FanPost

Boldin vs. Harvin?

Nfl-seahawks-49ers_medium

via 3.bp.blogspot.com


So who got the better acquisition, the Seahawks or the 49ers? I'd argue that the Seahawks got the better player, but they paid a king's ransom for him, giving up multiple draft picks (including a 1st rounder) to get a player who only has one-year left on his contract and wants to be paid big-time $$$. With Harvin, they have a well-rounded player (when healthy) that can return kickoffs, play slot receiver, and run the ball out of the back-field.

As for the 49ers, they got the better 'deal' in terms of value by only giving up a 6th round pick. Anquan Boldin, at 32-years old, is on the back side of his career, but he's still good for 60+ catches and 900 yards. He's a reliable possession receiver that you can count on in the clutch (see Super Bowl film).

I still think the 49ers need to find a deep threat (easier said than done), but this move gives the 49ers valuable depth in their perennially banged-up receiving corps without having to give up much in return.

Your thoughts?

This is a FanPost and does not necessarily reflect the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors. It does reflect the views of this particular fan though, which is as important as the views of Niners Nation's writers or editors.