernon Davis all over the place in terms of weekly production. He did have his share of drops, which remains a bit of an issue at times, but there were also times where it just seemed like the 49ers were not looking his way on offense.

And then the postseason happened. Davis had his two biggest games of the year, and really two of the biggest games of his life when it mattered most. He had two bad penalties in the Giants game, with the personal foul being particularly bizarre. The penalties didn't hurt the team from a production standpoint (they got a first down after the roughing penalty before eventually punting), but they were just not the things team leaders need to be doing. Well, the roughing one was particularly stupid, but the celebration after his big touchdown was over the top.

Nonetheless, those two games showed exactly what Vernon is capable of and has me scratching my head to a certain extent about the regular season when the offense sputtered at times.


Receiving Kickoff Returns Punt Returns
G Rec Yds Y/G AVG Lng TD KR YDS AVG Lng TD PR Yds Avg Lng TD
16 67 792 49.5 11.8 44 6 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Delanie Walker

The 49ers number two tight end had arguably his best season as a pro in the Harbaugh/Roman offense. While his receptions and yardage numbers were down, he had a career-high three touchdowns, and received as much playing time as any previous point in his career. The 49ers went to a base two tight end set that allowed them to keep defenses on their toes with the receiving/blocking skills of both tight ends.

This was sort of a tale of two seasons once Walker went down with his broken jaw in the Seahawks game. The 49ers beat the Rams and Saints without Walker, but one has to wonder if Walker was completely 100% for the Giants game. He had a pair of receptions, but a knowingly 100% Walker remains one of the small what if's of this magical season.

We have discussed plenty of issues related to the 49ers need for a wide receiver, but having Davis and Walker put the 49ers in a position where they might not feel the need to overload at the wide receiver position. Walker played wide receiver in college and we know Davis has the speed and size to split out wide on occasion. However, there are enough times where the team does not seem to utilize these two huge weapons nearly enough given their talents. How best can they utilize Walker and Davis to optimize their skills?


Receiving Kickoff Returns Punt Returns
G Rec Yds Y/G AVG Lng TD KR YDS AVG Lng TD PR Yds Avg Lng TD
13 19 198 15.2 10.4 29 3 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Justin Peelle

He had a quiet year receiving, but was a solid enough third tight end when it came to blocking. When Walker went down, Peelle moved into the number two spot, and given the 49ers use of multiple tight ends, it led to a sizable increasing in playing time.

Peelle is unlikely to be back in 2012 given the return of Nate Byham and the competition Konrad Reuland will likely bring to the position in training camp. It is possible he could get a chance to compete given his year in the system, but I would be a little surprised.


Receiving Kickoff Returns Punt Returns
G Rec Yds Y/G AVG Lng TD KR YDS AVG Lng TD PR Yds Avg Lng TD
4 1 19 4.8 19.0 19 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Nate Byham

The 49ers sixth round pick in 2010 tore his ACL early in training camp and never really had a chance to show his stuff for the new coaching staff. He will likely enter 2012 training camp as the leading candidate for the number three tight end role. Given the prominence of power formations, Byham will get a lot of opportunities to get on the field in 2012 if he wins the role.

Konrad Reuland

The former Stanford tight end spent much of the season on the practice squad. Barring a huge step forward that moves him past Byham, I think Reuland ends up getting waived late in training camp with the team hopeful he clears waivers and can end up back on the practice squad.

Poll
On a scale of one to five, with five being absolutely satisfied and one being "highest priority", how do you feel about the group of tight ends on the 49ers roster?
One
69 votes
Two
38 votes
Three
80 votes
Four
283 votes
Five
630 votes

1100 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 157 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

5 but

i would like to see us draft Fleener…as a WR

by Doni S on Feb 3, 2012 12:15 PM PST reply actions  

Yes please!

I don’t care what position they draft him for, just draft him.

I could see the following scenario:

Niners have 3rd and 2 to go.
2 TE set with Davis and Fleener with Gore & Walker in backfield, and Morgan (or I hope Meacham) split out wide.
Davis, Walker & Fleener all split out before they set…hike.
BAM!!! Big play for the offense!

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 12:49 PM PST up reply actions  

We wouldn't need to jump up to get Fleener, he's likely going in the 2nd.

It’s dumb to draft a 3rd string TE in the 1st or 2nd regardless when we have much bigger needs at OL, WR, and defensive depth.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Another would improve the team more than another WR

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 1:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Good gosh no.

Davis is one of the best in the league and Walker is a very good 2nd stringer, making for one of best TE tandems in the league.

We have one of the worst WR corps in the league. With one of the worst #1 and #2 duos in the league, and probably the outright worst depth at the position in the league. 3 TE sets aren’t going to fix our passing game. Better WRs will.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:28 PM PST up reply actions  

that's why i said

as a wr…he has played there some…

by Doni S on Feb 3, 2012 1:48 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh, I thought you were joking.

Fleener isn’t athletic enough or fast enough to play WR. There’s better prospects that are actually WRs in the draft.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:53 PM PST up reply actions  

He's not a burner, but...

I thought I saw somewhere that he runs a 4.5-4.6 in the 40. That’s not blazing speed, but fast enough to get downfield and use his size to make a play on the ball.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Where did you get that?

He ran a 4.6 coming out of highschool

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

well according to scout.com

4.4 http://stanford.scout.com/a.z?s=18&p=8&c=1&nid=2844507

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:04 PM PST up reply actions  

CBS has him as 4.77

Low and high were from here:

http://www.nfldraftscout.com/ratings/profilexnews.php?pyid=69875&draftyear=2012&genpos=TE

i call BS on that other site

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:06 PM PST up reply actions  

scout.com

is the most reliable college scouting website. He didn’t run a 40 recorded 40 since then.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:08 PM PST up reply actions  

Scout.com

Also has him at 220. Now draft sites have him at around 245 to 250. Things change when you put 25-30 pounds on a frame.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

thats true

but will adding 30 lbs make you slow down .4 seconds in a 40?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I'll wait for the combine and not talk about 40s instead of talking about projected 40s

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Obviously, it will

because that’s what he has been running.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

you recorded it with a stopwatch?

or are you going off of projected 40s still

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:16 PM PST up reply actions  

its more accurate than a projected 40

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:20 PM PST up reply actions  

Uh, no.

No it isn’t. For reasons stated above. He might wow some people and run below a 4.6, but I highly, highly, highly doubt he’s running a sub 4.5.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:20 PM PST up reply actions  

You don't need blazing speed when you line up against Lbs.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:23 PM PST up reply actions  

You guys were talking about him being a WR.

As I said earlier, he’s not fast enough or athletic enough to be WR.

Can you succeed as a WR running a 4.5-4.6? Sure. Fleener doesn’t have the skill set to do that though. He’s going to be a TE, and as a TE, he doesn’t offer us anything we don’t already have.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Here's waht I said:

Yes please! I don’t care what position they draft him for, just draft him.

I could see the following scenario:

Niners have 3rd and 2 to go.
2 TE set with Davis and Fleener with Gore & Walker in backfield, and Morgan (or I hope Meacham) split out wide.
Davis, Walker & Fleener all split out before they set…hike.
BAM!!! Big play for the offense!

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 2:27 PM PST up reply actions  

This whole comment tree stems from me

talking about him being a WR. Sorry for assuming, that’s my fault.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:28 PM PST up reply actions  

It's all right.

We can plant this tree in a depleted forest.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 2:37 PM PST up reply actions  

All those player bunched up together sounds awful.

It would make it hard to run and in the limited time we usually have to pass due to our o-line, our WRs would still be all bunched up together. There’s no spreading of the defense.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Only 1 WR in my scenario

VD & Fleener @ TE
Walker in backfield
Then they 3 of them split out

As for running, thats pretty much what they ran out of this year. 2 TE sets with an extra lineman or Soapoaga

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

If they're split out

it doesn’t mean they’re all bunched up.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 2:41 PM PST up reply actions  

Not really

Are they bunched up in base defense or forced to go to nickel to account for two deep threat TEs?

by bignerd on Feb 3, 2012 2:35 PM PST up reply actions  

They would start out bunched

but then if you shift a TE from the inside to the outside someone has to follow him or he is all by himself. At least I would assume so. I mean picture VD lined up next to the T like he normally is. A LB/S would be on him because they aren’t going to let him run solo. If we shift VD outside then the LB who was on him would have to follow him. Then we would essentially have VD against a LB on the outside.

Logically that what can happen. Not sure if it would work in nature though.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

What usually happens

Is with the defense facing a new formation the entire back end coverage gets an audible — what might have been a comfortable situation to run a Cover 2 might now be looking at a possible 3+ verticals which would be a big disaster.

Even if you wanted the matchup of your LB on the TE your base reads would dictate the coverage responsibilities change so that you don’t give away your coverage just because a guy jogged 5 yards East/West.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 2:45 PM PST up reply actions  

What would you audible too?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Depends

If there isn’t a good possibility of 4 verts and we don’t have any trips looks I’m probably looking for a quarter / quarter / half Cover 3.

Basically all that happens is the corner on the motion side now has to deep drop and he and the safety to his side split up that half of the field and the linebacker that was on the TE now has the flat responsibility that the corner had.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 3:02 PM PST up reply actions  

I never said that either

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:32 PM PST up reply actions  

As I said, this whole comment tree

comes from me talking about him being a WR. I assumed you guys were arguing his validity at that position.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:36 PM PST up reply actions  

Obviously I'm not saying he is going to run a 4.4

I said he on MTD that he will run between a 4.5 and 4.6. But to say he will run a 4.8 is crazy talk.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:22 PM PST up reply actions  

And I never said he'd run a 4.8

that’s what his lowest possible time was. I think he’ll run a 4.65 to a 4.75.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:27 PM PST up reply actions  

ok

let’s say that he’s 4.65-4.75…height, he’s listed @ 6-6…what he lacks in speed, he would make up for in height and I don’t know of any DB’s that are 6-6. Theoretically, all Alex would have to do is throw a jump ball and let Fleener go get it…

by Doni S on Feb 3, 2012 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

We are a TE offense

and like Oug continuously posts covering 1 good TE is extremely difficult so can you imagine covering two? Then there is so much more you can do if you have a good enough TEs

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:02 PM PST up reply actions  

Or it could be Harbaugh's offense

Its what he did in Stanford too.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

College =/= the NFL

What works in college does not always work in the NFL.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:11 PM PST up reply actions  

but the TEs do work in the NFL

note Saints and Patriots

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

Saints and Patriots have good WRs.

And also don’t run 3 TE sets all the time.

Big difference.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Patriots WRs are quite average

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Welker is a top 10, all-pro WR

The rest aside from Branch aren’t amazing, but their depth isn’t too bad.

Point is, their WR corp as a whole is a lot better than ours.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Note also

That the Saints and Patriots use them as 4 WR (2TE / 2 WR) sets and do not regularly use a fullback in addition to two tight ends.

You line up like we do with 2 TE (only one of which is a serious receiving threat), two running backs (neither of which are a serious receiving threat), and only 1 wide receiver (who is only periodically a serious receiving threat) and there is a world of difference in how a defense can limit you.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 2:16 PM PST up reply actions  

They also have a much better o-line

which makes it easier to do these things.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Hey Oug

do you think with the evolution of the TE that the LB will be more important? Because they are one of the main positions to cover TEs?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:24 PM PST up reply actions  

Not really

Less important.

If you have to face spread teams more and more often you start backing off to a 3-3-5 and only running a 6 man front. By that point your 3 backers are pretty much slightly bigger safeties who can blitz.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 2:38 PM PST up reply actions  

When you say spread teams do you mean when they line up their TE as a WR?

Because wouldn’t that be just an oversized WR instead of a TE?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

No I'm not talking about the formations

Talking about the general philosophy of getting as many playmakers out into space as possible to stretch the zones and make life hard on linebackers.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 2:52 PM PST up reply actions  

Harbaugh was TE oriented at Stanford out of necessity too.

Explosive skill position recruits are rare there.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Feb 3, 2012 2:43 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

He still had decent WRs

as your seahawks found out

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

Baldwin was an undrafted free agent diamond in the rough, and an afterthought as a HS recruit.

If anyone expected him to be this good, he would have received far more scholarship offers and would have been drafted in the first couple of rounds as the 3rd or 4th best WR in the draft.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Feb 3, 2012 2:57 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Bigger need in passing game than O-Line

Speaking of O-Line What do you guys think of moving Davis to G and having Boone start at RT? We could keep Snyder as backup G/C and maybe one of the guys we signed to a futures contract could move into the swing tackle position.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:26 PM PST up reply actions  

That won't work

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 1:28 PM PST up reply actions  

I highly respect your opinion manraj...

…but can you elaborate as to why it wouldn’t work?

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:30 PM PST up reply actions  

You can't just shift o-linemen around like it's Madden.

I don’t think Anthony Davis ever played Guard in college.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:31 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think he ever played RT in college

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Think he played LT in college

I just posed the question because I’ve seen it suggested in the comments a few times and wondered “what if.”

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:34 PM PST up reply actions  

No, he started some games at RT as a freshman IIRC.

Moving between tackles positions is a lot different than going from tackle to guard regardless.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:35 PM PST up reply actions  

He played both in college

A lot of NFL teams had him rated as a round 2/3 pick as a G.

by GB9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

a lot of teams?

You install spy cams in NFL team’s war rooms?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 1:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Jerry Jones

But he also picked the wrong ILB from Penn St.

by bignerd on Feb 3, 2012 2:39 PM PST up reply actions  

so a leaked big board that may or may not be fake

is many teams.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Yes

Right along the lines the 49ers drafted Kaepernick because the war room couldn’t recover from Dalton being stolen out from under them.

by bignerd on Feb 3, 2012 2:47 PM PST up reply actions  

Do you think we can spread a rumor that says that many teams had Griffin as the #1 QB?

So if Luck doesn’t turn out great we can troll the Colts?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Sean Lee is a very good LB.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. Maybe not as good as Bowman, but they’re pretty close.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:49 PM PST up reply actions  

Would you prefer to keep him at RT where he's

struggled from time to time?

True he got better once they replaced Rachal with Snyder next to him at G, but it’s been suggested Davis would be better at G.

Also it wouldn’t be the first time the Niners moved an OL to different position. They’ve had good results with it too. Jesse Sapoulu was a G before they moved him to C.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:38 PM PST up reply actions  

No. I'd prefer him to be a back-up. He's pretty bad.

I’m not against moving him to guard, but I wouldn’t expect much from the move.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:41 PM PST up reply actions  

He's been good in run blocking.

But he’s struggled with some speed rushers on the outside. If he was moved to G maybe we could utilize his strength (run-blocking) and minimize his weakness (blocking against speedy edge rushers).

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:45 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't know, he's pretty bad.

Not as atrocious as Rachal, but still bad.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:49 PM PST up reply actions  

You don't have to be a flaming bag of feces like Chilo Rachal to be considered a bad lineman.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Feb 3, 2012 2:50 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Davis was a top guard prospect

Coming out of high school. He played right guard for Rutgers his first year. Second year they moved him to left tackle because he was the best lineman they had left. He played left tackle for the 2008 and 2009 seasons but still looked like a guard playing tackle.

He still looks like a guard playing tackle. He has to open his hips and sell out to the sideline in order to stop anything remotely resembling speed — and anytime you have your shoulders parallel to the sideline and still haven’t made contact you are beat — either around the corner or the inside swim is going to get you.

This is where Snyder comes in. Snyder is pretty good at helping Davis with any inside double move so he can sell out further to take away the outside. This teamwork was the improvement that led to a better second half of the season.

The problem with moving Davis to guard is that Boone is a better match for the LT position than the RT position — on the left side he plays against speed where he can match it with his athleticism — on the right he has to play against power and when he plays against power and starts getting tired he gets too high and on the line the low man wins.

So if we move Davis to guard where I think he could be an All-Pro we still have to find a right tackle.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 1:47 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Hmm, my mistake.

Could’ve sworn it was RT he moved from. You’re right though, he was a guard coming out of HS and moved from that position.

Either way, it’d be great if I didn’t have to watch him at RT anymore. Your post makes me feel a bit better about moving him to RG than I did before. We could potentially move him to G and sign a free agent RT.

There’s also the option of moving Staley to RT and Boone up to LT, but I don’t like that. Too much shifting around.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Move Staley to Swing Tackle.

And Boone to LT. Haha!

I actually didn’t like Staley much at LT this season. He seemed to get beat too often.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:53 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah, he definitely didn't deserve a Pro Bowl, but

I still think he was our best lineman. Him and Iupati definitely form the better side of our o-line for running and pass protection. They’re better together than they were last year, and I think they’ll improve again this year.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:56 PM PST up reply actions  

Just goes to show what a joke the Pro Bowl has become.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Feb 3, 2012 2:54 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Thanks Ougadas

For the quality feedback.

So he could be a quality G, but we’d still need a good fit at RT to replace him.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:52 PM PST up reply actions  

I dunno , I don't think Davis can get out of the blocks fast enough to do what the Niners like ...

… which is to pull the gurads alot , he would be a bit slow and stands too tall to be a great guard at this level and that’s what he would have to be to justify paying him tackle money to play guard …!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 3, 2012 5:55 PM PST up reply actions  

No. Better o-line gives Alex more time to pass and gives us the capability

to actually be able to make conversions on short yardage situations. An o-line that doesn’t blow would help our offense tremendously. Bigger holes to run through, more time for WRs to get open, etc.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:30 PM PST up reply actions  

I like the idea of Davis at RG, but

Ultimately trust the judgement of the coaching staff and FO on this one. If they move Davis inside and get either Boone or a new RT then it’s good. If they continue with the Davis experiment and get a new RG then that’s good too.

I hope they go OL with their first pick and I think the candidates at 30 will be Mike Davis (Move Davis inside), Cordy Glenn (play guard, or RT), Kelechi O (G), Konz, start at G and move to C when Goodwin is done.

by GB9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:42 PM PST up reply actions  

I like signing a guy to play RG or drafting one in the first.

Hoping that his play will make Anthony Davis look better.

The right side of the line has been complete s*** the past 2 years, maybe one guy that doesn’t blow goats will make the other look better.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:45 PM PST up reply actions  

They will continue the Davis experiment

I have a good feeling they will continue many of our experiments.

Now that they have a whole off-season to work — there just isn’t much time after the pre-season.

This off-season we get to see if Kilgore added enough size and power to play the position in the pros or if the coaching staff think they can install a brain in Rachal’s skull.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

You may be right - re: in 2nd Round, but...

Think we jumped up and got V Davis – and how has that worked out. If one is good (VD), then two would be soooo much Mo’ betta! This kid is bigger and faster – which is hard to believe. Just sayin’ – I can dream, so please don’t wake me.

by ninernutt on Feb 3, 2012 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

We didn't jump up and get VD.

And good lord DO NOT compare Fleener as a prospect to VD as a prospect.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Fleener is taller, but not bigger or faster

Remember everyone was saying what a freak athlete VD was. Fleener is athletic, but he’s no freak athlete.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think we'd have to jump up to get him.

He’d be available at 30, or somewhere in the mid-2nd round.

by kailuakid9er on Feb 3, 2012 1:29 PM PST up reply actions  

Checking out the "so-called" Xperts

No Draft Expert is remotely indicating any team “needing” a TE desparately (as to be expected). So standing pat would be Baalke’s move I’m sure. Besides, jumping up would cost us something I know. Oh, well.

by ninernutt on Feb 3, 2012 1:32 PM PST up reply actions  

this

if we dont get a WR in the 1st. and get Fleener in the 2nd.

49ers 2012 Offseason: HELP WANTED at WR, DBs, & O-Line

by Giants49war on Feb 3, 2012 11:04 PM PST up reply actions  

4

I already feel we have the 2nd best tandem in the league(NE Pats 1st). I like our guys more, but that’s my heart talking. I would love to see a third outstanding TE, because of the creativity that Harbaugh and Roman already displayed this year. In Maiocco’s chat transcript, someone suggested three amazing TE’s who could bunch up at the LOS and based on the D’s personnel, spread out if they load the box and check to a pass, or if the D prepares for a pass, keep it tight and pound it up. I bet Alex could run an impeccable 2 min. offense with that type of versatility.

by ninerchip on Feb 3, 2012 12:32 PM PST reply actions   1 recs

Who would put 1

it should all be 4 and 5s.. especially after watching Alex and Vernon click in the playoffs. Gotta imagine that will only get better

by Collin B on Feb 3, 2012 12:45 PM PST reply actions  

3

Considering the high usage of TEs in the offense need a better TE than Walker at #2.

by bignerd on Feb 3, 2012 12:45 PM PST reply actions  

Cannot Agree

I think Walker would be a number one TE on 2/3 NFL rosters.

by ninerchip on Feb 3, 2012 12:47 PM PST up reply actions  

The guy is 6' tall. How many starting TE in the league are 6'?

"I believe in you guys in the media. I believe that you will find a way to doubt this team. Just as long as what's written is written against us we'll be happy." - Jim Harbaugh

by SanFranciscoKnights on Feb 3, 2012 5:54 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think he'll be a number one TE on any team

Considering he is a WR.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 6:40 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

My thoughts exactly...

And probably would have worded it exactly the same.

Byham coming off a torn ACL does not scare anyone and likely has about zero impact/playing time for this team considering how often we cycle in linemen to block.

If not for Davis being as good as he is, this group would jump to a 1 or 2 as a result of our WRs being equally as bad. The passing offense lacks weapons, period.

by 9thevolution on Feb 3, 2012 12:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Do we have a tight end on the roster?

Vernon is an over-sized receiver who is best running the deep routes on mismatches.
Walker is an H-Back who we use mostly on pulls and releasing into the flat on PA — almost more of a fullback.
Byham is a straight up blocking specialist.

Do we have a tight end on the roster? A guy who’s going to make those tough third down catches and drop a shoulder into a safety to get us the first? A guy who’s also not a liability playing up on the line?

Do we even have a tight end on the roster?

I don’t think we do.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 1:14 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

I’d take Vernon at the tightend position over a lot of “traditional” TE’s in the league. He is no liability on the line, but I agree that we don’t really have that go to guy on 3rd down.

by KGboomer on Feb 3, 2012 1:22 PM PST up reply actions  

Vernon is a liability on the line

Not because of his blocking skill but because of the opportunity cost and inviting the blitz.

Anytime we don’t send him into a route, we lose our best receiver. Anyone see the Detroit keeping Megatron in to catch the blitz while the other receivers run routes?

Since he’s our best receiver there are usually a couple guys assigned to keep an eye on him — and if he’s staying into block many teams will go ahead and blitz one or both of those guys and usually not at Vernon — so most of the time he’s standing out there blocking air while while the rest of the line has to find a way to deal with the heat.

I’m not saying get rid of Vernon. But put him with the wide receivers where he belongs and bring in a true tight end. Vernon Davis is the WR we are looking for and we’re wasting him at tight end.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 1:37 PM PST up reply actions  

meh its questionable that he's our best receiver

he was our best receiver in the playoffs. I disagree on moving him because he can block well on the line.

by KGboomer on Feb 3, 2012 1:39 PM PST up reply actions  

Having VD at TE gives us the mismatches at safety and linebacker that we want.

He’s also not a bad blocker. If we could just get a true playmaking WR like Bowe that would help him and our offense a ton.

If we had Megatron, I’d s*** my pants. I wish Alex could just lob balls to him and watch him bring them down like Stafford does.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:40 PM PST up reply actions  

lol

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

He is. Bowe had a good year with trash throwing him the football.

If he can reel in his drops he’d arguably be a top 10 WR.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:44 PM PST up reply actions  

couldn't you say that of any WR?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 3, 2012 2:45 PM PST up reply actions  

No, of course not.

For instance, Michael Crabtree’s problems extend beyond just drops.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Feb 3, 2012 3:08 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I already know that's the play where he let off in the route without looking.

1 play doesn’t discount the seasons he puts in.

This play is literally the only thing you guys ever talk about with him.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 2:55 PM PST up reply actions  

He gets crushed every season in KC for plays like this

I think its Michael Lombardi who bashes him more with his “he never gets open, I don’t know why KC keeps passing to him.”

by bignerd on Feb 3, 2012 2:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Maybe KC fans have higher standards?

That he wouldn’t have to live up to here?

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 3, 2012 3:03 PM PST up reply actions  

You're implying that he isn't.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Feb 3, 2012 3:09 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

he's definitely a TE/WR hybrid

He’s not a bad tight end — he’s a good blocker and a great match up against linebackers and safeties. But you’re right that Davis isn’t a short yardage target or someone who barrels through defends. All the more reason the niners should grab a TE to back up walker and eventually become that short yardage/goal line target they don’t have now.

by ninerspride on Feb 3, 2012 2:09 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't agree with this at all , Vernon playing T.E. gives them much more versatility and that's where he creates more mis-matches with Lb's and one on one with safeties ...!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 3, 2012 6:09 PM PST up reply actions  

you're totally right

and i think, to some extent, the niners also don’t have a WR on the roster. Vernon would be less of a liability with a real (every down) threat on the outside.

problem w/ Vernon as WR is his hands. literally not catching with his hands limits much that he could do as a WR. i feel that he becomes more of ‘a real TE’ with a ‘real #1WR’ on the outside.

by t p on Feb 3, 2012 2:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Bingo , most Cb's they.ve played didn't have much respect that the Niners could take the top of their Defense ...

… which allowed them to play closer to the box , which they wanted too anyway because of Gore , so they didn’t have to play honest in the back end …!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 3, 2012 6:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Hardly a need, but an opportunity is there

John Carlson is a free agent and coming off an injury. He could sign at a real discount. I think he’s a classic two-way TE who would be a real asset.

by hammystyle on Feb 3, 2012 1:24 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

This.

Seriously, Carlson is a quality player (much better than Peele) and could honestly probably push Walker for some PT. He’s a lot safer and we wouldn’t be blowing our first round pick on a TE.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 1:46 PM PST up reply actions  

very interesting

The Dude: Oh boy. How ya gonna keep 'em down on the farm once they've seen Karl Hungus.

by slapsy on Feb 3, 2012 1:59 PM PST up reply actions  

Well considering Alex can only throw to TEs, lets get as many as possible

"And thank you to God for making me an Atheist." - Ricky Gervais

by MichaelClutchtree on Feb 3, 2012 2:14 PM PST reply actions  

Prove it.

"I believe in you guys in the media. I believe that you will find a way to doubt this team. Just as long as what's written is written against us we'll be happy." - Jim Harbaugh

by SanFranciscoKnights on Feb 3, 2012 6:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Sign Jermichael Finley if the Packers let him go
Draft Fleener

Crabtree, VD, Finley, Fleener

"And thank you to God for making me an Atheist." - Ricky Gervais

by MichaelClutchtree on Feb 3, 2012 2:18 PM PST reply actions  

Finley kind of sucks.

Analysts have been on his balls since that playoff game against the Cardinals, but he’s more of a name than a quality player.

Aaron Curry is the first Seahawk since Walter Jones to have a legitimate shot at Hall of Fame induction - John Morgan

by Fearless Frog on Feb 3, 2012 3:12 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Yeah, Packer fans were saying top 5 TE the past two years.

lol

Now some of them want him off the team.

What the 49ers need to do is trade a sandwich for DJ Williams if the Packers aren’t going to use him.

by Odekerk on Feb 3, 2012 3:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Oh please

Don’t take away my football analyst, “You know what Jermichael Finley is my top rated TE in football”.

by bignerd on Feb 3, 2012 3:14 PM PST up reply actions  

would have to agree

Finley on IR and Quarless as TE, Packers win SB…Quarless out and FInley in, first game exit lol

by sanfranfanmdk on Feb 3, 2012 6:45 PM PST up reply actions  

That's not going to work ...

… because AleX sucks so hard he couldn’t hit them if they were standing rite in front of him …!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 3, 2012 6:17 PM PST up reply actions  

TE on this team is one of the lowest priorities on the team. No on Fleener.

1. Kelechi Osemele, OT/G, Iowa State
2.Xavier Rhodes CB FSU/ Vinny Curry OLB/DE Marshall/ LaMichael James*, RB, Oregon
3. Brandon Boykin, CB/KR/PR, Georgia/ Alex Okafor*, DE, Texas
4. DeMarlo belcher WR Indiana
5. Casey Hayward, CB, Vanderbilt
6. Marvin Jones WR Cal
7.T.J. Barnes*, DT/NT, Georgia Tech

by rlott#42 on Feb 3, 2012 10:02 PM PST reply actions  

Looking at our chances

I dont like our leftover selections for a WR at the end of the first round. I say we trade down, and pick up a good defense pick on a CB or a D-line, and Coby Fleener as the other 2nd round pick. We can pick up almost the same quailty WR in the 3rd, as we would of at the end of 1st.

49ers 2012 Offseason: HELP WANTED at WR, DBs, & O-Line

by Giants49war on Feb 3, 2012 11:07 PM PST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Site Decorum: Remember, We Are ALL 49er Fans

Recent FanPosts

Small
Concussions...
Small
Is Harbaugh lying or does he mean what he says?
872_small
Where have you seen 49er players?
Download2_small
Can the 49'ers Maintain their Turnover Differential in 2012?
Sfak_small
Why are you a 49er fan?
6a00e5500c77218833011168f234b4970c_small
FOX: "How To Save The Sport"
Small
Old Spice Patrick Willis Football ProCamp
Dave_small
Call For Moderators
Steve_young_small
Game Day Food

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

Dylan_cannes_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

428030_10150598134996875_112852666874_9167376_1157036734_n_small mikeinsp