Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Official Draft NN Draft Thread



Hi everybody since our previous draft thread manager is now gone Fooch has given me the privilege to write them. So do you know what that means? IT MEANS I HAVE ALL THE POWER IN THE WORLD, but then I realized that I live in an itty bitty tiny space called the dorms. I also need you guys to do me a favor by recing this post. Otherwise people won't be able to see it and the post will get lost.

Also we have a few rules on this thread. #1 this is about the NFL draft so if you want to ask if it is ok to cry during a Disney movie I would recommend that you go here. Rule #2 is to remain civil that means no personal attacks or breaking site decorum. So essentially the rules that you have to follow on the front page works on here too.

So now that you reced the post and the read the rules lets move on to the fun stuff. So after the jump I have posted a 49ers seven round mock draft. Next time will either be a first round mock draft including 32 teams or a big board. So if you have any opinions as to what I should do just write it in a comment.

Star-divide

I have projected a trade that the Niners in this draft. The trade is that the Niners will give up their 1st (#30) and their 3rd (#94) to the Bengals for their 1st round pick (#21).

1st round (#21): Peter Konz C/G Wisconsin - Video #1 Video #2

Why spend another first round pick on an O-Lineman? Because our QB, like every other QB in the entire world, plays better when he doesn't have to run for his life. We also do not have a starting Right Guard on our roster unless you expect Kilgore to step in. So we would need to either go to FA for his replacement or draft someone to fill the gap in now. Thankfully Konz is athletic enough to play Guard. Goodwin is also 33 years old and has two years remaining on his contract. I doubt he will offer him another contract and it would be nice to stop someone from digging a hole instead of having to fill it.

2nd round (#62): Harrison Smith S Notre Dame - Video #1

In the video highlighted above we get to see a lot of things from Smith. We get to see him cover TEs and RBs, play the run and blitz the QB. He plays with a high motor always running towards the ball and when he covers he does his job well.

3rd round: Traded away

4th round (#126): Adrian Hamilton DE/OLB Prairie View A&M - Video #1 (sorry for the highlight tape it was hard to find anything else)

Hamilton put up 20.5 sacks this year in the FCS. Only two other players were able to put that type of numbers and they were Robert Mathis and Chris Gocong. Some might bring up that the level of competition is poor but 20 sacks is hard to do at any level. MTD just did a scouting report on him and I would recommend that you guys go there to read what they have to say about him. I also believe that Brooks will not return for the 2012 season so it will be important to grab a DE for the nickel and a future starter.

5h round (#158):Donnie Fletcher CB Boston College (sorry could only find one video and it was horrible)

Fletcher is one of the rare Boston College DBs that have received a mid round grade from the NFL. From everything that I read/saw Fletcher has decent ball skills and plays against the run well. His biggest debate when talking about Fletcher is his straight line speed. But thankfully we have the combine and his pro day to see it. As for his size Fletcher is long and lanky measuring in at the senior bowl at 6'0 2/8s and 201 lbs. He will compete for the #4 or #5 CB position as the first three are safe assuming we resign Rogers.

6th round (#190): Chris Rainey HB/WR Florida - Video #1 (not big enough of a prospect to find any other video)

His speed is amazing. Although he did not produce like he would hope to have hoped to. He is still scary athletic. He wants to run a 4.1 40 at the combine. If Rainey pans out we got ourselves a good player if he doesn't then oh well its a sixth round pick.

7th round (#222): Derek Moye WR Penn State (no luck at all)

Moye is the leading WR for Penn State and according to cbs sports is 6'4. Of course he is probably not that tall but it would be nice to have a WR with size. He got invited to the combine so we will get to see his measureables. If he is athletic enough he may make the team.

So guys/girls tell me what you think of my first official draft post. Would you be happy with this draft or do you think I picked the worst players possible and that if I was the GM I would run this team to the ground?

P.S. Don't forget to rec the post.

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.

Comment 280 comments  |  13 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

rec whore.

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us"

by FearTheTree on Feb 7, 2012 10:42 PM PST reply actions   2 recs

agreed

Demarcus Dobbs is Our Future

by MRandolph on Feb 8, 2012 3:03 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

:(

look the recent fanposts are gone.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 9:31 AM PST up reply actions  

12 recs :D

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:25 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Back to the brothels you two

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us"

by FearTheTree on Feb 8, 2012 11:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Also I love the Konz trade up

I feel like the Patriots will actually trade up to acquire him though

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us"

by FearTheTree on Feb 7, 2012 10:42 PM PST reply actions  

A safer trade would be with the bears

1st and 2nd for their 1st and third. Would jump the Titans

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 7, 2012 11:03 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Indeed.

If the staff really loves Konz and feels he won’t fall (which he probably won’t), I’d love to trade up to get him. No WR until the 6th though?

I really hope that you think we’re getting a good WR in FA. Otherwise, we’ll have the same problems at WR we had last season, though if Konz immediately steps in and proves to be a quality starter, that would make things easier for everybody on the offense.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 11:21 AM PST up reply actions  

We will be fine with our current group of players.

Morgan will be back and Crabtree and VD both started to play well towards the end of the season.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 11:40 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

You're entitled to your opinion, but I don't think you could be more wrong.

We haven’t been fine the past 3 years with our current group, we won’t be fine now.

In the last thread, almost 70% voted WR as the go to position in the first. To not address our struggling WR corp in the early rounds of the draft or in FA seems incredibly unlikely. To not want our front office to address it is just… I don’t know what to say.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 12:16 PM PST up reply actions  

VJ is the only WR I would spend money on

also do you guys think that Crabtree would be a good slot player?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:10 PM PST up reply actions  

My personal opinion is Konz would step in and within the first week of camp secure the starting role at RG

And the only reasons he wouldn’t beat out Goodwin for the starting role at center is that Goodwin is ok and we don’t need to replace him and it takes a while to learn to run Harbaugh’s playbook ESPECIALLY for a rookie center.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:04 PM PST up reply actions  

I think so too.

I like the pick, but we’d definitely need to take a WR before the 6th round.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 2:05 PM PST up reply actions  

FA - Stevie Johnson.

He likes Buffalo but I follow him on Twitta. He would be very open to coming home. He’s hella stoked every time he comes back to the Bay.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:38 PM PST up reply actions  

I think VJ is the only one who deserves the money.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 2:48 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

this

VJ has the speed and he has the size that can win those jump balls.
Problem is that he’s expressed he wants to sign a long term contract in SD. However, as long as A.J. Smith is the GM of SD, I doubt that long term contract will happen

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 8, 2012 3:53 PM PST up reply actions  

everyone says they want to stay where they played

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:09 PM PST up reply actions  

Vincent Jackson can be rather hot-and-cold.

I don’t know if he’s worth elite money to play like an elite WR 6 or 7 times a year.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 8, 2012 5:31 PM PST up reply actions  

This

I’m definitely on the Stevie Johnson bandwagon, this FO wont go after a Bowe or Vincent Jackson and overpay. His biggest issue is drops, that can be fixed (Carlos Rogers)

by KGboomer on Feb 8, 2012 3:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Would rather go for Bowie before Stevie...

Don’t think they have to overpay for Bowie, but it’s not going to be cheap either!!

Niners,Nets,Reds & USC!!!

The Most Interesting Man In The World---->Mikhail Prokhorov!!!

by Kidd2Petrovic on Feb 8, 2012 3:55 PM PST up reply actions  

Stevie made Revis look bad, forget Bowe.

I am not an Alex hater, I'm an Alex apologist hater. Now you know. -Mr Moses

by rlott#42 on Feb 8, 2012 4:59 PM PST up reply actions  

he also dropped a crucial pass for a TD & the win vs Jets in NJ

Understand Bowie want’s loads of $$$ but what’s the range when you have VJax, DJax & Colston wanting $$$ as well? If his price tag is do-able pull the trigger…

Niners,Nets,Reds & USC!!!

The Most Interesting Man In The World---->Mikhail Prokhorov!!!

by Kidd2Petrovic on Feb 8, 2012 6:18 PM PST up reply actions  

Carlos couldn’t catch before he was on the Niners either

by KGboomer on Feb 9, 2012 8:12 AM PST up reply actions  

I'd love if the Bengals made the trade but we'd probably have to offer our 5th also to jump that high.

1st and 3rd by the chart takes us up to 24. Then there is another 60 points between 21 and 24. But I WANT Konz. He makes great adjustments to protections, he’s athletic enough to get out front and lead like a near side pulling guard and he can absolutely road grade in the run. Very good in pass pro also.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 7, 2012 11:20 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Ya if you click on the videos for Konz you can see what Burnz is talking about

And by the time he moves to C we will know if Kilgore can play G or not.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 7, 2012 11:24 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

The only guy he doesn't dominate in his tape is a kid from Ohio State

But you look at him and say… This kid across from Konz is massive. Turns out this OSU kid is a 360 lb sophomore. That’s the only guy Konz doesn’t handle 1 on 1 in his tape.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 7, 2012 11:31 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Can anyone handle a guy that out weighs them by 50lbs?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 7, 2012 11:35 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Blocking them as an O-Lineman? Nobody I've seen.

As a D-Lineman you can exploit your quickness and explosion to take advantage of much bigger men. Anyways, point being, Konz is the best center I’ve seen at the collegiate level. If he didn’t have to use his brain at all and just played guard he’d be my second guard after DeCastro.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 7, 2012 11:55 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Actually looked him up again. Johnathan Hankins is his name

He weighed 335 as a freshman. #52. I’d still say dude is close to 350 when you look at him compared to other guys that are 320+. Watch Konz tape vs Nebraska when he goes against Jared Crick. He DOMINATES him.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 1:14 AM PST up reply actions  

He's a sophmore?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 9:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Yup

A True Sophomore

"It is not enough that we win; all others must lose" -Larry Ellison
"I come up with something when I’ve got nothing, and it’s always brilliant. Always. So I reject your logic." -Grant

by Mdizzle138 on Feb 8, 2012 10:07 AM PST up reply actions  

May be an interesting prospect next year

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:09 AM PST up reply actions  

Definitely

Though, I’m projecting him to go in the top half of the first round, barring a major injury or setback. He “dropped down” to 335 at the start of his Sophomore year after a reported 350+ lb Freshman year. I wonder if he could play a 3-4 NT or be a Ngata type DT/DE (granted I don’t think Hankins is THAT athletic)

"It is not enough that we win; all others must lose" -Larry Ellison
"I come up with something when I’ve got nothing, and it’s always brilliant. Always. So I reject your logic." -Grant

by Mdizzle138 on Feb 8, 2012 10:26 AM PST up reply actions  

A guy of that size should play NT

Of course every guy is different and I would have to watch him play.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:34 AM PST up reply actions  

He's really not that athletic just huge.

You can see dude gets tired QUICK. He’s in for a handful of downs at a time. He dominates cause he’s so big and then 3 downs later he’s laboring and comes off the field.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Yeah

He’s been better with staying on the field his Sophomore year. Lost some weight and did some conditioning. But yeah, I see him more as a Terrence Cody or B.J. Raji type.

"It is not enough that we win; all others must lose" -Larry Ellison
"I come up with something when I’ve got nothing, and it’s always brilliant. Always. So I reject your logic." -Grant

by Mdizzle138 on Feb 8, 2012 2:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Iupati's not a starting guard?

I'm just a simple Niners fan trying to make my way in the universe.

by Tim Lincecum's Bong on Feb 7, 2012 11:24 PM PST reply actions  

He means we're missing one starting guard.

We have a practice squad tackle playing RG. Better than our completely inept RG he replaced but still. A good starter would be awesome.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 7, 2012 11:28 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

What about Snyder?

I'm just a simple Niners fan trying to make my way in the universe.

by Tim Lincecum's Bong on Feb 7, 2012 11:30 PM PST up reply actions  

He's the practice squad tackle.

He’s good enough to start at guard for maybe 3 or 4 teams. We’re one of them.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 7, 2012 11:32 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I'm saying that Snyder and Chilo are both FA

And the guy who is going to replace him is Kilgore… I’ll change it to make it more clear tomorrow when I get to a computer.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 7, 2012 11:37 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

RG

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 9:27 AM PST up reply actions  

Also you're right about guys that annihilate lower competition

Another example is JPP. He didn’t get drafted based off his USF stats alone. He got drafted cause he was racking up 25 sacks at the JuCo level as a frosh/soph. Haven’t seen this guy. Guess I’ll have to find some HLs

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 7, 2012 11:26 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

the video is the best I could find

Hard to find games of Prairie View A&M

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 7, 2012 11:36 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Was on my phone earlier and couldn't watch it

He looks like Von Miller playing I-AA ball. His shoulder dip is great, his change of direction is just nasty, (the outside inside move he has looks like its being performed by a running back) and he broke out a spin move that would beat guys at the NFL level. This kid looks built to be a pass rushing OLB.

His measurables will be a big issue… But if they are good this kid SHOULD, (Doesn’t mean will), SHOULD be a 2nd round pick. Man amongst boys.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 12:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Hrmmm... alright, that's interesting

I don’t like trading up that far for Konz. We won’t be able to get there with just a 3rd rounder. Not only do we have to make the points add up but we also have to consider that there are multiple teams that are going to be wanting this guy around the #20 to #25 range and the team that offers the sweetest deal to the highest team will get him. So you also have to put in the bidding fee.

We’re going to have to be patient and hope he falls a bit further if we want to move up.

I really like Harrison Smith but if we go his way we still have to find someone with the range to play deep center if Dashon goes down or in Dime packages.

I hadn’t heard about Hamilton. He looks good. I’m curious how he matchup up in his short time at the BCS level. If he did to BCS level linemen what he did to the guys on that highlight reel, then he immediately jumps to a second round grade in my book. But that’s a big if. He really looked like a man among boys on that reel and some of those tackles were so laughably horrid it wasn’t funny. But even against that poor competition the first step was there, multiple moves were demonstrated, the explosiveness to the quarterback after shedding was there — he’s one to keep an eye on.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 8, 2012 7:09 AM PST reply actions  

Projecting trades is really difficult but I think Konz is worth the price. Giving our QB time is exactly what our offense needs. You saw the sack rate for games we lost compared to the sack rate in the games we won.

I like Smith and I think he can play either S position.

I agree with Hamilton but we don’t get to see how he does against the BCS. But he still holds the sack record for the FCS which is no small feat.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:20 AM PST up reply actions  

He's worth a 1st and 3rd

But in this theoretical we’re jumping to #21 because demand is high. If demand is that high, Cincinnati is not going to give us a sweetheart deal and let us trade up without listening to the other 5-6 offers they get. Especially since our 1st and 3rd doesn’t even meet the trade value chart.

But again, that’s in this theoretical. I actually think he’s off the board by 20 to a team enthusiastic about BPA. There just aren’t 20 better players in this draft even when you consider position premium.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 8, 2012 10:34 AM PST up reply actions  

Ya I believe so

I believe a safer deal would be to the Bears but it will cost more.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:36 AM PST up reply actions  

If he's going above 20 I don't think we have a shot at him

And probably shouldn’t considering what it would cost.

But hey — we don’t have a shot at DeCastro, Floyd, Upshaw, Kirkpatrick, or Blackmon either. Downside of “close but no cigar”.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 8, 2012 10:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Don't you find Upshaw slow?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:54 AM PST up reply actions  

I would if I was running a 4-3 base or some Cover / Tampa 2 variant

But as a strongside backer in a 3-4 that’s how I like them.

Relentless, violent, smart, and very difficult to block.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 8, 2012 11:17 AM PST up reply actions  

We will be fine with our current group of players.

Morgan will be back and Crabtree and VD both started to play well towards the end of the season.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 11:38 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

reply fail

I’m not a huge fan of Upshaw. Because the most dominating OLBs tend to have that speed.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 11:42 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

To be fair and prove that 40 time isn't always everything

Tamba Hali ran a 4.87 at his pro day and nfldraftscout lists his best time as a 4.75

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:11 PM PST up reply actions  

40 times are good for Db's , Lb's , Rb's TE's Wr's and the like ...

… but as far as the interior linemen , IMO 20 times should be sufficient & I’m not sure but there should be ( Don’t do combines ) explosion out of the blocks measure-ables …!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 8, 2012 4:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Get like a blocking sled with a PPsqIn measure on it

And measure the amount of force they hit it with firing out of a 3 point

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 4:28 PM PST up reply actions  

Yup , or something like a fish scale ( much bigger ) with bungee cords ...!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 8, 2012 4:58 PM PST up reply actions  

And a harness belt ...!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 8, 2012 5:01 PM PST up reply actions  

Sounds kinky.

Niners Nation on the Reservation

by kinglouie33 on Feb 8, 2012 5:59 PM PST up reply actions  

They measure 10,20,40

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 5:39 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

with defensive lineman and OLB's

I think the 10 yard split is more important than the whole 40 meters because it shows their burst and explosiveness off the line.

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 8, 2012 3:58 PM PST up reply actions  

20 yards for OLB

Aldon Smith for example runs a lot more than just 10 yards

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:11 PM PST up reply actions  

forgot that they measured the 20 yard split.

that being said, the 10 and 20 yard splits are the most important for lineman and linebackers. The whole 40 yards are only good for WR/KR/PR

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 8, 2012 6:22 PM PST up reply actions  

agreed but Upshaw is still hella slow

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:34 PM PST up reply actions  

But still pretty worthless

Your biggest difference in 10 and 20 yard split times is going to be from a cleaner stance release. Unfortunately the sprinters stance isn’t used much in football.

If they really wanted to run a drill that measured linebacker speed with regard to rushing they would have a blocking dummy that must be pushed back 3 yards before getting a green light to run to a marker 5 yards away, make a right angle turn and hit a dummy 3 yards away simulating a QB.

But as it stands when I’m watching the linebackers I want to see their broad jump (explosiveness and lower body power) and 20 yard shuttle (quickness). You find a guy who is near the top in both of those and you have a winner from an athleticism standpoint.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 9, 2012 6:47 AM PST up reply actions  

Where do you think Upshaw stands?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 9, 2012 10:43 AM PST up reply actions  

Drew Brees is 6' doesn't mean size dosen't make a difference.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:11 PM PST up reply actions  

Surprised no receiving help until the 7th round....

Shame we lose the pick to trade up for Konz, but he won’t be around at #30 so it’s necessary. We improve the OL immediately with that pick.

Kinda surprised with the strong safety pick when we are in desperate need of a free safety. Are you imagining that Markelle Martin isn’t available in the 2nd when we pick or that Iloka can’t be had later in the draft? Even if Smith projects as a good safety and fits the team image, he won’t be a big contributor unless Whitner is injured.

Like the Hamilton pick and we definitely need someone at OLB opposite Smith.

Other than this not much to say. Rainey will never amount to much more than a returner I think. He seems like a less talented Harvin. Unless Moye is is a gem, then he’s not much more than TC fodder; though with our receivers he could make the roster.

by 9thevolution on Feb 8, 2012 7:10 AM PST reply actions  

Smith is my favorite S prospect so even if Martin is there I would take Smith over him.

Dude covers well, is disciplined, plays the run and is a decent athlete.

The 6th and 7th picks usually are a crapshoot. But I believe that both of these players can make the team. Moye will be our biggest WR on the team and Rainey will probably be the fastest.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 9:50 AM PST up reply actions  

Just don't see Smith as a FS and that's where we are really hurting

Smith doesn’t seem like a deep coverage guy and we really do need someone who can handle that. Smith would be a fine addition as an eventual replacement of Whitner, but we need someone who could potentially be an immediate replacement for Goldson; Smith does not seem like that type of player.

Also, I would hate to see out 2nd rounder sitting on the bench and playing special teams all year. We likely won’t be resting Whitner a ton, so Smith is a minimal contributor in year one.

As for the 6th and 7th, it’s pretty much always a crapshoot, but It might be best to add depth there that has a really good chance of making the team. You didn’t add a FS in this draft, so getting one here would be a good idea because we’re losing both depth on defense and special teams from the secondary. WR doesn’t need depth after FA happens, it needs starters; and Moye or anyone from the 6th or 7th is unlikely to be that guy.

by 9thevolution on Feb 9, 2012 8:46 AM PST up reply actions  

You may not see Smith as a FS but I do

And I used that in my decision. He will be playing the backup position for both S spots providing the necessary depth.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 9, 2012 11:44 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

To each their own...

It’s not as if I’ve watched him extensively to have the best opinion, but watching some footage I can find, I just don’t see him as a free safety with the non-hitting rules in place now. You have to play the ball and not the man now, and I don’t see the range to cover the way a FS in 2012 should be; you essentially need a big CB who can tackle well.

It’s possible this is attributed to the ND defense, but he’s going to be playing against the biggest and fastest guys there are in the NFL.

by 9thevolution on Feb 9, 2012 12:09 PM PST up reply actions  

he played deep a couple of times

and he has decent ball skills. Just don’t see it that much because they don’t throw it towards him.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 10, 2012 10:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Next draft thread will have that post

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:35 AM PST up reply actions  

isn’t this a general place for people to discuss the draft? Or is this thread just for discussing your mock draft?

by KGboomer on Feb 8, 2012 10:46 AM PST up reply actions  

everything and anything about the draft

but I want to do different things for each post. Off the top of my head the top 3-4 OLBs are (in no particular order yet) Nick Perry, Melvin Ingram, Upshaw, Hamilton, Irvin all but Hamilton should go in the top 2 rounds. Hamilton should go in the top 2 rounds but his school will hurt his draft stock.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:51 AM PST up reply actions  

oh and vinny curry

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

sorry if I made it seem you only can talk about me

Here is MTD list some of them are only DEs in the 4-3 though http://www.mockingthedraft.com/pages/2011-nfl-draft-defensive-end-rankings

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 11:00 AM PST up reply actions  

top OLB and DE all could be olb except Crick

2012 Top Defensive End Draft Prospects (Updated 2/8/2012)
12 Quinton Coples DE 1 North Carolina Sr 6-6 281 1 4.76
14 *Nick Perry DE 2 Southern California rJr 6-3 250 1 4.64
24 *Whitney Mercilus DE 3 Illinois rJr 6-4 265 1-2 4.68
34 Andre Branch DE 4 Clemson rSr 6-4 260 1-2 4.77
49 Jared Crick DE 5 Nebraska rSr 6-4 285 2 4.82
58 Vinny Curry DE 6 Marshall rSr 6-3 265 2 4.74

19 Melvin Ingram OLB 1 South Carolina rSr 6-2 276 1 4.82
20 Courtney Upshaw OLB 2 Alabama Sr 6-2 273 1 4.76
33 Zach Brown OLB 3 North Carolina Sr 6-1 236 1-2 4.48
38 Lavonte David OLB 4 Nebraska Sr 6-1 225 2 4.62
46 Bobby Wagner OLB 5 Utah State Sr 6-0 241 2 4.69
53 *Ronnell Lewis OLB 6 Oklahoma Jr 6-2 244 2 4.63
57 Sean Spence OLB 7 Miami (Fla.) Sr 5-11 228 4.58

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/TSX/2012_DE

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/prospectrankings/TSX/2012_OLB

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 8, 2012 2:03 PM PST up reply actions  

Brown, David, and Spence

Are 4-3 guys. Wagner probably fits both but most 3-4 teams would want him to bulk a little.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 9, 2012 6:49 AM PST up reply actions  

Like the draft.

But to me, Konz is the only immediate impact player in this draft. He’ll play RG but I wonder when Goodwin leaves if he would play C and Kilgore take over RG. Wherever Konz plays he’ll be a huge boon to the offense.

Smith will be blocked by Whitner for the next two years but could become a good strong safety (don’t get me wrong, I like the pick). The other thing about Smith is he’s phenomenal on Special Teams. If we draft him and we keep Costanzo, Jones, Spillman, Gooden, etc., the 49ers could have the best Special Teams unit to ever play the game

Don’t know much about the other picks outside Rainey, who’s a returner at worst, or a scat-back who can play the slot at best. He’d be worth a late rounder if Ginn doesn’t return.

I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
And Harbamania. And the San Francisco Giants 2010 World Series season.

by Hoopers Judge on Feb 8, 2012 11:57 AM PST via mobile reply actions  

only immediate impact player in the draft?

Andrew Luck and RG3 highly disagree with you; so do many other players.

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 8, 2012 2:05 PM PST up reply actions  

From whom the Niners drafted in manraj's mock. Not the entire draft eligible class.

Konz would be the only immediate starter.

I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
And Harbamania. And the San Francisco Giants 2010 World Series season.

by Hoopers Judge on Feb 8, 2012 2:08 PM PST up reply actions  

oh, I understand now.

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 8, 2012 2:12 PM PST up reply actions  

I think they are all important

It takes time for most people to get their thing together so by the time they are needed they can play.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 3:02 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

For sure.

I like H. Smith. Especially if he can sit behind Whitner for two years. Just pointing out that he would probably only contribute to ST his rookie year.

I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
And Harbamania. And the San Francisco Giants 2010 World Series season.

by Hoopers Judge on Feb 8, 2012 10:17 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

most new defensive players will be

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 10, 2012 10:41 PM PST up reply actions  

I think they've had enough time

I’m calling all of them a bust based on their performance, or lack thereof, so far

by reedkrase on Feb 17, 2012 4:25 PM PST up reply actions  

:( does this mean I’m fired?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 17, 2012 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

My draft strategy, would not allow a tradeup for Konz. Mainly because we know on defense teams HAVE to pass, so I’m looking to get better play makers in the DB field. Dual threats with return skills to push Williams to 4th on the depth chart for punt returns. A shame the team played so well and came up short of the bowl and have to pick 30th. I for one propose to trade back and try to acquire 3 2nd round picks to pick up 2 dbs and an interior lineman or, LaJames from Oregon. We don’t have enough homerun threats to capitalize on either a gaping hole or a missed tackle.

I am not an Alex hater, I'm an Alex apologist hater. Now you know. -Mr Moses

by rlott#42 on Feb 8, 2012 12:12 PM PST reply actions  

I'd definitely be up for a trade-back.

Unless, say, Michael Floyd was on the board.

It’s pretty difficult to find dance partners at that point in the draft, though, unless there are players at premium positions that people don’t want to miss out on (like last year with Kaep and Dalton)

We still have Harbaugh. So there's hope.

by grantmp on Feb 8, 2012 12:21 PM PST up reply actions  

I think the Steelers will be happy to deal. They need a guard

Cordy Glenn will be right there at 30. They don’t need a center. Peter Konz will (hopefully slip past the Lions) and be right there for us at 24.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:17 PM PST up reply actions  

I would be open to trading back or trading up

I think if we trade up we will get 1 great talent in Konz but if we trade back we can get a couple of good people. None of them the level of Konz though.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Konz and a bunch of decent backups

would be a good enough draft as far as I’m concerned.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 8, 2012 6:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Thats what I have

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't like the trade-up. But I do like Adrian Hamilton.

Snyder is coming back, which makes the OL less of a pressing need (not that it’s not a need). You can get Guards later in the draft, too. Plus, trading up to get a Guard is a double sacrifice; you get a player that’s not guaranteed to be of higher value than a guy that could be picked later plus you lose the pick.
The real reason that I don’t like the trade-up is that the 49ers maximized their draft last year by only moving up earlier in the 2nd (rather than into the late 1st) to get Kaepernick. We got Culliver with a 3rd and Hunter with a 4th. Both of those guys played pretty huge roles for the team. You could say that it would’ve been great to have a second 4th round pick (to pick up, say Rashad Carmichael), but Kaepernick was at a real need position. The Niners don’t have a ton of extra draft picks this year. I want them to keep all of them and use all of them to improve the roster.

Adrian Hamilton looks like a beast. He’s not as fluid as Aldon Smith, and he doesn’t look like he is much of a coverage player, but he can rush the passer, and that’s a very important skill give our still somewhat leaky secondary.

We still have Harbaugh. So there's hope.

by grantmp on Feb 8, 2012 12:18 PM PST reply actions  

Snyder stinks.

He’s barely a passable guard in pass protection and he gets zero push at all in the run game. He was the worst tackle in the league before Anthony Davis replaced him… And now Anthony Davis is one of the worst tackles in the league. Guard needs to be dealt with. Konz can play it then move to Center in 2 years and be named All-Pro for the rest of his career.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:22 PM PST up reply actions  

If Snyder stinks...

I would like to hear how you’d explain the offensive line’s getting better w. him vs. Rachal.
I agree that he was a terrible right tackle. Heck I hated Snyder until last year too. But he’s been serviceable.

We still have Harbaugh. So there's hope.

by grantmp on Feb 8, 2012 4:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Um...

Rachal stinks worse?

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 8, 2012 5:44 PM PST up reply actions  

I like Snyder as a RG

the line as a whole, more noticeably the right side, played a lot better when he was in

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 8, 2012 6:25 PM PST up reply actions  

Most of the guys in the later rounds won't make the team anyways this year

We need elite starters not guys fighting for depth. There are only 3 positions to address.

A combination of C/G/RT (meaning if we draft a RT that’s better than Davis in pass pro we can move him to guard, or if we move up we can draft Konz have the effective #2/3 guard in the draft and then move him over to be an all-pro at center when Goodwin is gone)

WR

Secondary

We need starters at each. The odds of finding a starter at one of those positions late in the draft is like 1/60. The odds of Konz starting for us for 10 years is about 1/3

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:26 PM PST up reply actions  

LB and dline depth too.

Though those aren’t huge needs, they’ll need to be addressed at some point. Especially LB if Larry Grant walks (which he very well may). Brooks may walk too.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 2:30 PM PST up reply actions  

I think Larry Brown is willing to stick around on another short term deal. He's got a long career ahead of him.

He has a chance to win a championship here and he’s at home. Personally I’d like to see how he can perform as an OLB. He seemed pretty proficient at rushing the QB when we blitzed him.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:54 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm thinking Grant is going to want to start somewhere.

And he doesn’t really have a chance here. His skillset is for the ILB position.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 2:57 PM PST up reply actions  

lol

I do hope he comes back, but I just don’t see it.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Its also easier when you force them to remain here

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:26 PM PST up reply actions  

Fantastic in coverage

Strong against the run… Seems throughout his college and now pro career to have a knack for getting at the ball. You find a way to keep guys like that.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

he's not an unrestricted FA

so if teams want him, we’re getting something in return (providing we tender him)

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 8, 2012 4:01 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm pretty sure he's a RFA

I’ve seen other people say it as well

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 8, 2012 4:34 PM PST up reply actions  

*googles other websites*

Yeah, it does seem he’s a RFA. PFF needs to change that.

Obviously I think that increases his chances of being back then.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 4:38 PM PST up reply actions  

Larry Grant

Wasn’t on a 53 man (or IR) for long enough to get an “accrued season” ( 6 games ) in 2008, so he’s still restricted.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 9, 2012 6:56 AM PST up reply actions  

Regarding draft-day trades...and specifically, trading back out of the first round...

given that people know that the Patriots love to trade their early picks away, do you think being positioned just ahead of the Patriots gives the 49ers a better than average chance of trading back out of the first round?

Imagine this scenario: the Dolphins know that the Seahawks love Brandon Weeden and want to trade with the Pats to get him at #31. The Dolphins know that the Pats won’t trade with them because they’re in the same division and that the 49ers would only be too happy to prevent the Seahawks from getting what they want. So would the Dolphins be more likely to trade up to #30 to make everybody happy?

We still have Harbaugh. So there's hope.

by grantmp on Feb 8, 2012 12:25 PM PST reply actions  

Depends what we get from the Phins

Ideally I would like a first and a late second.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 1:41 PM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

It's unlikely, but not impossible.

If he shows really well…well, never mind.

I guess I used him as an example because he’s at a position that teams often reach for due to lack of quantity. And in this draft, after Luck & RGIII, it’s a big drop…and then Weeden…and then another, bigger drop off in quality.

We still have Harbaugh. So there's hope.

by grantmp on Feb 8, 2012 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

Gabbert

LOL

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 9, 2012 6:57 AM PST up reply actions  

That's different.

Todd McShay hasn’t signed an endorsement deal with Brandon Weeden.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 9, 2012 8:19 PM PST up reply actions  

Truth

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 10, 2012 6:02 AM PST up reply actions  

I really hope they do not trade up for a guard

I think the real value in the draft is in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. I would trade down in the first and trade up from the later rounds. Try and get five or six picks in rounds 2-3.

by hammystyle on Feb 8, 2012 2:03 PM PST via mobile reply actions  

Konz would be an immediate upgrade though.

He’d make things easier for everyone on offense. Help open up holes for the run game, give the QB more time, and give WRs more time to get open.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 2:07 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't think OL is a need

The OL will get a lot better through familiarity and individual development.

I reall doubt they take an OL high but if they did, burning the 1 and 3 for a guard seems like massive overkill.

by hammystyle on Feb 8, 2012 2:42 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

It'd be nice if that was a guarantee to happen.

Them just getting better on their own. It’s not though, and we’re in dire need of an upgrade at RG.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 2:51 PM PST up reply actions  

There's no guarantee of anything

But I feel very comfortable with the OL as is. I don’t see understand the need at all.

by hammystyle on Feb 8, 2012 2:58 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Why are you comfortable with a team that was bottom 10 in sacks and QB hits

and bottom half of the league in rushing yards per attempt?

There’s nothing positive about any of that.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 3:00 PM PST up reply actions  

They'll get better

As will Smith at understanding the protections.

Ive seen you post a million times regarding the line so I am not going to try and convince you. I will just say that I am comfortable and I think the team’s actions will reflect that too. I don’t expect a high pick or an expensive free agent to come along.

by hammystyle on Feb 8, 2012 3:05 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I hope you're right they'll get better.

I hope you’re wrong about trying to find a replacement for our current RGs. I also think it is likely they either draft a RG in the 1st/2nd/3rd, or bring someone in to compete in FA, not necessarily a highly paid guard either.

You don’t have anything to back up your view other than how you feel, I’m sorry, but that just doesn’t cut it. I’d love for someone to be able to convince me they’ll just magically evolve into an above average/good line on their own, but it is highly unlikely at this point, and how someone feels won’t change my views.

by Odekerk on Feb 8, 2012 3:10 PM PST up reply actions  

Unless Chilo magically gets 10X better they aren't going to get better.

Snyder is 30 and has been in the league since 05. He was the worst tackle in the league a couple years ago and got benched for a guy who is STILL arguably the worst tackle in the league. That means Snyder is BAD. He got moved over to guard because our guard was SO bad that he was an upgrade. That means Rachel is horrible and probably wouldn’t find a job doing anything besides backing up anywhere in the league. Most teams wouldn’t even keep him on the practice squad.

So now we have the leagues worst tackle starting at guard. He can’t get any push but he generally doesn’t blow pass protection as badly as Chilo so he’s serviceable until we find somebody to put him on the bench since he doesn’t get the QB killed. That doesn’t mean we don’t have the weakest RG position in the league.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 3:16 PM PST up reply actions  

I already told you why

Familiarity and player development. It’s right up top there. There is a synergy to playing OL that is unlike any other position group. The collective can get better though familiarity with each other and the system. Individually I expect Anthony Davis and Iupati to take huge steps forward.

I expect that to add up to the OL being a major strength next year and why I do not consider RG a pressing need. I do expect they will continue to take developmental guys in the mid rounds. Maybe as high as a 2nd or 3rd, but I would be very surprised at a first, and flat out shocked at trading up for a guard.

by hammystyle on Feb 8, 2012 4:01 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

and that's the smart way to do it

Football is all about the trenches. You dominate the trenches, ou dominate the game

Rule #1) If you hate Joe Buck, watch this www.youtube.com/watch?v=fkCSZKbyL94

Rule #2) Follow rule #1

by mtl9ers14 on Feb 8, 2012 4:35 PM PST up reply actions  

This one

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 9, 2012 6:59 AM PST up reply actions  

Their OLine could definitely stand for some upgrades too

They improve that and they’ll be markedly better and more consistent over the duration of the season.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 3:12 PM PST up reply actions  

yup

that just shows how good their line coach is to get these guys working and communicating so well with average talent.

by mcwagner on Feb 9, 2012 4:21 PM PST up reply actions  

Or an attribute to the refs not calling blatant holds vs the 9ers.

I am not an Alex hater, I'm an Alex apologist hater. Now you know. -Mr Moses

by rlott#42 on Feb 9, 2012 4:50 PM PST up reply actions  

This also

They got away with a S***load of holding against us. Against NE though they kinda had 2 BS calls go against their LG.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 5:50 PM PST up reply actions  

seems that harbaugh system relies on great qb play.

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 8, 2012 10:42 PM PST up reply actions  

dont be surprised when he does not

but you will have another hyperbole to explain it.

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 9, 2012 5:04 PM PST up reply actions  

Did he build his OL at Stanford by landing all the top OL recruits?

Or did he outscout and outcoach the competition? Neither DeCastro or Jonathan Martin were that highly ranked as recruits.

by hammystyle on Feb 9, 2012 9:46 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Hmmm, they "built a great line" using so-called 2nd-class recruits...

that sounds like the kind of thing Bill Walsh would have done.

Just sayin’…

We still have Harbaugh. So there's hope.

by grantmp on Feb 9, 2012 11:58 AM PST up reply actions  

Decastro was #3 at his position and Martin was 60th

so I guess you are right.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 9, 2012 12:08 PM PST up reply actions  

He found the guys he wanted

And its easier (and smarter) to spend all your recruiting resources on the positions that you’re more likely to be able to get top ranked guys at (Offensive Line guys are the smartest players on the field along with the QB). Didn’t waste his time going after top flight receivers that couldn’t hack it at Stanford. Spend all your resources getting guys that can (OLine guys)

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 3:15 PM PST up reply actions  

Snyder is not going to develop.

He’s 30 years old and has been in the league since 05. He’s better than Rachel but that’s saying nothing at all.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:55 PM PST up reply actions  

This would be my preference, but even better would be...

getting a guy in the mid-to-late rounds of the draft that’s an immediate starter like Carl Nicks turned out to be when he was drafted a few years ago.

We still have Harbaugh. So there's hope.

by grantmp on Feb 8, 2012 4:53 PM PST up reply actions  

I'd like Konz in the 1st.

But waiting for someone like Brandon Washington in the 2nd might work just as well.

I survived the David Carr Press Conference Thread 3/06/2010
And Harbamania. And the San Francisco Giants 2010 World Series season.

by Hoopers Judge on Feb 8, 2012 2:10 PM PST up reply actions  

The problem with Washington

Is that he’s a developmental player not a plug and play. You plug and play and you’ll get Chilo out of him.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 9, 2012 7:03 AM PST up reply actions  

How on Earth are we going to get 5 or 6 picks with a #30, #62 and #94 picks

They aren’t worth that much. To move up to 24 it costs 30 and 94.

We’d need a team with multiple second round picks to offer them to us in exchange for our 1 and the Pats aren’t going to do that because they are picking right behind us.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 2:31 PM PST up reply actions  

I don't want to trade u

I want to trade out of the first round and end up with five or six picks in the 2nd and 3rd round.

A start would be trading 30 (620) for 48 (420) and 80 (190). That puts you at four in 2-3. Then you could potentially trade further down in the 2nd or try and package more lower picks to get in the 2nd and 3rd.

But I am not impressed with the first round at all. The guys in the 2nd and 3rd are right there with them as prospects.

by hammystyle on Feb 8, 2012 2:53 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

No. They aren't.

The guys in the 3rd are mostly not of the same caliber (perhaps 1 in 15 is) of the guys at the middle late 1st. There is talent that maybe we could use at CB or S in the 2nd but loading up on 3rd round picks when our team is ready for a super bowl push now is pointless. 3rd rounders are guys like Reggie Smith and Adam Snyder far more often than they are guys like Josh Sitton or Carl Nicks

And you said 5 or 6. You gave me one trade that gives us a mid 2nd, late 2nd and mid 3rd and late 3rd. We’d have to move that 40 for 60 and 92 and then you’re just completely eliminating the odds for near-term impact.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 8, 2012 3:06 PM PST up reply actions  

Frank Gore disagree with you!

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 8, 2012 10:42 PM PST up reply actions  

byhnam, culliver, hunter all had impact their rookie years

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 9, 2012 5:05 PM PST up reply actions  

None of them had significant #1 impact.

Which is what we need out of a WR and OL. Culliver was a #3 corner, Hunter was a backup RB who may or may not ever be a #1 and Byham was a #3 blocking TE.

None of those are equivalent to the type of immediate impact we need.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 5:52 PM PST up reply actions  

they all still had impact

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 10, 2012 12:08 AM PST up reply actions  

I gave ou one trade that got to four 2's and 3'a

And said from there you could trade back further or trade up from the 4-7 rounds.

My point is I dont see any near term impact players in the first round. I see a very shallow top group and a next 100 or so players of similar talent. Id rather grab five of those guys then three.

by hammystyle on Feb 9, 2012 9:53 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

Immediate impact guys that could be had by legitimately trading our 1 and 2 will be group A. Group B will be guys that can be had trading our 1 and 3. Group C will be guys that can be had trading 2 and 3

.Group A — one or two of the below will slide to 18 which is picks 30 and 62’s value (the most likely will be listed in group B as well)
Courtney Upshaw DE/OLB
Trent Richardson RB
David Decastro OG
Janoris Jenkins CB
John Martin (would require a big slide) OT
Mark Barron SS
Devon Still DT/DE
Melvin Ingram DE/OLB
Dre Kirkpatrick CB
Kendell Wright WR

Group B: Picks 30 and 94 to move up to 24
Dre Kirkpatrick CB (Got busted with his buddy’s weed in his car a couple days ago. Will cause him to slide a few picks)
Janoris Jenkins CB (History of blazin buds)
Kendell Wright WR (depends on his combine)
Mike Adams OT
Cordy Glenn OG
Michael Floyd WR (I’ve never been big on this guy personally but at 24 he’s about right)
Whitney Mercilus DE/OLB
PETER KONZ – C (Instant upgrade at RG. Future All-Pro center)
Alshon Jeffrey WR
Alfonzo Dennard CB

Group C: 62 + 94 = 49 (NFL draft math is non-intuitive)
Coby Fleener (very small chance – would be a 10+ value slide if he’s there at 45 you probably throw another lower pick in to move up and take him — Though I must note Charlie Campbell has him going 49 to the Chargers)
Kevin Zeitler OG
Tommy Streeter WR
Stephan Gilmore CB
Markell Martin S
Vinny Curry OLB/DE
Harrison Smith S
Jerel Worthy DE/DT
Juron Criner WR
Muhammed Sanu WR

ALL OF THE ABOVE WOULD BE IMPACT PLAYERS. Guys in the 3rd round are very rarely of the same immediate impact caliber. Most of them are at positions of need for us. Trade up

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 3:43 PM PST up reply actions  

value?

Talent is more important…

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:32 PM PST up reply actions  

They are synonymous

There is a greater depth of talent in rounds 2 and 3. You add more talent to your team by adding 5 guys from their rounds then staying with one guy in round 1,2, then 3.

Not all drafts. This draft.

by hammystyle on Feb 9, 2012 10:46 AM PST via mobile up reply actions  

I don't think they are

you are going quantity over quality. Konz is one of the best if not the best C prospect I have ever seen. This guy plays well and can instantly upgrade our weakest unit

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 9, 2012 12:11 PM PST up reply actions  

No

I am saying the quality difference between the last half of the first round and the 2-3 in this draft is minimal. I’m saying we can get roughly the same type of prospect later on only we can have 5 vs 3.

by hammystyle on Feb 9, 2012 2:41 PM PST via mobile up reply actions  

this

how many second round prospects will start on this team? Not many

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 10, 2012 10:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Not many. And the number of 3rd rounders that will start right away is significantly lower even than that.

It’s quite possible we could get somebody to start at RG in the 3rd round but that’s just an indictment of how horrible our RG play has been. To be a real #2 caliber receiver we POSSIBLY can get one middle of the second round but they are either athletes who are raw WRs (Streeter). Or polished WRs who aren’t elite athletes (Toon)

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 11, 2012 5:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Nothing wrong with that. I’d trade back in the second from the first, trade Craptree to the Jets for a second, draft Asmele from ISU, draft Toon, and Boykins, this, after I sign Stevie Johnson……championship

I am not an Alex hater, I'm an Alex apologist hater. Now you know. -Mr Moses

by rlott#42 on Feb 11, 2012 12:33 PM PST up reply actions  

He name is Micheal Crabtree

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 11, 2012 3:05 PM PST up reply actions  

Alex doesn't really care what you call him. He's dealt with it all

I’m pretty sure Michael would throw a temper tantrum if you didn’t get his name right. Craptree

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 12, 2012 7:50 PM PST up reply actions  

alex site decorum it is

i will make sure alex hears it from me at training camp, if you hear someone yelling it; it will be me

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 13, 2012 2:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Aaah, see you got Hamilton on here from the discussion in mockingthedraft....

Beastly when you see him play, I know Jim Levitt would mold that dude into a monster…. And I don’t buy into that “knock” of him playing at a lower level of comp. either!!

Niners,Nets,Reds & USC!!!

The Most Interesting Man In The World---->Mikhail Prokhorov!!!

by Kidd2Petrovic on Feb 8, 2012 3:46 PM PST reply actions  

I hear Ricky Williams is available....kind of.

I think I have his sat-phone number somewhere in here…is that…nope. Well, I’ll keep looking.

Niners Nation on the Reservation

by kinglouie33 on Feb 8, 2012 6:22 PM PST reply actions  

they are gone on mine too

and we were close

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 6:55 PM PST up reply actions  

its not stalking

they invited me over…

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 8, 2012 7:11 PM PST up reply actions  

network issues

There were some issues earlier today and the recent FanPosts have been removed while the issue is figured out. In the meantime, you can find all FanPosts HERE

by David Fucillo on Feb 8, 2012 6:57 PM PST up reply actions  

that's part of the truth

the system got over loaded with the name “Alex Smith” that it got overwhelmed. So once again, it’s Alex’s fault…

by mcwagner on Feb 8, 2012 6:59 PM PST up reply actions  

ya, I stayed up late last night posting alex smith __________ posts

I think I got up to about 9,812,234,233,434 and then my batter went out.

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 8, 2012 10:40 PM PST up reply actions  

Replaced by naked guy wearing diaper and mask ...!!

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 9, 2012 12:38 PM PST up reply actions  

No, that guy is gone too.

Now that I think about it, didn’t the recent FanPosts disappear around the same time as the naked guy? THAT THIEVING BASTARD‼

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 9, 2012 8:32 PM PST up reply actions  

Larry Grant

He is an RFA, If we tender him and a team look at him as starter, we can get an additional pick depending how high we tender. Am I correct? What kind of value you think we can get from him?

by Aleman12 on Feb 8, 2012 10:51 PM PST reply actions  

correct, can get up to a first round pick if the niners place a first round tender on him.

link

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 9, 2012 1:31 AM PST up reply actions  

Except no one would sign him for a first round pick.

Not to mention, if you give him a first round tender then you have to pay him more.

He is more likely to receive a third or fourth round tender.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 9, 2012 8:34 PM PST up reply actions  

1.4million for second round tender

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 10, 2012 12:11 AM PST up reply actions  

I'd put him right there.

The way he played… If he could maintain that he’s worth 1+ and he’s a young guy getting better. I don’t want him leaving for anything less than a #2

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 10, 2012 12:52 AM PST up reply actions  

Liar...

put Lawson vs Brooks and compare rushes and Lawson was the better pass rusher. Brooks had a ton more attempts one more sack and less forced fumbles.

Gonna make the WR position relevant again? When?

by rlott#42 on Feb 13, 2012 1:12 AM PST up reply actions  

you know whose better than both?

Aldon Smith :D

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 13, 2012 11:02 AM PST up reply actions  

Mos def

Gonna make the WR position relevant again? When?

by rlott#42 on Feb 16, 2012 11:09 PM PST up reply actions  

why you want him on the team if he won’ play, besides every player wants to play (and get paid). I rather tender him with a third round. One more pick!

by Aleman12 on Feb 13, 2012 9:31 PM PST up reply actions  

ILB doesn't make that much of a difference on a team (Especially when the guy opposite him is playing at all-pro level and his backup was playing like an all*star too)

His early years he was the best MLB/ILB in the game and we were still terrible. Ray Lewis was the best MLB in the league for years and years and is still top notch. How many titles has it won the Ravens?

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 14, 2012 6:06 PM PST up reply actions  

1

how many titles did the greatest QBs win when their D suffered? Lets see Brady 0 Peyton 1 Brees 0 Rodgers 0

Lets see how many won when their D played at a high level? Brady 3 Peyton 0 Brees 1 Rodgers 1

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 14, 2012 6:13 PM PST up reply actions  

and once again Bowman gets the benefit of playing with Willis

he is still good but he won’t be as good without Willis.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 14, 2012 6:14 PM PST up reply actions  

Ok is Willis the MVP of our defense?

Ask yourself that honestly. I know the answer is no. And then we have Bowman who is nearly as important if not equal and Aldon who is a tiny sliver below that.

We could replace Willis with Grant and get 3/4s the production from 1/10th the salary and add another elite player or 2 very good ones.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 15, 2012 2:41 AM PST up reply actions  

the salary thing is a lie

if we trade him we will take a huge cap hit from his Guaranteed money.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 15, 2012 10:55 AM PST up reply actions  

ok I was wrong after this year Willis will not be paid much but if we trade him we will still have to foot his signing bill for this year. Which would not open up the salary cap.

In 2013 he will be paid 3 mil
14 6
15 8
16 9

P.s. for more information about how the cap works click here.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 15, 2012 11:19 AM PST up reply actions  

And the Ravens were we to for instance trade him for Terrell Suggs,

would be taking the hit from Suggs guaranteed money, (which is extremely high as well). So it works the same in the end. And we get a player in Suggs that is >>>>> than the player he is replacing, (Brooks), while we lose a player in Willis that is >>> Larry Grant.

Now I’m sure the Ravens wouldn’t make that trade because Suggs is way more valuable than Pat but the same applies to other players/positions.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 16, 2012 12:12 AM PST up reply actions  

In other news

Our former HOF WR Arnaz Battle was released by the Steelers. Should we pick him up to replace Kyle Williams as a punt returner?

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us"

by FearTheTree on Feb 8, 2012 11:11 PM PST reply actions  

I agree.

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure. It is our light, not our darkness that most frightens us"

by FearTheTree on Feb 9, 2012 7:40 AM PST up reply actions  

no, start kyle williams next to crabtree

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 9, 2012 1:31 AM PST up reply actions  

If we're gonna get another PR/KR

We can look at Damaris Johnson probably as a UDFA after his legal issue.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 2:42 AM PST up reply actions  

I’d only trade up for Fitzpatrick..

I am not an Alex hater, I'm an Alex apologist hater. Now you know. -Mr Moses

by rlott#42 on Feb 9, 2012 3:48 PM PST reply actions  

Yeah, stupid phone.

I am not an Alex hater, I'm an Alex apologist hater. Now you know. -Mr Moses

by rlott#42 on Feb 9, 2012 6:31 PM PST up reply actions  

Dre Kirkpatrick has bust written all over him.

No man coverage instincts.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 9, 2012 8:36 PM PST up reply actions  

You see SEC corners cover so rarely since nobody throws the ball that all I can judge them by is the WOW factor

Patrick Peterson for instant has it. If Honey Badger can repeat his performance, he has it… Claiborne and Kirkpatrick? Never really saw it. I’m basically basing my judgement on them from national rankings. I saw enough of Joe Haden to believe in him when few else around here did but that’s more the exception than the rule.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 10, 2012 12:55 AM PST up reply actions  

Fortunately

a kind and loving Tebow had mercy on us and created the Arkansas Razorbacks, just so we’d have someone to throw the ball in the SEC.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 10, 2012 10:57 PM PST up reply actions  

True. Forgot about the Razorbacks.

Tennessee actually throws the ball a bit too. They just don’t have any talent except their QB.

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 11, 2012 5:14 AM PST up reply actions  

He will become a safety, and a damn good one.

Gonna make the WR position relevant again? When?

by rlott#42 on Feb 13, 2012 1:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Wouldn't be the least bit surprised

If he falls to us I wouldn’t be surprised to have him be our starting safety

Gimme 1 round!

by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 13, 2012 11:42 PM PST up reply actions  

Well...

hadn’t considered that.

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 14, 2012 2:34 PM PST up reply actions  

I wouldn't spend a 2nd on Harrison Smith

3rd at the earliest, but you’ve given that up, so probably a 4th, if he’s still there. Problem is, if his instincts prove wrong on a play, he’s cooked because it appears that doesn’t have the speed to correct errors in judgement….

by ratumike on Feb 9, 2012 6:24 PM PST reply actions  

So I just noticed the title of this post says draft twice.

Perhaps this version was only supposed to be a draft of the draft thread?

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 9, 2012 8:39 PM PST reply actions  

well never get the final version

Cat7 needs more recs for that

Demarcus Dobbs is Our Future

by MRandolph on Feb 9, 2012 9:33 PM PST up reply actions  

I'm going with a mid changed it.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 10, 2012 7:45 AM PST via iPhone app up reply actions  

Website Rec

Outside of sites on SB Nation (NN and Mocking the Draft), in your guys’ opinion, what is the best place out there for all things draft? I’m pretty busy these days and just looking for a place I can go and get good, consolidated knowledge. Thanks!

by InTimmyWeTrust on Feb 11, 2012 3:59 AM PST reply actions  

MTD

I am not an Alex hater, I'm an Alex apologist hater. Now you know. -Mr Moses

by rlott#42 on Feb 11, 2012 12:34 PM PST up reply actions  

Most of the draft media is awful.

You can’t trust anyone. Sorry. :-/

We don't need 8 in the box. We have 52 in the box.

by these3words on Feb 12, 2012 1:16 AM PST up reply actions  

This

Your best resources are raw data.

I usually rely on CBSSports for a listing of every athlete in the draft well into UDFA, these guys to keep good updates on height / weight / combine as the BS numbers given from collegiate athletic departments are shown the door, and JoshMTD on youtube and DraftBreakdown as more “legal in America” game film — you just have to realize that some of it is very limited, few of the clips show every play from every game unless it says University O vs State D. Then it’s usually every play without the time wasted standing around and on commercials.

There are many places online, especially if you aren’t in the States, where you can download full game film and do your own film study. You just have to know what you are looking for and ignore play results.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 12, 2012 2:51 AM PST up reply actions  

Mike Mayock is the best media analyst by far.

McShay is awful, and Kiper is pretty eh.

CBSSports and nfldraftscout are my most 2 used websites for the NFL draft too.

by Odekerk on Feb 12, 2012 1:48 PM PST up reply actions  

I like this mock draft

simply because there is no QB drafted. Personally, I like the odds of the 49ers heading into 2012 with Alex Smith and Colin Kaepernick at the QB position (especially if A.Smith continues to refuse turning the ball over). It would also be nice to have C, LG, LT and RT locked up for several seasons (if the team gets Peter Konz).

Fundamentally speaking, I like the way this team is built. Strong in the front seven and continuity starting to develop amongst the OL (in other words, tough in the trenches on both sides of the ball). Picking up secondary help, and pieces for the offense to work with are essential to the 2012 NFL Draft. The team can address those needs without trading, but a guy like Konz is worth it under the right circumstance.

I don’t think the team can afford to trade up in round 1 if they cannot resign Rogers or Goldson. If they resign just one, I think the extra pick can be spare, but if neither resign, it cannot. Luckily the franchise tag on Goldson is fairly affordable, so I’d wager at the very least Goldson will back for 2012. If Goldson returns on the 1-year and Rogers walks, I don’t think the team can afford spending that extra pick to move up.

Just my two cents.

by Andrew Davidson on Feb 11, 2012 4:41 PM PST reply actions  

I don't like the fact we made no attempt at finding a playmaking WR

in this draft. It wouldn’t bother me if we got one in FA, but manraj said he was fine with our current group of players, which just baffles me.

However, I do like Konz and it would make everything easier for everyone on offense, but we’d still need a good WR or at least respectable depth to really improve our passing game imo.

by Odekerk on Feb 12, 2012 1:51 PM PST up reply actions  

Anyone else see Dontavia Bogan’s highlights on you tube. This kid looks pretty darn good, maybe just maybe the Niners found a sleeper here. He might just be another Victor Cruz, Cruz went undrafted just like this kid. We cant only hope turns out like Cruz.

by bmcrae83@yahoo.com on Feb 12, 2012 3:42 PM PST reply actions  

I like him

I wish he didn’t get injured during training camp though.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 12, 2012 4:43 PM PST up reply actions  

Theres only one Eli.

Gonna make the WR position relevant again? When?

by rlott#42 on Feb 13, 2012 1:14 AM PST up reply actions  

All those wishing for Desean ...

Eagles will place franchise tag on DeSean Jackson http://wp.me/p14QSB-10BD

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 12, 2012 6:50 PM PST reply actions  

good

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 13, 2012 2:03 AM PST up reply actions  

Moss wants to come back too ...!!

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/02/13/randy-moss-says-hes-coming-back/

I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!

by Edggy on Feb 13, 2012 7:31 AM PST up reply actions  

I haven't really heard anyone mention the possibility of taking a NT for the first pick.

I know it’s not a huge need, and some would say it isn’t a need at all, but I was thinking that if we could get someone who could dominate in the middle as well as get pressure on the QB, that would put the Dline over the top. I know Williams could have a bright future, but probably not as a pass rusher from what I’ve heard. Sopoaga has one more year on his contract. Does anyone think taking a NT high in the draft could be a good idea? And if so, are there any good ones who will be available at 30?

by SanFranciscoKnights on Feb 12, 2012 10:29 PM PST reply actions  

i have see some mocks with this guy to the niners

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/1689166/alameda-taamu

most sites have him rated high middle round. i think baalke will either extend or draft soaps replacement like he drafted bowman before spikes contract expired

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 13, 2012 2:13 AM PST up reply actions  

Sopoaga dominates the middle

He’s always got a center and a guard on him and there is a reason that Willis and Bowman are both flying around the field locking down the run — opposing guards can’t reach them. You aren’t going to get much of a pass rush out of a 3-4 NT.

But even that aside, there aren’t any good NT’s available this year. You’ve got a couple big space eaters, but all have some major developmental issues and all had games where they were completely manhandled by some of the nations best centers.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 13, 2012 7:01 AM PST up reply actions  

So I am going to be making a new post soon

any preferences as to the subject?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 13, 2012 11:04 AM PST reply actions  

Abe Lincoln riding a grizzly bear in the Great Bacon Revolt??

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 13, 2012 1:23 PM PST up reply actions  

I mean would you guys prefer a 1st round mock or a big board post?

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 13, 2012 4:13 PM PST up reply actions  

Mock YEAH

Gonna make the WR position relevant again? When?

by rlott#42 on Feb 13, 2012 10:16 PM PST up reply actions  

Big Boards are more interesting

All team mocks are kind of a waste of time. Sometimes it’s a fun waste of time, but it gets old pretty fast and group think tends to zero in certain players at certain spots or to certain teams.

Every time Jamie Dukes says something enlightening and informative about football Jerry Rice and I mount up on our flying grizzly bears and claim pirate treasure from the moon. That's how often it happens.

by Ougadas on Feb 14, 2012 6:46 AM PST up reply actions  

I think I'll do that

Start with the QBs

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 14, 2012 5:58 PM PST up reply actions  

Idea

How about you list our needs and start at the bottom. Top 5 needs, and start with what’s voted as 5. Do a fan post cast a nn wide vote, then work your magic.

Gonna make the WR position relevant again? When?

by rlott#42 on Feb 14, 2012 6:48 PM PST up reply actions  

thats a wonderful idea

I think there is a front page post where we talked about that.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 14, 2012 7:56 PM PST up reply actions  

thanks

I just think it’d be too much work for threads that won’t have a lot of team based interest, although any position can be debated.

Gonna make the WR position relevant again? When?

by rlott#42 on Feb 14, 2012 8:15 PM PST up reply actions  

the ranking

http://www.pfcritics.com/DBN/results.php?id=104

I will be doing RBs first.

And when we win, we want to dominate. We want to take guys out. We want to hurt guys. We want to win. We just want to dominate, hit them in the mouth. - Rathman

by manraj7 on Feb 14, 2012 8:49 PM PST up reply actions  

partial mock draft

1st Vinny Curry OLB
another play maker added to the defense at an important position on defense

2nd Alameda Ta’amu Dt
soaps and RJF both UFA next year

3rd Stephen Hill WR
underdeveloped talent in the third round

4th Cliff Harris CB maybe moved to free safety

why not? could move to safety possibly
5th,6th and 7nth ILB,G or cb, and special team player

"You know whats funny? I always thought uhm dogs lay eggs and I learned something new today" Peter Griffin

by HUNGRY HUNTER on Feb 16, 2012 11:40 PM PST reply actions  

I say we trade all our picks for andrew luck and then move him to FS

by reedkrase on Feb 17, 2012 4:37 PM PST up reply actions   1 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Media Requests please email ninersnation@gmail.com

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Site Decorum: Remember, We Are ALL 49er Fans

Recent FanPosts

Small
Concussions...
Small
Is Harbaugh lying or does he mean what he says?
872_small
Where have you seen 49er players?
Download2_small
Can the 49'ers Maintain their Turnover Differential in 2012?
Sfak_small
Why are you a 49er fan?
6a00e5500c77218833011168f234b4970c_small
FOX: "How To Save The Sport"
Small
Old Spice Patrick Willis Football ProCamp
Dave_small
Call For Moderators
Steve_young_small
Game Day Food

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Head Ball Coach

Dave_small David Fucillo

Howtheyscoredcat_small howtheyscored

313483_2054510893373_1562580382_31984672_1965025_n_small James Brady

Coordinator

Pirates_small smileyman

Bowman_avi_sm_small Tre9er

Assistant Coach

Pixies_logo_small (Florida) Danny Tuccitto

Memento-lies_small urnext

Me_on_beach_small WesHanson

Dylan_cannes_small Dylan DeSimone

Officiating Crew

Jackalope_card_small wjackalope

These3words_small these3words

Joe_and_bill_small twolfe2

428030_10150598134996875_112852666874_9167376_1157036734_n_small mikeinsp