49ers Bring in "Consultant": Hey Jim, did ya get the memo?

Oh indeed, the 49ers have brought in Ted Tollner to be a consultant for the rest of the season, with no word on anything beyond that. It was mentioned in the link dump for this week, but I thought it was worth fleshing out a little bit more. That, and as soon as I read about it, I knew an Office Space graphic was called for. The Bobs certainly are appropriate right about now.
Ted Tollner has quite a bit of experience working with offenses. I've included a less than stellar graphic that I can't make any bigger. For those who can't quite see everything, he's coached wide receivers, quarterbacks and tight ends, as well as being the Chargers OC from 1989-1991, the 49ers OC in 2004 and the Lions OC in 2005. While he learned the west coast offense under Steve Mariucci, he is more known as a proponent of the Don Coryell offensive system that Norv Turner used last year.
I don't have as good a historical perspective as I probably should so I did a little research into the Don Coryell system and for now have some basic info from Wikipedia, which you can check out here. and here If anybody can find better information on it definitely post it or a link in here. From what I've read, it was originally the West Coast offense before the name became more known with Bill Walsh's scheme.
Coryell's scheme came to be known as the "Air Coryell and is a system that places emphasis on timing and precision. As I'm typing this I just came across info on the system from 49ers Webzone after Norv Turner was hired by the 49ers in 2006:
Three wide-receiver sets are also a staple of this scheme. In fact, the three wide receiver set was a Coryell staple...Motion and shifting is used to confuse the defense.
Here's some additional information from a Chargers website, which compared there team last year to a new version of the Air Coryell system (I wonder what they thought when they brought in Norv Turner, a student of the system?):
So what does all this mean? Well the hell if I know, to be perfectly honest with you. While the 49ers weren't blowing people away with their offense last year, we all are pining for those days based on current production. So it will be interesting to see how Tollner is utilized in the coming weeks. Jim Hostler received the dreaded vote of confidence, which of course always comes when people have the least amount of confidence in you.
There is no word yet on what this means after the current season. It'd be nice to have Smith working with Tollner, but that doesn't seem too likely now (I don't even want to start on that topic yet). So for now, maybe this can help create a spark.

0 recs |
41 comments
Comments
Ted Tollner really loves Michael Bolton
by Nosetackle Supreme on Nov 20, 2007 8:07 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
That no talent ass-clown!
by Fooch on Nov 20, 2007 8:18 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tollner
by frankthetank on Nov 20, 2007 8:40 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Anything's better than nothing
by Bob In Pacifica on Nov 20, 2007 8:51 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Tollner
by NinerInLA on Nov 20, 2007 9:20 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
When Tollner was with the Lions
by Bob In Pacifica on Nov 21, 2007 6:46 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In all honesty...
by sfgfan on Nov 21, 2007 9:26 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Principles?
by NinerInLA on Nov 20, 2007 9:30 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
So...
by BawLa on Nov 20, 2007 9:49 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Ruining the reference party!
by howtheyscored on Nov 20, 2007 10:20 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I already told you
by Nosetackle Supreme on Nov 21, 2007 11:21 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
We're gonna need you to come in on Sunday...
- Hire Dennis Green to be GM in the offseason. I know may of you know Green the coach but Green the GM is an entirely different situation. The guy built a very good offensive team in Minnesota and a pretty good one in Arizona. He hasn't proven to be a very good coach, but he knows how to draft offensive talent.
- Try to hire Jason Garrett as Head coach. I'm not going to try to rationalize this too much. I have no idea if he'll be a good head coach, but it would piss off the Cowboys and I hate the Cowboys.
- Make Singletary the Defensive Coordinator. Keeps some continuity within the team. Keeps Patrick Willis happy. The name alone demands respect.
- Draft Colt Brennan. He may be another Joey Harrington but I think we need to at least create some competition at the QB spot. Brennan competes...period. I saw him put his body on the line against SJSU. That's all I needed to see. I wouldn't spend a 1st round pick on him(save it for Limus Sweed), but if he's there in the 3rd, I'd grab him.
by applejack on Nov 20, 2007 10:35 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Generally Disagree
- Dennis Green built very good offenses, but has no concept of healthy foundation and structure. He ignores offensive line and stockpiles at positions that already have depth. Furthermore, he has no idea how to put a defense together. Furtherfurthermore, I have very few problems with the job that Nolan and Mcloughlan have done bringing in players. I can't name a single acquisition the team has made in FA, trade, and teh draft that I don't agree with that doesn't involve a HEAVY dose of retrospect. Furthermore, the drafts have been FANTASTIC in this regime, and the FA signings have been generally shrewd if not mind-blowing.
- I won't bother going into why I disagree (just know it would be a brilliant anti-reactionary rant similar to ones I have made elsewhere) because you just want this for a laugh. I do disagree, but I can go along with the laugh. Plus my name is Garrett. So that's cool.
- Why would Singletary accept a demotion? Furthermore, Manusky has done a pretty fantastic job with the defense, and Nolan never hesitates to step in when needed.
- I'd be fine with Brennan. He's very much the kind of QB I'm looking to land in the draft. A guy with an honest shot at taking Smith's place without dooming Smith simply by being drafted.
by howtheyscored on Nov 20, 2007 11:25 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
He just wants to look at boys' limuses...
So this doens't look like just an OT comment, I'd seen someone else make the point that Bill Walsh typically had a pretty good idea where guys would fit in, and had the tendency to get great value from picks in the later rounds. It's an interesting point, and I personally don't remember any great picks that have come from rounds 4-7 of the draft during the Nolan era. Still, I totally agree, he's done a fantastic job get getting players, particularly in the draft.
Also agree that Manusky seems to have done as good a job with the defense as one can do when your defensive unit has to spend the majority of the game on the field.
by Drunken Miller on Nov 21, 2007 9:16 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It does what is most important
Denise says in the papers this a.m. that she wants to bring in a general manager to oversee Nolan. I don't know if he'll chafe at this, or if this move is Denise getting ready to kick Nolan in the can and out the door.
I get the feeling that Garrett is wedded to the Cowboys. He'll probably get the reins there in a few years, so while he may be intriguing, he's probably not available.
+++
On other fronts, looks like Alex is going to be shut down for at least two weeks. If we're two and ten by then is there any point in bringing him back?
by Bob In Pacifica on Nov 21, 2007 6:56 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
In all fairness...
In Minnesota, as HTS pointed out, he ignored the offensive line, never had a really elite RB and just lacked a solid structure/foundation overall.
by sfgfan on Nov 21, 2007 9:34 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Also
by sfgfan on Nov 21, 2007 9:36 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Tollner?
Yes, this is horrible, this idea.
Ummm. Doesn't Tollner suck? I mean, sure, I like the idea of bringing in a consultant to help the offense but really, Tollner? We can't do better than him? Oh man, if we're hiring Tollner to help Hostler, that just confirms that Hostler is completely useless. Oh man, we SUCK.
by wjackalope on Nov 21, 2007 9:27 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Funny stuff:
"Air Coryell" = get rid of the ball quickly AND long routes + maximum pass protect.
And LOLs at the OL being the key.
by zenbitz on Nov 21, 2007 9:55 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Hey Ted, watch your cornhole man...
Clearly we are out of the playoff picture.
The season is obviously a bust.
No one seems to have had an answer to our offensive woes all season. Now, perhaps 9 weeks too late, someone decides to bring in a consultant.WTF.
Are the Yorks delibrately trying to drive this Niner fan away?
by jfainsf49 on Nov 21, 2007 10:40 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
Who said...
Even if Tollner succeeds in helping Hostler "fix" this offense, there is little doubt in my mind that Nolan will still have an offensive coordinator search this offseason.
by sfgfan on Nov 21, 2007 11:27 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re. Who said
I guess what I wrote kind of implied that Tollner was an answer, albiet an incorrect answer, more than likely. That isn't what I meant though.
My main issue is why do this now? And why Hollner he has experience but does this guy have any clout?
My knowledge of the NFL is not that comprehensive. But I have followed the game for some time and I have never heard of the guy.
by jfainsf49 on Nov 21, 2007 11:53 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
My attempt at answers
I think it's Tollner because he is probably the best choice out of a bunch of crap options. We're still in the middle of the season so everybody who might be actually attractive is likely already working somewhere.
I'm just glad that we're doing something, and that it's still more or less designed to keep Smith in the same type of offense we threw at him last year. I'm sure when the offseason comes around we'll see much more exciting things happen with the offensive coaches.
Though I wouldn't be surprised to see Hostler take back the QB coach job in '08. He wasn't doing half bad there.
by howtheyscored on Nov 21, 2007 12:31 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re. My attempt...
by jfainsf49 on Nov 21, 2007 2:11 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
It could be dollars, or it could be...
Even with the season seemingly in the toilet last season, the 49ers pulled it together to a 7-9 record. Had they won two games they SHOULD have won in the final four weeks (I think it was), they would have been 9-7 and a possible playoff team. That late-season push gave so many players confidence this season, that they themselves not only said they would win the division, but actually believed they could.
So why is this season any different? Every little bit of momentum counts at the end of the season. You could either run away with your collective tails between your legs or you can man up and try to finish strong. Fans look at the record of a losing team and hope they continue to lose, as it only grants them a higher draft pick. Even if team management saw things this way (i.e. throwing in the towel or tanking it in hopes of getting the #1 pick), the 49ers don't have that. If they don't get to control their own draft pick, you might as well try to win some games right?
by sfgfan on Nov 21, 2007 2:27 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re. It could be...
I agree completely about trying to win games. But it is too late for this team to man up. We could not beat the lowly Falcons or Rams. Now all the sudden, their going to man up, I would hope so, but I don't think so.
by jfainsf49 on Nov 21, 2007 2:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh no...
Or even moreover, if the 49ers turn the ship around and win some games to close out the season, it could make the team more attractive to free agents. We all know how much good free agents LOOOOVE to go to losing teams, or how much they're willing to "try" for their new team.
There is this saying, "every day is a new day." So what if the team is where it is right now. If they can play solidly through the rest of the season, you're not going to admit that the team of the second half is drastically different from the team in the first half? As a fan, I'm down on this team, sure. But I still want them to win on any given Sunday, no matter how unrealistic or realistic it could be, or how many games they've won up to that point.
by sfgfan on Nov 21, 2007 3:54 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Re. Oh no
by jfainsf49 on Nov 22, 2007 5:47 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
Because I seriously doubt the conversation went like this:
Nolan: Hey Ted, we need help on offense.
Tollner: I'm on my way!
I don't think we should really treat these things like they take hours to put together.
by howtheyscored on Nov 21, 2007 6:09 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't believe what a bunch of nerds we are.
by Nosetackle Supreme on Nov 21, 2007 11:24 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
good one
by wjackalope on Nov 21, 2007 12:24 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Coordinator help or not...
by jaytierney on Nov 21, 2007 11:28 AM PST reply actions 0 recs
"Illegal contact?"
by Nosetackle Supreme on Nov 21, 2007 4:36 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
"This isn't Riyadh...
by Fooch on Nov 21, 2007 10:49 PM PST up reply actions 0 recs
Why do I feel hopeful tonight?
I have no illusions for the rest of the season, but I would hope that Tollner can help loosen up the offense and maybe push Nolan a little further away from it.
by Bob In Pacifica on Nov 21, 2007 9:00 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Look at the bright side
by NinerInLA on Nov 21, 2007 11:55 PM PST reply actions 0 recs
Not sure about getting a GM
As miserable as the team has been offensively, a few changes could make things better.
by Bob In Pacifica on Nov 22, 2007 7:23 AM PST up reply actions 0 recs

by 






















