NFC West rankings: Wide receiver position a tough pick, but Cardinals get the nod with Larry Fitzgerald

USA TODAY Sports

Ranking the wide receivers in the NFC West was hard, but the Arizona Cardinals get the benefit of the doubt in lieu of a real NFL quarterback.

So here's a position that's a bit of an oddity. When I started taking a look at each position in the NFC West, I thought the wide receiver position was going to be the most difficult. Now that Michael Crabtree has torn his Achilles tendon, I think things are a little clearer.

The San Francisco 49ers started to look pretty good at receiver before Crabtree's injury. They might have been at the top of these rankings, just based on here-and-now production, but after the injuries, I can't place them there. So then I look to both the Seattle Seahawks and Arizona Cardinals, and I .... don't know which way to go.

Arizona's receivers struggled last season, but they haven't had a real quarterback since Kurt Warner retired with his walker. Seattle's receivers are looking good right now, but none of them have ever lived up to their expectations throughout their careers. It's all a little confusing for me. I think these rankings are mostly interchangeable, but here it goes.

1. Arizona Cardinals with Larry Fitzgerald, Michael Floyd, Andre Roberts, Ryan Swope, LaRon Byrd

Larry Fitzgerald is the best wide receiver in the division, and it's not even close. Anybody who disagrees with this is fooling themselves. True, Fitzgerald had a poor season last year, with under 800 yards and a general lack of domination in the realm of highlight reels, but let me list off some names for you:

Ryan Lindley, John Skelton, Brian Hoyer, Kevin Kolb

Those are all quarterbacks who threw the football last season. Fitzgerald will rebound. Behind him, Michael Floyd seems to be on the up-and-up. He hasn't quite reached his potential just yet but if Carson Palmer can manage to stay off his back, Floyd could have a breakout year. Andre Roberts is solid and Ryan Swope has a ton of potential.

2. Seattle Seahawks with Percy Harvin, Sidney Rice, Golden Tate, Doug Baldwin, Chris Harper

Sidney Rice will probably have more yards than Percy Harvin next year. That's just my opinion, as I think the Harvin trade wasn't a good deal at all. Rice is a pretty good receiver who will probably sit around the 800-yard mark for the next few years.

Harvin does have the potential to do big things, even if my personal expectation is that he won't. He's as quick and agile as they come, and he's a competent route runner, even though he's not often asked to do much in that vein. Will he turn out to be worth that first-round pick? I doubt it, but he's more proven than many of the receivers in the division.

Golden Tate is a pretty good, if unremarkable receiver. Same goes for Doug Baldwin.

3. San Francisco 49ers with Anquan Boldin, Mario Manningham, Kyle Williams, A.J. Jenkins, Quinton Patton, Ricardo Lockette

If we were to include tight ends in the equation, the 49ers would definitely be above the Seahawks and possibly up on top, but that's not the case. Crabtree would also sway things in their favor, but for now, we have to keep him out of the equation. Anquan Boldin, going by the stats, is the second-best receiver in the division, though he's slowing down and may not have more than one good season left in him.

On top of that, it will be interesting to see how he fares with the coverage that will be on him that wasn't there in Baltimore. Mario Manningham inspires confidence for sure, but he's recovering from an injury, along with Kyle Williams.

There are three young receivers with all the potential in the world, but only two proven guys. Fortunately, those proven guys have been pretty effective in the past, and that's what puts the 49ers above the St. Louis Rams at this point.

4. St. Louis Rams with Tavon Austin, Chris Givens, Stedman Bailey, Brian Quick, Austin Pettis

Here's another position that our Rams blog, Turf Show Times, had themselves on top. They put the Rams receivers on top because Sam Bradford will be "slinging" it everywhere this season. You know, despite their top receiver being a rookie.

Tavon Austin will probably be pretty good in the NFL, though I see him as being a better returner than a wide receiver. He'll come in and make some flashy plays but I don't think he was worth what the Rams gave up. Austin Pettis, Brian Quick and Chris Givens are all just OK, though Quick does have some solid potential.

Stedman Bailey is where the Rams get interesting. He was better than Austin in college and I think he'll be a much more consistent and polished receiver at the next level. Bailey could take this unit much higher than they are now, though he could just as easily flame out.

Keep Reading:

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Niners Nation

You must be a member of Niners Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Niners Nation. You should read them.

Join Niners Nation

You must be a member of Niners Nation to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Niners Nation. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker