49ers 2012 Free Agency Review: Inside Linebackers
We had more people suggesting that the 49ers' safety is a concern in free agency than I expected, though I personally think it is. I guess I just assumed people were totally confident despite some pretty big plays blowing up in our face from the safety position. Still, it's not as big an issue as some other positions on the team, though I don't think the position we'll look at today is going to demand any kind of concern.
Today, we'll take a look at the inside linebacker position and how that was looking last year and what it's looking like heading into free agency. It was most definitely a position of strength this past season, and guys like Patrick Willis and NaVorro Bowman are locked up for the foreseeable future, though the latter may be in line for an extension at some point next season.
That isn't to say that the position is totally locked down. In fact, the entirety of the depth at the position is up for free agency. Larry Grant is a free agent and could be on his way out given his high-level of play and the fact that he wants to start, while nobody else on the roster actually saw the field in significant time as an inside linebacker. Tavares Gooden was the next man up, but again, didn't see much time and is a free agent. Blake Costanzo was a special teamer and is a free agent, but everyone expects him back. Let's take a look at the individual players.
Patrick Willis
Did you ever see those one-second Miller High Life commercials where they just said one phrase but was still an accurate depiction of said beer? "HIGH LIFE!" and "CHUBBLY BUBBLY!" I feel like everything that needs to be said about Patrick Willis could be summed up in the same way. While it's mis-applied to the aforementioned High Life, Willis is so good at what he does that everybody knows it. We only need one word. Awesome. Playmaker. Badass. And yes, chubbly bubbly.
Go ahead and argue that he's not chubbly bubbly. I dare you. You can't. Because I'll hurt you with my palms.
Anyway, Willis is so good at everything we ever ask of him. He tackles anybody, he can catch anybody, he uses the best angles to make sure he can catch anybody and he hits hard. For a negative, Willis was actually beaten in coverage at times this season - usually by tight ends who are just too big. Jimmy Graham caught a touchdown pass over him that I'm sure no linebacker in the league would have prevented. He's locked up for the future and that's a very, very good thing.
NaVorro Bowman
I think I've made it abundantly clear that Bowman is my favorite player on the team not named Anthony Dixon. It definitely helps that he's incredibly good. Bowman's 2011 was exceedingly better than his 2010, and really, better than most inside linebackers in the NFL. It was his first full season as a starter and looked like a completely different player than the guy who was completely unable to make a tackle in his first season.
Maybe that judgement of his limited playing time is a bit harsh, but that's still in the past. The point is that Bowman made a serious case to contend with Willis for best linebacker in the league. Just typing that sentence feels like heresy, but it's true. He was a complete linebacker and is playing on a rookie deal. The 49ers will try like mad to extend him and keep these two together.
Larry Grant
Grant is a guy I've always liked, and I've always considered him to be a really, really good backup without anything to support that information. When we signed him, I was ecstatic, and I couldn't really tell anybody why. His performance filling in this past season has shown everyone why. He was able to not only fill in servicably, but make plays like a starter. He knocked down multiple passes and was great rushing the passer. Best of all, he was a sure-tackler for most of the time out there.
But he wasn't perfect. The final game he received significant playing time, he started to have lapses in his coverage and mental mistakes. In short, he looked like an inexperienced player the times when he wasn't making big plays. Still, he might have made enough of those big plays to be on his way out this season and competing for a starting job elsewhere. Which means the backup is certainly a need for the 49ers in free agency.
Tavares Gooden
I liked his signing, but I also thought he might see a little more time on defense. He only recorded one tackle on defense, but did stick with the core special teams group, and had 12 tackles in that regard. He's a free agent and could return to the team with a minimum type deal, but he doesn't inspire much confidence as an actual backup.
Oh man, this guy was fantastic this year. He's a special teamer and nothing else, but he's a damn good special teamer. He's the first core guy to come in and really fill a void that was left by losing all of Michael Robinson, Jeff Ulbrich and Donald Strickland in the same offseason, with the help of someone like C.J. Spillman. Still, Constanzo doesn't factor much into the picture in regards to the actual position of inside linebacker.
67 comments
|
Do you like this story?
Comments
After Willis & Bowman....not really a whole lot there
Yes, Yes, Larry Grant had a stretch of solid games replacing injured Willis.
But frankly, I think he was playing out of his mind, I don’t feel he can play like that.
So my bottom line….we need better behind Willis & Bowman.
Frankly I think you don't have any idea what you're talking about with Larry Grant.
He was JuCo player of the year. Went to Ohio State, sat a year and then came out and played excellent across the board as a senior. He got taken in the 7th round by us and got immediately snatched off our practice squad by St. Louis. He was the 2nd best backer on St. Louis and came back here as soon as he could.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 5:56 PM PST up reply actions
Because they wanted him as their staring weakside 4-3 OLB and he wasn't consistent enough... and he wasn't going to win the job as their starting MLB from Laurinitis
Doesn’t mean he wasn’t the 2nd best backer on the team. Just means he got pigeon holed into a position he wasn’t ready to play at.
I’d definitely stand by my statement that he’s a better player than both Poppinga and Leber.
Welker was cut by the Chargers and traded by the Dolphins too.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 6:34 PM PST up reply actions
In 4 games Grant totaled almost as many tackles as Leber and Poppinga did all season.
Results are right in front of your eyes.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 6:38 PM PST up reply actions
James Harrison was cut 4 times
Was on and off the Steelers practice squad. Then signed by the Ravens and sent to NFL Europe, then cut again.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 7:35 PM PST up reply actions
He's a backup. He was playing out of his mind.
Isn’t that exactly what you want out of a backup?
And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it. ... Always a ninja
Out of Treble | Twitter
He has done this on every post, if only it were 1989
After Montana & Young … not really a whole lot there.
Yes, Yes, Steve Bono had a solid stretch in preseason.
But Frankly, I think he was playing out of his mind, I don’t feel he can play like that.
So my bottom line … we need better behind Montana & Young.
Larry Grant
Played very well and not just out his mind. I never understood why the Niners cut him in the first place. His rookie year he did some of the same things only to be cut. Again Nolan/Manusky and Harbaugh/Fangio are different guys with different wants in a player and Grant has earned his position as next man up.
I'll be fine if we don't get a free agent ILB.
Just sayin.
I'm just a simple Niners fan trying to make my way in the universe.
by Tim Lincecum's Bong on Feb 9, 2012 5:15 PM PST reply actions
Including our own?
And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it. ... Always a ninja
Out of Treble | Twitter
Whats concerns me a bit about our defense is.....
so many starters all at one time in the same season had fantastic career years.
We did not witness this elevated play in the prior seasons?
Even Justin who “consistantly” plays wel every seasonl had a enoumious 2011 season.
Can they all play like they did in 2011 again in 2012?
Don't forget that Alex had a career year and Frank the tank broke 1000 yards again...
It might have to do with this wonderful new thing we have…
Good coaching.
It’s the gel that holds our team together.
Justin Smith was just as good in 2010 but nobody really paid attention except ProFootballFocus
Patrick Willis had a down year. Bowman is getting better. Ray McDonald started for the first time. Soap had an average year. Brooks had an average year. Haralson had an average year. Terrell Brown had a fantastic second half to the season. Rogers played average for him but actually caught the ball. Dashon played average but the front 7 gave him a lot of easy picks. Whitner had an above average year. So quite frankly I don’t see what you’re talking about in the slightest.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 6:00 PM PST up reply actions
NOBODY....noticed that Justin Smith was just as good in 2010?
Justin has ALWAYS been good and all noticed (except for maybe you?)….but come on, Justin did indeed have a superior 2011 year over his past very good years
ProFootballFocus rated him the #2 player in the NFL at any position last year
So yes – He played just as well last year as this year.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 6:43 PM PST up reply actions
Not really
He had more “impact” plays but he was just as good if not better last season. Maclin fumble and the bat down vs the Giants in the reg season coupled with the manhandling of LT’s in the playoffs gained him more exposure than last season but he was just as disruptive in 2010.
this.
I had a friend in NY who watches alot of football, but it wasn’t until the divisional playoff game that he texts me and says ’ this SF defense is hardcore!‘….i was like ’ bro, are you for real? what have YOU been watching? Seattle vs Cleveland?’, but it was so indicative of the media’s focus on all things east coast.
Not really
Another thing that often gets overlooked is the change in philosophy on defense. The way this team goes about it’s business as compared to years past is like night and day. Willis was Willis it was just now playing with Bowman he’s in competition for tackles. Both guys ended up All Pro’s for a reason. The Dline was stout as I expected it to be and Brooks and Haralson did their jobs. When a defense plays so well it’s hard to say any player of significant snaps played average. If anything the talent is more spread out so guys like Willis and Brooks will have less impact in stats but the defense overall improved dramatically. I think that’s a good thing.
I know Willis split his tackles with Bowman but I'm not just talking about stats
Just watching him he was a touch slower and just a tiny bit off this year. I think that hammy issue might have been bothering him before he actually went out with the injury.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 7:39 PM PST up reply actions
maybe
I saw his coverage abilities improve a great deal. Maybe it was the added responsibilities in the passing game. I think this was his best season yet and that includes the injury.
I think sometimes we are so mystified by Willis’ abilities that we expect perfection out of him. Year II of Bowman and Willis sounds good to me.
This is what I meant...
Willis is a stud but his responsibilities changed along with the emergence of Bowman. He still made huge plays just in different ways. He was still a huge force against the run and was better in coverage. Like I said this defense played differently schematically than it did in 2010 even though its generally the same thing. Bowman freed up Willis to be a more versatile LB than he was with Spikes.
Agreed in everything you said.
Whitner had a well above average year, a great year in fact imo. Haralason was better than I thought he’d be, Brooks was average – was hugely overrated. Bowman was our best linebacker last season. To have two 5-techniques that have pass-rushing ability is rare, and pretty outstanding. Soap was good at nose, considering he’d played 5-techinuqe for a couple seasons.
Alex Smith 86%+ QB rating with 22+ TDs this season, hopefully! :)
5
Re-sign Costanzo and Grant at the right prices, or bargain FA’s/late-round picks. Shouldn’t be a point of emphasis at all, along with K/P the only spots that are set.
i might feel a little different if both Grant and Costanzo get ridiculous FA offers, but at least for Costanzo I think the Niners should be able to retain him.
The Bleacher Report suggests the 9ers should trade up....
For one of these 4 players:
OLB Courtney Upshaw (by trading for KC 11th pick)
WR Alshon Jeffery (by trading for Dallas 14th pick)
OG David DeCastro (by trading for Jets 16th pick)
NT Dontaro Poe ( by trading for 25th pick)
However, bleacher report does not say what 9ers would give up to trade up into one of those spots.
I find the trading for Dontaro Poe sceanio interesting because we would be moving up from our 30 spot to 25 spot, so possibly not giving up that much in a trade in order to get a super strong monster in Poe who is bigger than Ravens Nagata.
And I think Poe talented enough to play 3-4 end too!
They’d give up far too much. Especially going up for a NT. That being said, that’s a horrible site anyway.
And then God created Saturn ... and he liked it, so he put a ring on it. ... Always a ninja
Out of Treble | Twitter
Ah yes ... Our Bleacher Report friends. That's always the problem ... they don't say exactly what they propose that you give up!
Besides, I think that we stand a very good chance that Jeffery will be available at Pick #30. Obviously Upshaw and DeCastro will not. Poe could be available, but we can’t afford to draft a NT in the first round … too many other more important needs. And, next year’s NT class will be MUCH better than this year’s prospects.
by 49erFanSince1950 on Feb 9, 2012 6:03 PM PST up reply actions
LMAO trade up to 11 eh? We'd only need to move our entire draft to get there.
Sounds like a brilliant idea. SARCASM. ****ing retards at Bleacher report. And nobody is taking Jeffery at 14 lol Even trading up to 16 requires our 1st, 2nd and 5th at a minimum.
If anything we should move 1 and 3 for Konz at 24
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 6:04 PM PST up reply actions
please don't
use the word retards. Point can be made without using a word that offends many.
by David Fucillo on Feb 9, 2012 6:07 PM PST up reply actions
Got as far as Bleacher report ...!!
I'm your " Huckelberry "...it's just my game ..( .AleX ) was asked , what do you think about all the game manager talk ... AleX i guess i just managed myself a VIctory ... Extend the Man ...!!
My assessment ...
The only strong ILBs in the draft will be gone before we can justify selecting that position; besides, next year’s draft will be MUCH strong for ILBs than this year’s class.
Re-sign Grant and Costanzo and I’d be more than happy. If Grant is unwilling to be a backup, sign another young free agent.
by 49erFanSince1950 on Feb 9, 2012 5:58 PM PST reply actions
Actually Vontaze Burfict will be right around 30
But uh… Why the hell would we waste our #1 on a career backup.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 6:06 PM PST up reply actions
Frankly, I think strong possilbility of a trade down with our 30 spot....
it may make more sense to trade our 30 spot to some team looking to jump back into the bottom of the 1st round.
Scenario trade our 30 spot for a 2nd and a 4th rounder.
Draft day:
2 – 2nd rounders
1 – 3rd rounder
2- 4th rounders
1- 5th rounder
1 – 6th rounder
1 – 7th rounder
That would be 8 new bodies to fill some holes.
another 4th rounder is not what we need to fill gaping starter holes at #1 WR, #1 RG, #1 FS, #2 CB
We should be looking to get a higher 1 and higher 2 if somebody falls if anything.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 6:28 PM PST up reply actions
and what exactly in trade do you think the 9ers would have to "give up" in order
to accomplish your scenario, and still somehow end up filling all those gaping holes you mention?
I would rather....
Trade out of the first round and pick up more draft picks. The way this coaching staff was able to develop the late round picks this year, it seems to me that they can find talent that can contribute anywhere in the draft. These gaping holes that ItBurnz is talking about are not as gaping as they seem. A FA WR fills the #1 WR, re-signing Goldson fills the #1 FS spot, that means only two spots remain. Both the guard position and the cornerback position can be solved in the draft. The more bodies the merrier to me because the Niners need to add depth throughout the roster, ( ie. WR, RB, OL, DL, OLB, CB, S)
Goldson is overrated. A FA WR that we may or may not get
Most of the big names are going to cost huge money… The guard position to secure somebody that can actually do a good job right off the bat requires a high pick. So does CB. BTW how many great CBs have come out of the last 3 drafts in rds 3 and below?
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 7:42 PM PST up reply actions
We need depth at running back???
Let's giggity giggity Go 49ers!!! ::: whywontgodhealamputees.com
by Kittles on Feb 9, 2012 7:47 PM PST via Android app up reply actions
Only if Trent Richardson is there at 30 lol
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 7:58 PM PST up reply actions
He'll run a high 4.4 to a low 4.5
Remember I hated Mark Ingram… I think Richardson is the real deal. Worthy of a 10 spot on 1st-round pick. I don’t buy the SEC >> than everybody else just because… But he literally made some of the best defenders in the SEC not want to tackle him. He is a load and it will transfer to the NFL level. He’ll never be out there popping runs when he hits the sideline but he’d be great in a power scheme. I think he’s the Bronco’s #1 target. He’s the type of kid that can get away with 300 carries a year and still have a rather long career. 5’10" 220 lbs. 475 lb bench 600 lb and power cleans 375 for reps when he was 19? He’s a solid block of granite. He’ll get even stronger in the NFL. He’s a freak. (Oh and I still think Lattimore is an even better prospect)
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 10:33 PM PST up reply actions
Ball went back to school after the draft advisory board told him he was a 3rd round or later pick
He’s gotta prove something without Konz and Zeitler giving him 4 yards before he ever gets touched.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 10:41 PM PST up reply actions
You have to be kidding!
The two big holes are at RG and WR maybe FS if Dash isn’t resigned. If Rogers walks Cully would be a solid starter as he lined up outside in nickel situations and held his own. A #3 CB would be needed if Rogers walks but otherwise the Niners need a RG and another WR.
Our depth at corner is horrible. That was exposed when Brown got injured
Cully made bad plays as often as good ones… Which is alright for a 3rd round corner as a rookie. But yah we have Tremaine Brock if anybody gets injured. We need depth. ESPECIALLY if Rogers goes. Dash isn’t a good FS either he’s league average benefitting from a spectacular front 7.
And to fill these holes our #3 should be used in trade.
If that means it’s used to jump up to #24 to get Konz and fill the RG hole and soon to be hole at center – fantastic.
If it doesn’t work there it can be used to jump up 15 spots in rd 2 to #49 where we can grab a starter at whatever position we did not draft in rd 1. The amount of talent drops off after 50 significantly. Most of the pro ready starters are gone from there on.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 6:56 PM PST up reply actions
Konz is a premier talent
but if he’s gone at #30, and we can almost book it that he is, then the F.O. should explore every avenue that allows us to trade down. Giving up a third will move us up to #24 (if my maths is correct), and even then I’d still be very surprised if Konz is still there. If we do make that move, and he’s still there, run to the podium. Otherwise, bail out of this 1st rd….
Konz only has to make it past a couple teams to be available at 24.
The Lions being the single biggest hurdle. If both Kirkpatrick and Konz are there we should be talking to the Steelers.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 7:16 PM PST up reply actions
I'd actually be surprised
if he gets past Tennessee at #20. Then he has to go past the Lions, who need solid help at both tackle and guard. If he gets past those two teams, pick up the phone…
Tennessee has many bigger issues to worry about and while he's still a value at 20 he's only +3 or so at that point
They need help all over and should probably go BPA at anywhere but RB.
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 7:32 PM PST up reply actions
He'll probably be BPA at that point
in the next few weeks and months, his stock will continue to rise. I also doubt the lions would make the mistake of letting him go past them. Their line needs are blatantly obvious.
So are their corner needs
But yah I think the Lions are taking him. If they don’t we should be on the horn with the Steelers. 30 + 94 = 24
Gimme 1 round!
by ItBurnzWhenIP on Feb 9, 2012 8:00 PM PST up reply actions

by 












































